• Aucun résultat trouvé

Affine bundles are affine spaces

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Affine bundles are affine spaces"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Affine bundles are affine spaces

Thomas Leuther

University of Liege

Abstract

We show that the category of affine bundles over a smooth manifold M is equivalent to the category of affine spaces modeled on locally free C∞(M)-modules.

1. Differential Calculus in the language of Commutative Algebra

Differential Calculus on smooth manifolds (Classical Physics) can be developed in the language of commutative algebra (see [1]).

Algebraic translation allows to define in an elegant and powerful way Differential Calculus on more “exotic” spaces (manifolds with boundaries, etc.). In practice, Differential Calculus is embedded into Commutative algebra according to the following dictionary :

Geometry :

 smooth manifold M

smooth map f : M → M0  vector bundle η : Eη → M

morphism of vector bundles η → η0 

affine bundle π : Zπ → M modeled on η : Eη → M

morphism of affine bundles π → π0

:

Algebra :  R-algebra C∞(M) R-homomorphism f ∗ : C∞(M0) → C∞(M), g 7→ g ◦ f  C∞(M)-module of sections Γ(η) C∞(M)-linear map Γ(η) → Γ(η0)  ??? ???

2. Affine bundles over vector bundles

Definition 1

An affine bundle modeled on a vector η : Eη → M is a fibered manifold π : Zπ → M that looks locally like the product of M and an affine space. More precisely :

I there is an affine space Aπ modeled on the typical fiber Vη ;

I for every x ∈ M, πx := π−1(x ) is an affine space modeled on ηx ; I the base M is covered by fiberwise affine diffeomorphisms

π−1(U) −→ U × A∼ π.

An M-morphism of affine bundles π → π0 is a fiberwise affine smooth map α : Zπ → Zπ0, i.e. for any x ∈ M, f |π

x : πx → π

0

x is an affine map.

Remark The choice of a global section σ0 ∈ Γ(π) determines an isomorphism of affine bundles π ' η, namely

Tσ0 : Zπ → Eη

z 7→ z − σ0(x ) if z ∈ πx

Thus, any affine bundle is isomorphic to the vector bundle on which it is modeled, but not canonically !

3. Affine spaces over modules

Definition 2

Let R be a commutative ring and P be an R-module. An R-affine space

modeled on P is a set A together with a free and transitive group action t : P × A → A

(p, a) 7→ tp(a).

We often write a + p instead of tp(a) and a − a0 for the unique p “moving” a0 to a.

A map T : A → A0 is called an R-affine map if there is an R-linear map ~

T : P → P0 such that

T (a + p) = T (a) + ~T (p)

Remark The choice of an element a0 ∈ A determines an R-affine isomorphism A ' P, namely

Ta0 : A → P

a 7→ a − a0.

Thus, any R-affine space is isomorphic to the module on which it is modeled, but not canonically !

4. Affine bundles are torsors

Affine bundles are “affine spaces over vector bundles” :

Proposition 1

A fibered manifold π : Zπ → M is an affine bundle modeled on η iff there exists a fibered smooth map

t : Eη ×

M

Zπ → Zπ

such that for any x ∈ M, t|ηx×πx : ηx × πx → πx makes πx an affine space modeled on ηx.

5. Vector bundles are C

(M)

-modules

The space of sections Γ(η) is a C∞(M)-module :

(s1 + s2)(x ) := s1(x ) + s2(x ) ∈ ηx, g.s(x ) := g(x )s(x ) ∈ ηx.

Moreover, any M-morphism of vector bundles β : η → η0 induces a C∞(M)-linear map Γ(β) : Γ(η) → Γ(η0), s 7→ β ◦ s

Theorem 1 (see [2])

The functor of sections Γ : VB(M) → Modlocally freeC∞(M) is an equivalence of categories.

6. Affine bundles are affine spaces

The space of sections Γ(π) is a C∞(M)-affine space modeled on Γ(η) : (σ + s)(x ) := σ(x ) + s(x ) ∈ πx

Moreover, any M-morphism of affine bundles α : π → π0 induces a C∞(M)-affine map

Γ(α) : Γ(π) → Γ(π0), σ 7→ α ◦ σ

Theorem 2

The functor of sections Γ : AB(M) → AS(Modlocally freeC∞(M)) is an equivalence of categories.

Idea of the proof

Both concepts are torsors under group objects in equivalent categories (cf. Definition 2, Theorem 1 and Proposition 2).

[1] Jet Nestruev. Smooth manifolds and observables, volume 220 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003.

[2] D. Husemöller, M. Joachim, B. Jurˇco, and M. Schottenloher. Basic bundle theory and K -cohomology invariants, volume 726 of Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, Berlin, 2008.

Local coordinates of the author :

Institut de Mathématiques, Université de Liège, Thomas.Leuther@ulg.ac.be

Sart-Tilman, Bât. B37, Parking P32 www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~leuther

Références

Documents relatifs

Finite Element Method, ANSYS, COSMOS/M, rods, beam, plane stress, plane strain, beam structure, axisymmetric, plate,

We prove a dichotomy for Manneville-Pomeau maps f : [0, 1] → [0, 1]: given any point ζ ∈ [0, 1], either the Rare Events Point Processes (REPP), counting the number of exceedances,

As another application, we answer in § 3.3 a question raised by Freudenburg [8] concerning the structure of locally nilpotent derivations with a slice on polynomial rings in

• The Working Group reported on a range of new findings regarding salmon assessment and management: including an update of salmon populations in Germany, smolt marine

In contrast to the q-deformed vector space, where the ring of differential operators is unique up to an isomorphism, the general ring of h-deformed differential operators Diff h,σ

The tent space method can be used in different contexts, for instance to obtain an atomic decomposition for Hardy spaces defined by maximal functions involving second order

The second chapter begins with the definition of the affine flag manifold, which is an ind-scheme of ind-finite type, and with the definition of the Kashiwara affine flag

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des