• Aucun résultat trouvé

Contrast-to-tissue ratio improvement by transmitted optimized binary signal in ultrasound pulse inversion imaging

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Contrast-to-tissue ratio improvement by transmitted optimized binary signal in ultrasound pulse inversion imaging"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01075518

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01075518

Submitted on 17 Oct 2014

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Distributed under a Creative CommonsAttribution - ShareAlike| 4.0 International License

Contrast-to-tissue ratio improvement by transmitted optimized binary signal in ultrasound pulse inversion

imaging

Sébastien Ménigot, Jean-Marc Girault

To cite this version:

Sébastien Ménigot, Jean-Marc Girault. Contrast-to-tissue ratio improvement by transmitted opti- mized binary signal in ultrasound pulse inversion imaging. 2013 IEEE 10th International Sympo- sium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Apr 2013, San Francisco, United States. pp.776 - 779, 2013,

�10.1109/ISBI.2013.6556590�. �hal-01075518�

(2)

Contrast-to-Tissue Ratio Improvement by Transmitted Optimized Binary Signal in Ultrasound Pulse Inversion Imaging

Sébastien Ménigot

1,2,

and Jean-Marc Girault

2,

1 IUT Ville d’Avray, université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, Ville d’Avray, France

2 UMR-S930 “Imaging and Brain”, université François Rabelais de Tours, Inserm U930, Tours, France

[email protected], [email protected]

April 7-11, 2013

1. Introduction & Background A. Ultrasound Contrast Imaging

Injection of encapsulated microbubbles

High nonlinear behaviour

Contrast-to-Tissue Ratio CTR =

Emicrobubbles

Etissue

0 2 4 6 8 10

−80

−60

−40

Frequency (MHz)

Amplitude (dB)

0 2 4 6 8 10

−80

−60

−40

Frequency (MHz)

Amplitude (dB)

B. Simulation

Marmottant model for a 2.5 µm microbubble

Nonlinear propagation in tissue by Anderson’s model

Transducer: 4 MHz - 75%

2. Pulse Inversion Ultrasound Imaging with Feedback

Increasing CTR by odd harmonic extraction

Simpson et al., IEEE T UFFC, 46(2), 1999

3. Usual Transmitted Pulse 4. Optimal Binary Command

2 6 10 14 18 22 26 30 34 38

−1

−0.5 0 0.5 1

Samples

Input Sample

Input Signal with a Fixed Transmit Frequency

2/3 f

c Optimal frequency

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2

−150

−100

−50 0 50 100 150

Time (µs) Driving Pressure (kPa)

p(t) at the transducer output

Horizontal Position (mm)

Depth (mm)

Synthetic image at 2/3 f

c

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Grey Level (dB)

15 17.5 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 37.5 40 42.5 45 47.5 50 52.5 55

Horizontal Position (mm)

Depth (mm)

Synthetic image at f

opt

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Grey Level (dB)

15 17.5 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 37.5 40 42.5 45 47.5 50 52.5 55

CTR = 13.6 dB CTR = 16.8 dB

2 6 10 14 18 22 26 30 34 38

−1 0 1

Samples

Binary Value

Optimal Binary Command

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2

−150

−100

−50 0 50 100 150

Time (µs) Driving Pressure (kPa)

p(t) at the transducer output

Horizontal Position (mm)

Depth (mm)

Synthetic image with the optimal binary command

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Grey Level (dB)

15 17.5 20 22.5 25 27.5 30 32.5 35 37.5 40 42.5 45 47.5 50 52.5 55

CTR = 17.6 dB 5. Optimization Process by Binary Genetic Algorithm

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 15 15.5 16 16.5 17 17.5 18

Generation

CTR (dB)

Optimization

Genetic Algorithm Optimal frequency f

opt

2/3 f

c

6. Discussion

Automatic optimization of CTR

Gain

4 dB in comparison with an excitation at 2/3fc

0.8 dB in comparison with an excitation at the optimal frequency

Ménigot et al., Optimization of Contrast to Tissue Ratio by Frequency Adaptation in Pulse Inversion Imaging, IEEE T UFFC, 59(11), 2012

Stochastic excitation combined with genetic algorithm → Nonlinear

Nonlinear backscattered components only due to medium nonlinearities

Prospects

Implementation on ultrasound scanner

Using programmable analogue transmitter

Références

Documents relatifs

The follow-up of the concentration of the mineral content of the solution (Fig. 4 ) indicates that the adsorption of BP mol- ecules is associated with a chemical phenomenon: the

Improvement of signal to noise ratio in electro optical probing technique by wavelets filteringA. Anthony Boscaro, S Jacquir, K Sanchez, P Perdu,

Reprinted, with permission, from S´ebastien M´enigot, Jean-Marc Girault, Iulian Voicu and Anthony Novell, Optimization of Contrast to Tissue Ratio by Frequency Adaptation in

The first result indicated that the CTR had a global maximum whatever the pressure level A 0. These maxima were obtained neither with the two- thirds of the central frequency of

Burns, “Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency

(27) are not fully accurate in this case; 2) the images, especially the ABI ones, have not been acquired at exactly the points of highest theoretical sensitivity (the curve of

Comparison between temperature-time curves obtained by solving a heat balance and those described by an analytical expression for ventilation-controlled fires i n enclosures

Less invasive surgical treatment for aortic arch aneurysms in high-risk patients: a comparative study of hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repair and conventional