• Aucun résultat trouvé

Search for the Higgs boson decays H→ee and H→eμ In Collisions at with the ATLAS detector

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Search for the Higgs boson decays H→ee and H→eμ In Collisions at with the ATLAS detector"

Copied!
20
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Article

Reference

Search for the Higgs boson decays H→ee and H→eμ In Collisions at with the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration

ADORNI BRACCESI CHIASSI, Sofia (Collab.), et al.

Abstract

Searches for the Higgs boson decays H→ee and H→eμ are performed using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139fb−1 collected with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV at the LHC. No significant signals are observed, in agreement with the Standard Model expectation. For a Higgs boson mass of 125 GeV, the observed (expected) upper limit at the 95% confidence level on the branching fraction B(H→ee) is 3.6×10−4 (3.5×10−4) and on B(H→eμ) is 6.2×10−5 (5.9×10−5). These results represent improvements by factors of about five and six on the previous best limits on B(H→ee) and B(H→eμ) respectively.

ATLAS Collaboration, ADORNI BRACCESI CHIASSI, Sofia (Collab.), et al . Search for the Higgs boson decays H→ee and H→eμ In Collisions at with the ATLAS detector. Physics Letters. B , 2020, vol. 801, p. 135148

DOI : 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135148

Available at:

http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:131174

Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version.

1 / 1

(2)

Contents lists available atScienceDirect

Physics Letters B

www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb

Search for the Higgs boson decays Hee and He μ in pp collisions at √

s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

.TheATLASCollaboration

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t ra c t

Articlehistory:

Received24September2019

Receivedinrevisedform20November2019 Accepted6December2019

Availableonline10December2019 Editor: M.Doser

SearchesfortheHiggsbosondecaysHeeandHeμareperformedusingdatacorrespondingtoan integratedluminosityof139 fb1collectedwiththeATLASdetectorinppcollisionsat

s=13 TeVat theLHC. Nosignificantsignalsareobserved,inagreementwiththeStandardModelexpectation.Fora Higgsbosonmassof125 GeV,theobserved(expected)upperlimitatthe95%confidencelevelonthe branchingfractionB(Hee)is3.6×104(3.5×104)andonB(Heμ)is6.2×105(5.9×105).

Theseresults representimprovements byfactors ofaboutfive andsix onthepreviousbestlimits on B(Hee)andB(Heμ)respectively.

©2019TheAuthor.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).FundedbySCOAP3.

1. Introduction

Thediscoveryofaheavy scalarparticlebyATLAS andCMS [1, 2] providedexperimentalconfirmationoftheEnglert–Brout–Higgs mechanism [3–8], which spontaneously breaks electroweak (EW) gaugesymmetryandgeneratesmasstermsfortheW andZ gauge bosons.Inthe StandardModel(SM) thefermionmassesaregen- erated via Yukawa interactions. The Yukawa couplings to third- generationfermions were determined by measurements ofHiggs boson production and decays [9–15], andfound to be in agree- mentwiththeexpectationsoftheSM.However,thereiscurrently noevidenceofHiggsbosondecaysintofirst- orsecond-generation quarksorleptons.

ThisLetter presentsthe first ATLAS searches for Hee and forthelepton-flavour-violating decay Heμ usingthe fullRun 2datasetofproton–proton(pp)collisions atacentre-of-mass en- ergyof

s=13 TeV, withan integratedluminosity of 139 fb1. TheCMSCollaborationhaspreviouslyperformedsearchesforH ee[16] andHeμ[17] usingLHCRun1ppdataat

s=8 TeV correspondingtoanintegratedluminosityof19.7 fb1.

In the SM the H ee branching fraction is given by GFmHm2e/(4

2πH)5×109,wheremH andH aretheHiggs massandwidthrespectively.This branchingfractionis farbelow the sensitivity of the LHC experiments. Contributions from dia- gramsthat do not depend on the electron Yukawa coupling Yee and are non-resonant e.g. Heeγ, are expected to be signifi- cantlylarger,althoughstillmuchsmallerthanpresentsensitivity.

E-mailaddress:atlas.publications@cern.ch.

The LHCoffers thebest constrainton Yee [18], whichmaybe larger than predicted by the SM. The SM forbids lepton-flavour- number-violating Higgs boson decays. There are strong indirect constraintsontheoff-diagonalYeμcoupling,thestrongestderived fromlimitsonthebranchingfractionof μ eγ andtheelectric dipole momentoftheelectron [19].However, theseindirectcon- straintsassumeSMvaluesfortheasyetunmeasuredYeeandYμμ Yukawa couplings. Searchingfor Heμ allows Yeμ to be con- straineddirectly.

BothanalysespresentedinthisLettercloselyfollowthesearch forthe SM Higgsboson decay Hμμ [20]. Thesignal is sepa- ratedfromthebackgroundprimarilybyidentifyinganarrowpeak in the distribution of theinvariant mass ofthe two leptons m corresponding to the mass of the Higgs boson of 125 GeV [21].

The backgroundinthe ee search isdominatedby Drell–Yan(DY) Z/γ production,withsmallercontributions fromtop-quarkpair (tt)¯ anddibosonproduction(Z Z,W ZandW W).Intheeμsearch, a much smalleryield ofSM background events is expected. The DYbackgroundonlycontributesthroughdecaysof Z/γτ τ

eντνeμντνμ.Thustheproductionoftopquarks,dibosons(mainly through W W eνeμνμ), W+jetsand multijetevents,withjets misidentifiedasleptons,aremoreimportantthanintheeesearch.

2. ATLASdetector

The ATLAS experiment [22–24] at the LHC is a multipurpose particle detector with a forward–backward symmetric cylindrical geometryandanear4π coverageinsolidangle.1 Itconsistsofan

1 ATLASuses aright-handedcoordinatesystemwith itsoriginat thenominal interactionpoint(IP)inthecentreofthedetectorandthez-axisalongthebeam

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135148

0370-2693/©2019TheAuthor.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Fundedby SCOAP3.

(3)

innertrackingdetector(ID)surroundedbyathinsuperconducting solenoidprovidinga2 Taxialmagneticfield,electromagneticand hadroncalorimeters,andamuonspectrometer.

TheIDcoversthepseudorapidityrange|η|<2.5.Itconsistsof silicon pixel, silicon microstrip, and transition radiation tracking detectors. Lead/liquid-argon (LAr) sampling calorimeters provide electromagnetic (EM) energy measurements with high granular- ity.Asteel/scintillator-tilecalorimeterinthecentral pseudorapid- ityrange|η|<1.7 measurestheenergies ofhadrons.The endcap and forward regions are instrumented withLAr calorimeters for boththe EMandhadronicenergymeasurements up to |η|=4.9.

The muon spectrometer (MS) surrounds the calorimeters up to

|η|=2.7 and is based on three large air-core toroidal supercon- ducting magnets with eight coils each. The field integral of the toroidsrangesbetween2.0and6.0 T macrossmostofthedetec- tor.Themuonspectrometerincludesasystemofprecisiontracking chambersandfastdetectorsfortriggering.

Atwo-leveltriggersystemisusedtoselectevents [25].Itcon- sists of a first-level trigger implemented in hardware and using a subset of the detectorinformation to reduce theevent rateto 100 kHz. This is followed by a software-based high-level trigger thatemploysalgorithms similartothoseusedofflineandreduces therateofacceptedeventsto1 kHz.

3. Simulatedeventsamples

Samples of simulated signal events with a Higgs boson mass of mH =125 GeV were generated as described below and pro- cessed through the full ATLAS detectorsimulation [26] based on GEANT4 [27]. Higgs boson production via the gluon–gluon fu- sion (ggF) process was simulated using the POWHEG NNLOPS program [28–35] with the PDF4LHC15 set of parton distribution functions(PDFs) [36]. TheHiggsboson rapidity inthesimulation was reweighted to achieve next-to-next-to-leading-order (NNLO) accuracy in QCD [37]. Higgs boson production via vector-boson fusion(VBF)andwithanassociatedvectorboson(V H)weregen- erated atnext-to-leading-order (NLO) accuracy inQCD usingthe POWHEG-BOXprogram [38–40].The Z H sampleswere simulated forprocesseswithquark–quarkinitialstates,andthesmallcontri- butionfromgluon–gluoninitialstatesisaccountedforinthenor- malisationofthe Z H cross section.The parton-level eventswere processed with PYTHIA8 [41] for the decay of the Higgs bosons into theee oreμ final states andto simulateparton showering, hadronisation and the underlying event, using the AZNLO set of tuned parameters [42]. All samples were normalised to state-of- the-art predictions using higher-order QCD and electroweak cor- rections [43–66].Theeffectsarisingfrommultipleppcollisions in thesameorneighbouringbunchcrossings(pile-up)wereincluded inthesimulationbyoverlayinginelastic ppinteractions generated withPYTHIA8usingtheNNPDF2.3LOsetofPDFs [67] andtheA3 set of tuned parameters [68]. Events were reweighted such that thedistribution ofthe average numberofinteractions per bunch crossingmatchesthatobservedindata.Simulatedeventswerecor- rectedtoreflecttheleptonenergyscaleandresolution,andtrigger, reconstruction,identificationandisolationefficienciesmeasuredin data.

Toevaluatetheuncertaintyinthebackgroundmodellinginthe eechannel,adedicatedfastsimulationforthedominantDY back- groundwas used to produce a sample of 109 events, equivalent

pipe.Thex-axispointsfromtheIPtothecentreoftheLHCring,andthe y-axis pointsupwards.Cylindricalcoordinates(r,φ)areusedinthetransverseplane,φ beingtheazimuthalanglearoundthez-axis.Thepseudorapidityisdefinedinterms ofthepolarangleθasη= −ln tan(θ/2).Angulardistanceismeasuredinunitsof R

(η)2+(φ)2.

to 40 times the integratedluminosity ofthe data. For thissam- ple, Z/γ+(0,1)-jet events were generated inclusively at NLO accuracyusingPOWHEG-BOX [69] withtheCT10PDFset [70].Ad- ditional Z/γ+2-jeteventsweregeneratedwithALPGEN [71] at leading-orderaccuracywiththeCTEQ6L1PDFset [72].Theevents were interfaced to PHOTOS [73] to simulate QED final-state ra- diation. The effects ofpile-up and a fastparameterisation of the responseofthedetectortoelectronsandjets,usingsimplesmear- ingfunctions,wasthenappliedtothegeneratedevents.

4. Eventselection

Events are recorded using triggers that require either an iso- latedelectronoranisolatedmuonaboveatransversemomentum (pT)thresholdof26 GeV [25,74].Electronsarereconstructedinthe range|η|<2.47 from clustersofenergydepositsinthecalorime- ter matched to a track in the ID [75]. Muons are reconstructed in therange |η|<2.5 by combiningtracks inthe ID eitherwith tracksintheMSor,for|η|<0.1,withcalorimeterenergydeposits consistentwithamuon [76].Theelectronsandmuonsarerequired tobeassociatedwiththeprimaryppcollisionvertex,whichisde- fined asthecollisionvertexwithlargestsumofp2T oftracks,and to beisolated fromother tracks [75,76]. Eacheventmustcontain eitherexactlytwo electrons oran electronandamuon. Onelep- tonmusthave pT>27 GeV toensureahightriggerefficiencyand theothermustbeofoppositechargeandhavepT>15 GeV.

Requirementsonjetsareusedinthisanalysistosuppressback- groundanddefinea categorythathasa highsensitivitytosignal produced intheVBFproductionmode.Jetsintherange|η|<4.5 and pT>30 GeV are reconstructed from energy deposits in the calorimeter [77],usingtheanti-kt algorithm [78,79] witharadius parameterof0.4.Trackinginformationiscombinedusingamulti- variatelikelihoodtosuppressedjetsfrompile-upinteractions [80].

Backgrounds with top quarks are suppressed by identifying b-hadronsandneutrinosinthefinal state.Jetsintherange|η|<

2.5 containingb-hadronsareidentifiedasb-jetsusingamultivari- atealgorithmthatusescalorimeterandtrackinginformation [81].

Eventsarerejectedifthereisatleastoneidentifiedb-jet.Different workingpoints are usedforthe ee andeμchannels becausethe latterhasalargertop-quarkbackground.Forthe ee(eμ) channel theb-jet identificationefficiencyisabout60%(85%)witharejec- tionfactorofabout1200(25)forlight-flavourjets [82].Neutrinos produced insemileptonic top-quark decays escape detectionand lead tomissingtransversemomentum EmissT ,reconstructedasthe magnitudeofthevectorsumofthetransversemomentaofallcal- ibrated leptons andjetsand additionalID tracks associated with the primary vertex(soft term) [83].Backgrounds with significant EmissT aresuppressedby requiring EmissT /

HT<3.5(1.75)GeV1/2 fortheee(eμ)channel,where HTisthescalarsumofthetrans- versemomentaofleptonsandjetsand

HT isproportionaltothe EmissT resolution.

Backgroundfromtheprocess Hγ γ,wherethephotonsare misreconstuctedaselectrons,isstudiedwithsimulatedeventsand found to contribute about0.07% inthe ee channel fora Hee branching fractionat theexpectedlimit. It isthereforeneglected intherestoftheanalysis.

Thesearchisperformedintherangeofdileptoninvariantmass 110<m<160 GeV, which allows the background to be de- termined withanalyticfunctionsconstrainedby thesidebands to eithersideofthepotentialsignal.

The eventsample passing thebasicleptonselection isdivided into seven (eight) categories for the ee (eμ) channel that differ intheirexpectedsignal-to-backgroundratios,toimprovetheover- all sensitivityof the search. Thesecategories are based on those

(4)

usedinRef. [20], andarefoundtoprovidegoodsensitivityinthe presentanalyses.

First,a low-pT lepton category ‘Low pT is definedin the eμ

channel with events in which the subleading lepton has pT<

27 GeV.Thisregionhasasignificantfractionofeventsinwhichei- therreconstructedleptonisofnon-promptoriginorisamisidenti- fiedphotonorhadron,hereaftercalledafakelepton.Theseevents arenotseparatedoutintheeechannelbecausetherelativecontri- butionfromfakeleptonsissmaller.Acategoryenriched inevents fromVBF productionisdefinedfromtheremainingeventsbyse- lectingthosecontainingtwojetswithpseudorapiditiesofopposite signs,apseudorapidityseparation|ηj j|>3 andadijetinvariant massmj j>500 GeV.

Events that fail to meet the criteria ofthe ‘Low pT and VBF categoriesareclassifiedas‘Central’ifthepseudorapiditiesofboth leptons are |η|<1 or as ‘Non-central’ otherwise. For each of thesetwo categories, threeranges inthedileptontransversemo- mentum pT are considered: ‘Low pT (pT 15 GeV),‘Mid pT (15<pT 50 GeV),and ‘High pT (pT >50 GeV). These cate- gories exploit differences in the dilepton mass resolution, which is better for more central leptons, as well as differences in the expected signal-to-background ratio between the signal and the backgroundprocesses asfunction ofdilepton transverse momen- tumandrapidity.

5. Signalandbackgroundparameterisation

Analyticfunctionsareusedtodescribethemdistributionsfor boththesignalandthebackground.The HeeandHeμsig- nals consideredare narrow resonances witha massanda width set to the SM values of mH =125 GeV and 4.1MeV respec- tively.Theobservedsignalshapesarethusdeterminedbydetector resolution effects and are parameterised as a sum of a Crystal Ballfunction (FCB) [84] and a Gaussian function (FGS) following Ref. [20]:

PS(m) = fCB×FCB(m|mCBCB,α,n) +(1fCB)×FGS

m|mGSGSS.

Theparameters αandndefinethepower-lawtailoftheFCBdistri- bution,whilemCB,mGS, σCB,and σGSS denotethe FCB meanvalue, FGS meanvalue, FCB width,and FGS widthrespectively.Therela- tivenormalisationbetweenthetermsisgovernedbytheparame- ter fCB.Theseparameters aredeterminedbyfittingthesimulated signalm distributionineachcategory.Intheee(eμ)channelthe signalmassresolutionvariesbetweenabout2.0GeV (2.3GeV) for thecentraland2.9GeV (3.0GeV)forthenon-centralcategories.

The background parameterisation for the ee channel follows Ref. [20] asthebackgroundisverysimilar.Themeedistributionsin eachcategory aredescribed by asumofaBreit–Wigner function (FBW)convolvedwitha FGS,andan exponentialfunction divided byacubicfunction:

PB(mee) = f× [FBW(mee|mBW,BW)FGS(mee|σGSB)]

+(1f)×CeA·mee/m3ee,

where f representsthefractionofthe FBW componentwheneach individualcomponent isnormalisedto unityand C isa normali- sationcoefficient.The σGSB parameterineach category isfixed to thecorrespondingaveragemresolutionasdeterminedfromsim- ulated signal events. For all the categories, the FBW parameters are fixed tomBW=91.2 GeV and BW=2.49 GeV [85]. The pa-

rameters f and A andthe overall normalisation are left free to bedeterminedinthefitanduncorrelatedbetweendifferentcate- gories.

ABernstein polynomial ofdegreetwo isused toparameterise the meμ distributionof the backgroundineach of the eightcat- egories in the eμ channel, with parameters uncorrelated across categories. The choice of background function is validated by an F-testconsideringBernstein polynomialsoffirst,second andthird degree.

The signal yield, which is allowed to be positive ornegative, is constrained using separate binned maximum-likelihood fits to theobservedm distributionsintherange110<m<160 GeV inthetwo channels.Thefits areperformedusingthesumofthe signalandbackgroundmodels(‘S+B model’)andareperformed simultaneouslyinallthecategories.Inadditiontothebackground- modelparametersdescribedearlier,thebackgroundnormalisation ineach categoryandthebranchingfractionofthesignal arefree parametersinthefit.

6. Systematicuncertainties

Thesignalexpectationissubjecttoexperimental andtheoreti- caluncertainties,whicharecorrelatedacrossthecategories.

The uncertainty in the combined2015–2018 integratedlumi- nosity is 1.7% [86], obtained usingthe LUCID-2detector [87] for the primary luminosity measurements. Other sources of experi- mentaluncertaintyincludethe electronandmuontrigger, recon- struction,identificationandisolationefficiencies [75,76], theb-jet identification efficiency [81], the pile-up modelling [88], the de- termination ofthe EmissT soft term [83], andthe jet energy scale andresolution [89].Theuncertainties intheelectronenergyscale andresolution [75] andinthemuonmomentumscaleandresolu- tion [76] affecttheshape ofthesignal distributionaswell asthe signalacceptance.

Thetotalexperimentaluncertaintyinthepredictedsignalyield in each ggF category is between 2% and 3% for the ee channel and between4% and6% forthe eμ channel. It is dominated by the luminosity, EmissT soft term and pile-up effects, and the last twocontributions arelargerintheeμ analysisduetothetighter EmissT /

HT requirement. TheexperimentaluncertaintyintheVBF category isbetween7% and15% fortheee channel andbetween 6% and22% fortheeμ channel,dueto largercontributions from thejetenergyscaleandresolution.

Thetheoreticaluncertainties intheproductioncrosssection of the Higgs boson are taken from Ref. [43]. In addition, theoreti- calmodellinguncertaintiesaffectingtheacceptanceforthesignals are calculated separately for the ggF and VBF Higgs boson pro- ductionprocessesineachanalysiscategory.Theuncertaintyinthe acceptanceforthe V Hprocessisneglected.Theeffectsofmissing higher-order termsin the perturbative QCD calculationsare esti- matedbyvaryingtherenormalisationandfactorisationscales.For theggF processtheuncertainties are approximatedastwocorre- latedsources that rangefromaround 1% to11% forthe different analysiscategoriesinboth channels. FortheVBF process theun- certaintiesintheacceptanceduetotheQCDscalesarefoundtobe small.Theeffectsofuncertainties inthepartondistributionfunc- tionsandthevalueof αSareestimatedusingthePDF4LHC15rec- ommendations [36] andfoundtobeverysmall.Theuncertaintyin themodellingofthepartonshower,underlyingevent,andhadro- nisation isassessedbycomparingthe acceptanceofsignal events showeredbyPYTHIAwiththatofeventsshoweredbyHERWIG [90, 91].Thetotalvariationsduetotheseuncertaintiesrangefromless than 1%to 11% fortheggF signalprocess andfrom1% to8% for theVBFsignalprocessdependingontheanalysiscategory.

Références

Documents relatifs

60 ( a ) Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei; ( b ) Institute of

60 (a) Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei; (b) Institute of Frontier

60 Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics (a) , University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei; Institute of Frontier

60 ( a ) Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China; ( b ) Institute

Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei; (b) Institute of Frontier

60 ( a ) Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China; ( b ) Institute

60 Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics (a) , University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei; Institute of Frontier

60 Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics (a) , University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei; Institute of Frontier