• Aucun résultat trouvé

From insects to robots and back

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "From insects to robots and back"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02195476

https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02195476

Submitted on 26 Jul 2019

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License

From insects to robots and back

Nicolas Franceschini, Franck Ruffier, Julien Serres

To cite this version:

Nicolas Franceschini, Franck Ruffier, Julien Serres. From insects to robots and back. 2nd International Conference on Invertebrate Vision (ICIV), Aug 2008, Bäckaskog, Sweden. �hal-02195476�

(2)

From insects to robots and back

Nicolas FRANCESCHINI, Franck RUFFIER and Julien SERRES

Biorobotics Lab, Institute of Movement Science

CNRS & Uni. of the Mediterranean MARSEILLE, France

nicolas.franceschini, franck.ruffier, julien.serres @univmed.fr

When insects are flying forward, the image of the environment sweeps backward across their viewfield and forms an “optic flow” (OF)

that depends on both the groundspeed and the distance to the ground (or to the lateral obstacles). Several studies have shown that insects are able to maintain a constant OF with regard to their surroundings while cruising and landing. To explain how insects could behave in this way, we introduced the concept of an optic flow regulator, that is, a feedback control system that adjusts a flight force so as to maintain the OF at a fixed set-point [1]. The variable that needs to be measured is neither groundspeed nor range but the ratio groundspeed:range - in other words, the optic flow - which the insect can access

directly via motion detecting neurons. The OF regulator concept accounts for a number of seemingly disparate insect behaviours that were reported over the last decades [2]. Most reports are qualitative, but quantitative findings made on honeybees’ landing can also be explained on the basis of this simple control system, including the constant descent angle observed in the bee’s final approach [3]. In a similar vein, a honeybee trained to fly in a corridor [4] may rely on a dual OF regulator that adjusts both its forward and side thrusts - resulting in a forward groundspeed and a clearance to the walls, respectively - without any needs to measure groundspeed or range [5]. The OF regulator concept was simulated and physically implemented on board two kinds of aerial robots: a miniature helicopter for ground avoidance [1] (Fig.1) and a miniature hovercraft for lateral obstacle avoidance and cruise control in straight or tapered corridors [5]. The electronic OF sensors aboard [6] were derived from the housefly EMDs previously analyzed using single neuron recording combined with single photoreceptor stimulation [7].

[1] Ruffier, F., Franceschini, N., Robotics and Autonomous Systems 50 (2005) 177-194 [2] Franceschini, N., Ruffier, F., Serres, J., Current Biology 17 (2007) 329-335

[3] Srinivasan M.V., Zhang, S., Chahl, J.S., Barth, E., and Venkatesh, S., Biol. Cyb. 83 (2000) 171-183 [4] Srinivasan, M.V., Zhang, S., Lehrer ,M., and Collett, T., J. Exp. Biol., 199 (1996) 237-244

[5] Serres, J., Ruffier, F., Franceschini, N., Autonomous Robots (2008, in press) [6] Pudas, M. et al., Sensors and Actuators A133, (2007) 88-95

[7] Franceschini, N. et al., In: Facets of vision, D. Stavenga and R. Hardie, Eds. Springer (1989) 360-390 Fig. 1. The robot OCTAVE equipped with a ventral OF sensor and an OF regulator mimics insect behaviour in the vertical plane (takeoff, cruising, terrain following, landing, wind reaction)

Références

Documents relatifs

The proof of theorem 4.1 actually shows that the heat kernel associated to the Lichnerowicz operator is positivity improving in case (M n , g 0 (t)) t≥0 is an expanding gradient

This last step does NOT require that all indicator be converted - best if only a small percent need to be reacted to make the change visible.. Note the

loops: (i) the speed control loop (along x-axis) based on a feedback signal coming from the maximum value of the bi-lateral or bi- vertical optic fl ow; consequently the agent

When the transcription rates were slowed by diluting both UTP and rNTPs, there was still a slight preference towards the WRC hotspot motifs but activity also peaked at

The problem of deciding the existence of a SEPI from G to G’ is NP-complete, but show that when G is fixed, this problem can be decided in constant-time (hint: this

We define a partition of the set of integers k in the range [1, m−1] prime to m into two or three subsets, where one subset consists of those integers k which are < m/2,

It is expected that the result is not true with = 0 as soon as the degree of α is ≥ 3, which means that it is expected no real algebraic number of degree at least 3 is

BD-LETTER.LISP The book design specifications for the Letter Generic, Letter Screen, and Letter LGP2 document device types.. Various com- mands and environments used only by the