• Aucun résultat trouvé

Unravelling the geology beneath the Meso-Cenozoic sedimentary cover of the intracratonic Paris Basin -Part 1: new insights from seismic and potential field methods

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Unravelling the geology beneath the Meso-Cenozoic sedimentary cover of the intracratonic Paris Basin -Part 1: new insights from seismic and potential field methods"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01275906

https://hal-brgm.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01275906

Submitted on 18 Feb 2016

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Unravelling the geology beneath the Meso-Cenozoic

sedimentary cover of the intracratonic Paris Basin -Part

1: new insights from seismic and potential field methods

Laurent Beccaletto, Julien Baptiste, Guillaume Martelet, Michel Faure, Yan

Chen

To cite this version:

Laurent Beccaletto, Julien Baptiste, Guillaume Martelet, Michel Faure, Yan Chen. Unravelling the geology beneath the Meso-Cenozoic sedimentary cover of the intracratonic Paris Basin -Part 1: new insights from seismic and potential field methods. 35th International Geological Congress : IGC 2016, Aug 2016, Cape Town, South Africa. �hal-01275906�

(2)

Unravelling the geology beneath the Meso-Cenozoic sedimentary cover of the

intracratonic Paris Basin - Part 1: new insights from seismic and potential field

methods

Beccaletto, L.

1

, Baptiste, J.

1

, Martelet, G.

1

, Faure M.

2

and Chen, Y.

2

1

BRGM - French Geological Survey, Orléans, France. l.beccaletto@brgm.fr

2

Institut des Sciences de la Terre, Université d'Orléans, Campus Géosciences, France

__________________________________________________________________________

The Paris Basin is an intracratonic basin made of Meso-Cenozoic sediments unconformably overlying a Variscan substratum (Figure 1). Deciphering the geology beneath its sedimentary cover is important for at least two reasons: (1) the area is a "data gap" in the middle of an important segment of the Variscan belt in Western Europe, and (2) the role of the structural inheritance on the Meso-Cenozoic sedimentation is not fully understood yet.

The basin basement is roughly made of two different geological units, namely (1) the Variscan substratum sensu stricto, made of heterogeneous deformed sedimentary, magmatic and meta-sedimentary rocks, with minor meta-magmatic rocks, and (2) the late Variscan (late orogenic) Permo-Carboniferous basins, made of thick siliciclastic sedimentary deposits.

These two geological basement units have their own geological characteristics and geophysical properties, which are fairly different from each other. For that reason, they must be investigated using dedicated methods. Seismic methods were implemented for studying the Permo-Carboniferous basins. Based on the reprocessing and interpretation of several thousands of km of seismic lines, we propose a new location and thickness map of the Permo-Carboniferous basins. On the other side, potential field methods were used for mapping buried polygenic basement rocks. Based on the combination of aeromagnetic and gravity data, supported by petrophysical signatures and field/borehole geological information, we propose a new map of the architecture of the Variscan substratum.

Figure 1 - The Variscan basement below the intracratonic Paris Basin; the colours represent the various Variscan domains

The combination of the above methods and related results provides an updated view of the Variscan to late Variscan basement of the Paris Basin. The structural and lithological continuities with the outcropping Variscan massifs are refined (e.g. with a better delimitation of the various Variscan domains), filling the "data gap" we mentioned earlier. These new results also open the possibility to discuss the influence of the basement structures on the Meso-Cenozoic sedimentary filling (e.g. reactivation of older structures in relation with variations of the stress field, and related migration of the depocenters). This integrated approach finally shows the importance to study intracratonic basins not only from a sedimentary filling point of view, but also from a basement perspective.

Figure

Figure 1 - The Variscan basement below the intracratonic Paris Basin; the colours represent the  various Variscan domains

Références

Documents relatifs

Figure 7 shows the variation of the reflection coefficients with the square of the sine of the incidence angle in the two principal horizontal directions of anisotropy in the cases

– SEM view of the outer surface with pits and transverse section of the endocarp showing wall and elongate-flattened tubercles between seed tissues.. – SEM view of the inner layers

Toward this goal, the World Health Organization (WHO) released new guidelines for the prevention of MTCT (PMTCT) in 2010, based on combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) for

the redshift-, density- and scale-dependence of the biasing function b(z, δ, R) between galaxy and matter overdensities up to redshift z = 1.5. Our results can be summarized as

Dans cette partie, la méthode pour obtenir un maillage sous-structuré adapté pour les méthodes de décomposition de domaine sans recouvrement est décrite.. L’objectif est ici de

standardized steady state heavy-duty diesel engine emission testing.. Duty Cycle for nonroad applications. This and heavier loading conditions than. )iesel Duty

La transcription est l’outil utilisé afin de mettre sur papier et d’organiser ce qui a été mené oralement durant l’entretien. Cette technique permet de retranscrire toutes

Pour les périodes 2 et 3, l’énergie fournie par la PAC en mode chauffage seul est moindre avec volets ouverts (23 kWh) que celle avec volets fermés (43 kWh), du fait de la