Relationships between soil properties and
contents in trace elements in a landscape
impacted by atmospheric fallouts in Belgium
Vienna (Austria), 8th April 2013
LIÉNARD AMANDINE* & COLINET GILLES
S
TUDY
CONTEXT
Contaminated fallouts by
metallic trace elements (MTE) Cd-Cu-Pb-Zn Hosted ore
S
TUDY
AREA
-
LOCALIZATION
Belgium
S
TUDY
AREA
-
CHARACTERISTICS
Meuse valley Situation of old chimney Loyse river Forest Crop Grassland VillageImpact of landscape factors on MTE distribution in soils
Interaction between soil properties and MTE contents in soils
Factors of variation MTE mobility Fate of MTE in contaminated landscape
S
AMPLING
STRATEGY
Sampling points are distributed between 3 distinct soil types, 3 land uses and 4 wind directions (36 combinations)
1. Main soil types 2. Land use 3. Wind directions
Loamy soil with good drainage Loamy soil with poor drainage Loamy-stony soil with silexite and gravels
M
ETHODOLOGY
i) 247 topsoil (0-20cm) samples are collectedii) Chemical analyses :
- Pseudo-total (Aqua regia) and available (AA + EDTA (pH4.65))
contents in Ca-Mg-K-Fe-Al-Mn & Cd-Cu-Pb-Zn - pHwater and pHKCl
- Total Organic Carbon - N
iii) Statistical analyses :
- log transformation of all parameters excepted pH - Ancova (2 or 3 ways) with distance as covariate - Correlation
Impact of landscape factors on MTE distribution in soils
Interaction between soil properties and MTE contents in soils
Variation factors of MTE mobility Fate of MTE in contaminated landscape
D
ISTANCE
FROM
SOURCE
:
T
HE MAIN FACTOR INFLUENCINGMTE
CONTENT- Content in each MTE decreases
with distance
- P-value < 0.001 and R
2> 0.5
y = 30877x-1.248 R² = 0.5281 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 To tal cad m iu m c o n te n t (p p m )Source of contamination distance (m)
D
IRECTION
OF
DOMINANT
WINDS
:
A
SECOND FACTOR WHICH INFLUENCESMTE
CONTENT0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
South West North East
Cadmium content (ppm)
- Typical wind direction in Wallonia is South-West
toward North-East
S
OIL
TYPES
:
A
THIRD FACTOR WHICH INFLUENCES THEMTE
CONTENT- Presence of a soil type effect for Cd – Pb – Zn total content
- Loamy-stony soils with gravels contain more MTE than
loamy soils
Loamy-Stony(Gravels) Loamy(PoorDrainage) Loamy(GoodDrainage) 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5Lead total (log(ppm))
S
OIL
TYPES
:
A
THIRD FACTOR WHICH INFLUENCES THEMTE
CONTENTEffect maybe due to their position in the landscape
Loamy soil withgood drainage
Loamy soil with poor drainage
Stony-loamy soil with gravels
L
AND
USE
:
A
LAST FACTOR WHICH INFLUENCES THEMTE
CONTENTGrassland Forest Crop 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0
Zinc total (log(ppm))
a a a Grassland Forest Crop 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5
Lead total (log(ppm))
b a b
- Two different situations of MTE according to land use
- Cd and Zn total content are not impacted by land use in
opposite to Cu and Pb total content
C
ONFIRMATION
BY
PCA
ANALYSIS
0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 0.50 0.25 0.00 -0.25 -0.50 -0.75 First Component S e co n d C o m p o n e n t Distance South West East North Forest Grassland CropLoamy soil (poor drainage)
Loamy soil (good drainage)
Stony-loamy (gravels) ZnTot PbTot CuTot CdTot ZnAvail. PbAvail. CuAvail. CdAvail. Principal Component Analysis (TS- LU - WD - Distance - MTE)
Impact of landscape factors on MTE distribution in soils
Interaction between soil properties and MTE contents in soils
Variation factors of MTE mobility Fate of MTE in contaminated landscape
R
ELATION
BETWEEN
SOIL
PROPERTIES
AND
LANDSCAPE
FACTORS
0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 First Component S e co n d C o m p o n e n t Distance South West East North Forest Grassland Crop Loamy (PD) Loamy (GD) Loamy-stony MnTot AlTot FeTot KTot MgTot CaTot MnAvail. PAvail AlAvail. FeAvail. KAvail. MgAvail. CaAvail. N COT pHKCl pHEau
Principal Component Analysis (TS - LU - WD - Distance - Soil parameters)
- No influence of soil type and distance
R
ELATION
BETWEEN
P
H
KCL- COT
AND
LANDSCAPE
FACTORS
- Distance and wind directions factors
don’t affect pHKCl and COT values in soils
- Soil type and land use influence pH and COT values in soils
Grassland Forest Crop 8 7 6 5 4 3 pHKCl a c b
Comparison of MTE and pH
KCl– COT
Distance Wind
direction Soil type Land use MTE
Yes Yes Yes
(Cd-Pb-Zn)
Yes (Cu–Pb)
pHKCl No No Yes Yes
Impact of landscape factors on MTE distribution in soils
Interaction between soil properties and MTE contents in soils
Variation factors of MTE mobility
Fate of MTE in contaminated landscape
R
ELATION
BETWEEN
MTE
AVAILABLE
/
TOTAL
RATIO
AND
S
OIL
TYPE
– L
AND
USE
FACTORS
- Cd ratio is not influenced by the two factors
- Cu -Pb and Zn ratio are different according to land use ratio on forest is always highest
- Zn ratio is modified by soil type loamy-stony soil contains a high proportion of Zn available content
In forest, the fraction of potentially mobile Cu – Pb and Zn are more higher as Zn in loamy-stony soil Grassland Forest Crop 0.65 0.60 0.55 0.50 0.45 0.40 M e a n ( lo g (p p m )) Pb available/total Loamy-Stony(Gravels) Loamy(PoorDrainage) Loamy(GoodDrainage) 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 M e a n ( lo g (p p m )) Zn available/total
Impact of landscape factors on MTE distribution in soils
Interaction between soil properties and MTE contents in soils
Factors of variation MTE mobility Fate of MTE in contaminated landscape
C
ONCLUSION
-Important impacts for distance and wind directions
- Soil and land use are
also significant - Classical relations
- pH and COT variability is different than MTE
Soil type and land use impact MTE mobility
R
ELATION
BETWEEN
Z
N
/P
B
AND
Z
N
/C
D
R² = 0.7257 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 Pb To t co n te n t (l o g(p p m ))Zn Tot content (log(ppm))
Relation between Zn Tot and Pb Tot
R² = 0.8448 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 Cd To t co n te n t (l o g(p p m ))
Zn Tot content (log(ppm))
Relation between Zn Tot and Cd Tot
-Contaminants contents are strongly correlated one with the other.
- It thus seems that they have the same signature in term of landscape dispersion