• Aucun résultat trouvé

Concerned Member State Comments on Day 120 Draft Assessment Report to be sent at Day 145 at the latest

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Concerned Member State Comments on Day 120 Draft Assessment Report to be sent at Day 145 at the latest"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Doc. Ref: CMDh/205/2005 Rev.3 October 2016

Concerned Member State Comments on Day 120 Draft Assessment Report

to be sent at Day 145 at the latest

1. This document is sent by:

CMS FRANCE

Contact point, project team leader (name) phone

email

Assessors, if applicable (name e-mail, phone) Regulatory/quality:

Date/Day of procedure 24.07.2017 (Day 145)

2. This document concerns:

Procedure number UK/H/6370/01/DC

Name of the medicinal product in the RMS PLENVU

Name of the active substance Macrogol 3350, Sodium Ascorbate, Sodium Sulfate, Ascorbic acid, Sodium chloride, Potassium chloride

Applicant Norgine B.V.

Deadline for comments 24.07.2017 (Day 145)

3. Comments, general

3.1 Assessment of the RMS

We fully endorse the RMS assessment, and have no further comments We endorse the RMS assessment, but also have additional comments We do not fully endorse the RMS assessment, and have other comments

3.2 Conclusions on the product Our conclusion is that the product is Approvable

Approvable, provided that satisfactory responses are given to the list of questions and/or the SmPC/PL/labelling is changed according to the comments

Non-approvable

3.3. List of Questions/Proposed conditions for marketing authorisation

We have grounds of potential serious risks to public health on the following part of the assessment report not already raised by the RMS as major objections

Quality

(2)

Non-Clinical Clinical SmPC PL Labelling

We have additional other concerns on the following part of the assessment report Quality

Non-Clinical Clinical SmPC PL Labelling

Module 1 – Application related comments (including product name)

4. Potential serious risk to public health

Quality

Potential serious risk to public health not already raised by the RMS as major objection

Rationale

Non-clinical

Potential serious risk to public health not already raised by the RMS as major objection

Rationale

Clinical

Potential serious risk to public health not already raised by the RMS as major objection

Rationale

(3)
(4)

SmPC

PL

Potential serious risk to public health not already raised by the RMS as major objection

Rationale

Labelling

Potential serious risk to public health not already raised by the RMS as major objection

Rationale

5. Additional other concerns

Quality

Other concerns not already raised by the RMS

Rationale

Non-clinical

Other concerns not already raised by the RMS

Rationale

Clinical

Other concerns not already raised by the RMS

Rationale

SmPC

Potential serious risk to public health not already raised by the RMS as major objection

Rationale

(5)

Other concerns not already raised by the RMS

Rationale

PL

Other concerns not already raised by the RMS

Rationale

Labelling

Other concerns not already raised by the RMS

Rationale

Module I – Application related comments (including product name)1 Other concerns not already raised by the RMS

- The proposed product name PLENVU, poudre pour solution buvable is acceptable in France.

- Taking into account the posology in the SmPC, the only pack which may be authorised under the non-prescription status and delivery through pharmacies will contain only one treatment.

If duly justified, the other packs may be authorised but will be hospital use only.

Therefore, the Applicant is requested to indicate the packs which will be marketed in France.

- 2 samples of the finished product should be sent to :

Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé

Direction des vaccins, des médicaments anti-infectieux, en hépato-gastroentérologie, en dermatologie, de thérapie génique et des maladies métaboliques rares (INFHEP) 143/147 bld Anatole France

F-93285 Saint-Denis cedex

Rationale

6. Additional information for the Applicant

Additional information on the submission of response documents within the Member State should be included within this section. E.g. Institutional mailbox, etc.

1 Please note that for 10.1 and 10.3 applications with a centrally authorised product as reference product, the product name in RMS and all CMS must be the same. It is therefore important that comments on the product name are sent early in the procedure in order to reach agreement before day 210/90.

Références

Documents relatifs

Annex V contains a list of documents distributed at the Conference, including reports on vctivities, background pa,pers and technical papers submitted by

"tc initiate immediate consultdtions with African Governments and donor countries for the setting-up of sub-regional industrial informa tion and promotion centres to adviso

economic indicators, financial leakages, role of small and medium scale businesses, balance of payments constraints in Africa, coordination of the public and private sectors, and

The participants also took stock of other developments taking place within the subprogramme on regional cooperation and integration in the following areas: intra-African and

L’objectif de la Coalition mondiale contre la peine de mort (ci-après la "Coalition mondiale") est de renforcer la dimension internationale de la lutte contre

Budget 2011 moves Manitoba forward by implementing several new initiatives, including: opening quick–five quick-care clinics where nurse practitioners

It seems evident, therefore, that, at dose rates only moderately greater than those due to background radiation, such cancer risk as there is at these low doses must be

Water for hemodialysis (treated water) represents 97% of the dialysate's composition, its quality is thus the determining factor of the dialysate quality and