HAL Id: jpa-00218045
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00218045
Submitted on 1 Jan 1978
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
RECENT EXPERIMENTS IN SUPERFLUID 3He
D. Osheroff
To cite this version:
D. Osheroff. RECENT EXPERIMENTS IN SUPERFLUID 3He. Journal de Physique Colloques,
1978, 39 (C6), pp.C6-1270-C6-1277. �10.1051/jphyscol:19786556�. �jpa-00218045�
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
Colloque C6, suppl6ment au
no8, Tome 39, aotit 1978, page C6-1270
RECENT EXPERIMENTS I N S U P E R F L U I D 3 ~ e
D.D. Osherof f
BeZ
Z
Laboratories, Murray H i ZZ ,
New Jersey, U.S. A .RdsumC.- On p r d s e n t e u n e r e v u e du t r a v a i l e x p 6 r i m e n t a l r d c e n t d a n s 1 1 ~ H e s u p e r f l u i d e c o n c e r n a n t l a r e s o n a n c e m a g n s t i q u e , l e s e f f e t s d ' o r i e n t a t i o n d e s d i s t o r s i o n s d a n s l e s n u a g e s G l e c t r o n i q u e s d e s atomes d V 3 H e q u i c o m p o r t e n t l e s p a i r e s d e Cooper, e t l e s e x p d r i e n c e s P h a u t e r d s o l u t i o n s u r p e n d u l e d e t o r s i o n , y c o m p r i s l e s m e s u r e s d e ps/p e t d e
n.
Un e f f o r t e s t f a i t pour d i s c u t e r d e q u e l l e f a p n l e s e x p d r i e n c e s d i v e r s e s s e r a p p o r t e n t l ' u n e 1 l ' a u t r e e t P n o t r e c o n n a i s s a n c e d e l r 3 H e s u p e r f l u i d e . A b s t r a c t . - A r e v i e w i s p r e s e n t e d o f r e c e n t e x p e r i m e n t a l work i n s u p e r f l u i d 3 ~ e i n v o l v i n g m a g n e t i c r e s o n a n c e , t h e o r i e n t i n g e f f e c t s o f d i s t o r t i o n s i n t h e e l e c t r o n c l o u d s of t h e 3 ~ e atoms c o m p r i s i n g t h e Cooper p a i r s , and t h e h i g h r e s o l u t i o n t o r s i o n a l pendulum e x p e r i m e n t s i n c l u d i n g measurements o f p s / p and 0 . An e f f o r t i s made t o d i s c u s s v a r i o u s e x p e r i m e n t s a s t h e y r e l a t e t o e a c h o t h e r and t o our u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f s u p e r f l u i d 3 ~ e .INTRODUCTION.- I n t h i s a r t i c l e I w i l l d i s c u s s r e c e n t t h e s e o b s e r v a t i o n s had r e g a r d i n g t h e s u p e r f l u i d s e x p e r i m e n t s i n j u s t t h r e e a r e a s o f s t u d y , t r y i n g t o t h e m s e l v e s . S i n c e t h a t t i m e , s t u d i e s of n u c l e a r ma- r e l a t e them t o e a c h o t h e r and t o t h e f u l l e r u n d e r s - g n e t i c phenomena have c e n t e r e d around t h r e e m a j o r t a n d i n g of 3 ~ e we hope t o o b t a i n . These a r e a s a r e a r e a s : 1) A t t e m p t i n g t o r e s o l v e t h e d i s a g r e e m e n t s m a g n e t i c r e s o n a n c e , e l e c t r o n i c e f f e c t s i n v o l v i n g the which e x i s t e d when t h e B p h a s e s u s c e p t i b i l i t y was e l e c t r o n c l o u d s of t h e 3 ~ e atoms, and r e c e n t measu- measured s t a t i c a l l y and t h e n d y n a m i c a l l y . 2 ) S t u d i e s r e m e n t s of
n
and ps/p. I r e g r e t n o t b e i n g a b l e t o o f s p i n dynamics o f s p a t i a l l y non-uniform s a p l e s , a n d c o v e r more i n t h i s m a n u s c r i p t , and a p o l o g i z e t o tho- 3) S t u d i e s o f l o n g i t u d i n a l s p i n r e c o v e r y u s i n g t h e s e whose work i s n o t m e n t i o n e d . U n f o r t u n a t e l y , spa- p o w e r f u l SQUID-NMR t e c h n i q u e s . I n a d d i t i o n t o t h e s e c e i s t o o l i m i t e d , and t h e r e i s t o o much t o d i s c u s s . t h r e e m a j o r a r e a s of i n t e r e s t , e f f o r t s have c o n t i - A) N u c l e a r Magnetism.-nued t o measure l o n g i t u d i n a l r e s o n a n c e f r e q u e n c i e s a s a f u n c t i o n o f p r e s s u r e and l i n e w i d t h s a s a func- i ) I n t r o d u c t i o n . - The u n u s u a l b e h a v i o r o f t h e nu- t i o n of t e m p e r a t u r e ; and I r e f e r t h e r e a d e r t o t h e c l e a r m a g n e t i c moments i n s u p e r f l u i d 3 ~ e was one o f v e r y b e a u t i f u l work by Avenel e t a l . / 7 / a l t h o u g h I t h e e a r l i e s t and most u s e f u l p r o b e s o f t h e n a t u r e w i l l n o t c o v e r i t h e r e .
of t h e o r d e r e d p h a s e s / I / . I n t e r p r e t e d t h r o u g h t h e t h e o r e t i c a l work o f A . J . L e g g e t t / 2 / , t h e s h i f t s i n t h e m a g n e t i c r e s o n a n c e f r e q u e n c i e s o f q u a s i - u n i f o r m s a m p l e s , a s w e l l a s t h e l o n g i t u d i n a l r e s o n a n c e modes f i r s t p r e d i c t e d by L e g g e t t / 3 / , a n d combined w i t h mea- s u r e m e n t s of t h e n u c l e a r m a g n e t i c s u s c e p t i b i l i t i e s / 4 / , h a v e a l l o w e d u s t o f i n g e r p r i n t t h e m i c r o s c o p i c i d e n t i t i e s o f t h e new s t a t e s w i t h i n t h e b r o a d mani- f o l d o f L = I s u p e r f l u i d s c o n s i d e r e d . The o b s e r v a - t i o n o f a t r a n s v e r s e r e s o n a n c e f r e q u e n c y s h i f t i n t h e A1 p h a s e /S/,combined w i t h t h e t h e o r e t i c a l work by N . D . Mermin / 6 / f u r t h e r enhanced t h e l i k e l i h o o d t h a t t h e A and B p h a s e s a r e L = 1 s u p e r f l u i d s b y e l i m i n a t i n g a s a p o s s i b l e c o n t e n d e r f o r t h e A, pha- s e t h e most l i k e l y L = 3 c a n d i d a t e .
By t h e t i m e o f LT14 a c o n s i d e r a b l e amourltwas known b o t h a b o u t t h e s u p e r f l u i d s p i n d y n a m i c s , even i n t h e n o n - l i n e a r r e g i m e , and t h e i m p l i c a t i o n s t h a t
i i ) S t a t i c S u s c e p t i b i l i t i e s i n 3 ~ e ~ . - One o f t h e most u n s e t t l i n g c o n t r o v e r s i e s i n t h e f i e l d o f s u p e r - f l u i d i t y i n 3 ~ e h a s been t h e d i s a g r e e m e n t o f s t a t i c measurements o f t h e B p h a s e s u s c e p t i b i l i t y ,
xB,
S w i t h v a l u e s , X B , made u s i n g D NMR t e c h n i q u e s . G e n e r a l l y ,S ' S
s t a t i c measurements a c t u a l l y r e c o r d
xN - xB,
w h e r e a s NMR measurements r e c o r d o n l y t h e n u c l e a r s u s c e p t i - b i l i t y d i r e c t l y . Although o n e d o e s n o t e x p e c t a change i n t h e n o n - n u c l e a r m a g n e t i c s u s c e p t i b i l i t y c o n t r i b u t i o n s i n t h e B p h a s e , p r e v i o u s e x p e r i m e n t sS S D D
have c o n s i s t e n t l y found XN
- xB
= 1.5 (xN-
xB) /8/.One p o s s i b l e s o u r c e o f t h e a b o v e d i s a g r e e m e n t was l o n g b e l i e v e d t o b e t h e manner i n which t h e s t a - t i c SQUID m a g n e t o m e t e r s were c a l i b r a t e d . T o e l i m i n a - t e t h i s p o s s i b l e f a i l i n g o f t h e SQUID t e c h n i q u e , two s e p a r a t e e x p e r i m e n t s h a v e b e e n performed /9,10/ i n which t h e SQUID s y s t e m was c a l i b r a t e d by u s i n g a r e - s o n a n t r a d i o f r e q u e n c y ( r f ) p u l s e t o t i p t h e nuclea'r
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:19786556
m a g n e t i z a t i o n by a known a n g l e , u s u a l l y 180°, and o b s e r v i n g t h e change i n t h e s t a t i c m a g n e t i z a t i o n i n t h e p r o c e s s . T h i s c a l i b r a t i o n was g e n e r a l l y p e r f o r - med j u s t above T
.
Once c a l i b r a t e d , t h e SQUID s y s -tems were a b l e t o measure t h e changes i n s u s c e p t i - b i l i t y a t t h e A
2
B t r a n s i t i o n s and a s a f u n c t i o n of t e m p e r a t u r e by n o t i n g t h e changes i n m a g n e t i z a t i o n a s t h e y had measured them b e f o r e . I n work by Webb a t Argonne / 9 / , however, t h e r e c o v e r y of t h e B p h a s e m a g n e t i z a t i o n could b e o b s e r v e d f u l l y f o l l o w i n g a n r f p u l s e w h i l e i n t h e s u p e r f l u i d p h a s e , s o t h a t Webb was a b l e t o u s e h i s SQUID s y s t e m t o a c t u a l l y measure t h e dynamic s u s c e p t i b i l i t i e s a s w e l l a s t h e s t a t i c changes i n s u s c e p t i b i l i t y . T h i s e l i m i n a t e d t h e need t o a d j u s t thermometry s c a l e s i n o r d e r t o compare h i s r e s u l t s t o t h e dynamic measurements.The r e s u l t s o f t h e s e e x p e r i m e n t s a r e s t i l l a mystery however : The s t a t i c s u s c e p t i b i l i t y d i f f e r e n c e s Webb measures a r e s t i l l n e a r l y 1.5 t i m e s a s l a r g e a s t h e d i f f e r e n c e s ,
xN - xB,
D D which he m e a s u r e s d y n a m i c a l l y .I n work a t La J o l l a by S a g e r e t a l . / I 0 1 mea- s u r e m e n t s were made i n t h r e e d i f f e r e n t g e o m e t r i e s , a l t h o u g h no s i g n i f i c a n t dependence o n geometry was
S S
n o t e d . I n t h e La J o l l a work
xA - x
was r e c o r d e d a t B*the thermodynamic B -+ A t r a n s i t i o n a s a f u n c t i o n of p r e s s u r e . T h e i r r e s u l t s show t h a t t h e s t a t i c s u s c e p - t i b i l i t y d i f f e r e n c e s a r e s t i l l c o n s i s t e n t l y l a r g e r t h a n t h e dynamic d i f f e r e n c e s , b u t t h a t t h e r a t i o o f t h e two v a l u e s a p p r o a c h e s u n i t y a s t h e p r e s s u r e ap- p r o a c h e s t h e m e l t i n g p r e s s u r e . T h i s f e a t u r e was n o t c l e a r i n t h e Argonne r e s u l t s , a l t h o u g h t h o s e r e s u l t s were o b t a i n e d o n l y a t 26.5 b a r and 18 b a r p r e s s u r e s . Because t h e La J o l l a group must compare t h e i r s t a t i c v a l u e s w i t h dynamic measurements made e l s e w h e r e ,
t h e r e i s s t i l l a q u e s t i o n c o n c e r n i n g thermometry s c a l e s , and hence some room f o r f u r t h e r a d j u s t m e n t I t seems h i g h l y u n l i k e l y , however, t h a t any s u c h m a n i p u l a t i o n w i l l e l i m i n a t e t h e s t i l l s u b s t a n t i a l d i s c r e p a n c y between t h e r e s u l t s o f t h e two d i f f e r e n t
t y p e s o f measurements a t lower p r e s s u r e s , and t h e n a t u r e of t h e d i s a g r e e m e n t i s s t i l l a fundamental q u e s t i o n we do n o t u n d e r s t a n d .
i i i ) S p i n Dynamics of Non-Uniform Samples.- E f f o r t s t o u n d e r s t a n d s u p e r f l u i d 3 ~ e s p i n dynamics i n t h e p r e s e n c e of non-uniform t e x t u r e s have r e p r e s e n t e d a major new t h n s t s i n c e LT14, and one which may w e l l b e e x p e c t e d t o c o n t i n u e f o r y e a r s t o come.
The f i r s t c a r e f u l e f f o r t t o u n d e r s t a n d s t a n - d i n g s p i n waves i n a known geometry was made a t B e l l Labs. / 1 1 , 1 2 / . I n t h a t work NMR s p e c t r a o f a sample
o f 3 ~between p a r a l l e l p l a t e s was s t u d i e d when t h e e ~ s t a t i c f i e l d was i n t h e p l a n e o f t h e p l a t e s . I n s u c h a geometry t h e a n i s o t r o p y a x i s i n 3 ~ e ~ , 3, i s f i x e d a l m o s t r i g i d l y a t t h e w a l l s t o l i e n e a r l y p e r p e n d i - c u l a r t o Ho, b u t bends upward between t h e p l a t e s t o
-+
-f
l i n e n e a r l y a l o n g Hn.
-
S i n c e t h e t r a n s v e r s e f r e q u e n - cy s h i f t i n 3 ~ i s ep r o p o r t i o n a l t o n 2 t h e s q u a r e ~-L'+
of t h e component o f 6 ~ e r ~ e n d i c u l a r t o H o , a l a r g e v a r i a t i o n i n t h e l o c a l t r a n s v e r s e NMR f r e q u e n c y s h i f t r e s u l t e d . However, r a t h e r t h a n o b s e r v i n g a b r o a d NMR l i n e , t h e B e l l group i n s t e a d o b s e r v e d up
t o f o u r n e a r l y e q u a l l y spaced r e s o n a n c e p e a k s . To u n d e r s t a n d t h e above r e s u l t , c o n s i d e r t h e e q u a t i o n g o v e r n i n g t h e s p i n dynamics i n s u c h a geo- m e t r y :
E S+ = -
I R ~
f ( S )-
d z d27
- :n ( z ) }s
Here E i s t h e t r a n s v e r s e f r e q u e n c y s h i f t n o r m a l i z e d t o i t s v a l u e when n: = 1 , S i s t h e p r e c e s s i n g ma- g n e t i z a t i o n , RS i s t h e d i p o l a r h e a l i n g l e n g t h , and f ( 6 ) i s a s c a l a r of o r d e r u n i t y . T h i s e q u a t i o n r e
-
s e m b l e s a S c h r z d i n g e r e q u a t i o n w i t h E t h e e i g e n v a - l u e and n: a p o t e n t i a l e n e r g y term. I t i s assumed t h a t t h e v a r i a t i o n o f 6 i s a l o n g 2.
I n t h e geometry of t h e B e l l Labs. e x p e r i m e n t , n
: v a r i e s a p p r o x i m a t e l y q u a d r a t i c a l l y o v e r t h e 3 ~ e f i l l e d r e g i o n . Once t h i s v a r i a t i o n of n: i s s u b s t i t u - t e d i n t o e q u a t i o n 1 , one o b t a i n s t h e e q u a t i o n of a harmonic o s c i l l a t o r , i n which t h e s p i n wave m o d e s a r e t r a p p e d i n t h e q u a d r a t i c p o t e n t i a l w e l l c r e a t e d by t h e t e x t u r e .
By d e t e r m i n i n g t h e 6 t e x t u r e n u m e r i c a l l y on a computer and u s i n g t h a t t e x t u r e i n s o l v i n g equa- t i o n l , t h e B e l l group a r r i v e d a t r e s o n a n c e s which c l o s e l y matched t h e i r d a t a . These r e s u l t s h a v e g i v e n u s c o n f i d e n c e i n d e a l i n g w i t h t e x t u r a l induced d i s - t o r t i o n s i n NMR s p e c t r a .
At t h e time of LT14, Avenel e t a l .
/
131 ob- s e r v e d " s a t e l l i t e " r e s o n a n c e s i n l o n g i t u d i n a l NMR s p e c t r a i n jHe.A. We now b e l i e v e t h e s e s a t e l l i t e s a r e a s s o c i a t e d w i t h s p i n waves t r a p p e d i n a d i p o l a r p o t e n t i a l w e l l a s s o c i a t e d w i t h a p l a n a r s i n g u l a r i t y i n 3 ~which h a s been s t u d i e d e x t e n s i v e l y t h e o r e - e ~ t i c a l l y by Maki and Kumar / 1 4 , 1 5 / . These s i n g u l a r i - t i e s , t o p o l o g i c a l s o l i t o n s,
r e s u l t when two r e g i o n s o f 3 ~ a r e j o i n e d t o g e t h e r i n which e ~a
i s p a r a l l e l t o^a
i n one o f t h e r e g i o n s and a n t i p a r a l l e l t o i n t h e o t h e r . Maki and Kumar d e t e r m i n e t h e t e x t u r e s f o r s u c h s i n g u l a r i t i e s i n s e v e r a l e x p e r i m e n t a l s i -JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
t u a t i o n s by r n i n i m i ~ i n g t h e t o t a l f r e e energy asso- c i a t e d w i t h them. Then u s i n g a n e q u a t i o n s i m i l a r t o e q u a t i o n 1 , they d e t e r m i n e t h e bound s p i n waves as- s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e s o l i t o n s . I n g e n e r a l , t h e i r c a l c u - l a t i o n s f i t r e c e n t d a t a q u i t e c l o s e l y . I n f a c t , r e - c e n t l y Maki 1151 h a s f i t t h e t e m p e r a t u r e dependence of t h e r a t i o of t h e l o n g i t u d i n a l s a t e l l i t e r e s o n a n t frequency t o t h e main l o n g i t u d i n a l r e s o n a n t frequen- cy a s determined by Gould and Lee 1161 t o e s t i m a t e t h a t t h e Landau Fermi l i q u i d parameter Fa =
-
1.2.1
A v e r y s i m i l a r v a l u e of Fa h a s a l s o been a r r i v e d a t 1
by Osheroff e t a l . 1121 who needed t o invoke a v a l u e of :F t o f i t t h e i r s p i n wave d a t a t o t h e o r y , and by P e t h i c k , Smith and B h a t t a c h a r y y a 1171 who needed i t t o f i t normal s t a t e v i s c o s i t y d a t a t o t h e i r t h e o r y . Perhaps we a r e a g a i n l e a r n i n g something about t h e normal Fermi l i q u i d by s t u d y i n g t h e s u p e r f l u i d pha- s e s .
There i s no u n i v e r s a l agreement t h a t t h e sa- t e l l i t e r e s o n a n c e s , s e e n i n b o t h l o n g i t u d i n a l and t r a n s v e r s e NMR e x p e r i m e n t s , c a n b e completely ex- p l a i n e d by t h e s o l i t o n p i c t u r e , a l t h o u g h I p e r s o n a l - l y am v e r y o p t i m i s t i c : I n work by Gould and Lee 1161 i t was observed t h a t r a p i d h e a t flow could c r e a - te t h e s a t e l l i t e r e s o n a n c e s , as i f
2
were b e i n g pul- l e d o u t of t h e p l a n e i n whicha
must r e s i d e d u r i n g t u r b u l e n t c o u n t e r f l o w , t h e r e b y a l l o w i n g a s o l i t o n t o b e formed. G i a n n e t t a , Smith and Lee 1181 showed t h a t s a t e l l i t e s of n e a r l y t o t a l l i n e i n t e n s i t y (no main peak) could b e formed i n p u l s e d e x p e r i m e n t s byt i p p i n g t h e m a g n e t i z a t i o n , MZ, w e l l away from Ho.
-+
I n l a t e r s e c t i o n s of t h i s m a n u s c r i p t i t w i l l be shown how such a p r o c e s s can b e expected t o c r e a t e s o l i - tons. B o z l e r and B a r t o l a c 1191 have shown t h a t i n p u l s e d e x p e r i m e n t s , s a t e l l i t e r e s o n a n c e s a r e c r e a t e d w i t h i n a v e r y s h o r t time (- 20 ms) f o l l o w i n g a t i p - p i n g p u l s e . F i n a l l y , Kokko e t a l . 1201 have demons- t r a t e d t h a t t h e s a t e l l i t e s o r i g i n a t e from q u i t e lo- c a l i z e d r e g i o n s of t h e f l u i d , and t h a t t h e y r e q u i r e a s t a t i c f i e l d t o s t a b i l i z e them, a t l e a s t i n t h e i r p a r a l l e l p l a t e geometry. A l l t h e s e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s a r e c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e s o l i t o n model.Our a p p a r e n t a b i l i t y t o i d e n t i f y t e x t u r a l s i n g u l a r i t i e s i n 3 ~ e A by t h e i r NMR s i g n a t u r e s i s v e r y h e a r t e n i n g , and may e v e n t u a l l y prove i m p o r t a n t i n u n d e r s t a n d i n g t h e e f f e c t s o f f l o w i n 3 ~ e A , such a s t h e v e r y complex r e s u l t o b t a i n e d by Adams and coworkers a t t h e U n i v e r s i t y of F l o r i d a , / 2 1 / i n which a p p a r e n t d e c r e a s e s i n t h e A phase s u s c e p t i b i l i t y and a complex time dependent NMR s p e c t r a were observed
I n an a r e a r e l a t e d t o t h e s o l i t o n problem, groups a t Sussex 1221 and C o r n e l l 1231 have been s t u d y i n g NMR s p e c t r a of 3 ~c o n t a i n e d i n 2 e ~ vm d i a - meter c y l i n d r i c a l c h a n n e l s i n o r d e r t o u n d e r s t a n d
t h e e q u i l i b r i u m t e x t u r e s i n r e s t r i c t e d g e o m e t r i e s . I n such t i g h t s p a c e s
1
cannot remain everywhere pa- r a l l e l t o2,
and hence t h e NMR r e s o n a n t f r e q u e n c y i s d e p r e s s e d r e l a t i v e t o t h e bulk. There i s , a s w e l l , t h e p o s s i b i l i t y t h a t t h e e q u i l i b r i u m t e x t u r e w i l l be dominated by a l i n e s i n g u l a r i t y which c a n b e d e t e r - mined from i t s NMR s i g n a t u r e . I t now a p p e a r s t h a t b o t h groups have s e e n two s e p a r a t e t e x t u r e s s t a b l e i n d i f f e r e n t t e m p e r a t u r e r e g i o n s , which t r a n s f o r m i n t o e a c h o t h e r on warming o r c o o l i n g v e r y s l o w l y . These o b s e r v a t i o n s w i l l undoubtedly produce a g r e a t d e a l of f u r t h e r e x p e r i m e n t a l and t h e o r e t i c a l work.i v ) L o n g i t u d i n a l S p i n Recovery.- When t h e e q u i l i b r i m m a g n e t i z a t i o n , MZ, of t h e n u c l e a r s p i n system a l o n g t h e s t a t i c f i e l d i s d e s t r o y e d i n a p u l s e d NMR expe-
A
riment by t i p p i n g MZ w e l l away from Ho, s p i n noncon- s e r v i n g p r o c e s s e s must e v e n t u a l l y r e t u r n MZ t o i t s e q u i l i b r i u m v a l u e . The c h a r a c t e r i s t i c time f o r t h i s p r o c e s s t o occur i s u s u a l l y termed T I . I n 1975 C o r r u c c i n i and Osheroff 1241 showed t h a t v e r y unusu- a l r e c o v e r y mechanisms e x i s t i n b o t h s u p e r f l u i d pha- s e s of 3 ~ e , s u f f i c i e n t l y s t r a n g e t h a t even today we have no e x p l a n a t i o n f o r t h o s e o b s e r v a t i o n s , a l t h o u g h r e c e n t e x p e r i m e n t s a t La J o l l a 1251 and a t Argonne 1261 have g i v e n u s f u r t h e r c l u e s a s t o what may b e happening i n t h e s e i n h e r e n t l y n o n l i n e a r and s p a t i a l -
l y nonuniform p r o c e s s e s .
S h o r t l y f o l l o w i n g t h e p u b l i c a t i o n by C o r r u c c i n i and Osheroff 1241 (C-O) of t h e i r r e s u l t s showing t h a t MZ recovered n e a r l y l i n e a r l y w i t h time i n t h e A p h a s e , L e g g e t t and Takagi 127,281 (L-T) produced a t h e o r y p r e d i c t i n g a new m a g n e t i z a t i o n r e - covery mechanism i n which t h e d i p o l a r t o r q u e r e p r e - s e n t e d t h e s p i n nonconserving p r o c e s s . T h i s t h e o r y s u g g e s t e d t h a t t h e e x c e s s e n e r g y i n t h e s p i n system s h o u l d obey t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p :
Here t h e l e f t hand s i d e of t h e e q u a t i o n i s t h e time r a t e of change of t h e energy i n t h a s p i n system, w i t h ED t h e d i p o l a r e n e r g y , which we s h a l l i g n o r e a s b e i n g n e g l i g i b l e . (x/x,) i s t h e s u s c e p t i b i l i t y enhan- cement (xlx,
-
( I +.L
4 Z 0I-',
A-
(= .2 (Ao/kBTc) where A i s t h e maximum of t h e gap f u n c t i o n , 52 i s t h el o n g i t u d i n a l r e s o n a n t f r e q u e n c y , y i s t h e gyromagne- d u r i n g f l o w c o n d i t i o n s .
t i c r a t i o
,
and ¸ is t h e normal q u a s i p a r t i c l e s c a t - t e r i n g t i m e a t t h e Fermi s u r f a c e .The L-T e q u a t i o n s u g g e s t s a r e l a x a t i o n t i m e T p r o p o r t i o n a l t o (I-T/T )3/2 n e a r t o Tc, i n which
1
M~ r e c o v e r s l i n e a r l y w i t h time. Because t h e t i m e s Z
f o r f u l l s p i n r e c o v e r y a r e p r o p o r t i o n a l t o H2 i n t h i s t h e o r y , o n e n e e d s t o s t u d y t h i s phenomenon i n v e r y low f i e l d s where more r a p i d p r o c e s s e s w i l l n o t d o m i n a t e t h e r e c o v e r y .
S a g e r e t a l . / 2 5 / a t La J o l l a , and ~ e b b / 2 6 / a t Argonne have employed SQUID NMR t o s t u d y t h e s e r e -
l a x a t i o n p r o c e s s e s . As i n t h e s t a t i c m a g n e t i z a t i o n s t u d i e s , t h e y have t i p p e d t h e m a g n e t i z a t i o n w i t h a r e s o n a n t r f p u l s e , and t h e n f o l l o w e d t h e r e c o v e r y of M
z
d i r e c t l y u s i n g SQUID magnetometers. T h i s t e c h n i - que h a s many v i r t u e s o v e r c o n v e n t i o n a l NMR i n t h i s p a r t i c u l a r a p p l i c a t i o n , i n c l u d i n g good s e n s i t i v i t y a t v e r y low f i e l d s , and t h e a b i l i t y t o r e c o r e t h e e n t i r e Mz
r e c o v e r y a f t e r a s i n g l e r f p u l s e . Both g r o u p s have b e e n a b l e t o o b s e r v e L-T r e c o v e r y i n b o t h s u p e r f l u i d p h a s e s , a l t h o u g h i n t h e La J o l l a s t u d y o n l y i n a narrow t e m p e r a t u r e r a n g e v e r y n e a r t o Tc, and i n f i e l d s of 30 Oe o r l e s s . I n t h e Argonne work, L-T r e l a x a t i o n was observed i n 3 ~i n f i e l d s e ~ a s h i g h a s 180 Oe f o r (1-TIT ) a s l a r g e a s 0.07, b u t n e v e r i n a f i e l d a s low a s 31 Oe. I n g e n e r a l , t h e measured r e l a x a t i o n r a t e s a p p e a r t o b e somewhat t o o h i g h i n 3 ~ e ~ , and i n 3 ~Sager e t a l . measure a e ~ ( I -TITc) t e m p e r a t u r e dependence i n s t e a d o f ( I - T I T ~ ) ~ ~ ? . It i s c l e a r , however, t h a t i n a t l e a s t c e r t a i n li- m i t s t h e L-T r e l a x a t i o n d o e s dominate a l l o t h e r pro-c e s s e s .
The d i f f e r e n c e s between Webb's r e s u l t s and t h o s e of Sager e t a l . may l i e i n t h e d i f f e r e n c e s i n geometry, and perhaps i n t h e g r a d i e n t s i n Ho. The La J o l l a group s t u d i e d s p i n r e c o v e r y i n a n open ge- o m e t r y , and i n g e o m e t r i e s c o n t a i n i n g p a r a l l e l p l a t e s b o t h p a r a l l e l and p e r p e n d i c u l a r t o t h e s t a t i c f i e l d . The r e s u l t s showed s t r o n g dependences o f t h e c h a r a c - t e r of t h e r e c o v e r y p r o c e s s e s on geometry. L-T r e - l a x a t i o n was o n l y o b s e r v e d i n 3 ~i n t h e open and e ~ p a r a l l e l ( t o
H
) p l a t e a r r a y . I n 3 ~ e ~ , L-T r e l a x a - t i o n was o n l y o b s e r v e d i n t h e open geometry.Under o t h e r c o n d i t i o n s t h a n t h o s e d e s c r i b e d above, b o t h g r o u p s o b s e r v e d a v a r i e t y o f d i f f e r e n t r e l a x a t i o n b e h a v i o r s , i n c l u d i n g l i n e a r r e c o v e r y o f MZ w i t h t i m e v e r y s i m i l a r t o t h e C-0 r e s u l t s , and e x p o n e n t i a l r e c o v e r y i n t h e B p h a s e which may b e i n good a g r e e m e n t w i t h t h e b e h a v i o r C-0 o b s e r v e d i n t h e B p h a s e . (Because i n t h e B p h a s e C-0 o b s e r v e d a
s t r o n g dependence o f T I on g r a d i e n t s i n Ho, and s u c h g r a d i e n t s c o u l d n o t b e v a r i e d i n e i t h e r of t h e new e x p e r i m e n t s , t h i s agreement i s t i l l i n q u e s t i o n . )
Two of many new f e a t u r e s Sager e t a l . /25/
-
o b s e r v e d were t h a t i n t h e p e r p e n d i c u l a r ( t o Ho) p l a - t e a r r a y , r e l a x a t i o n i n 3 ~was much s l o w e r t h a n e ~ e i t h e r of t h e o t h e r two g e o m e t r i e s ; and t h a t t h e m a g n e t i z a t i o n i n t h e A phase d i d n o t a l w a y s r e c o v e r m o n o t o n i c a l l y . F r e q u e n t l y a r e v e r s a l i n t h e r e c o v e r y would b e o b s e r v e d i n which t h e m a g n e t i z a t i o n would d r o p f o r a w h i l e b e f o r e c o n t i n u i n g t o r e c o v e r . Sager e t a l . found t h e maximum o f t h i s r e v e r s a l t o b e com- p a r a b l e t o t h e s u s c e p t i b i l i t y a n i s o t r o p y i n 3 ~ e ~ , and i t s d u r a t i o n t o b e comparable t o t h e o r b i t a l r e l a x a t i o n t i m e .
Undoubtedly t h e most i n t e r e s t i n g new r e s u l t i n t h e Argonne work i s t h e e x i s t e n c e of a tempera- t u r e and f i e l d d e p e n d e n t c r i t i c a l t i p p i n g a n g l e f o r b o t h s u p e r f l u i d p h a s e s beyond which n o n e x p o n e n t i a l r e l a x a t i o n i s o b s e r v e d , and below which e x p o n e n t i a l r e l a x a t i o n i s o b s e r v e d . Webb f e e l s h i s r e s u l t s ex- p l a i n t h e v e r y d i f f e r e n t c h a r a c t e r of t h e A and B p h a s e r e c o v e r y mechanisms r e p o r t e d by C-0, b u t t h e dependence o f h i s c r i t i c a l t i p p i n g a n g l e s on geome- t r y and s t a t i c f i e l d g r a d i e n t a r e a s o f y e t unknown.
S i g n i f i c a n t l y , t h e s e c r i t i c a l t i p p i n g a n g l e s e x t r a - p o l a t e t o z e r o a t T f o r b o t h p h a s e s , s u g g e s t i n g t h a t t h e y a r e n o t r e l a t e d t o t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c ma- g i c a n g l e s ( s u c h a s cos-' (-114)) i n e i t h e r p h a s e .
I t h a s l o n g b e e n b e l i e v e d t h a t t h e l i n e a r r e c o v e r y o f MZ w i t h time may b e due t o c o u n t e r f l o - wing m a g n e t i z a t i o n s u p e r c u r r e n t s c a u s e d by t h e d i f - f e r e n c e s i n l o c a l c h e m i c a l p o t e n t i a l o f t h e s p i n s y s t e m f o l l o w i n g a n r f p u l s e . I f s o , we would e x p e c t t h e
a
v e c t o r t o t w i s t u p i n s p a c e , s i n c e i t i s r e - l a t e d t o t h e r e l a t i v e p h a s e s o f t h e up and downspi"s y s t e m s , and m a g n e t i z a t i o n s u p e r f l o w i s r e l a t e d t o s p a t i a l g r a d i e n t s i n t h a t r e l a t i v e phase. Such a t w i s t i n g would r e s u l t i n t h e ( a t l e a s t ) t e m p o r a r y f o r m a t i o n of
2
s o l i t o n s i n 3 ~and e 8 ~s o l i t o n s i n 3 ~ e ~ , p r o v i d e d t h e g r a d i e n t s w e r e s u f f i c i e n t l y l a r - g e . We t h e r e f o r e c a n n o t d i s c u s s m a g n e t i z a t i o n s u p e r - c u r r e n t s w i t h o u t c o n s i d e r i n g s o l i t o n s a s w e l l . How t h e s e i d e a s must b e m o d i f i e d by t h e r e s u l t s o f B o z l e r and B a r t o l a c / 9 / i s u n c l e a r a t t h i s t i m e , b u t c e r t a i n l y such s t u d i e s which p r o b e t h e n a t u r e o f t h e d i s e q u i l i b r i u m s t a t e f o l l o w i n g a n r f p u l s e w i l l pro- v i d e i m p o r t a n t new i n f o r m a t i o n i n o u r e f f o r t s t o u n d e r s t a n d T p r o c e s s e s i n s u p e r f l u i d 3 ~ e .1
C6-
1274 JOURNAL D E PHYSIQUEB) E l e c t r o n i c E f f e c t s . -
i ) I n t r o d u c t i o n . - We n o r m a l l y t h i n k of s u p e r f l u i d 3 ~ e as b e i n g composed o f c h a r g e l e s s p a r t i c l e s w i t h s p i n 112. R e c e n t l y , however, L e g g e t t h a s s u g g e s t e d 1291 t h a t we s h o u l d be aware o f p o s s i b l e e f f e c t s on t h e s u p e r f l u i d s caused by a r e d i s t r i b u t i o n o f e l e c - t r o n j c c h a r g e by atoms forming a Cooper p a i r . T h i s r e d i s t r i b u t i o n might r e s u l t i f t h e atoms were t o form a n unbound dimer i n r e s p o n s e t o c o n v e n t i o n a l c h e m i c a l e n e r g y c o n s i d e r a t i o n s . Two p o s s i b l e con- s e q u e n c e s of such a c h a r g e r e d i s t r i b u t i o n m i g h t b e t h e e x i s t e n c e o f a m a g n e t i c moment a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e
?
v e c t o r i n 3 ~ e A , and a p e r h a p s s u b s t a n t i a l a l - t e r a t i o n of t h e o r i e n t a t i o n a l e f f e c t s an e l e c t r i c f i e l d /30/ might have on t h e a n g u l a r momentum o f t h e Cooper p a i r s .i i ) O r i e n t a t i o n i n a n E l e c t r i c F i e l d . - D e l r i e u 1301 -+
showed i f a n e l e c t r i c f i e l d E i s a p p l i e d a c r o s s a sample of 3 ~ e A , t h e
2
v e c t o r s h o u l d f e e l a t o r q u e-f
t e n d i n g t o a l l i g n i t normal t o E. T h i s i s d u e t o t h e e l e c t r i c d i p o l e e n e r g y o f t h e p o l a r i z e d 3 ~ e atoms i n d i r e c t anology w i t h t h e m a g n e t i c d i p o l e e n e r g y . However, p r e v i o u s e x p e r i m e n t s 131,321 have f a i l e d t o o b s e r v e s u c h a n e f f e c t . I n an e x p e r i m e n t a t C o r n e l l 1311 t h e r e a p p e a r e d t o e v e n b e a s l i g h t tendancy f o r ?t o a l l i g n p a r a l l e l t o E. Although i + i t was b e l i e v e d t h e a b s e n c e o f t h i s e f f e c t m i g h t b e a Fermi l i q u i d l i k e e f f e c t , it c o u l d p e r h a p s b e due t o a r e d i s t r i b u t i o n o f e l e c t r i c c h a r g e f o r s m a l l s e p a r a t i o n s of t h e atoms of t h e Cooper p a i r s d u e t o dimer e f f e c t s j u s t where t h e l a r g e s t c o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e e l e c t r i c d i p o l e e n e r g y s h o u l d o c c u r .
Two g r o u p s have r e c e n t l y t r i e d t o measure t h e e l u s i v e e l e c t r i c f i e l d e f f e c t . At La J o l l a , P a u l s o n and Wheatley 1331 have used t h e a n i s o t r o p y i n t h e a t t e n u a t i o n o f z e r o sound a s a p r o b e 1351 t o m o n i t o r t h e o r i e n t a t i o n of
2
i n j ~ e ~ , While o b s e r - v i n g t h e a t t e n u a t i o n , a, t h e two a p p l i e d a f i e l d of -lkV/cm a c r o s s t h e i r z e r a sound c e l l and looked f o ra change i n t h e a t t e n u a t i o n due t o a r e o r i e n t a t i o n
..
of t h e i r 9, t e x t u r e . They c a l i b r a t e d t h e i r s y s t e m t o
..
s m a l l t o r q u e s on .9 b y a p p l y i n g and t h e n r o t a t i n g a s m a l l (300-600 mG) m a g n e t i c f i e l d . Except f o r a t r a n s i e n t , and a s t a t i c e f f e c t which o c c u r r e d e v e n i n t h e normal p h a s e , P a u l s o n and Wheatley o b s e r v e d no o r i e n t i n g e f f e c t s of t h e e l e c t r i c f i e l d what s o e v e r . They e s t i m a t e t h a t i f i t e x i s t s , t h e e l e c t r i c f i e l d o r i e n t a t i o n a l e n e r g y must b e a t l e a s t 1000 t i m e s s m a l l e r t h a n D e l r i e u e s t i m a t e d .
At B e l l Labs., P a a l a n e n e t a1.1341 looked f o r a n o r i e n t i n g e f f e c t of t h e
ii
v e c t o r i n 3 ~ e ~ . Byl o o k i n g f o r a n e f f e c t i n 3 ~ e ~ , t h e B e l l group c o u l d work a t much lower sample p r e s s u r e s , where Fermi l i q u i d e f f e c t s s h o u l d b e s m a l l e s t . I n t h e i r e x p e r i - ment, changes i n t h e o r i e n t a t i o n of t h e 6 t e x t u r e upon t h e a p p l i c a t i o n o f an e l e c t r i c f i e l d a s h i g h a s 35 kV/cm were m o n i t o r e d by m e a s u r i n g t h e s p i n - wave s p e c t r a i n a p a r a l l e l p l a t e a r r a y . The expe- r i m e n t a l geometry was n e a r l y i d e n t i c a l t o t h a t used p r e v i o u s l y i n t h e B p h a s e spinwave s t u d i e s 1121.
Again, no e f f e c t was o b s e r v e d which c o u l d b e i n t e r - p r e t e d a s e v i d e n c e of a n e l e c t r i c f i e l d o r i e n t i n g e f f e c t . A t 32 b a r , t h e B e l l group e s t i m a t e t h e o r i e n t a t i o n a l e n e r g y t o b e a t l e a s t 3000 t i m e s l e s s t h a n s i m p l e t h e o r y p r e d i c t e d , and a t 0 b a r a t l e a s t 700 t i m e s l e s s .
Exept f o r t h e 0 b a r r e s u l t by t h e B e l l group, none of t h e s e r e n o r m a l i z a t i o n f a c t o r s i s l a r g e r t h a n t h o s e e x p e c t e d from a new t h e o r y I 3 6 1 which e s t i m a t e s Fermi l i q u i d r e n o r m a l i z i n g e f f e c t s . T h i s i s n o t t o s a y t h a t c h e m i c a l e f f e c t s d o n o t e x i s t i n t h e o r i e n t a t i o n a l e l e c t r i c f i e l d e n e r g y , b u t t h a t i f t h e y a r e i n d e e d p r e s e n t , we w i l l have t o work much, much h a r d e r t o measure them.
i i i ) E l e c t r o n i c O r b i t a l Ferromagnetism i n 3 ~ e ~ . - 3 ~h a s been termed a n " o r b i t a l f e r r o m a g n e t " /37/ e ~ b e c a u s e t h e o r b i t a l a n g u l a r momenta of a l l t h e Cooper p a i r s p o i n t i n t h e same d i r e c t i o n . I f t h e s o r t o f c h e m i c a l e f f e c t s L e g g e t t h a s c o n s i d e r e d were t o change t h e e l e c t r o n i c c h a r g e d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e Cooper p a i r s , t h e y c o u l d p o s s e s s o r b i t a l ma- g n e t i c moments, and h e n c e t h e e n t i r e f l u i d could p o s s e s s a s p o n t a n e o u s m a g n e t i z a t i o n a l o n g t h e d i - r e c t i o n o f
2
1381. L e g g e t t h a s e s t i m a t e d t h a t t h i s m a g n e t i z a t i o n a t 9Tc c o u l d b e a s l a r g e a s t h e nu- c l e a r m a g n e t i z a t i o n i n an a p p l i e d f i e l d o f 1 mG.Such a m i n u t e m a g n e t i z a t i o n a s t h e above might b e o b s e r v a b l e i n t h e z e r o sound e x p e r i m e n t s /33/of P a u l s o n and Wheatley. I n s i m i l a r e x p e r i m e n t s 1391, t h e y h a v e found t h a t when t h e y j u s t r e v e r s e d t h e s i g n o f t h e i r a p p l i e d 300 mG f i e l d , t h e y mea- s u r e d a change i n a , i n d i c a t i n g a r e o r i e n t a t i o n o f
x.
Such a r e o r i e n t a t i o n c o u l d b e e x p e c t e d i f%
had a s s o c i a t e d w i t h i t a m a g n e t i c moment. It a l s o could r e s u l t , however, i f t h e f i e l d t h e y r e v e r s e d were n o t t h e t o t a l f i e l d a c r o s s t h e i r sample. To l i m i t t h i s second p o s s i b i l i t y , P a u l s o n and Wheatley c a r e - f u l l y s h i e l d e d t h e i r sound chamber from s t r a y ma- g n e t i c f i e l d s . S t i l l , t h e y e s t i m a t e t h a t p e r h a p s a r e s i d u a l f i e l d of-
2 mG remained. T h i s i s t h e magnitude o f t h e t r a p p e d f i e l d n e c e s s a r y t o producet h e a v e r a g e s h i f t i n
?.
o b s e r v e d .The o r i e n t i n g e f f e c t due t o a s p o n t a n e o u s m a g n e t i z a t i o n a l o n g
x
would depend upon which d i r e c - t i o nx
p o i n t e d r e l a t i v e t o t h e a p p l i e d f i e l d . I f upon warming above T and c o o l i n g back t h e2
t e x t u r e were t o e x a c t l y r e v e r s e i t s s e n s e , t h e n t h e change i n a caused by t h e m a g n e t i z a t i o n would a l s o r e v e r s e . I n f a c t , P a u l s o n and Wheatley d i d o b s e r v e s c a t t e r i n t h e i r changes i n a upon r e p e a t e d c y c l i n g above and below Tc, and a n a p p a r e n t c l u s t e r i n g a b o u t two d i s - t i n c t s e t s o f v a l u e s ; a n e n c o u r a g i n g s i g n .U n f o r t u n a t e l y , t h e t e x t u r e s i n t h e sound c e l l a r e n o t w e l l known, and p r o b a b l y change w i t h t e m p e r a t u r e . I n any e v e n t , t h e changes i n a above and below t h e v a l u e a t t r i b u t e d t o t h e r e s i d u a l f i e l d showed c o n s i d e r a b l e s c a t t e r , and n o t t h e t e m p e r a t u r e dependence which i s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e e f f e c t s o f t h e s p o n t a n e o u s m a g n e t i z a t i o n . On t h e o t h e r h a n d , t h e m a g n i t u d e of t h e s c a t t e r was f a r l a r g e r t h a n t h e two c o u l d a t t r i b u t e t o any known e x p e r i m e n t a l a r t i - f a c t , and i n d e e d v e r y n e a r l y e q u a l t o t h e m a g n i t u d e of t h e change i n o r i e n t a t i o n e x p e c t e d from t h e spon- t a n e o u s m a g n e t i z a t i o n .
I t a p p e a r s q u i t e l i k e l y t h a t t h e La J o l l a p a i r have i n d e e d d e t e c t e d s p o n t a n e o u s m a g n e t i z a t i o n a l o n g
3 ,
a l t h o u g h a s t h e y a r e q u i c k t o p o i n t o u t , t h e i r e x p e r i m e n t i s o n l y q u a l i t a t i v e and from i t n o v a l u e o f t h e moment c a n b e e x t r a c t e d . I f we a r e i n - d e e d t o u n d e r s t a n d L e g g e t t ' s c h e m i c a l e f f e c t s , more c a r e f u l e x p e r i m e n t s w i l l be needed. I n p a r t i c u l a r , i t w i l l b e n e c e s s a r y t o r e d u c e t h e m a g n i t u d e o f t h e r e s i d u a l f i e l d s o t h a t i t s e f f e c t s a r e no l o n g e r comparable t o t h e s c a t t e r which r e p r e s e n t t h e e f f e c t s of t h e s p o n t a n e o u s m a g n e t i z a t i o n o n t h e o r i e n t a t i o n ofz.
C) _ T o r s i o n a l Pendulum E x p e r i m e n t s P l u s . - Of p a r t i - c u l a r u s e f u l l n e s s i n t h e p a s t and w i t h even more p r o m i s e f o r t h e f u t u r e h a s been t h e t e c h n i q u e o f u s i n g t h e A n d r o n i k a s h v i l i o s c i l l a t i n g - p e n d u l u m , o r t o r s i o n a l pendulum t o measure s u p e r f l u i d p r o p e r t i e s o f 3 ~ e s u c h a s p s / p , t h e r e l a t i v e s u p e r f l u i d d e n s i - t y , and
n,
t h e v i s c o s i t y . Main e t a l . 1401 w e r e t h e f i r s t t o u s e t h e t e c h n i q u e t o show c o n c l u s i v e l y t h e a n i s o t r o p y o f p / p i n 3 ~ e ~ , w h i l e B e r t h o l d e t a l . /41/ have g o t t e n c r e d i t f o r t h e f i r s t a c c u r a t e mea- s u r e m e n t s o f t h a t a n i s o t r o p y . R e c e n t l y , P a r p i a e t a l . 1421 h a v e a g a i n u s e d s u c h a t e c h n i q u e t o m e a s u r e t h e normal and s u p e r f l u i d v i s c o s i t i e s o f 3 ~ e a t a number of p r e s s u r e s , w i t h p a r t i c u l a r emphasis b e i n gg i v e n t o t h e r e g i o n v e r y n e a r t o Tc.
I n t h e i r new r e s u l t s , P a r p i a e t a l . f i n d t h a t Aq/n v a r i e s a s ( ~ - T / T ~ ) ' / ~ o n l y w i t h i n a b o u t
5 x lo-" o f Tc. T h i s i s s i g n i f i c a n t b e c a u s e i t was o r i g i n a l l y b e l i e v e d All/rl, s h o u l d b e p r o p o r t i o n a l t o t h e e n e r g y gap o n l y n e a r Tc, b u t presumably o v e r a s u b s t a n t i a l t e m p e r a t u r e i n t e r v a l . The new C o r n e l l r e s u l t s u p p o r t s a t h e o r e t i c a l p r e d i c t i o n by Ono e t a l . 1431. I n a d d i t i o n , P a r p i a e t a l . f i n d a s u b s - t a n t i a l
-
1.4X
d r o p i n q o v e r a 5 pK t e m p e r a t u r e i n t e r v a labove
Tc, and i n d i c a t e t h a t o v e r t h i s same t e m p e r a t u r e i n t e r v a l a n anomalous r i s e i n t h e pe- r i o d of t h e i r pendulum was o b s e r v e d . The a u t h o r s s u g g e s t t h a t t h e s e e f f e c t s may be d u e t o a f l u c t u - a t i o n p r e c u r s o r s u c h a s Emery 1441 h a s p r e d i c t e d . R e c e n t l y P a u l s o n and Wheatley 1 4 5 1 h a v e r e p o r t e d what t h e y b e l i e v e t o b e p r e c u r s o r y b e h a v i o r o v e r a much b r o a d e r t e m p e r a t u r e i n t e r v a l above T i n t h ea t t e n u a t i o n of z e r o sound.
I n s t i l l u n p u b l i s h e d work a t C o r n e l l 1461, h i g h r e s o l u t i o n s t u d i e s of p / p i n 3 ~h a v e been e ~ made a t a l a r g e number of d i f f e r e n t sample p r e s s u r e s u s i n g p l a t i n u m NMR thermometry. The d a t a h a s been a n a l y z e d t o e x t r a c t t h e "weak c o u p l i n g " p n , t h e Yoshida f u n c t i o n . I n t h i s a n a l y s i s , v a l u e s o f m f / m p u b l i s h e d by W h e a t l e y 1471 h a v e b e e n u s e d t o e l i - m i n a t e t h e Fermi l i q u i d e f f e c t s . Once c o m p l e t e , t h i s a n a l y s i s shows t h e Yoshida f u n c t i o n i n 3 ~t o e ~ be a s i n g l e f u n c t i o n of TITc, i d d e p e n d e n t o f p r e s - s u r e . From t h e i n i t i a l s l o p e o f p / p n e a r Tc
,
t h e C o r n e l l g r o u p c a n e s t i m a t e
Ac/AcBCS
= 1.39 a t a l l p r e s s u r e s . T h i s i s i n good agreement w i t h t h e measurements by H a l p e r i n 1481 a t m e l t i n g p r e s s u r e , b u t t h e f a i l u r e o f t h e s t r o n g c o u p l i n g e f f e c t s t o d e c r e a s e w i t h d e c r e a s i n g p r e s s u r e i s n o t e x p e c t e d . Yet i t seems u n l i k e l y t h a t t h e p l a t i n u m thermometry c o u l d b e wrong by more t h a n t e n p e r c e n t a t m o s t , and o n e would e x p e c t t h a t t h a t e r r o r s h o u l d be a c o n s t a n t m u l t i p l i c a t i v e f a c t o r a t a l l t e m p e r a t u r e s .Using t h e i r new Lanthinum d i l u t e d CMN t h e r - mometry s c a l e , Wheatley and coworkers 1 4 9 1 h a v e r e c e n t l y r e a n a l y z e d p r e v i o u s z e r o sound d a t a o f P a u l s o n e t a l . / 5 0 / t o e s t i m a t e AC/ACBCS. They n o t e t h a t t h e z e r o sound a b s o r p t i o n peak i n 3 ~ i s e r e - ~ l a t e d t o t h e e n e r g y g a p , and u s e t h e p o s i t i o n of t h e peak a s a f u n c t i o n o f t e m p e r a t u r e t o o b t a i n t h e i r r e s u l t s . I n s t r o n g c o n t r a s t t o t h e C o r n e l l r e s u l t , t h e La J o l l a r e s u l t shows AC/ACBCS a l m o s t e q u a l t o u n i t y from 12 b a r t o 20 b a r sample p r e s - s u r e . Although t h e l a c k of a t e m p e r a t u r e dependence
c6-1276 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE agrees with the Cornell result, the value of AC/ACBCS
is nearly 40
%lower than the Cornell result. This strong disagreement is well outside the errors in thermometry, and, according to Serene 1511 appears beyond the range which "non-trivial" strong coupling effects could produce, at least those which influ- ence ps/p. It goes without saying that new, highly reliable measurements of the heat capacity jump are desperately needed.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.- The author whishes to thank Mikko Paalanen, Bob Richardson and Mike Cross for many substantive discussions of the content of this ma- nuscript and the ideas which are presented there.
References
/I/ Osheroff. D.D., Gully, W.J., Richardson, R.C.
and Lee, D.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2 (1972) 920 /2/ Leggett, A.J., Rev. Mod. Phys. 5 (1975) 331 131 Leggett, A.J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 31 (1973) 352 /4/ For a concise review see
:Richardson, R.C. in
"Low Temperature Physics - LT 14", edited by Krusius, M. and Vuorio, M. (North Holland Pu- blishing Co., Amsterdam, 19751, 5, p. 69
151 Osheroff, D.D., and Anderson, P.W., Phys. Rev.
Lett. 33 (1974) 686
161 Mermin, N.D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1975) 1651 171 Avenel, O., Berglund, P., Bloyet, D.,
Varoquaux, E., Vibet, C., and Combescot, R. in
"Physics at Ultralow Temperatures", edited by Sugawara, T. et al. (Phys. Soc. of Japan, Tokyo,
1978) p. 142
181 Corruccini, L.R., and Osheroff, D.D., Phys. Rev.
Lett. 3 (1975) 695
191 Webb, R.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2 (1977) 1151 1101 Sager, R.E., Kleinberg, R.L., Warkentin, P.A.,
and Wheatley, J.C., J. Low Temp. Phys. 31
(1978) 409
1111 Osheroff, D.D., Van Roosbroeck, W., Smith, H., and b-Lnkman, W.F., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2 (1977)
134
1121 Osheroff, D.D., Physica (1977) 20 1131 Avenel, O., Bernier, M.E., Varoquaux, E.J.,
and Vibet, C., in "Low Temperature Physics -
LT14", edited by Krusius, M. and Vuorio, M.
(North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1975) 5, 429
-
1141 Maki, K., and Kumar, P., S y s . Rev. Lett. 38
(1977) 557
;Phys. Rev. B. 2 (1977) 182 1151 Maki, K., in "Physics at Ultralow Temperatures"
edited by Sugawara, T. et al. (Phys. Soc. of Japan, Tokyo, 1978) p. 66
/16/ Gould, C.M. and Lee, D.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2
(1976) 1223
1171 Pethick, C.J., Smith, H., and Bhattacharyya, P., Phys. Rev. B 15 (1977) 3367
1181 Giannetta, R.W., Smith. E.N. and Lee, D.M., Phys. Lett. 62A (1977) 335
I191 Bozler, H.M., and Bartolac, T., in "Physics at Ultralow Temperatures", edited by Sugawara, T.
et al. (Phys. Soc. of Japan, Tokyo, 1978), p. 136
;and to be published
1201 Kokko, J., Paalanen, M.A., Richardson, R.C., and Takano, Y., J. Physics. C 11 (1978) L125 1211 Mueller, R.M., Flint, E.B., and Adams, E.D.,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1976) 1460, and Flint,E.B., Adams, E.D., and Mueller, R.M., in "Quantum Fluids and Solids" edited by Trickey, S.B. et al. (Plenum, New York, 1977) p. 153
1221 Saunders, J., Betts, D.S., Swithenby, S.J., and Truscott, W.S., Phys.
Rev.Lett. 40 (1978) 1-278 1231 Gould, C., Private Communication
1241 Corruccini, L.R. and Osheroff, D.D.. Phys. Rev.
Lett. 36 (1975) 564
1251 Sager, R.E., Kleinberg, R.L., Warkentin, P.A., and Wheatley, J.C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2 (1977)
1343
1261 Webb, R.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (9178) 883 1271 Leggett, A.J. and Takagi, S., Phys. Rev. Lett.
34 (1975) 1424
-
I281 Leggett, A.J., and Takagi, S., To be published 1291 Leggett, A. J., in "Physics at Ultralow Tempe-
ratures", edited by Sugawara, T. et al. (Phys.
Soc. of Japan, Tokyo, 1978), p. 318
1301 Delrieu, J.M., J. Physique Lett. (1974) L189 Erratum, Ibid 2 (1975) L-22
I3 11 Gully, W. J., Gould, C.M., Richardson, R. C . , and
Lee, D.M., Phys. Lett. S5A (1975) 27
1321 Avenel,
0..Bernier, M.E., Varoquaux, E.J., and Vibet, C., in "Low,Temperature Physics - LT14", edited by Krusius, M. and Vuorio, M. (North- Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam 19751, ?,
427
1331 Paulson, D.N., and Wheatley, J.C., preprint I341 Paalanen, M.A., Cross, M.C., Sprenger, W.O.,
Van Roosbroeck, W., and Osheroff, D.D., preprint 1351 Paulson, D.N., Krusius, M., and Wheatley, J.C.,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 21 (1976) 599
;and Krusius,M., Paulson, D.N., and Wheatley, J.C., preprint I361 Fomin, I.A., Pethick, C.J., and Serene, J.W.,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 1144
1371 Anderson, P.W., and Morel, P., Phys. Rev. Lett.
5 (1960) 136
-
1381 Leggett, A.J., Nature (London) 270 (1977) 585 1391 Paulson, D.N., and Wheatley, J.C., Phys. Rev.
Lett. 40 (1978) 557
1401 Main, P.C., Kiewiet, C.W., Band, W.T., Hook, J.
R., Sandiford, D.J., and Hall, H.E.. J. Phys.
C - 9 (1976) L397
1411 Berthold, J.E., Giannetta, R.W., Smith, E.N., and Reppy, J.D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1976)
1138
1421 Parpia, J.M., Sandiford, D.J., Berthold, J.E., and Reppy, J.D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978)565
1431 Ono, Y.A., Hara, J., Nagai, K., and Kawamura,K., J. Low Temp. Phys. 7 (1977) 513
1441 Emery, V.J., J. Low Temp. Phys., 22 (1976) 467
1451 P a u l s o n , D . N . , and Wheatley, J . C . , p r e p r i n t 1461 A r c h i e , C.N., A l v e s a l o , T.A., Reppy, J . D . , and
R i c h a r d s o n , R.C., B u l l . Am. Phys. Soc.
2
(1978) 514. A l s o , A r c h i e , C.N., p r i v a t e comm.1471 Wheatley, J.C., Rev. Mod. Phys.
9
(1975) 4151481 H a l p e r i n , W.P., A r c h i e , C . N . , Rasmussen, F.B., A l v e s a l o , T.A., and R i c h a r d s o n , R . C . , Phys.
Rev. B
12
(1976) 21241491 P a u l s o n , D.N., K r u s i u s , M., and Wheatley, J . C . , p r e p r i n t
1501 P a u l s o n , D.N., K l e i n b e r g , R.L., and Wheatley, J.C., J. Low Temp. Phys.
2
(1976) 725/51/ S e r e n e , J . W . , p r i v a t e c o m u n i c a t i o n .