• Aucun résultat trouvé

Experiencing trilingual Master study programs at uni.lu. Perceptions of multilingualism: a Grounded Theory

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Experiencing trilingual Master study programs at uni.lu. Perceptions of multilingualism: a Grounded Theory"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

a) Perceptions of a trilingual Master  multilingualism = courses in different languages vs. multilingual  practices within courses  emergence of language hierarchies seen as necessary vs. problematic  when combined with marginalization of languages  ideal of trilingual students and professors vs. perception of  heterogeneous linguistic repertoires (seen as enriching or disturbing) b) Multilingual teaching strategies  in heterogeneous groups resuming parts of lecture in another language   alternating between languages  ‐ comparing originals with translations ‐ discussing concepts in different languages ‐> enhancing awareness of  meaning nuances  c) Student’s strategies for coping with multilingualism  writing papers in one language mainly (time economic)  giving presentations in a weaker language to improve  while taking notes translating a lecture into L1 or taking notes in the  language of the talk  learning from misunderstandings and from corrections  creating new words in Luxembourgish (building up the academic  register of Luxembourgish in the Lux‐Master) d) Perceptions of learning the third language (as a beginner/  already advanced learner)  acquiring writing skills in Luxembourgish (only Lux‐Master)  realizing that immersion in one language is hard to achieve  learning from each other & multilingual contexts  avoiding the weak language  following lectures by clinging to key words already acquired  Trilingual Master’s program: an opportunity to • construct new linguistic and disciplinary knowledge • improve metalinguistic and multilingual capabilities (compare  knowledge in different languages) • consider subject content from different perspectives Example of student’s perception of a trilingual Master: each language  and each member of teaching staff contributes specific perspectives  linked to language & culture = European perspective (G3, X) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12

monoligual bilingual trilingual

Experiencing trilingual Master study programs at uni.lu

Perceptions of multilingualism: a Grounded Theory

Rahel Stoike-Sy

University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Contact: [email protected]

Subject

Preliminary findings

Research questions

Selection of References

Methods

University of Luxembourg: founded in 2003, officially trilingual  (French, German, English), bi‐ or trilingual BA‐Programs 26 MA‐Programs in winter term 2012/13 4 trilingual MA programs 3 x 1 x  Where and how do multilingual practices emerge in the Master?  Which perceptions of multilingualism and of a multilingual study  program are expressed by students?  How do students perceive and categorize individual language  repertoires?  Which strategies do students declare to use to cope with linguistic and  academic challenges?

• Interactional and linguistic ethnography (Dellwing & Prus 2012; Rampton et al 2004) • Constructionist Grounded Theory(Charmaz 2006; Birk & Mills 2012)

Data generation

Pilot phase: June 11- March 2012 Field phase I: Sept. - Dez 2012 Field phase II: Febr. - April 2013

Birks, Melanie & Mills, Jane (2011). Grounded Theory. A practical guide, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Breuer, Franz (2009). Reflexive Grounded-Theory. Eine Einführung für die Forschungspraxis. Wiesbaden: VS. Charmaz, Kathy (2006). Constructing grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage. Dellwing, Michael & Prus, Robert (2012). Einführung in die interaktionistische Ethnografie. Soziologie im Außendienst. Wiesbaden: VS.

Purpose

 Exploratory study  Focus on students perceptions of studying in several languages Aims:    develop an interpretive theory of how individual & institutional  multilingualism is perceived  show value of trilingual study programs for Higher Education, the        labor market and students German French English

Conclusion

German French Luxembourgish

Field phases I + II Duration

47 Course observations

with 3 audio recordings

90 h 19 questionnaires 13 interviews 14 h Participant observation Open questionnaires Interviews

open coding & memo-writing focused -> theoretical coding

developing categories -> a Grounded Theory

Références

Documents relatifs

Our research question is formulated as follows: in the French context, what perceptions do both visitors and non-visitors to museums and monuments have of free admission, and how

Hou, Cleak and Peveler [12] focused more specifically on the impact of illness representation on adherence in bipolar disorder with the Revised Illness

When we compare the organic and conventional focus groups, we realize that organic farmers value biodiversity mainly for its ethical and social value, while conventional

So the students are also asked to construct generic proofs using figurate numbers (see below) and the proof with geometric variables (see below).. In every sum of three

We observed a number of issues users experienced while they integrated smartcards into their work processes, including forgetting smartcards in readers, forgetting to use

In this work, we addressed the choice of transformed normalized expression profiles rather than raw counts for RNA-seq co-expression analysis under the framework of Gaussian mix-

Even though the survey generally revealed perceptions of question- able SCII effectiveness, more than four fifths of the students who were interviewed (87%) felt that as a result