• Aucun résultat trouvé

Relationships between individual digestion efficiencies and gut anatomy in broilers from experimental D+ and D Disgestion lines or from commercial strains

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Relationships between individual digestion efficiencies and gut anatomy in broilers from experimental D+ and D Disgestion lines or from commercial strains"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Gut anatomy and digestion efficiencies

Relationships between individual digestion efficiencies and gut anatomy in broilers from experimental D+ and D- Digestion lines or from commercial strains.

B. CARRÉ1*, N. ROUGIÈRE1, D. BASTIANELLI2, O. LAFEUILLE1, S. MIGNON-GRASTEAU1

1UR083 Recherches Avicoles, INRA, Nouzilly, France, 2Systèmes d’élevage, CIRAD,

Montpellier, France

*Corresponding author: [email protected] Summary

Calculations were performed using a combination of data from 5 previous studies conducted in broilers from the experimental D+ and D- Digestion lines (n=432) observed during their selection process on 3rd, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th generation, or from 3 previous studies with broilers from commercial strains (n=118). In each experiment, individual diet (wheat or maize) AMEn values or protein digestibilities (PD) were measured at 3 weeks. Weights of empty gizzards and small intestines relative to body weight (G and I, respectively) were also measured at various ages from 22d to 62d. Phenotypic correlations between recorded traits were performed on data corrected for diet and age effects. In birds from Digestion lines, AMEn values were positively correlated to G (r = 0.32; 0.24) and G/I (r= 0.57; 0.42) and negatively correlated to I (r = -0.79; -0.46), with wheat and maize diets, respectively. In contrast, no significant correlation was found between AMEn and G in commercial birds. However, in commercial birds fed wheat diets, AMEn was also negatively correlated to I (r = -0.41) and positively correlated to G/I (r =0.32). PD was positively correlated to G (r = 0.35; 0.28) and G/I (r = 0.47; 0.36), and negatively correlated to I (r = -0.36; -0.17) in birds from Digestion lines and commercial strains, respectively. Cereals (wheat versus maize) did not affect regressions between PD and anatomic data neither in Digestion lines nor in commercial strains.

Keywords: broiler, gizzard, intestine, digestion, AMEn, genetics Introduction

Variations in digestion efficiencies were reported to be associated with variations in gut anatomy (Péron et al., 2006; García et al., 2007; Rougière et al., 2009; Rougière and Carré, 2010). Most of these relationships were observed in genetic Digestion lines selected for divergent digestion efficiencies (Péron et al., 2006; García et al., 2007; Rougière et al., 2009; Rougière and Carré, 2010). It remains to be known whether such relationships also exist in commercial broiler populations. So, the aim of the current study was to combine our three previous experiments conducted in commercial broilers (Maisonnier et al., 2001; Carré et al., 2005a; Péron et al., 2005) in order to investigate such relationships using a high number of birds. In the current study, relationships obtained in broilers from Digestion lines were also examined by combining data from all our previous studies conducted in these birds (Carré et

al., 2005b; García et al., 2007; Rougière et al., 2009; Rougière and Carré, 2010;

Mignon-Grasteau et al., 2010), in which digestion efficiencies and relative weights of gizzard and intestine were measured. Thus, a comparative approach between broilers from commercial strains and those from Digestion lines was developed in the current study.

Materials and methods

All individual data from our laboratory reporting dietary AMEn values, total apparent protein digestibility (PD), gizzard and intestine weights relative to body weights in broilers from commercial strains (Maisonnier et al., 2001; Carré et al., 2005a; Péron et al., 2005) or from

(2)

Gut anatomy and digestion efficiencies

D+ and D- Digestion lines (Carré et al., 2005b; García et al., 2007; Rougière et al., 2009; Rougière and Carré, 2010; Mignon-Grasteau et al., 2010) were combined in a common file, with diet (33 different diets), age (continuous variable), cereal (wheat or maize) and genetics (commercial strain or Digestion lines) factors being associated to each individual data.

In these studies, all AMEn and protein digestibility data were obtained at about 3 weeks of age. Gut anatomic data were all obtained between 3 and 4 weeks of age in broilers commercial strains, while those from Digestion lines were obtained at various ages up to 63 days of age.

Statistical calculations of relationships between digestion efficiencies and gut anatomic data were only performed on individual variations. For that purpose, AMEn values and protein digestibilities were corrected for diet effect. Anatomic data in broilers from commercial strains were also corrected for diet effect. Anatomic data for Digestion lines were corrected for both diet and age effects.

Statistical analyses were performed with the SuperAnova software (Abacus Concepts, Inc), applying the type III technique for the calculation of sums of squares.

Results and discussion

In all cases, gizzard was bigger and intestines smaller in D+ than in D- birds, which resulted in about 30% higher G/I ratio in D+ than in D- birds (Figure 1). Combining all data from Digestion lines observed in previous experiments (Carré et al., 2005b; García et al., 2007; Rougière et al., 2009; Rougière and Carré, 2010; Mignon-Grasteau et al., 2010), relationships

Figure 1. Relative differences (%) between D+ and D- lines1 [(D+ - D-)/D+ ; means and SE].

Generation n° of genetic selection

Wheat diets Maize diets 0 20 40 3 5 7 6 7 8 AMEn 0 4 8 12 3 5 7 6 7 8 Protein Digesti- bility 0 10 20 30 3 5 7 6 7 8 Gizzard / Body Weight -20 0 3 5 7 6 7 8 -40 Intestine / Body Weight 0 20 40 3 5 7 6 7 8 Gizzard / Intestine

1Data were derived from Carré et al. (2005b), Garcia et al. (2007), Rougière et al. (2009),

(3)

Gut anatomy and digestion efficiencies

Figure 2. Relationships between individual digestion efficiencies (A: AMEn (kcal/kg DM); B: protein

digestibility (%)) in 3 week broilers1, and individual gut anatomy. Digestion efficiencies were corrected

for diet effects. Gut anatomic data were corrected for diet and age effects.

Commercial strains Digestion lines

Wheat diets Maize diets Wheat diets Maize diets

500 1500 2500 3500 4500 5 15 25 35 455 15 25 35 45

Relative gizzard weight (g/kg BW)

5 15 25 35 455 15 25 35 45 50 60 70 80 90 100 5 15 25 35 45 n=81 n=36 n=162 n=270 NS NS R2=0.10 P=0.0001 R2=0.06 P=0.0001 n=82 R2=0.08 P=0.0053 5 15 25 35 45 n=36 R2=0.11 P=0.025 5 15 25 35 45 n=91 R2=0.11 P=0.0007 5 15 25 35 45 n=270 R2=0.13 P=0.0001 A B 500 1500 2500 3500 4500 n=81 10 30 50 70 90 R2=0.17 P=0.0001 n=36 10 30 50 70 90 NS n=161 10 30 50 70 90 R2=0.62 P=0.0001 n=270 10 30 50 70 90 R2=0.21 P=0.0001 10 30 50 70 90 50 60 70 80 90 100 R2=0.07 P=0.0077 10 30 50 70 90 NS 10 30 50 70 90 R2=0.27 P=0.0001 10 30 50 70 90 n=82 n=36 n=90 n=270 R2=0.11 P=0.0001

Relative small intestine weight (g/kg BW) A B 0 0.4 0.8 500 1500 2500 3500 4500 n=81 R2=0.09 P=0.0048 0 0.4 0.8 n=36 NS 0 0.4 0.8 n=161 R2=0.33 P=0.0001 0 0.4 0.8 n=270 R2=0.18 P=0.0001 0 0.4 0.8 50 60 70 80 90 100 n=82 R2=0.19 P=0.0001 0 0.4 0.8 n=36 R2=0.06 P=0.08 0 0.4 0.8 n=90 R2=0.23 P=0.0001 0 0.4 0.8 n=270 R2=0.22 P=0.0001

Gizzard / small intestine weight ratio A

B

1Data were derived from Maisonnier et al. (2001), Péron et al. (2005), Carré et al. (2005ab), Garcia et al.

(4)

Gut anatomy and digestion efficiencies

between individual variations of digestion efficiency and gut anatomy were all highly significant (P< 0.001) (Figure 2), with relationship patterns similar to those observed in previous experiments (García et al., 2007; Rougière et al., 2009; Rougière and Carré, 2010). In broilers from Digestion lines, slopes observed for AMEn values were more pronounced with wheat than with maize diets, while, for protein digestibility values, slopes did not differ between wheat and maize diets (Figure 2).

In broilers from commercial strains (Maisonnier et al., 2001; Carré et al., 2005a; Péron et al., 2005), the number of birds examined was not very high, especially with maize diets. So, the relationships were often not significant (Figure 2). However, with wheat diets, most of the relationships were significant and showed trends similar to those observed in Digestion lines, with positive relationships regarding gizzard and G/I ratio, and negative relationships regarding intestine (Figure 2). The slopes of the line relating AMEn to G/I did not differ between Digestions lines and commercial strains (Figure 2). However, the lines relating PD to G/I showed higher slope values for commercial strains than for Digestion lines. Slopes of the lines relating PD to gizzard or intestine weights did not differ between bird types (Figure 2). So, relationships between digestion efficiencies and gut anatomy observed in birds from commercial strains showed many similarities with those observed in Digestion lines. This suggests that the sources of variations in digestion efficiencies were probably similar in both bird populations.

References

CARRÉ, B., MULEY, N., GOMEZ, J., OURY, F.-X., LAFFITTE, E., GUILLOU, D. and SIGNORET C. (2005a) Soft wheat instead of hard wheat in pelleted diets results in high starch digestibility in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 46: 66-74.

CARRÉ, B., MIGNON-GRASTEAU, S., SVIHUS, B., PÉRON, A., BASTIANELLI, D., GOMEZ, J., BESNARD, J. and SELLIER, N. (2005b) Nutritional effects of feed form, and wheat compared to maize, in the D+ and D- chicken lines selected for divergent digestion capacity. Proceedings of the 15th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, pp. 42-44, Budapest (H): WPSA.

GARCÍA, V., GOMEZ, J., MIGNON-GRASTEAU, S., SELLIER, N. and CARRÉ, B. (2007) Effects of xylanase and antibiotic supplementations on the nutritional utilization of a wheat diet in growing chicks from genetic D+ and D- lines selected for divergent digestion efficiency. Animal 1: 1435-1442.

MAISONNIER, S., GOMEZ, J., CHAGNEAU, A.M., and CARRÉ, B. (2001) Analysis of variability in nutrient digestibilities in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 42:70-76.

MIGNON-GRASTEAU, S., LAFEUILLE, O., DOURMAD, J.-Y., HILLION, S., BASTIANELLI, D., ARNOULD, C., PHOCAS, F. and CARRÉ, B. (2010) Consequences of selection for digestibility on feeding rythm and excretion. Proceedings of the 13th European Poultry Conference, CD 4 pages, Nouzilly (F): WPSA.

PÉRON, A., BASTIANELLI, D., OURY, F.-X., GOMEZ, J. and CARRÉ, B. (2005). Effects of food deprivation and particle size of ground wheat on digestibility of food components in broilers fed a pelleted diet. British Poultry Science 46: 223-230.

ROUGIÈRE, N. and CARRÉ B. (2010). Comparison of gastrointestinal transit times between chickens from D+ and D- genetic lines selected for divergent digestion efficiency.

Animal 4: in press.

ROUGIÈRE, N., GOMEZ, J., MIGNON-GRASTEAU, S. and CARRÉ, B. (2009). Effects of diet particle size on digestive parameters in D+ and D− genetic chicken lines selected for divergent digestion efficiency. Poultry Science 88: 1206–1215.

Références

Documents relatifs

By challenging the model with different inputs, the animal response in terms of changes in body weight and feed conversion can be understood more by studying the shift

Sandrine Grasteau, Agnès Narcy, Cécile Arnould, Aline Bertin, Marie Yvonne Boscher, Fabien Brossier, Fanny Calenge, Irène Gabriel, Edouard Guitton,. Melynda Hassouna,

The aim of this study was to analyze and compare plasmids coding for resistance to ESC isolated from 16 avian commensal and 17 avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) strains

We ensure that the incomplete trajectories mimic the temporal sampling properties of those extracted from CDR as follows: (i) we construct an empirical distribution of the

In this setting, the classification problem is modeled as a combinatorial optimization problem, in which the aim of the learner is to find a {− 1 , 0 , +1 }-weighted linear

The second study is related to the adaptation of speech recognition technologies to the older popula- tion which has not been extensively studied in the literature,

EMVT, CIRAD, Montpellier, France, 4 Direction Scientifique et Technique, INZO, Chierry, France, 5 Direction Scientifique et Technique, Bioplante, Cappelle en Pevele,

Animal Production, Poultry production, Central University of Venezuela, Maracay, Venezuela, 2 URD, Systemes d’Elevage, CIRAD, Montpellier, France. XIIIth European Poultry