• Aucun résultat trouvé

Online vs. offline course evaluation revisited : testing the invariance of a course evaluation questionnaire using a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis framework

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Online vs. offline course evaluation revisited : testing the invariance of a course evaluation questionnaire using a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis framework"

Copied!
18
0
0

Texte intégral

Figure

Table 1 Cronbach ’ s α for the three scales of the course evaluation questionnaire
Fig. 1 The two baseline models

Références

Documents relatifs

For each of the seven subscales, which presented seven respective coping strategies (patient’s social involvement, positive communication, avoidance, information

obtained by models more appropriate for count data, i.e., the binomial model and the Poisson model using natural parameters.. The non-negative models are slightly worse than the

To separate the portion of anchor uplift capacity related to shaft resistance from the portion related to the bearing capacities of the helical plates, two different sets of model

AAQ: Acceptance and action questionnaire; ACT: Acceptance and commitment therapy; BDI: Beck depression inventory; BPD: Borderline personality disorder; CFA: Confirmatory

• Support for multiculturalism can vary across different life domains among minority and majority group members.. • Minority members express more positive attitudes but

Because of their simplicity, practicality, and non- intrusiveness into learning processes, subjective rating scales have been used to measure cognitive load (includ- ing different

This is followed by the NEST (preferred NESTip version) for models with increasing number of di- mensions, where the rank of the data eigenvalues among the corresponding eigenvalues

The Display factor score coefficient matrix shows the correlation between factors and the coefficients used to produce the factor scores through multiplication – this