• Aucun résultat trouvé

MEETING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES: THE STRATEGIC SIGNIFICANCE OF SAFEGUARDS TO BIODIVERSITY OFFSETS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "MEETING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES: THE STRATEGIC SIGNIFICANCE OF SAFEGUARDS TO BIODIVERSITY OFFSETS"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

INTERNATIONAL SIDE EVENT AT CBD COP 12 organized by Mission Economie de la Biodiversité

MEETING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES: THE STRATEGIC SIGNIFICANCE OF SAFEGUARDS TO BIODIVERSITY OFFSETS

Scope of the side event

The conservation of global biodiversity alongside economic development is a key challenge for the 21st century. Biodiversity offset is conceived within the frame of the mitigation hierarchy, and from this perspective, may contribute to reducing the loss of biodiversity and to meeting sustainable development objectives. Some biodiversity offset schemes have been inconsistent in meeting conservation objectives and the approach itself requires continuous improvements – for instance, on metrics (chosen to measure biodiversity), on the equivalence between gains and losses (to address conservation value), on the management of uncertainty, on the duration of offset schemes… To allow biodiversity offset schemes to effectively contribute to reducing biodiversity loss, a combination of sound and solid safeguards have to exist ex ante. The place and space for ecological compensation indeed is defined by those safeguards. Globally, the existing safeguards necessitate further improvements and others are still under development. Thus, international exchanges upon how to clarify what compensation is and how it should be implemented, is useful and may help to identify emerging research needs.

This is why the CDC - Mission Economie de la Biodiversité wishes to initiate an international dialogue on Biodiversity offset safeguards and will organize a side event on this set of issues at the next COP 12 in Korea, in October 2014.

Objectives of the side event

Drawing from a range of international experiences (success and failure), the aim of this side-event is to engage in a discussion on the conditions in which biodiversity offsets can work to support sustainable development. This side-event will provide an overview of the existing safeguards, their limits and margins for improvements, and will shed light upon research needs and tools to be developed: this topic still require a great deal of improvements to effectively address the radicality of the biodiversity losses around the globe and an overriding conceptual framework to ensure proper rigor in the implementation process is yet to be established. This side-event is an opportunity to exchange on the mechanisms that are used in various national contexts to implement biodiversity offset schemes in the most efficient way to contribute to sustainable development. There is indeed much to learn from each other on how to provide guidance, how to ensure that the scheme gives priority to avoidance and reduction measures, on how to ensure that the environmental authorities have the appropriate oversight capabilities and that the responsibilities for managing and monitoring credit sites are clear and on how to ensure permanence. Bringing together various international experiences on safeguards will offers a rich pool of information to work with and will create a solid basis for constructive and interactive discussions during the side event.

Key questions

 In order to contribute to meeting sustainable development objectives, what are the necessary safeguards to ensure, over time, proper rigor in the implementation of compensatory measures?

 What are the existing tools and who is in charge?

(2)

Participating parties (1hrs 30min)

Moderators

Sebastian Winkler, Sr Policy Adviser, BBOP Keynote speech (tbc)

Laurent Piermont, President, CDC Biodiversité – Mission Economie de la Biodiversité, France Minister of Environment (tbc)

Expert Reflections / presentations

« Cossure Case study» Vincent Hulin, Mission Economie de la Biodiversité, France

« Country-specific Habitat banking process » Martin Szaramowicz, Flächenagentur Brandenburg GmbH, Germany

« Lessons from REDD+ safeguards » Rosa Lemos de Sa, Funbio, Brazil Roundtable discussion

David Alvarez, Bancos de Habitat Ecoacsa, Spain + Francois Wakenhut, EU No net loss, DG

Dates: The 14th of October, at 18:15.

Focal point Anna Dupont 0033(0) 6 33 84 93 56

Références

Documents relatifs

Biodiversity offsets, biodiversity indicators, standardized framework, ecological equivalence, offset 27.. policy, operationality, scientific basis, comprehensiveness

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

Practical issues Introduction Spatial patterns Old growth forests Managed stands TreM-dwelling taxa. In

St.. The primary purpose of the study was to deter- mine which mathematics objectives teachers emphasized at the grade six level in Newfoundland and Labrador elementary schools and

Figs 5 and 6 show that a harvesting strategy with a high impact on population size structure, or a high impact on biomass, implies a low basic reproduction ratio (recovery

de photons à la surface de l’électrode sur une longue période pourrait entrainer l’apparition d’un point de nucléation permettant de déclencher la cristallisation du

Promoted as a decision making-tool, this initiative try in fact to make recognize customary rights at large scale in order to put them against land management and planning

The issue of conservation through the interactions between ecological and social dynamics (Simulating areas of biodiversity). • Li An, Guangming He, Zai Liang, Jianguo