• Aucun résultat trouvé

Diversification of current plant protection strategies to mitigate climate change effects

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Diversification of current plant protection strategies to mitigate climate change effects"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01602261

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01602261

Submitted on 5 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike| 4.0 International

License

Diversification of current plant protection strategies to

mitigate climate change effects

Jay Ram Lamichhane, Marc Barzman, Kees Booij, Piet Boonekamp, Nicolas

Desneux, Laurent Huber, Per Kudsk, Stephen Langrell, Alian Ratnadass,

Pierre Ricci, et al.

To cite this version:

Jay Ram Lamichhane, Marc Barzman, Kees Booij, Piet Boonekamp, Nicolas Desneux, et al..

Diver-sification of current plant protection strategies to mitigate climate change effects. 18. International

Plant Protection Congress, Aug 2015, Berlin, Germany. 38 p. �hal-01602261�

(2)

Diversification of current plant protection strategies to mitigate climate change effects

J. R. Lamichhane1, M. Barzman1, K. Booij2, P. Boonekamp2, N. Desneux3, L. Huber1, P. Kudsk4, S. R. H. Langrell5,

A. Ratnadass6, P. Ricci3, J.-L. Sarah6, A. Messéan1 1INRA, Grignon, France

2Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands 3INRA, Sophia, France

4Aarhus University, Slagelse, Denmark 5European Commission, Grange, Ireland 6CIRAD, Montpellier, France

jay-ram.lamichhane@grignon.inra.fr

Climate change is increasingly perceived as one of the major constraints that limit agricultural productivity. Crop losses due to climate change could be direct, such as damages through flooding or storms, or indirect such as altered distribution of crop pests. The real impact of climate change at global level is yet uncertain and likely variable from one region to another. Within this context, it is difficult to predict effects of climate change, particularly when long-term datasets from the past are missing to develop and test predictive models for the future. Nevertheless, our knowledge of plant-disease interactions, population genetics of pathogens as well as crops, and examples of overwhelming establishment of new diseases in a given region provides insights into how climate change may affect disease incidence and severity. Here we report examples of pest populations which have been established across regions previously considered detrimental for their survival and yield losses associated to these pests. Faced with the uncertainty regarding the effects of changing climate on crop protection, here we propose a number of action points that, to our opinion, may help improve current plant protection strategies. Given this uncertainty, policy, research, and extension should be prepared to promote resilience vis-à-vis pests which, at the biophysical level, entails uncovering what currently makes cropping systems resilient, while at the organizational level, the capacity to adapt needs to be recognized and strengthened (Lamichhane et al 2014). Such action points include increase in human resources, development of resilient cropping systems, more focus on crop-weed competition, anticipating of risks and international monitoring, and more effort on breeding for resistance, development of biological control strategies and pest risks analysis. This diversification could be achieved by improving current plant protection practices which might help mitigate the effect of climate change in future crop protection, particularly in the EU, but also at global level. The vision presented here is that of the ENDURE European Research Group, which brings together some of Europe’s leading agricultural research, teaching, and extension institutes with a special

interest in IPM.

References: Lamichhane JR, Barzman M, Booij K et al., 2014. Robust cropping systems to tackle pests under climate change: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, DOI 10.1007/s13593-014-0275-9.

Références

Documents relatifs

The increased durability of quantitative resistance could be due to (i) the partial resistance effect exerting a low selection pressure on the pathogen population, (ii) a combination

These complementary satellite-based prod- ucts are combined to estimate the variation of surface water storage (SWS), which is then subtracted from the terrestrial water storage

National temporal trend in the mean nitrogen preference of plant communities 537. from 2009 to 2017 calculated with abundance data for

If the main objective of the control is to maintain the crop yield above a critical threshold, then plant growth and plant-insect interactions have to be taken into account.. They

However, up to now, biological control modelling has primarily focused on pests-natural enemies interactions considering somehow that crop yield is not affected by the pests..

We also made the first calculations of CO 2 e due to cover crop effects on albedo and found that for typical plant and soil albedo combinations, albedo changes increase the

6 Change of population size of 25 common forest bird species in Germany due to climate change (IPCC scenario A2, 2021–2050) only and due to climate change and conversion of

Key measures, either provided or estimated from the available data, were: (1) the grain yield potential at the area level through either the experimental mean yield (EYI,