HAL Id: hal-01475546
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01475546
Submitted on 23 Feb 2017
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Carbamylated erythropoietin enhances mice ventilatory responses to changes in O2 but not CO2 levels
Hanan Khemiri, Marc Maresca, Christian Gestreau
To cite this version:
Hanan Khemiri, Marc Maresca, Christian Gestreau. Carbamylated erythropoietin enhances mice
ventilatory responses to changes in O2 but not CO2 levels. Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology,
Elsevier, 2016, 232, pp.1 - 12. �10.1016/j.resp.2016.06.002�. �hal-01475546�
Contents lists available atScienceDirect
Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / r e s p h y s i o l
Carbamylated erythropoietin enhances mice ventilatory responses to changes in O 2 but not CO 2 levels
Hanan Khemiri
a, Marc Maresca
b, Christian Gestreau
a,∗aAixMarseilleUniv,CNRS,CRN2M,Marseille,France
bAixMarseilleUniv,CNRS,CentraleMarseille,iSm2,Marseille,France
a r t i c l e i n f o
Articlehistory:
Received26May2016
Receivedinrevisedform14June2016 Accepted15June2016
Availableonline16June2016
Keywords:
Erythropoietin Carbamylatedderivative Breathing
Chemoreflexes Plethysmography
a b s t r a c t
Erythropoietin(EPO)hasbeneficialtissue-protectiveeffectsinseveraldiseasesbuterythrocytosismay causedeleteriouseffectsinEPO-treatedpatients.Thuscarbamylated-EPO(C-EPO)andotherderivatives retainingtissue-protectivebutlackingbonemarrow-stimulatingactionshavebeendeveloped.Although EPOmodulatesventilatoryresponses,theeffectsofC-EPOonventilationhavenotbeeninvestigated.
Here,basalbreathingandrespiratorychemoreflexesweremeasuredbyplethysmographyafteracute andchronictreatmentswithrecombinanthumanC-EPO(rhC-EPO;15,000IU/kgduring5days)orsaline (controlgroup).Hematocrit,plasmaandbrainstemrhC-EPOlevelswerealsoquantified.ChronicrhC- EPOsignificantlyelevatedtissuerhC-EPOlevelsbutnothematocrit.Noneofthedrugregimenaltered basalventilation(normoxia).ChronicbutnotacuterhC-EPOenhancedhyperoxicventilatorydepression, andsustainedthehypoxicventilatoryresponsemainlyviaareductionoftheroll-offphase.Bycontrast, rhC-EPOdidnotblunttheventilatoryresponsetohypercapnia.Thus,chronicC-EPOmaybeapromis- ingtherapytoimprovebreathingduringhypoxiawhileminimizingadverseeffectsoncardiovascular function.
©2016ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
1. Introduction
Erythropoietin(EPO)playsamajorroleinoxygen(O2)homeo- stasisin mammals.Thishormone ismainlysynthetizedin fetal liverandadultkidneys,and itsbasal levelisupregulated when thearterialPO2decreasesbelownormallevels(Becketal.,1991;
Haase,2013;Jelkmann,1992).HigherplasmaEPOlevelsstimulate redbloodcellsproduction,therebyincreasingthebloodO2 car- ryingcapacity.Accordingly,theuseof recombinanthumanEPO (rhEPO)inpatientswithsevereanemiaand/orchronickidneydis- easeshoweda reduced requirementfor bloodtransfusions and improved quality-of-life assessments (Canadian Erythropoietin Study Group, 1990; Eschbach et al., 1989; Kato, 2010; Pfeffer et al., 2009). Besides its erythropoietic effect, EPO has tissue- protective properties in a broadrange of pathologies including hypoxiaandischemia-inducedbraindamages(Chateauvieuxetal., 2011;Jelkmann,2007;Kumraletal.,2011;Sanchis-Gomaretal.,
∗ Corresponding author at: Aix−Marseille Université and CNRS, Centre de RechercheenNeurobiologieetNeurophysiologiedeMarseille(CRN2M),UMR7286, FacultédeMédecineSecteurNord,51BoulevardPierreDramard,13344Marseille cedex15,France.
E-mailaddress:[email protected](C.Gestreau).
2013;Sirenetal.,2009).Theseneuroprotectiveeffectsaremediated byendogenousEPO(i.e.producedbyneuronsandastrocytes)or exogenousrhEPOactingonEPO-receptors(EPO-R)thatareexten- sivelypresentinbrain(Martietal.,1996).However,thedosesof rhEPOrequiredtoobtainsuchtissue-protectiveeffectsstimulate erythropoieisisand increasethehematocrit,leadingtoasubse- quent procoagulant status and elevatedblood pressure (Marti, 2004; Velly et al., 2010).Serious side effects of chronic rhEPO includehypertension,polycythemia,myocardialinfarction,stroke andseizures,plateletactivationandincreasedthromboembolicrisk (Banachetal., 2010; Macdougallet al.,2012;Ponikowskietal., 2007;Shinetal.,2012;vanVeldhuisenetal.,2007).Thisprompted for thedevelopmentofnewgeneration ofEPO-Ragonistdrugs topreservetissue-protectivepropertiesandavoiderythropoiesis (Sirenetal.,2009).CarbamylatedEPO(C-EPO)isoneofthepromis- ingderivativesthatmayprovidebetteroutcomeinclinicaltrials (Choietal.,2014;Leconteetal.,2011;Leistetal.,2004).
Inadditiontoitserythropoieticandtissue-protectiveeffects, EPOisthoughttointeractwithperipheralandcentralchemore- ceptorstoincreaseventilationinresponsetohypoxia(Gassmann andSoliz,2009;Khemirietal.,2012;Soliz,2013;Solizetal.,2005).
EPOmayplayaroleinthecentralregulationofbreathingasEPO injectionsintheadultratbrainincreaseminuteventilation(Yalcin etal.,2007).Also,thehypoxicventilatoryresponseisenhancedin http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2016.06.002
1569-9048/©2016ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
transgenicmicewithchroniccerebralrhEPOoverexpressioncom- pared to wildtype animals (Caravagna et al., 2015). Similarly, bath application of rhEPOprior to recording of fictive breath- ingpreventedhypoxicdepressioninbrainstempreparationsfrom miceneonates (Khemiri et al.,2012).Therefore, chronicrhEPO therapywassuggestedasareliableapproachfortreating respi- ratorydisorders (Caravagnaet al.,2015; Soliz,2013).However, we have recently shown that polycythemia alone or increased rhEPOlevelsinplasmaandbrainbluntsthehypercapnicventila- toryresponse(Menuetet al.,2016).Thispotentially deleterious effect on breathing may represent another limitation for pre- scriptionofchronicrhEPOtreatmentinpatients.Thus,idealdrug therapy to compensate for the lack of O2 at multiple levels shouldinvolvemoleculesretainingbeneficialrespiratory-related andtissue-protectiveeffectsindependentoferythrocyteproduc- tion. Although the effects of C-EPO on the neural control of breathinghavenotbeeninvestigated,this moleculecouldfulfill these criteria. Indeed, in 2004,Leist and collaborators demon- stratedthatcarbamylationofEPO,whichtransformslysineresidues intohomocitrullinesand alterstheproteinconformation,main- tained the tissue-protective effects of EPO and eliminated its hematopoieticeffects(Leistetal.,2004).Inthelastyears,several studiesconfirmedtheseobservationsand provedtheneuropro- tectiveeffects ofC-EPOin numerousCNS diseases(Chenet al., 2015).Therefore,thisstudywasdesignedtomeasureventilationby plethysmographyafteracuteandchronictreatmentswithrhC-EPO, andtoevaluatedrugeffectsinnormoxia,hyperoxia,hypoxiaand hypercapnia.WealsocomparedplasmaandbrainrhC-EPOlevels aswellashematocritinsalineorrhC-EPOtreatedmice.
2. Materialandmethods 2.1. Ethicsstatements
AdultC57BL6 malemice(n=20;Janvier, France)from 90to 120postnataldayswereusedinthisstudy.Animalswerehoused underpathogen-freeconditions,hadunlimitedaccesstofoodand water,andweremaintainedonareversed12:12hlight/darkcycle inatemperature-controlledroom(25◦C±2◦C)for1weekprior toexperimentalmanipulation.Theexperimentalprocedureswere carriedoutinaccordancewithFrenchnationallegislation(JO87- 848,EuropeanCommunitiesCouncilDirective2010/63/EU,74)and localethicscommittee“DirectionDépartementaledelaProtection desPopulations”,withpermitnumber13-227deliveredtoCG.
2.2. PreparationandidentificationofrhC-EPO
RhC-EPO was prepared from rhEPO (Eprex, Janssen Cilag, France) aspreviously described (Leistet al., 2004).Briefly, one volumeofrhEPO(1mg/ml) wasmixedwithonevolumeof1M Na-borate(pH8.8)andrecrystallizedKOCNwasaddedtoafinal concentrationof1M.Themixturewasincubatedat37◦Cfor24h.
SampleswereimmediatelydialyzedagainstMill-Qwaterandsub- sequentlyagainst20mMSodiumcitratein0.1MNaCl,pH6.0.After dialysis,thesampleswereconcentratedusingCentriconwithpore sizeof3kDa(Amicon).Theproteincontentwasdeterminedwitha Bradforddosage.EfficientcarbamylationofrhEPOwasconfirmed bytestingtheresistanceofnativeandcarbamylatedrhEPOtopro- teolysisbyLys-Cproteinase(Leistetal.,2004).Briefly,10gof rhEPOorrhC-EPOwereincubatedwith0.4gofLys-Cproteinase at37◦Cfor20h.Laemmlibufferwasthenaddedandsampleswere boiledfor5min.Thedigestionproductswerefinallyseparatedby SDS-PAGEelectrophoresison15%acrylamidegelandproteinswere visualizedbysilverstaining.
2.3. Druginjections
Miceweredividedinto2groups(10animalspergroup).Mice wereinjectedi.pwithsterileNaCl(0.9%)orrhC-EPOat15,000IU/kg dilutedinfinalvolume100lofNaCl.ThisdoseofrhC-EPOhasbeen chosenbasedonbothpreviousstudiesonneuroprotection(Banks etal.,2004;Ehrenreichetal.,2004;Xenocostasetal.,2005)and ourpreliminaryplethysmographyexperimentssuggestingcentral effects ofEPO.Injectionsweremadein theeveningduringfive consecutivedays.
2.4. Hematocritmeasurements
Afterrecordingsofventilationondays1and5,bloodsamples (100l)wereobtainedafterasmallincisionwasmadeatthetipof thetail.Thesampleswerecollectedinheparinizedplasticcapillar- iesandhematocrit(Htc)wasmeasuredbycentrifugationmethod (5000gfor5minat4◦C).
2.5. Determinationofventilationbyplethysmography
Ventilation of conscious animals was recorded using non- invasivewhole-bodybarometric plethysmography(EMKATech- nologies, Paris,France), as previously described (Menuet et al., 2016).Twodaysbeforerecordings,themicewerehabituatedtothe plethysmographchambertoreducestress.Onthedayoftheexper- iment,micewereweightedandrectaltemperaturewasmeasured beforeand after ventilatorymeasurement. We used a constant flow plethysmograph (EMKA Technologies, Paris, France) with 200-mlanimalchamberventilatedwithair(600ml/min).Thevar- iousgasmixturescorrespondingtonormoxia,hyperoxia,hypoxia andhypercapniaweredeliveredusingaprogrammablegasmixer (GSM3,CWE,USA).Spirogramswerestoredandanalyzed(Spike2;
CambridgeElectronicDesign,Cambridge,UK)tocalculatethemean respiratoryfrequency(Rf,cycles/min),tidalvolumenormalizedby thebodyweight(VT,ml/100g)andminuteventilationnormalized bythebodyweight(VE,ml/min/100g,withVE=Rf×VT).Volume calibrationswereperformedbyinjectingsmallamount(100l)of airintherecordingchambers,andthesemeasurementswereused tocalculateVT(DrorbaughandFenn,1955;Menuetetal.,2016).
Micewereinitiallyexposedtonormoxia(21%O2balanceN2) andbasalventilation(VE,RfandVT)wasrecordedforatleastthirty minutes.Ondays1and5,animalswereexposedtohypercapnia (21%O2,5%CO2 balanceN2),hyperoxia(100%O2),andhypoxia (10%O2 balanceN2).Ventilationwasrecordedfor5minduring thehypercapnic(HCVR)andhyperoxic(HxVR)challenges,andfor 20mininhypoxiatostudytheearlyphase(from0to5min)andthe latephase(from15to20min)ofthehypoxicventilatoryresponse (HVR)(MaxovaandVizek,2001;Powelletal.,1998).Eachchallenge wasseparatedbyarecoveryperiodofatleast20mininnormoxia, duringwhichbasalventilationwasreassessedfor5minbeforethe nextchallenge.Onlyperiodsofbreathingwithoutbodymovements werestudied.Insomecases,animalsweretooagitatedduringa particularrecordingperiodandcorrespondingdatawereexcluded fromtheanalysis.
2.6. ELISAassay
Onthelastexperimentalday(Day5),brainstemandplasma werecollectedtodeterminerhC-EPOconcentrations.Afterdeep anesthesiaofthemicewithisoflurane(5%inair),bloodsamples wereobtainedbycardiacpunctionandcollectedinheparinized tubes. They were immediately centrifuged (760g for 15min at 4◦C)and100lofplasmawerecollected.Aftertranscardiacperfu- sionwithheparinizedPBS,brainstemwasdissectedandremoved.
Plasmaandbrainstem sampleswereimmediatelyfrozeninliq-
uidnitrogen,andstoredat−80◦Cuntilfurtheruse.Theanalysis ofrhC-EPOlevelsinbrainstemrequiredthehomogenizationofthe tissues.Briefly,foreachgroup,3sampleswerepreparedbypooling togetherbrainstemfrom3miceinFastPrep@LysingmatrixDtubes (fromMP),thetubesbeingmaintainedonice.Ice-coldlysisbuffer (150l,0.9% NaCl with protease inhibitor cocktail from Sigma Aldrich)wasthenaddedtothetubesandtissueswerehomoge- nizedusinglysishomogenizer(40shomogenization).Tubeswere centrifugedtoremovecelldebris(12,000gfor20minat4◦C)and clearsupernatantswerecollectedandanalyzed.Concentrationsof rhC-Epoinplasmaandtissuehomogenatesweremeasuredusing ELISAkit(fromR&Dsystems,Minneapolis,MN)accordingtoman- ufacturer’sinstructions(Menuetetal.,2016).Thesensitivityofthe assaywas∼1.0mIU/mL.ResultsareexpressedasmIUpergramof tissue(mIU/g)forthebrainstem,andasmIU/mLfortheplasma.
2.7. Statisticalanalysis
All statistical tests were performed using GraphpadPrism 6 (Graphpadsoftware,LaJolla,California,USA),andvaluesexpressed asmean (SD).Resultsof theELISA assaywerecompared using unpairedttests.Hematocrit,bodyweight,rectaltemperature,basal ventilationandvaluesofdeltaVEwerecomparedusingatwo-way ANOVAwithtreatmentandtimeeffectsasmainfactors.RawHxVR, HVRandHCVRwerecomparedusingtwo-wayrepeatedmeasures ANOVAwithtreatmentandFiO2orFiCO2effectsasmainfactors.
Whenappropriate,post-hocprotectedleastsignificantdifference ofFisher(PLSD)testswereused.Differenceswereconsideredsig- nificantatP<0.05.
3. Results
3.1. ValidationofrhEPOcarbamylation
Afterchemical modificationofrhEPOtorhC-EPO,rhEPOand rhC-EPOweredigestedbyLys-CandanalyzedbySDS-PAGE.After digestionbyLys-C,rhEpowasentirelydegradedsothatnobandsof rhEPOcouldbeobserved.Bycontrast,rhC-EPOresistedproteolysis sincenodegradationpeptidescouldbedetected,confirmingthe efficientcarbamylationofrhEpo(Fig.1).
3.2. AcuteorchronicrhC-EPOdidnotincreasehematocrit
Resultsofhematocrit(Htc)measurementsinmiceafteracute (Day1)andchronic(Day5)treatmentswithNaClorrhC-EPOare showninTable1.Noneofthestatisticalcomparisonsrevealedsig- nificantdifferences.Thus,controlandrhC-EPOgroupshadsimilar hematocritafteracuteandchronicinjections.
Fig.1. IdentificationofrhC-EPO.TheefficiencyofcarbamylationofrhEPOintorhC- EPOwasconfirmedbySDS-PAGEafterdigestionwiththeendoproteinaseLys-C andvisualizationbysilverstaining.Lane1:molecular-weight-markers(MW).Lane 2:rhEPOwithoutLys-Cdigestion.Lane3:rhEpowithLys-Cdigestion.Lane4:rhC- EPOwithoutLys-Cdigestion.Lane5:rhC-EPOwithLys-Cdigestion.Notethelackof degradationofrhC-EPOafterincubationwithLys-C.
Table1
Comparisonsofhematocritlevelswith2-wayrepeatedmeasuresANOVAanalysis.
Dataareexpressedasmean(SD).
Time Groups Hematocrit Timeeffect Treatmenteffect Interaction Day
1
Control(n=7) 41.14(3.01) F=0.727 F=3.310 F=0.040 rhC-EPO(n=7) 43.41(1.66) P=0.411 P=0.094 P=0.845 Day
5
Control(n=7) 39.89(2.93) rhC-EPO(n=7) 42.64(5.07)
Table2
ComparisonsofplasmaandbrainstemrhC-EPOconcentrationsonday5with unpairedt-test.
Parameter Groups Mean(SD) t-Values
Plasmaconcentration Control(n=5) 29.55(31.46) −8.266 rhC-EPO(n=5) 1009∗∗∗(263.1)
Brainstemconcentration Control(n=3) 0.008(0.002) −3.166 rhC-EPO(n=3) 0.019∗(0.005)
3.3. ChronicinjectionsincreasedrhC-EPOlevelsinplasmaand brainstem
Tissuelevelsof rhC-EPOweremeasuredincontrol andrhC- EPOgroupsofmiceonday5.Resultsindicatedthatchronicdrug injectionssignificantlyelevatedrhC-EPOconcentrationsinplasma and brainstemcompared tocontrolvalues (Table2).Therefore, peripherallyadministratedrhC-EPOpartially crossedtheblood- brainbarrierandreachedthebrainstem.
Table3
Comparisonsofbodyweightandrectaltemperaturewith2-wayrepeatedmeasuresANOVAanalysis.Dataareexpressedasmean(SD).
Time Groups Weight(g) Temperature(◦C) Timeeffect Treatmenteffect Interaction
Day 0
Control(n=8) 23.7(1.08) 37.6(0.86) Statisticsforbodyweight:
rhC-EPO(n=9) 23.5(1.74) 37.7(0.88) F=19.50 F=0.056 F=0.054
p<0.001 p=0.816 p=0.947
Day 1
Control(n=8) 24.0(1.23) 37.5(0.74) rhC-EPO(n=9) 23.8(1.86) 37.9(0.66)
Statisticsfortemperature:
Day 5
Control(n=8) 24.6(1.10) 37.1(0.66) F=2.371 F=0.702 F=0.795
rhC-EPO(n=9) 24.4(1.91) 37.3(0.87) p=0.110 p=0.415 p=0.461
Fig.2.Measurementsofrespiratoryparametersinnormoxia(basalventilation) beforetreatment(Day0),afteracute(Day1)andchronic(Day5)druginjections.A:
Minuteventilation(VE).B:Tidalvolume(VT).C:Respiratoryfrequency(Rf).Values areexpressedasmean(SD).Basalventilationdidnotchangesignificantlybetween thetwogroupsofmiceovertheexperimentalprotocol.
3.4. rhC-EPOdidnotalterbodyweightandrectaltemperature
Bodyweightandrectaltemperatureweremeasuredondays0, 1and5.Statisticalresultsshowedasignificantmaintimeeffectfor bodyweightonly(Table3).Post-hoccomparisons,however,didnot revealsignificantwithin-groupdifferences(P>0.05forallcompar- isons).Thus,thetwogroupsofmicehadsimilarbodyweightand rectaltemperatureovertheexperimentalprotocol.
3.5. BasalventilationwasnotaffectedbyrhC-EPO
Basalventilatoryparameters(VE,VTandRfinnormoxia)were measuredbeforetreatment(Day0),aswellasafteracute(Day 1)andchronic(Day5)druginjectionsincontrol(n=8)andrhC- EPOtreated(n=9)mice(Fig.2).Allstatisticalgroupcomparisons yieldednon-significantresults(datanotshown).Therefore,control
andrhC-EPOgroupsofmicehadsimilarbasalventilationoverthe experimentalprotocol.
3.6. ChronicbutnotacuterhC-EPOincreasedthehyperoxic ventilatorydepression
Ventilatoryresponsestohyperoxia(HxVR,100%O2for5min) weremeasuredincontrolandrhC-EPOgroupsofmiceafteracute andchronicdruginjections.Originaltracesfromplethysmography areshowninFigs.3a–cand4a–c.Inbothgroups,hyperoxiasignif- icantlydecreasedVE,thisventilatorydepressionbeingmainlydue toadecreaseinRf(Fig.3d).However,therewasnotreatmentxFiO2
interactionforVE,VTandRfafteracuteinjection(Day1;Table4).
Thus,acuterhC-EPOtreatmenthadnoeffectonHxVR.
After chronic drug injections (Day 5), significant treatment xFiO2 interactions were foundfor VE and VT denoting greater decreasesinbothparametersduringhyperoxiainmicetreatedwith rhC-EPO(Fig.4d,Table4).Themagnitudeofventilatorydepression (orDeltaVE)wasalsocomparedtofurtherexaminetheeffectsof treatmentsovertime(Fig.5).Thisconfirmedalackofsignificant effectonday1(P=0.332),andasignificantdecrease(P<0.01)in DeltaVE inrhC-EPOtreatedmicecomparedtocontrolgroupon day5.Thus,thehyperoxicventilatorydepressionincreasedafter chronictreatmentwithrhC-EPO.
3.7. ChronicbutnotacuterhC-EPOenhancedthehypoxic ventilatoryresponse
The effects of rhC-EPO on thehypoxic ventilatory response (HVR,10%O2for20min)weremeasuredafteracute(Day1,Fig.6) andchronic(Day5,Fig.7)treatments.Representativetracesfrom plethysmographyareshowninFigs.6a-dand7a-d,respectively.
DatacomparisonswithANOVAanalysesaredetailedinTable5.
Onday1,bothgroupshadsignificantlyelevatedVEintheearly phaseofHVRcomparedtobasalventilation(significantmainFiO2 effect).ThelatephaseofHVRwascharacterizedbyasignificant ventilatorydepression in thetwo groupsof mice(i.e.a signifi- cantdecreaseinVEcomparedtotheearlyphaseofHVR),mainly explainedbydecreasesinRfand/orVT(Fig.6e,Table5).Notreat- mentxFiO2interactionwasfound(Table5).Thus,acutetreatment withrhC-EPOhadnoeffectontheHVR.Onday5,however,asignif- icanttreatmentxFiO2interactionwasfoundforVE(Table5).The twogroupshadanelevatedVEinboththeearlyandlatephases ofHVRcomparedtobasalventilation,duetoelevatedVTandRf.
However,onlycontrolmicehadaclearventilatorydepressionin thelatephaseofHVRwhereasnodifferenceinrespiratoryparam- eterscouldbedetectedbetweentheearlyandlatephasesofHVR inrhC-EPOtreatedmice(Fig.7e,Table5).Tofurtherexaminethe effectsoftreatmentsovertime,wealsocomparedthemagnitude oftheresponsesasDelta VE ondays1 and5(Fig.8).Thiscon- firmedalackofsignificanteffectsonday1forthemagnitudeof theearly,lateandroll-offphasesofHVR(P>0.05forallcompar- isons),andsignificantincreases(P<0.05)inDeltaVEforthelate androll-offphasesofHVRinrhC-EPOcomparedtocontrolmiceon day5.Thus,rhC-EPOenhancedthelatephaseofHVRandreduced hypoxicventilatorydepression.
3.8. rhC-EPOdidnotalterventilatoryresponsetohypercapnia
Ventilatoryparametersrecordedduringhypercapniaafteracute andchronicrhC-EPOinjectionsareillustratedinFigs.9 and10, respectively. Inthetwo groups of mice,statisticalcomparisons revealedsignificantlyelevatedVE,VTandRfinhypercapniacom- paredtobasalcondition(mainFiCO2effect)afterbothacuteand chronictreatments.However,inbothcases,therewasnotreatment effectandnotreatmentxFiCO2 interaction(Table6).Therefore,
Fig.3. Changesinventilationinresponsetohyperoxiaafteracutedruginjections(Day1).A:Originaltracingsfromplethysmography.B-C:Enlargementsofthespirogram atperiodsindicatedbyarrowsinA.B:basalventilation(basal)undernormoxia(N).C:Ventilatoryresponsetohyperoxia(100%O2).Verticalscalebarscorrespondtoone arbitraryunit.D:Measurementsofminuteventilation(VE),tidalvolume(VT),andrespiratoryfrequency(Rf).Valuesareexpressedasmean(SD).*,**,***:P<0.05,P<0.01 andP<0.001post-hocdifferencesinhyperoxiavsbasalventilation.Notethesimilarventilatorydepressioninresponsetohyperoxiainthetwogroupsofmice,asevidenced byANOVAanalysesdetailedinTable4.
Table4
Comparisonsofventilatoryparametersinhyperoxiaafteracute(Day1)andchronic(Day5)treatmentswith2-wayrepeatedmeasuresANOVAanalysis.
Time Parameter Groups FiO2effect Treatmenteffect Interaction
Day1 VE(Basal,Hyperoxia) Control(n=7) rhC-EPO(n=8)
F=26.53 F=0.203 F=1.015
P<0.001 P=0.660 P=0.332
VT(Basal,Hyperoxia) F=3.921 F=2.027 F=0.402
P=0.069 P=0.178 P=0.537
Rf(Basal,Hyperoxia) F=36.91 F=2.793 F=0.854
P<0.001 P=0.119 P=0.372
Day5 VE(Basal,Hyperoxia) Control(n=8) rhC-EPO(n=9)
F=95.27 F=0.068 F=9.001
P<0.001 P=0.797 P=0.009
VT(Basal,Hyperoxia) F=46.05 F=0.479 F=6.452
P<0.001 P=0.500 P=0.026
Rf(Basal,Hyperoxia) F=18.98 F=0.955 F=0.874
P<0.001 P=0.344 P=0.365
Table5
Comparisonsofventilatoryparametersinhypoxiaafteracute(Day1)andchronic(Day5)treatmentswith2-wayrepeatedmeasuresANOVAanalysis.
Time Parameter Groups FiO2effect Treatmenteffect Interaction
Day1 VE(Basal,EarlyandLatehypoxia) Control(n=8) rhC-EPO(n=9)
F=46.64 F=0.268 F=0.787
P<0.001 P=0.613 P=0.464
VT(Basal,EarlyandLatehypoxia) F=41.18 F=1.641 F=1.515
P<0.001 P=0.220 P=0.236
Rf(Basal,EarlyandLatehypoxia) F=55.14 F=1.046 F=0.294
P<0.001 P=0.323 P=0.747
Day5 VE(Basal,EarlyandLatehypoxia) Control(n=7) rhC-EPO(n=7)
F=30.23 F=2.818 F=5.353
P<0.001 P=0.119 P=0.012
VT(Basal,EarlyandLatehypoxia) F=30.69 F=6.935 F=3.827
P<0.001 P=0.022 P=0.036
Rf(Basal,EarlyandLatehypoxia) F=44.30 F=0.424 F=4.045
P<0.001 P=0.527 P=0.031
Fig.4.Changesinventilationinresponsetohyperoxiaafterchronicdruginjections(Day5).A:Originaltracingsfromplethysmography.B-C:Enlargementsofthespirogram atperiodsindicatedbyarrowsinA.B:basalventilation(basal)undernormoxia(N).C:Ventilatoryresponsetohyperoxia(100%O2).Verticalscalebarscorrespondtoone arbitraryunit.D:Measurementsofminuteventilation(VE),tidalvolume(VT),andrespiratoryfrequency(Rf).Valuesareexpressedasmean(SD).*,**,***:P<0.05,P<0.01 andP<0.001post-hocdifferencesinhyperoxiavsbasalventilation.VentilatorydepressioninresponsetohyperoxiawasmorepronouncedinrhC-EPOmice,asevidenced byANOVAanalysesdetailedinTable4.
Table6
Comparisonsofventilatoryparametersinhypercapniaafteracute(Day1)andchronic(Day5)treatmentswith2-wayrepeatedmeasuresANOVAanalysis.
Time Parameter Groups FiCO2effect Treatmenteffect Interaction
Day1 VE(Basal,Hypercapnia) Control(n=8) rhC-EPO(n=9)
F=57.39 F=0.199 F=0.088
P<0.001 P=0.662 P=0.771
VT(Basal,Hypercapnia) F=73.02 F=0.060 F=0.471
P<0.001 P=0.810 P=0.503
Rf(Basal,Hypercapnia) F=84.57 F=1.638 F=1.375
P<0.001 P=0.220 P=0.259
Day5 VE(Basal,Hypercapnia) Control(n=7) rhC-EPO(n=7)
F=96.51 F=0.034 F=0.297
P<0.001 P=0.855 P=0.593
VT(Basal,Hypercapnia) F=125.0 F=0.002 F=0.188
P<0.001 P=0.967 P=0.670
Rf(Basal,Hypercapnia) F=123.6 F=0.106 F=1.266
P<0.001 P=0.749 P=0.277
controlandrhC-EPOtreatedmicehadsimilarpatternsofventila- tioninhypercapniaovertheentireexperimentalprotocol.
4. Discussion
ThisstudyexaminedtheeffectsofrhC-EPOonmiceventilation andotherphysiologicalparameters.Asexpected,chronicrhC-EPO injectionsdidnotstimulateerythropoiesis despiteanincreased plasmarhC-EPOconcentration.Resultsdemonstratedthat1/acute or chronic drug treatment did not change basal breathing in normoxiccondition,2/chronic butnotacuterhC-EPOtreatment enhancedthehyperoxicventilatoryresponse,andsustainedventi- lationinresponsetohypoxiabyreducingthehypoxicventilatory depression(theroll-offphaseoftheHVR),and3/noneofthedrug
regimenalteredventilatoryresponsetohypercapnia.Wediscuss therelevanceofthesefindingswithavailableliterature,including theeffectsofEPOonneuralcontrolofbreathing.
4.1. Methodologicalconsiderations
Drug wasinjected at 15,000IU/kg usingan intra-peritoneal route.In humans, sucha doseand route of rhEPOadministra- tionallowthedrugtocrosstheblood-brainbarrierandreachthe cerebralparenchyma(Rasmussenetal.,1985;Xenocostasetal., 2005).ThisisinagreementwithourELISAmeasurementsshowing increasedlevelsofrhC-EPOinmicebrainstemtissueafterchronic treatment.Besides,druglevelswerehigherinplasmathaninbrain- stem,consistentwithpreviousobservationsdemonstrating that
Fig.5.Differencesinminuteventilation(DeltaVE)betweennormoxiaandhyper- oxiaafteracute(Day1)andchronic(Day5)druginjections.Valuesareexpressed asmean(SD).*:P<0.05vscontrolgroup.ChronicbutnotacuterhC-EPOinjections enhancedtheventilatorydepressionseeninhyperoxia.
onlyafractionofcirculatingrhEPOcouldreachthecerebrospinal fluid(BrinesandCerami,2005).Leistandcollaboratorssuggested thatrhEPOandrhC-EPOsharesimilarpharmacokinetics(Leistetal.,
2004).SincerhC-EPOtissueconcentrationwasmeasuredatonly onetimepoint(Day5)inthepresentstudy,ourdatacannotcon- firmthissuggestion.Lowdruglevelswerealsodetectedintissues fromcontrolanimals.Theselevelslikelycorrespondtoendogenous mouseEPOasahighdegreeofsequencehomologyexistsbetween humanandmurineEPO(Wenetal.,1993).Thelackofsignificant effectsofchronicrhC-EPOtreatmentonbodyweightandcorebody temperatureinourstudyisconsistentwithanotherobservationin mice(Fantaccietal.,2006).Thisisparticularlyimportantforval- idationofourventilatorymeasurementswithplethysmography, aschangesinbodytemperature(e.g.whenmiceareexposedto hypoxia)mayconfoundinterpretationofresults.
4.2. LackofacuterhC-EPOtreatmentonventilation
AcuterhC-EPOhasnoeffectonventilationinnormoxia,hyper- oxia,hypoxiaorhypercapnia.Thisisinagreementwithaprevious reportshowingasimilarlackofdrugeffectonbothbasalventila- tionandinresponsetomoderatehypoxia(10%O2)2hafteracute injectionof2000IU/kgrhEPO(Solizetal.,2005).Althoughdrug concentrationintissueswasnotmeasuredonday1,plasmalevels ofrhEPOandrhC-EPOremainedelevatedfor24hafterasingledrug
Fig.6.Changesinventilationinresponsetohypoxia(10%O2)afteracutedruginjections(Day1).A:Originaltracingsfromplethysmography.B-D:Enlargementsofthe spirogramatperiodsindicatedbyarrowsinA.B:basalventilation(basal)undernormoxia(N).C-D:Earlyandlatephasesofthehypoxicventilatoryresponse,respectively.
Verticalscalebarscorrespondtoonearbitraryunit.E:Measurementsofminuteventilation(VE),tidalvolume(VT),andrespiratoryfrequency(Rf).Valuesareexpressedas mean(SD).*,**,***:P<0.05,P<0.01andP<0.001post-hocdifferencesinhypoxiavsbasalventilation.$,$$,$$$:P<0.05,P<0.01andP<0.001post-hocdifferencesinlate vsearlyhypoxia.Bothgroupshadsimilarincreasesinventilationintheearlyphaseofhypoxiafollowedbyasignificantdecline(orventilatorydepression)inthelatephase ofhypoxia(seealsoTable5).
Fig.7. Changesinventilationinresponsetohypoxia(10%O2)afterchronicdruginjections(Day1).A:Originaltracingsfromplethysmography.B-D:Enlargementsofthe spirogramatperiodsindicatedbyarrowsinA.B:basalventilation(basal)undernormoxia(N).C-D:Earlyandlatephasesofthehypoxicventilatoryresponse,respectively.
Verticalscalebarscorrespondtoonearbitraryunit.E:Measurementsofminuteventilation(VE),tidalvolume(VT),andrespiratoryfrequency(Rf).Valuesareexpressedas mean(SD).*,**,***:P<0.05,P<0.01andP<0.001post-hocdifferencesinhypoxiavsbasalventilation.$,$$,$$$:P<0.05,P<0.01andP<0.001post-hocdifferencesinlate vsearlyhypoxia.NotethelackofventilationdepressioninthelatephaseofhypoxiainrhC-EPOmice(seealsoTable5).
injectionatsimilardosesinrats(Leistetal.,2004).Also,acuteinjec- tionwithahigherdoseofrhEPO(77,000IU/kg)inmiceresultedin elevatedrhEPOlevelsinbothplasmaandbrainupto48hpost- injection(Schuleretal.,2012).Thus,ourresultsreinforcetheidea thatstimulationofEPOreceptorsafteracuteinjectionofrhC-EPO doesnotexertsignificanteffectsonbasalventilation,noronrespi- ratorychemoreflexes,despiteelevateddruglevelsintissues.
4.3. LackofchroniceffectsofrhC-EPOonbasalventilation
Chronic treatmentwith rhC-EPO didnot change ventilatory parameters measured in normoxia. Similar findings have been reportedintransgenicmicewithchronicoverexpressionofrhEPO inbothplasmaandbrain(Tg6mice)orinbrainonly(Tg21mice), aswellasinwildtypemiceafterchronicrhEPOinjections(Menuet etal.,2016;Solizetal.,2007;Solizetal.,2005).Thepresentresults inadultmicealsocorroboratedpreviousobservationsinnewborns, demonstratingnochangeinfictiverespiratoryactivityafterprein- cubationofisolatedbrainstemwithrhEPO(Khemirietal.,2012).
Thusourdatasuggestthat,similarlytorhEPO,chronictreatment withrhC-EPOdoesnotalterneuronalmechanismsinvolvedinbasal breathing.
4.4. rhC-EPOenhancedventilatoryresponsestochangesinO2 levels
It iswidely acceptedthat changesin ventilation afterexpo- sureofanimalsto100%O2,theso-calledDejour’stest(Dejours, 1962),isduetothesilencingofcarotidbodies.Thus,thistestcan beusedasanindirectmeasureofcarotidbodies’sensitivitytoO2
(Ramanantsoaetal.,2006;Solizetal.,2007).Ourresultsobtained inmiceinjectedwithrhC-EPOoverfiveconsecutivedaysshowed greaterventilatorydepressioninhyperoxiathancontrolmice.A similarfindingwasreportedinTg6micewithanoverexpressionof rhEPOinbothplasmaandbrain(Solizetal.,2007).Thissuggests thatchronictreatmentwithoneoranotherdrugincreasedcarotid bodies’ O2 sensitivity. Interestingly, since a normal hematocrit wasobservedinrhC-EPOtreatedmicewhereaschronicrh-EPOis knowntoinducepolycythemia(Menuetetal.,2016),itisunlikely thatdistinctbloodcarryingO2capacitiescontributetochangesin hypoxicbreathingpatterns.
ChronicrhC-EPOtreatmentdidnotchangetheearlyphase(first 5min)oftheHVR.Atfirstglance,theseresultsaresurprisingsince 1/theinitialincreaseinventilationinresponsetohypoxiaismainly attributedto carotid bodies (Powellet al., 1998; Teppema and Dahan,2010),and2/enhancementoftheHxVRafterchronicrhC- EPOsuggestedanincrease incarotid bodies’O2 sensitivity(see
Fig.8. Differencesinminuteventilation(DeltaVE)betweennormoxiaandhypoxiaincontrolandrhC-EPOmiceondays1and5.A:Magnitudesoftheearlyandlatephases ofhypoxia.B:Magnitudeoftheroll-offphase.Valuesareexpressedasmean(SD).*:P<0.05vscontrolgrouponday5.$$:P<0.01withingroupdifferencesinlatevsearly hypoxia.#:P<0.05betweengroupsdifferenceinlatehypoxia.N.S.:notstatisticallysignificant.ChronicbutnotacuterhC-EPOinjectionsdecreasedthehypoxicventilatory depression.
above).Interestingly,rhEPOalsoenhancescarotidbodies’O2sen- sitivityinmalemicebutdoesnotaltertheearlyphaseofHVRin responsetomoderatehypoxia(10%O2)(Solizetal.,2005).Inthelat- terstudy,however,changesinpatternsofventilationattributable to a role of EPO on carotid body cells could be demonstrated onlyafteraseverehypoxicchallenge(6%O2)inbothTg21mice withchronicrhEPOoverexpressionandwildtypemicereceiving anacuteinjectionofrhEPO(2000IU/kg,2hbeforehypoxia).There- fore,itispossiblethattheearlyphaseofHVRdidnotincreasein ourstudyduetoinsufficientchangesinarterialPO2betweennor- moxia(21%O2)andmoderatehypoxia(10%O2).Bycontrast,drastic changesin arterialPO2 occurredbetweennormoxiaand hyper- oxia(100%O2)sothattheresultingfiringalterationofperipheral chemosensitivefibersmaybesufficienttoenhancetheHxVR.
AnotherstrikingsimilaritybetweentheeffectsofrhC-EPOand rhEPOisthereductionofventilatorydepressioninthelatephase (last5min) oftheHVR(MaxovaandVizek,2001;Powelletal., 1998),therebyenhancingventilationinresponsetolowO2 lev- els.Hypoxicventilatorydepression,alsocalledtheroll-offphase, isverylikelyattributabletoacentralinhibitoryeffectofhypoxia althoughtheprecisemechanismsarestilldebated(Gestreauetal., 2010;MaxovaandVizek,2001).TransgenicTg21micewithacon-
stitutivecerebraloverexpressionofrhEPOalsohavea sustained ventilationinthelatephaseofHVRatasimilarlevelofhypoxia(10%
O2)(Solizetal.,2005).Also,Tg21micedisplayasustainedhypoxic responseafterbilateraltransectionofcarotidsinusnervewhich iscorrelatedwithalterationsincatecholaminesynthesisinboth medullaandpons(Solizetal.,2007;Solizetal.,2005).Thus,asimple interpretationofourresultsisthatrhC-EPOmayplayamodulatory roleoncentralstructuresinvolvedinthecontrolofbreathingdur- inghypoxia.TheelevatedbrainstemrhC-EPOconcentrationfound afterchronicdruginjection(presentresults),andthewideexpres- sionofEPO-Rinbrainstemnucleiinvolvedinrespiratorycontrol (Solizetal.,2005)areinlinewiththishypothesis.
To furtherstudy centralchemoreception, we also measured changes inventilation inresponse tohypercapniaafter chronic rhC-EPOorsalineinjections.Resultsrevealedsimilarincreasein ventilatoryparametersinbothmicegroups,suggestingalackof effectofcarbamylatedEPOoncentralchemoreceptorsdetecting changesinCO2/pH,suchasneuronsoftheretrotrapezoidnucleus (GuyenetandBayliss,2015;Guyenetetal.,2010;Wangetal.,2013).
Thus,ourstudypointedtoamajordifferencebetweentheventila- toryeffectsofrhEPOandrhC-EPOsincechronicrhEPOtreatment bluntstheHCVR(Menuetetal.,2016).Consequently,itisunlikely
Fig.9.Changesinventilationinresponsetohypercapniaafteracutedruginjections(Day1).A:Originaltracingsfromplethysmography.B-C:Enlargementsofthespirogram atperiodsindicatedbyarrowsinA.B:basalventilation(basal)undernormoxia(N).C:Ventilatoryresponsetohypercapnia(5%CO2).Verticalscalebarscorrespondtoone arbitraryunit.D:Measurementsofminuteventilation(VE),tidalvolume(VT),andrespiratoryfrequency(Rf).Valuesareexpressedasmean(SD).***:P<0.001post-hoc differencesinhypercapniavsbasalventilation.Bothgroupsofmicehadsimilarincreasesinventilationinresponsetohypercapnia(seealsoTable6).
thattheenhancedHVRreportedhereinafterchronicrhC-EPOtreat- mentcouldbeexplainedbychangesincentralCO2sensitivityin thesemice.
4.5. AretheheterodimericEPOreceptorsresponsibleforthe effectsonventilation?
EPOisthoughttomodulaterespiratoryactivitybyactingonclas- sicalhomodimeric(EPO-R/EPO-R)EPOreceptors(Bunn,2013).This viewissupportedbyexpressionofEPOreceptorsincarotidbodies andmanybrainstemrespiratoryareas(Solizetal.,2005).However, thespecificityofmostantibodiesdirectedagainstEPO-Rhasbeen recentlychallenged(Elliottetal.,2006;Elliottetal.,2014;Kirkeby etal.,2007).Here,weshowthatrhC-EPO,likerhEPO,alteredboth hyperoxicandhypoxicventilatoryresponsesalthoughthisdrug lackserythropoieticeffectandbindsheterodimeric(EPO-R/c-R) receptors(Brinesetal.,2004;Bunn,2013;Chamorroetal.,2013;
Chateauvieuxetal.,2011).Therefore,modulationofbreathingin responsetochangesinO2levelsmaybemediatedbyinteractionof bothdrugswithEPO-R/cRreceptors.ThecRsubunitiscommon forseveralcytokinereceptors(D’AndreaandGonda,2000).Itwas detectedinvariousstructuresofthecentralnervoussystem(Brines etal.,2004;Nadametal.,2007;Sanchezetal.,2009),butnoinfor- mationisavailableonitslocalizationinthebrainstem,inparticular inrespiratoryareas,noratthelevelofthecarotidbodies.Future studiesshouldidentifytheprecisemechanismsofEPO-mediated
respiratoryeffects, includingthetargetcells andtheidentityof theirEPOreceptors.
4.6. Conclusions
Chronic treatmentwithrhC-EPO altered bothhyperoxic and hypoxic ventilatory responses in the absence of polycythemia.
These effects are very likely mediated by neuromodulation of peripheralandcentralstructurescontributingtoventilatoryadap- tationtochangesinO2 levels.Interestingly,rhC-EPOissafeand welltoleratedinHumans(Boeschetal.,2014).Thus,heterodimeric EPO-R/c-RagonistssuchasC-EPOcouldrepresentgoodcandi- datesforthetreatmentofdiseaseslinkedtorespiratorynetwork dysfunctionwhenerythropoiesis-stimulatingeffectisunwanted.
SincechronicrhEPO,butnotrhC-EPO,bluntsthehypercapnicven- tilatoryresponseandmaybedeleteriousforbreathing(Menuet etal.,2016),clinicaluseofrhC-EPOmayprovidegreaterefficacy thanrhEPO.
Conflictofinterest
Theauthors declarethat theresearchwasconducted inthe absenceofanycommercialorfinancialrelationshipsthatcouldbe construedasapotentialconflictofinterest.