Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Canadian Paint and Finishing, 41, 3, pp. 38-39, 1967-05-01
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
How does freeze-thaw affect solvent-based paints?
O'Doherty, G. A.; Ashton, H. E.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC:
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=e6a20fb1-21b2-44fe-b97a-d6c7ee9d14d0
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=e6a20fb1-21b2-44fe-b97a-d6c7ee9d14d0
-
--
TH1
N21r2
no. 314
c.
2
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL O F CANADA
L..
CONSEIL NATIONAL DE RECHERCHES DU CANADA
,-
H O W DOES FREEZE/THAW AFFECT SOLVENT-BASED PAINTS
by
G. A. O'DOHERTY AND H. E. ASHTON
Reprinted from
Canadian Paint and Finishing
Vol. 41, No.
3,March 1967
Research Paper
NO.^^
14
of the
Division of Building Research
OTTAWA
May 1967
How does f reezelthaw affect
solvent- based paints?
0 Almost all studies of the effect of low temperatures o n
paint stability have been devoted to water-based coatings, particularly latexes. F r o m time to time, however, the question comes up whether solvent-based coatings are af- fected to any extent by low temperatures. It has ~ ~ s u a l l y been answered o n theoretical grounds that there should be no effect because the freezing point of most solvents is lower than the lowest temperatures experienced in Can- ada. Nevertheless, a practical answer is of some impor- tance to Canadian paint manufacturers because of the severe winter climate of most parts of Canada. This pa- per summarizes information obtained from trials run to determine whether solvent-based coatings are seriously af-
fected by storage in northern regions.
PROCEDURE-Fifteen alkyd enamels, four exterior paints and three lacquers were subjected to -50 1 5 ° F in a test cabinet. Each material was initially divided into two samples. One was placed in continuous frozen stor- age for 2 weeks; the other was subjected to a 48-hour cycle of 24 hours freezing and 24 hours at room teni- perature, also for 2 weeks. After normal laboratory stor- age of about 10 months, the materials were again ex- posed to their respective low temperature tests (some had to be excluded because of insufficient quantity for test) Most samples that had been stored continuously at -50°F were then subjected for 2 weeks to a severe (,-hour cycle. 1.e. 3 hours freezing and 3 hours at room temperature. The length of the working day allowed only two expos~lrc5
at one teniperature and one at the other: overnight ex- posure, therefore, alternated.
T o determine whether the low temperature had caused changes. the liquid coatings were examined visually and subjected to two physical tests. Consistency nieas~~renients made with the Stornier viscometer were ~lsed to follow the effect on the vehicle. If the binders were adversely a f - fected. the consistency would be expected to increase. Hiding power as measured by contrast ratio was used to I'ollow any changes in pigment dispersion. If the pigment or pigment-vehicle combination were ~lnstable. the hiding power should decrease because of pigment flocculation o r agglomeration.
RESULTS-No visual changes in the condition of the materials in the container were noted during the con- sistency and hiding power tests. Two materials tcsted for drying time were still satisfactory after exposure to low tcmperatLlfe.
Cot~.ti.ctetzcy trzeu.rLlretjletlt.c. provirlecl the tr1o.r.t infornia- tion on thc effects of continuous or alternating low tem- peratures. T h e changes in consistency after different cx- posures are given in Tnhle I. Fig~lre I illustrates the effects of the two cold tests on samples 1 and 3. T h e
BY G. A. O'DOHERTY a n d H. E. ASHTON O r g a n i c Materials Section Division of Building Research
National Research Council
algebraic mean for all tests is plotted in F i g ~ ~ r e 2. It niay be seen that the first exposure to continuous low temperature ( C L T ) had little effect on consistency. The mean change was less than 2 Krebs nits with about equal numbers increasing and decreasing. When some of the materials were exposed a second time to C L T the mean showed a noticeable increase in consistency. but this was influenced by one extreme value.
The cycling exposures caused greater consistcncy changes than did continuous exposure during the first 2- week period. Saniples exposed to cycling increased in consistency more during subsequent normal storage than did those that had been continuously frozen. T h e short (,-hour cycle was more severe than the 48-hour cycle altho~lgh, again, onc result markedly affected the mean. Of the different types of coatings the alkyd drum en;~mels showed the greatest changes. This result might be expected beca~lsc they are industrial finishes not neces- sarily formulated for long storage. The exterior paints showed the least change. but tho number of samples was too small to establish significi~nce. The 48-hour cycle had
a greater effect o n sample I than on sample 3. The former seemed more ~lnstable judging by the consistent). changes during latcr storage. Hence, this cycle might be ~ l s e f ~ l l in determining which materials would be most af- fected by low temperatures.
N o c o n c l ~ ~ s i o n s wer-c obtained from the hiding power tests d ~ ~ e to large, apparently random variations in the results. The variations occurred because when the tests were run the contrast ratio ~iiethod was fairly new ant1 not fully developecl. Since then i t has been improved and in the ASTM inter-laboratory test on hiding power by contrast ratio thc results reported to the 1966 meetings showed good agreement.
CONCLUSIONS-Contin~~ous exposure to low temperE1- tures is not deleterious to solvent-based coatings as evi- denced by consistency measurements. which mainly reflect thc condition of the vehicle. The general appcar- ancc also indicated satisfactory stability. This is to bc expected since the rates of chemical reactions decrease as tcmpcratures arc lowercd. As with water-based coatings. alternate freezing and thawing is more damaging, particu- larly to materials that are somewhat ~ ~ n s t a b l e . F r o m com- parisons made between consistcncy changes o c c ~ ~ r r i n g dur-
ing normal storage and accelerated tests, the 48-hour cycle charge o f the Paint Laboratory. Most of the laboratory is the best short-term test for predicting low temperature tests were performed by R. C. Seeley.
stability. The 6-hour cycle is too severe and CLT is not (This paper is a contributiorz frot~z the Divisorr of
drastic enough for this purpose. B~~ildirlg Research, Natiorial Research Co~cncil, Canada, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT-This study was carried out a i d is p~~blished with the approval of the director o f the under the direction of John Harris, formerly officer in division.)
Normal storage
.-.-
I-',
Sample 1, cont. low tempTIME. WEEKS TIME, WEEKS
Fig. 1
-
Effect of cold tests on two samples Fig. 2-
Mean effect of cold tests.TABLE I
Changes in Consistency in Krebs Units
Second Exposure to Low Temperature
First Exposure to Normal Storage 6 hr. Cycle
Sample Type of Low Temperature C.L.T. 48 hr. C.L.T. 48 hr. C.L.T. New
Number Material C.L.T. 48 hr. Cycle Sample Sample Sample Cycle Sample Sample
Drum Enamel
. . . .
Drum Enamel . . . . Drum Enamel. . . .
Drum Enamel. . . .
D r ~ ~ n i Enamel. . . .
Drum Enamel. . . .
Drum Enamel. . . .
Drum Enamel. . . .
Drum Enamel. . . .
Drum Enamel. . . .
Drum Enamel. . . .
Automotive Enamel Automotive Enamel Automotive Enamel Laquer. . .
Laquer. . .
House Paint. . .
House Paint. . .
Exterior Paint . . . . House Paint. . .
Mean Change. . .
1.6 3.9 4.0 6.5 4.2 5.3 4.7 11.5Algebraic Mean Change
.
-0.2+
3.7 +2.8+
6.5+
3.8.
+5.3 $4.7 f11.5Group Mean
. . .
5.1 8.5':: New material at time of second tests; subjected to 6-hr. cycle after only one exposure to C.L.T.