TORQUE MEASUREMENTS IN Ni-Ag MULTILAYERS

HAL Id: jpa-00229051

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00229051

Submitted on 1 Jan 1988

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

TORQUE MEASUREMENTS IN Ni-Ag

MULTILAYERS

R. Krishnan, M. Porte, M. Tessier

To cite this version:

JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE

Colloque C8, Supplement au no 12, Tome 49, decembre 1988

TORQUE MEASUREMENTS IN Ni-Ag MULTILAYERS

R. Krishnan, M. Porte and M. Tessier

Laboratoire de Magnitisme, C.N.R.S., 1 place A. Briand, 92195 Meudon Cedes, France

Abstract.

-

Torque measurements were carried out on Ni-Ag multilayers in the temperature range 6 to 300 K. From the analysis of the torque curves both magnetization (M) and anisotropy ( K , ) were obtained. The K, values thus obtained for t ~ j

>

4 nm are in good agreement with FMR data. For t ~ i

<

3 nm, a small in-plane anisotropy of the order of

1 x

lo6

erg.cm-3 is obtained at 6 K.

We had recently reported on our magnetization and FMR studies on Ni-Ag multilayers [ I ] . The es- sential results were as follows. The magnetizationM remains relatively high even for Ni sublayer thickness

( t ~ i ) of 1 nm. FMR measurements yield the effec- tive magnetization 4nM' which is equal to 4 r M

-

H A where HA is the uniaxial anisotropy. For t ~ i

>

6 nm, HA was strongly positive mainly arising from stress induced effects whereas for t ~ i

<

4 nm, HA becomes negative. This latter result was shown t o be difficult to reconcile with since it needed a change in the sign of either the stress or the magnetostriction (A)

.

It was tentatively concluded that

HA

was not present and 4nM' = 4 r M [ I ] . We since measured X and found our conclusions to be right [2]. It was hence decided to carry out torque measurements to get more insight into this problem of anisotropy and we describe our results here.

Experimental details

The Ni-Ag multilayers used in this work are the same as those in reference [ I ] and had been prepared by se- quentiel evaporation in ultra high vacuum using dual electron guns. The growth parameters are as follows: 0.8

<

t ~ i

<

8.9 and t ~ , = 5 nm. The total num- ber of bi-layers was adjusted t o give an effective Ni layer thickness of about 120 nm. Torque measurements were performed in the range 6-300 K with a home madetorque meter with a sensitivity of 0.5 dyne.cm. Torque was measured as a function of angle 8 (mea- sured from the film plane) at every 6' interval through 360'. The angle setting was better than 0.1'. Studies were made also as a function of field in the range 1 to 12.5 kOe. The torque results were analysed t o get

M

and the anisotropy

Ku,

by both the methods pro- posed by Neugebauer [3] and Niyajima et al. [4]. Let us note that the results from both these methods agree to within 20 % and we recon here the results obtained by Neugebauer method [3].

ter measurements reported by us in reference [I]. Let us discuss the imisotropy K , . The measured anisotropy (K) and the intrinsic uniaxial anisotropy K u are re- lated by the equatio? K u = K

+

2 7 ~ ~ ~ . So if K , = 0 , K = - 2 n ~ ~ , namely, the demagnetization energy, or called the form anisotropy arising from geometrical ef- fects.

Fig. 1.

-

Angular dependence of torque curves for different fields for the sample with t ~ i = 7.4 nm.

Figure 1 shows the angular dependence of the torque curves taken at different fields 1.0

<

H

<

12.5 KOe for the sample with t ~ i = 7.4 nm. Analjrsis of the field dependence of the torque (L) for 8 = 45' yields the magnetization and the anisotropy of the sample.

The results for t ~ ;

>

4 nm, are quite clear and in- terpretation is straightforward and hence will first be discussed. Figure 2 shows the t N ; dependence of K , at 290 and 6 K obtained from torque measurements. A board peak is observed neat t ~ i = 6 nm which could be explained as follows. The stress induced anisotropy

Results and discussion [ K ,

>

01 [ I ] increases at t ~ i decreases may be due to an

increase in the stress. However K u vanishes near t ~ i =

The magnetization ( M ) values obtained from torque 4 nm and changs sign for smaller Ni layer thickness as

measurements agree well with those from magnetome- explained in the following paragraph.

C8

-

1752 JOURNAL Dl3 PHYSIQUE

However, we are faced with a serious difficulty if we want to correct for the possible presence of dead lay- ers. Taking this to be between 0.5 to 1.0 atomic layer of Ni, the whole reasoning would change. It is possi- ble then to show that for an appropriate value of dead layer thickness KM z 2 x ~ ' . At present, we are un- fortunately not in a position to decide, though we are tempted to conclude rather that the surface anisotropy could be negligibly small and that M 'values, higher t h b measured, in the same trend as we proposed in our earlier work [I].

0 5 10

t,i (nm)

Fig. 2. - t ~dependence of i K, at 290 K and 6 K obtained from torque measurements. Samples with t ~

>

i4 nm.

Now let us discuss the results on anisotropy for samples with t ~ i

<

3 nm. As we had mentioned

earlier if we consider FMR data ( 4 7 r ~ ' ) along with 47rM measured with a magnetometer then an in plane anisotropy namely K,

<

0 , would result [I]. For these samples we measured the angular dependence of the torque curve for 0

< 8

<

180" and calculated the anisotropy from the maximum value of torque. Then from this measured value of anisotropy K M we ob- tained the intrinsic anisotropy Ku from the relation Ku =

K M

-

2 7 r ~ ' . For M we took the values from magnetometer measurements. Figure 3 shows the re- sults a t 290 and 6 K where

K,

is plotted as a function of inverse Ni layer thickness. It indicates that for t ~N i

4 nm, K, tends to zero. If this were to be the surface anisotropy arising from the surface Ni atoms (due to the local symmetry) [5], then its dependence on ( t ~ i ) - ' should be linear which is not the case. Also our values (a few kOe expressed as field) are much smaller than what is usually found. For instance for Ni(ll1) on Cu, Gradmann reports surface anisotropy of 40 kOe 161. The anisotropy field obtained from the relation 47rMf = 4nM

-

HA, also is in good agreement with the present torque measurements (Ku = 2 H n l ~ ) (1).

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

(+,,;I ) [nm-'1

-

Fig. 3. - Anisotropy Ku (in-plane) a s a function of 1

/

t ~ ;

at 290 and 6 K.

[I] Krishnan, R., Tessier, M., Frey, Th. and Jantz,

W., Trans. IEEE Magn. MAG-23 (1988) 3713.

[2] Zuberek, R., Szymczak, H. and Krishnan, R., ICM-88.

[3] Neugebauer, C. A., Phys.

Rev.

116 (1959) 1441. [4] Miyajima, H., Sato, K. and Mizoguchi, T., J.

Appl. Phys. 47 (1976) 4669.

[5] Neel, L., C.

R.

Acad. Sci. 237 (1953) 1468.