• Aucun résultat trouvé

Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A Duration-Based Approach

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A Duration-Based Approach"

Copied!
29
0
0

Texte intégral

Figure

Table 1: Empirical Power in Independence Tests: Historical Simulation with T e = 500
Table 2: Empirical Power in Independence Tests: Historical Simulation with T e = 250

Références

Documents relatifs

In fact, a model that does not satisfy the independence property can lead to clusterings of margin exceedances even if it has the correct average number of violations.. (7) This

In addition, the existing tests can be used to identify relevant pieces of model executions that make it possible to reach a given state in the property automaton, helping

a backtesting sample size of 250, the LR independence tests have an e¤ec- tive power that ranges from 4.6% (continuous Weibull test) to 7.3% (discrete Weibull test) for a

‘ Density Forecast Evaluation’ approach to the assessment of the tail of return distribution only, we suggest adapting a test of the ‘ Event Probability Forecast

13 conditional coverage tests are used, namely 7 dynamic binary specifications DB, 6 DQ tests (Engle and Manganelli, 2004) including several lags of the violations variable and VaR,

Gwenaël PIGANEAU, Directeur de recherche, CNRS Adam EYRE-WALKER, Professor, University of Sussex Carole SMADJA, Chargée de recherche, CNRS Laurent DURET, Directeur de recherche,

This dissimilarity measure is used in conjunction with the McDiarmid Theorem within the a contrario approach in order to design a robust Variable Size Block Matching (VSBM)

On the contrary, the backtests based on bootstrap critical values display empirical sizes that are close to the nominal size of 5% for all reported sample sizes and risk levels..