• Aucun résultat trouvé

Euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions after implementation of the law on euthanasia in Belgium

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions after implementation of the law on euthanasia in Belgium"

Copied!
36
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions after implementation of the law on euthanasia in Belgium

Prof dr Luc Deliens Prof essor of Public H ealth and Palliative C are Head of End-of-Life Care Research Group, Brussels

(2)

Questions addressed

How was the law on euthanasia implemented in Belgiu

m? (“reported case”)

How did the incidence of end-of-life decisions develope since the implementation of th

e law on euthanasia in 2002?

How does medical end-of-life decision- making vary according to language community (Dutch vs French) in Belgium? How does medical end-of-life decision- making vary according to palliative care and end-of-life care?

(3)

ELDs = end-of-life decisions with a possible or certain life-shortening effect – Non-treatment decision : forgoing a possibly life-prolonging treatment • With the explicit intention of hastening death – Intensifying symptom alleviation using possibly life-shortening drugs (opioids) • Co-intended to hasten death – Administering, supplying, or prescribing lethal drugs with explicit life-shortening intention

E uthanasia / Physician-assisted suicide • Life-ending without explicit patient request

e Research Group

(4)

administering sedatives (barbiturates or benzodiazepines) to keep the patient in deep sedation or coma continuously until death:

w ith administration of artificial food and fluid • W ithout administration of artificial food and fluid Life-shortening effect unclear in literature “slow euthanasia”

ELDs = end-of-life decisions with a possible or certain life-shortening effect

(5)

Questions addressed 1.

How was the law on euthanasia implemented in Belgium?

• H ow many cases of euthanasia have been reported by physicians to the Federal Control and Evaluation Committee between 2002 and 2008 ?

e Research Group

Smets T, Bilsen J, Cohen J, Rurup ML, Deliens L. Legal euthanasia in Belgium: Characteristics of all reported euthanasia cases.Medical Care2010 Feb;48(2):187-92.

(6)

24

235

347 388 428 495

705 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Tota l num be r of re p o rt e d cases R e p o rt e d cases in Du tc h R e p o rt e d cases in F ren ch

reported euthanasia cases (N= 2622)

Smets T, Bilsen J, Cohen J, Rurup ML, Deliens L. Legal euthanasia in Belgium: Characteristics of all reported euthanasia cases.Medical Care2010 Feb;48(2):187-92.

(7)

Ag e p a ti e n t 2 3 10

26 38

53 50

18 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All deats in population

Reported cases of euthanasia

18- 39 year 40- 59 year 60- 79 year > 79 year

reported euthanasia cases

e Research Group

Smets T, Bilsen J, Cohen J, Rurup ML, Deliens L. Legal euthanasia in Belgium: Characteristics of all reported euthanasia cases.Medical Care2010 Feb;48(2):187-92.

(8)

D iag n o si s p a ti en t 24

83 76

17 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

aths in ation

ases of a

Can cer N on- ca nc er

reported euthanasia cases

Smets T, Bilsen J, Cohen J, Rurup ML, Deliens L. Legal euthanasia in Belgium: Characteristics of all reported euthanasia cases.Medical Care2010 Feb;48(2):187-92.

(9)

P lace o f d eat h 22

4 3

2 52

52 22

42 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All deaths in population

Reported cases of euthanasia

Ho sp it al Ho me C ar e hom e Ot h er

reported euthanasia cases

e Research Group

Smets T, Bilsen J, Cohen J, Rurup ML, Deliens L. Legal euthanasia in Belgium: Characteristics of all reported euthanasia cases.Medical Care2010 Feb;48(2):187-92.

(10)

T erminally ill patients: 93% (N=1790) N on-terminally ill patients: 7% (N=126)

reported euthanasia cases

Smets T, Bilsen J, Cohen J, Rurup ML, Deliens L. Legal euthanasia in Belgium: Characteristics of all reported euthanasia cases.Medical Care2010 Feb;48(2):187-92.

(11)

D ia gnos is pa ti e n t 9 2 9 5

30

88% 38% 5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Te rm ina lly ill N on- te rm ina lly ill

Can ce r N eur om us cu la r d isease Card io vascu lar d isease Ot h er

reported euthanasia cases

e Research Group

Smets T, Bilsen J, Cohen J, Rurup ML, Deliens L. Legal euthanasia in Belgium: Characteristics of all reported euthanasia cases.Medical Care2010 Feb;48(2):187-92.

(12)

reported euthanasia cases

Smets T, Bilsen J, Cohen J, Rurup ML, Deliens L. Legal euthanasia in Belgium: Characteristics of all reported euthanasia cases.Medical Care2010 Feb;48(2):187-92.

(13)

Consultation services • Life End Information Forum in Flanders (since 2003)

• S upport and Consultation for Euthanasia in the Netherlands (since 1997) Æ

Provide trained independent physicians for consultation in cases of a euthanasia request

Æ

Qualitative consultations in which the legally defined due care criteria are checked

e Research Group

(14)

Questions addressed

How was the law on euthanasia implemented in Belgiu

m?

How did the incidence of end-of-life decisions develope since the implementation of th

e law on euthanasia in 2002? death certificates ( 3,623 cases in 2007 )

Chambaere K, Deliens L et al. Continuous deep sedation until death in Belgium. Archives of Internal Medicine2010 Mar 8;170(5):490-3 Bilsen J, Deliens L et al. Medical end-of-life practices under the euthanasia law in Belgium. New Engl J Med. 2009 sep; 361(11):1119-21 Chambaere K, Deliens L et al. A post-mortem survey on end-of-life decisions using a representative sample of death certificates inFlanders, Belgium: research protocol. BMC Public Health2008 Aug;8:299

(15)

Research method • R epresentative sample of official Flemish death certificates in 1998 and 2007 • Q uestionnaire sent to physicians • A nonymity guaranteed • 6927 cases in 2007 (12% of all deaths) • R esponse rate 58% • M ethod and questionnaire identical to past study in 1998 (response 48%)

e Research Group

(16)

1998 N=1,925 2007 N=3,623 33.3 31.9 27.4 20.3 39.3 47.8 4.4 3.8 E uthanasia 1.1 1.9 P hysician-assisted suicide 0.12 0.07 Life-ending without request 3.2 1.8 18.4 26.7 16.4 17.4 8.2* 14.5

Bilsen J, Deliens L et al. Medical end-of-life practices under the euthanasia law in Belgium. New Engl J Med. 2009 sep; 361(11):1119-21

(17)

Euthanasia cases (%) 1998 2007 Male 1.0 2.4 Female 1.5 1.5 1-64 years 2.4 4.2 65-79 years 1.0 2.6 80+ years 0.9 0.8 Cancer 2.1 5.7 Non-cancer 0.9 0.5 At home 2.6 4.2 In hospital 1.0 1.7 In care home 0.6 0.3

e Research Group Bilsen J, Deliens L et al. Medical end-of-life practices under the euthanasia law in Belgium. New Engl J Med. 2009 sep; 361(11):1119-21

(18)

Life-ending without request (%) 1998 2007 Male 3.4 1.7 Female 3.0 1.9 1-64 years 4.2 0.8 65-79 years 3.8 2.2 80+ years 2.2 1.9 Cancer 5.9 2.1 Non-cancer 2.2 1.7 At home 3.6 1.4 In hospital 3.0 2.4 In care home 3.0 1.0

Bilsen J, Deliens L et al. Medical end-of-life practices under the euthanasia law in Belgium. New Engl J Med. 2009 sep; 361(11):1119-21

(19)

Euthanasia

e Research Group

Bilsen J, Deliens L et al. Medical end-of-life practices under the euthanasia law in Belgium. New Engl J Med. 2009 sep; 361(11):1119-21

(20)

Life-ending without request

Bilsen J, Deliens L et al. Medical end-of-life practices under the euthanasia law in Belgium. New Engl J Med. 2009 sep; 361(11):1119-21

(21)

Questions addressed 1.

How was the law on euthanasia implemented in Belgiu

m? 2.

How did the incidence of end-of-life decisions develope since the implementation of th

e law on euthanasia in 2002? 3.

How does medical end-of-life decision- making vary according to language community (Dutch vs French) in Belgium?

e Research Group

(22)

Dutch vs French-speaking communities in Belgium

ate 82% (Dutch) - 18% (French) • N on-explicable on the basis of population size : 60% - 4 0% • In home care : 92% - 8 %

Do the two language communities of Belgium differ in incidence and types of medical end-of-life decisions? If so, how?

(23)

OR 1.4 50 41 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Du tc h F re nc h

% patient s

Dutch-speaking and French- speaking communities End-of-life decisions with possible or certain life-shortening effect among non-sudden deaths

e Research Group

Van den Block L, Deliens L et al. Euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions: a mortality follow-back study comparing medical practice in the two cultural communities of Belgium. BMC Public Health2009 Mar 9;9:79.

(24)

15 11 0 5 10 15

20

25

30 Dut ch F re nc h

% patient s

co-intended or with the explicit intention among non-sudden deaths OR 1.4

Dutch-speaking and French- speaking communities

Van den Block L, Deliens L et al. Euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions: a mortality follow-back study comparing medical practice in the two cultural communities of Belgium. BMC Public Health2009 Mar 9;9:79.

(25)

1, 6 1, 7

29, 3 17, 6 0, 9 1 ,4

25, 1 14 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 % pa tie nts OR N S

Du tc h Fr e n ch

Dutch-speaking and French- speaking communities

Van den Block L et al. Euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions: a mortality follow-back study comparing medical practice in the two cultural communities of Belgium. BMC Public Health2009 Mar 9;9:79. e Research Group

End-of-life decisions among non-sudden deaths

(26)

9. 2

15. 1 8. 2 3. 6 5. 9 4. 6 0 5 10 15

20

25

30 Du tc h F re nc h

% p atie nts

to ta l wit h out fo o d /fl u id w ith fo o d /fl u id

deep sedation among non-sudden deaths

Dutch-speaking and French- speaking communities

Van den Block L et al. Euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions: a mortality follow-back study comparing medical practice in the two cultural communities of Belgium. BMC Public Health2009 Mar 9;9:79.

(27)

Questions addressed 1.

How was the law on euthanasia implemented in Belgiu

m? 2.

How did the incidence of end-of-life decisions develope since the implementation of th

e law on euthanasia in 2002? 3.

How does medical end-of-life decision- making vary according to language community (Dutch vs French) in Belgium?

4.

How does medical end-of-life decision- making vary according to palliative care and end-of-life care?

e Research Group

(28)

End-of-life decisions and end-of-life care T o what extent are medical end-of-life decisions part of palliative care provision? T he WHO states that “ palliative care

intends neither to hasten nor to postpone death

” E thics Taskforce of the European Association of Palliative Care states that “euthanasia is not part of the responsibility of palliative care

(29)

End-of-life decisions according to place of death

3 0

0,8

3,2 2,2 1,8 0,6

3,2

5,2 2

3,7

6

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8

9 10

% patients dying following a decision per sett

ing

p lace o f d eat h

euthanasia / PAS life-ending without expl request sedation without food/fluid Van den Block L, et al. How are euthanasia and other medical end-of-life decisions related to the care provided in the final three months of life? Brit Med J 2009 Jul;339:b2772 e Research Group

(30)

End-of-life decisions and multidisciplinary palliative care

1.41.9

9. 8

14. 1

2 0.9

6.1 2.3

0 2 4 6

8 10

12

14

16 no ye s u s e o f s p e c ia lis t m u lt id is c ip lin a ry p a llia ti v e c a re

% p ati ents wh ere d ecisi on

eut hanas ia / P A S lif e- endi ng w ithout ex pl r e ques t sedat ion w ith out food/ flui d e xp lic it lif e -e n d in g

Van den Block L, et al. How are euthanasia and other medical end-of-life decisions related to the care provided in the final three months of life? Brit Med J 2009 Jul;339:b2772

(31)

0. 2

1. 9

3. 8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 to a ( ve ry ) sm all ex tent av er aged to a ( ver y) lar ge ex te nt s p ir it u a l o r e x is te n tia l c a re

% p ati ents wh ere d ecisi

on

eut hanas ia / P A S

End-of-life decisions and spiritual/existential care

Van den Block L, et al. How are euthanasia and other medical end-of-life decisions related to the care provided in the final three months of life? Brit Med J 2009 Jul;339:b2772 e Research Group

(32)

Conclusion uthanasia most often performed in o significant changes in characteristics

Conclusions on “reported” euthanasia cases

(33)

Conclusion Conclusions on incidence “trends”

e Research Group

• E nactment of the law was followed by an increase in all types of medical end-of- life decisions, except for life ending without request • N o shift towards the use of life-e nding drugs in vulnerable patient groups • S ubstantial increase in terminal sedation

(34)

Conclusion Conclusions on Dutch-speaking vs French- speaking communities E uthanasia occurs less among French speaking people (but not significantly) T erminal sedation occurs more often among French speaking people M oreover, French speaking doctors report less often than Flemish doctors

to the Federal Control and Evaluation Committee on Euthanasia

(35)

Conclusion Conclusions concerning “palliative care”

e Research Group

• Life shortening and palliative care do not have to oppose each other ; t h ey commonly coexist • E uthanasia and other end-of-life decisions

that shorten life are NOT related to a lower use of palliative care in Belgium

• E uthanasia occurs often within the context of multidisciplinary palliative care

(36)

Acknowledgement luc. del iens@vub.a c. b e +32 2 477 47 57 www.endoflifecare.be/ZrL

End-of-life Care Research Group Brussels

Références

Documents relatifs

I t is disappointing to see Canadian Family Physician being used to perpetuate the myth that dying people request medical assistance in dying (MAID) because of inadequate

Objective To review the issues with setting goals of care for patients with advanced dementia, describe the respective roles of the physician and the patient’s family in

My hope is that whatever the decisions, discussing death as a society will help our patients find it easier to discuss end-of- life care with their loved ones and health care

Si ce document vous plait, vous pouvez partager le lien de mon site internet ou de la

CCA axis 1 based on T-RFLP data only separated the samples into two clus- ters, one containing the tailings site (S5) and the other grouping the sites along the creek (S1, COWG,

Because the CCRC method was used to merge expert opinions and statistics and CRC and DRC mech- anisms were used to instrument inference in directed evidential networks, determining

We applied two relativistic re flection models to the GRS 1739−278 data, with different assumptions: either assuming a constant emissivity index of q =3 or a self-

The physical mechanism responsible for the change in the bifurcation character is the nonlinear coupling between the transverse soft mode at the transition and the