Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la
première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=85d3556d-82d1-492a-8ec2-bd4da9c27df7 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=85d3556d-82d1-492a-8ec2-bd4da9c27df7
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Investigation of surface properties explaining the exceptional
environmental durability of adhesively bonded grit-blasted aluminum
IN V E ST IG A T IO N O F SU R FA C E PR O PE R T IE S E X PL A IN IN G T H E E X C E PT IO N A L E N V IR O N M E N T A L D U R A B IL IT Y O F A D H E SIV E L Y
B O N D E D G R IT -B L A ST E D A L U M IN U M PA R T S
D . G allant
Structural A dhesives and C orrosion G roup, A lum inium Technology C entre, Industrial M aterials Institute, N ational R esearch C ouncil C anada (A TC /IM I/N R C ), 501 bou\. U niversité Est, Saguenay, Q uebec, C A N A D A , G 7H 8C 3
D anick.G allant@ cm c-m c.gc.ca
Introduction M echanicaIly deoxidized alum inum surfaces generaIly provide adhesively bonded joints w ith a low durability w hen subm itted to environm ental degradation conditions. A lthough results in agreem ent w ith this statem ent have often been reported in literature, it rem ains that the relative efficiency of different deoxidizing procedures is not yet clear, especiaIly w hen a single adhesive is considered for aIl these treatm ents.
O verview of results This com m unication w ill present the influence of the deoxidation m ethod applied to alum inum prior to its assem bly into SLS specim ens (see Fig. 1) using a single 2-com ponent epoxy adhesive (Loctite H ysol 9460). This adhesive chem istry is generaIly reported as being highly sensitive to the surface state. A cataplasm a test (Jaguar standard JN S 30.03.35) w as used to accelerate the degradation of adhesively bonded specim ens. A s presented in Fig. 2, phosphoric acid
anodizing, generaIly considered as the reference treatm ent for adhesive bonding, provides assem blies w ith the highest strength and an acceptable durability. Surprisingly, am ong deoxidation procedures em ployed, alum ina grit blasting provides adhesively bonded joints w ith an outstanding durability. Figs. 3 and 4 show that alum ina grit blasting treatm ent does not foIlow the general trends observed w ith other surface treatm ents prior and after degradation of assem blies, respectively. The expected causes explaining these observations w ill be discussed.
Figure C aptions:
Fig. 1: G eom etry of A I-A l SLS specim ens em ployed (dim ensions are in m m ). Fig. 2: D ependence of surface treatrnent on the SLS strength of adhesively bonded specim ens before and after cataplasm a degradation.
Fig. 3: R elationship betw een SLS stress (before cataplasm a degradation) and the polar com ponent of the surface free energy (yp) rneasured, as a function of the surface treatm ent.
Fig. 4: R elationship betw een % SLS loss strength (during cataplasm a degradation) andl, as a function of the surface treatm ent.
Fig.l
- ---lE _50
--
~--35
_ B efore degradation
c:::::J A fier degradatlon Fig.2
f11 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ 30 "i25 ~ s: 20 S, c ~ 15 Vi <Il ~ 10 34 35 100 " 32 ~ 30 E '"30 80 -8'" 0.. 28 25 .<: ~ ~ ~ ë>
.~
so 26 c: '" 20 ..., ~ ii ~ .é. 60 '" '" 24 c, '" '" 15 e-'" ..J 22 .2 1/) 1/) 40 20 10 ...J • 1/) 18 ~ 20 16 III l' ~ ~ '" ~ if J~ o.c;:;~ . ..s-<8~ ~.~ .~ ~ ~~(;-O) s$rz; Ilf .s Q;J' ~'" 0 § .. .§Q; "'('(JI §4' t ~t? 0 8~ ~o ~ 8~ ...~ «s Ç1jit.,$ ~ '<i,," Fig.4 10 20 30 40 rP,Owens (rnJ/rn2)Aluminium
Technology
Centre
Investigation of Surface Properties Explaining the
Environmental Durability of Adhesively Bonded
Grit-Blasted Aluminum
D. Gallant, A. Ruest & V. Savard
Structural Adhesives and Corrosion, Aluminum Technology Centre, Industrial Materials
Institute, National Research Council Canada.
501, University Blvd, Saguenay, QC, Canada, G7H 8C3. danick.gallant@cnrc-nrc.gc.ca
1. Introduction
It is well known that surface pretreatment of substrates is a key step to ensure the hydrolytic
stability of adhesive joints. For many years now, highly efficient aluminum surface pretreatments have been used in numerous fields, ranging from basic industrial to advanced aerospace industry applications. However, for many small and medium enterprises (SMEs), anodizing or conversion coatings are not realistic solutions due to their cost and the technical/scientific resources they require.
During recent projects in collaboration with SMEs, simple surface pretreatment approaches were used to meet the requirements of some non-load-bearing and fatigue-free applications involving adhesive bonding. Surprisingly, among the surface pretreatments investigated, alumina
grit-blasting was found to be very efficient in providing durable adhesive joints. Without being an extensive study on the mechanisms that support durability issues, this poster proposes some explanations that might account for these findings.
2. Methodology
The single-lap-shear (SLS, see Figure 1) strength of adhesively bonded aluminum specimens was evaluated for eight (8) different surface pretreatments, from simple acetone degreasing to phosphoric acid anodizing (PAA), according to standard ASTM D3933. A two-component (2K) room-temperature curing epoxy adhesive (amine hardener) was used to evaluate the relative efficiency of surface pretreatments. This adhesive
chemistry is well known for its sensitivity to the quality of surface preparation [1]. The mechanical strength of SLS assemblies was evaluated using an electromechanical test system (Alliance RT/100 model from MTS), before and after cataplasma degradation (Jaguar standard JNS 30.03.35). The surface morphology of
aluminum samples was studied using profilometry (CHR450 from STIL). Chemical modifications brought to aluminum during surface pretreatments were investigated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Axis-Ultra XPS spectrometer from Kratos Analytical) and diffuse reflectance infrared spectroscopy (Nicolet 6700
spectrometer from ThermoFisher Scientific). The surface free energy parameters were calculated from water, formamide and diiodomethane contact angles, using the Owens, Wendt, Kaelble and Uy theory (DSA100
from Krüss). Finally, polypropylene and adhesive chemistry were investigated using attenuated total reflectance infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR) (Nicolet 6700 spectrometer from ThermoFisher Scientific).
Figure 1. Typical Al-Al SLS specimen (dimensions are in mm).
3. Results & Discussion
3.1. Influence of Surface Pretreatment on the Durability of Adhesive Joints
Figure 2. Influence of surface pretreatment on the SLS
stress measured before and after cataplasma.
• Before environmental degradation of adhesive joints, cohesive failure of the adhesive was
observed for P2 etch and PAA pretreatments. Following cataplasma, mixed failure mode (i.e. cohesive + interfacial) was observed for PAA
and interfacial debonding was obtained from the P2 etch treatment.
• SLS specimens prepared from grit-blasted (50m white alumina) aluminum substrates were virtually unaffected by cataplasma
degradation. Visually, the failure mode seemed to be interfacial in either degraded or
non-degraded states. However, according to many studies, a greater fraction of the fracture path occurs in the Al oxide [2-5].
• SLS specimens assembled with aluminum coupons treated with Scotch-Brite 7447B were found to be the most affected by
cataplasma degradation.
3.2. Surface Morphology and Surface Free Energy of Scotch-Brite 7447B
Abraded and Grit-Blasted Samples: Comparison of the Least & Most
Durable Pretreatments
Figure 3. Influence of mechanical surface pretreatments on surface roughness.
Scotch Brite 7447B
R
a= 0.280.02 m
Grit-Blast 50m alumina
R
a= 1.90.1 m
(1.70.1 m in Ref. 6)
3.3. Durability of Grit-Blasted Aluminum Substrates: Literature Overview
According to literature:
1) Changes in surface area and path length for moisture diffusion are unlikely to be the only factors contributing to the bond
durability performance of adhesive joints made of grit-blasted aluminum coupons [4].
2) The influence of roughness on adhesion durability is not insignificant [3-5]. However, mechanical interlocking does not
seem to be responsible for the durability observed, especially in the opening mode [3].
3) Grit-blasting process introduces chemical changes on the surface of aluminum substrates [6].
4) Surface free energy of grit-blasted aluminum depends on the composition of alumina used as blasting media [6]. 5) For grit-blasted Al specimens, a greater fraction of the fracture path occurs in the Al oxide [2-5].
Conclusion Grit-blasting introduces complex changes to aluminum surfaces.
S= 69.7 mJ/m
2
D= 38.8 mJ/m
2
P= 30.9 mJ/m
2
S= 70.7 mJ/m
2
D= 35.8 mJ/m
2
P= 34.9 mJ/m
23.4. Chemistry of Scotch-Brite 7447B Abraded and Grit-Blasted
Aluminum Substrates
(a) Influence of polar component of
Son the percentage of SLS strength loss due to
environmental exposure
(b) X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy & Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Spectroscopy
(c) Evidences of H-Bonding Interactions between Grit-Blasted Aluminum Surfaces and
Epoxy Adhesive
According to literature, in the case of epoxy resins, the significant chemical interactions that affect bond
strength are believed to occur between the hydroxyl (OH) groups on the metal oxide surface and OH groups in the adhesive [8,9]. In the present study, in order to support this mechanism, plasma treated polypropylene (PP) material, mainly rich in OH groups (see Figure 6), was used to model the behaviour of OH groups from grit-blasted aluminum. Figure 7 shows that SLS stress measured for Al-PP assemblies is linearly related to the OH concentration measured on the surface of different 2K epoxy adhesives.
Grit-blasted surfaces significantly deviate from the tendency observed with other surface treatments: very high polar
component, but low strength loss.
Figure 4. Influence of the polar component
of surface free energy on the % of SLS strength loss following cataplasma
degradation of specimens.
XPS (top):
• The presence of Al
oxide/hydroxide/oxyhydroxide is more
significant on the surface of grit-blasted Al coupons.
Infrared spectroscopy (left):
• Absorption bands in the 1200-1000 cm-1
interval are attributable to OH-deformation in boehmite, -AlO(OH); [7]
• Absorption bands in the 3700-3000 cm-1
interval are attributable to OH-stretching in boehmite, -AlO(OH). [7]
References [1] R.G. Dillingham et al. (2008) J. Adhesion 84, 1007. [2] D.R. Arnott et al. (1993) Appl. Surf. Sci. 70-71, 109. [3] A.N. Rider et al. (1999) Surf. Interface Anal. 27, 1055. [4]
A.N. Rider et al. (2004) J. Adhesion Sci. Technol. 18, 1123. [5] A.N. Rider (2006) Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 26, 67. [6] A.F. Harris et al. (1999) Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 19, 445. [7] A. Corina Geiculescu et al. (2003) Thin Solid Films 426, 160. [8] R.G. Schmidt et al. (1986) Adv. Polym. Sci. 15, 33. [9] A.E. Yaniv et al. (1983) Surf. Interface Anal. 5, 93.
XPS spectra of grit-blasted Al XPS spectra of Scotch-Brite treated Al
Infrared spectra of grit-blasted Al
Figure 5. XPS and IR spectra of aluminum surfaces.
Figure 6. ATR-IR spectra of PP before and after
plasma treatment.
Figure 7. Relationship between Al-PP SLS
stress and OH band intensity for different 2K epoxy adhesives.
Substrate
Adhesive H-bonding
4. Conclusion
H-bonding between -AlO(OH) from the surface of grit-blasted Al and OH groups from the 2K epoxy adhesive is expected to contribute in providing durable joints. It is proposed that water (H-OH) is not efficient in the
displacement of existing bonds through the formation of new H-bonds.
O-H vibration