• Aucun résultat trouvé

Optic flow based autopilot: From insects to rotorcraft and back

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Optic flow based autopilot: From insects to rotorcraft and back"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02295426

https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02295426

Submitted on 24 Sep 2019

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Optic flow based autopilot: From insects to rotorcraft and back

N. Franceschini, F. Ruffier, Julien Serres

To cite this version:

N. Franceschini, F. Ruffier, Julien Serres. Optic flow based autopilot: From insects to rotorcraft and back. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - Part A: Molecular and Integrative Physiology, Elsevier, 2007, 146 (4), pp.S133. �10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.01.255�. �hal-02295426�

(2)

Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology (2007), pp. S133 

A7.15  

Optic flow based autopilot: From insects to rotorcraft and back  

N. Franceschini, F. Ruffier, J. Serres, (CNRS and University of the Mediterranean, France) 

When  insects  are  flying  forwards,  the  image  of  the  ground  sweeps  backwards  across  their  ventral  viewfield, forming an “optic flow”, which depends on both the groundspeed and the height of flight. 

To explain how these animals manage to avoid the ground using this image motion cue, we suggest  that insect navigation hinges on a visual feedback loop we have called the optic flow regulator, which  controls the vertical lift. To test this idea, we built a micro‐helicopter equipped with a fly‐inspired optic  flow  sensor  and  an  optic  flow  regulator.  We  showed  that  this  fly‐by‐sight  microrobot  can  perform  exacting tasks such as take‐off, level flight and landing. Our control scheme accounts for many hitherto  unexplained  findings  published  during  the  last  70  years  on  insects'  visually  guided  performances,  including the facts that honeybees descend under headwind conditions, land with a constant slope  and  drown  when  travelling  over  mirror‐smooth  water.  Our  control  scheme  explains  how  insects  manage to fly safely without any of the instruments used onboard aircraft to measure the height of  flight, the airspeed, the groundspeed, and the descent speed. An optic flow regulator could be easily  implemented neurally. It is just as appropriate for insects (1) as it would be for aircraft (2,3).  

(1) Franceschini et al., Curr. Biol. (2007, in press). 

(2) Ruffier, F., Franceschini, Rob. Aust. Syst. Bot. 50, 177‐194 (2005).  

(3) Franceschini et al., CNRS International Patent: PCT Nb 28 44 607 (2002).  

 

doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.01.255 

Références

Documents relatifs

swift -A https://oculcloud/auth/v1.0 -U system:root -K testpass upload thumbnails dataverse/logo.png swift -A https://oculcloud/auth/v1.0 -U system:root -K testpass upload

Current reactive MABS design methodologies do not specify clearly how the target of interactions are selected, because they do not provide both the separation between knowledge

The interviews were comprised of semi-structured questions addressing four main themes: the direct, indirect and meta effects of the introduction of SIM method on the way to manage,

In line with the OCTAVE autopilot, we designed the LORA III autopilot (LORA III stands for Lateral Optic flow Regulator Autopilot, mark III), which is able to control both the

To explain how insects could behave in this way, we introduced the concept of an optic flow regulator, that is, a feedback control system that adjusts a

loops: (i) the speed control loop (along x-axis) based on a feedback signal coming from the maximum value of the bi-lateral or bi- vertical optic fl ow; consequently the agent

Our perioperative protocol for colostomy closure con- sisted in: (1) admission on the day before surgery; (2) clear liquids by mouth; (3) repeated proximal stoma irrigations with

The problem for the principal, learning from the single agent case, is to minimize the costs of adjusment, knowing that the adjustment conditions the productive effort.. So the