• Aucun résultat trouvé

2. Gas-phase chemistry in the GEM-Mars model

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "2. Gas-phase chemistry in the GEM-Mars model"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Simulations of O 2 (a 1 ∆ g ) with GEM-Mars

L. Neary, F. Daerden and S. Viscardy

Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, Brussels, Belgium ([email protected])

1. Introduction

The composition of the Martian atmosphere is driven by a complex system of photochemistry, transport and small scale processes. Constituents that are key to the understanding of these processes are water vapour and ozone, and related to these is the observable oxygen airglow. There have been terrestrial based observa- tions of the O2airglow in the Martian atmosphere (e.g.

Novak et al., 2002) as well as those from orbit such as the SPICAM (Fedorova et al. 2006) and OMEGA (Al- tieri et al., 2009) instruments.

During daytime, the O2 airglow is formed by the photodissociation of O3in the lower atmosphere. At night, the formation of O2(a1g) comes from the three body reaction of atomic oxygen atoms and CO2. The emission observed at 1.27µm is a result of the deac- tivation of the excited molecule. At lower altitudes, it can be quenched by collision with CO2.

Modelling the photochemistry of the Martian at- mosphere with a Global Circulation Model (GCM) helps to understand the interplay between dynamics and chemistry.

2. Gas-phase chemistry in the GEM-Mars model

The chemical package included online in GEM-Mars uses reactions and rate coefficients based on the work of Garcìa-Muñoz et al. (2005). There are 15 photoly- sis and 31 chemical reactions (solved implicitly using Gaussian elimination method) and include the follow- ing 13 species: O3, O2, O(1D), O, CO, H, H2, OH, HO2, H2O, H2O2, O2(a1g) and CO2.

The chemical species are transported and mixed by the resolved circulation, eddy diffusion and in the up- per atmosphere, molecular diffusion. The model in- cludes interactive dust lifting by saltation and dust dev- ils (Daerden et al., 2013) utilizing a detailed map for aerodynamic roughness length (Hébrard et al. 2012).

Other physical parameterisations included in the model are a 14 layer soil model with sub-surface ice,

CO2condensation/sublimation and a water cycle with simple bulk condensation. The simulations presented are made with horizontal resolution 4x4, 103 stag- gered vertical levels up to approximately 160 km, and a 30 minute timestep.

3. Simulations of O

2

(a

1

g

) airglow

Figure 1 shows the modelled zonal average O2(a1g) volume emission rate for one Martian year (day and night glow combined). The largest emissions are around in the polar regions, between the autumnal and spring equinoxes. This can be shown to be a result of the transport of air rich in atomic oxygen from lower latitudes. These results are consistent with other mod- elling results and observations (e.g. Fedorova et al., 2006). Further analysis of the interaction between dy- namics and chemistry is ongoing.

Figure 1: GEM-Mars zonal average O2(a1g) volume emission rate in MR (1 R =106/photons cm−2s−1(4π ster)−1).

4. Summary and Conclusions

The GEM-Mars model is a three-dimensional GCM for the Mars atmosphere with active dust lifting, CO2

EPSC Abstracts

Vol. 9, EPSC2014-564, 2014

European Planetary Science Congress 2014 c

Author(s) 2014

EPSC

European Planetary Science Congress

(2)

condensation/sublimation and water cycles and gas- phase chemistry. The model is able to reproduce the basic distribution of O2 airglow, an observable phe- nomenon which provides information about the com- position of the Mars atmosphere. The model can be used to complement the observations and make the link between airglow, ozone and water vapour.

References

[1] Altieri, F. et al. (2009), O21.27µm emission maps as derived from OMEGA/MEX data. Icarus 204, 499-511.

[2] Daerden, F. et al. (2013), Dust lifting in GEM-Mars us- ing a roughness length map, EPSC2013-206.

[3] Fedorova, S. et al. (2006), Observation of O2) 1.27µm dayglow by SPICAM IR: Seasonal distribution for the first Martian year of Mars Express, J. Geophys. Res., 111, E09S07.

[4] García-Muñoz et al. (2005), Airglow on Mars: Some model expectations for the OH Meinel bands and the O2

IR atmospheric band. Icarus 176, 75-95.

[5] Hébrard, E., et al. (2012), An aerodynamic roughness length map derived from extended Martian rock abun- dance data, J. Geophys. Res., 117, E04008.

[6] Novak, R.E. et al. (2002), Mapping of ozone and water in the atmosphere of Mars near the 1997 aphelion. Icarus 158, 14-23.

Références

Documents relatifs

Our de- tections made at ~3.2 to 3.8  m with the Atmospheric Chemistry Suite and confirmed with Nadir and Occultation for Mars Discovery instruments onboard the ExoMars Trace

4 Radiative transfer in the ultraviolet 41 4.1 General

Our decision to incorporate the surface height and average each profiles into vertical bins with weighting propor- tional the altitude resolution (option 2c above) means that

Physical parameteriza- tions in the model include an interactive condensa- tion/surface pressure cycle, a fully interactive water cycle including cloud radiative feedbacks, a

Figure 1: Temperature profiles from MCS (black), GEM-Mars V4 (green) and GEM-Mars V3 (red and blue, same dust opacities, different

We will present simulations using the new grid definition, comparing with previous model results, and discuss the impact on general circulation and the water cycle. Of

Figure 3 shows the zonal mean optical depth for the two simulations, separated into optical depth from dust devils and wind lifting.. Figure 4 shows the dust optical depth at

Model sensitivity studies showed that the free atmo- sphere stability functions and mixing length used can have a significant impact on the ozone column amount in the polar spring