• Aucun résultat trouvé

Improved fallows implementation in southern Xayabury. Towards a better use of waste lands

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Improved fallows implementation in southern Xayabury. Towards a better use of waste lands"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Improved fallows implementation in southern

Xayabury

Tran Quoc, H; Lienhard, P; Tivet, F; Sosomphou, T; Khamxaykhay, C;

Chantharath, B; Panyasiri, K; Julien, P; Séguy, L Tran Quoc, H; Lienhard, P; Tivet, F;

Sosomphou, T; Khamxaykhay, C; Chantharath, B; Panyasiri, K;

Julien, P; Séguy, L

Towards a better use of waste lands

When a field is too infested by the so known Imperata grass (Imperata cylindrica), farmers have usually no other choice than let it return into fallow. Indeed, Imperata emergence and infestation is closely linked with soil fertility reduction. Moreover, labour required for weeding Imperata land is very high.

Furthermore, fallows infested by Imperata grass offer only few interests for animal husbandry since this weed is not appreciated by cattle.

Therefore, biological control of this vegetal pest which covers nowadays large areas in the South of Xayabury province is of main importance.

Imperata

Imperata

Landscape in Boten district

OBJECTIVES

•To develop technical alternatives based on biological control of Imperata grass (principle of competition between species) ; • To improve fodder resources quality ;

• To test the possibility and the different ways to restart cropping activities after 3 years of improved fallow (restitution of fertility by recycling lixiviated minerals from deep soil layers).

MATERIALS et METHODS

•Trials are conducted in order to substitute Imperata cylindrica by fodder species.

• Demonstration plots are implemented in different ecological units .

• 6 species are tested : B. ruziziensis, B. humidicola, B. decumbens, Panicum maximum,

Andropogon gayanus, Stylosanthes guianensis

(using seeds or stem/root cutting according to species)

ANALYSIS OF SPECIES POTENTIALITIES

Panicum maximum

Species Imperatacontrol

(after 1 year)

Recovery

capacity Adaptation to the environment Implementation

Brachiaria ruziziensis

+++

+++

++

Transplanting

or sowing

Brachiaria decumbens

+++

++

++

Transplanting

Brachiaria humidicola

++

++

+++

Transplanting

Panicum maximum

+++

+++

++

Transplanting

or sowing

Andropogon gayanus

+

+

+

Transplanting

Stylosanthes guianensis

++

+

++

Transplanting

or sowing

Panicum maximum Brachiaria ruziziensis

Stylosanthes guianensis

Imperata cylindrica

Slashing (10 – 15 cm)

Treatment with herbicide 15 days after slashing Systemic herbicide Glyphosate (5L/ha) Transplanting Grazing After 3 years Possibility to cultivate Succession cropping operations realized in the South of Xayabury province in order to substitute

Imperata cylindrica by different fodder species

10 to 15 days after treatment

National

National ProgramProgramofof AgroecologyAgroecology

Références

Documents relatifs

Inscrit sur l’inventaire des substances EINECS de la CEE (inventaire européen des substances chimiques commercialisées Classification selon le règlement (CE) N° 1272/2008

Decreasing herbicide use by contrasted cropping systems lead to various dynamics of weed communities Fabrice Dessaint, Dominique Meunier, Florence Strbik, François Dugué,

Daily maximum temperature influences fledgling brood size directly via inducing nestling metabolic stress and decreased nestling survival and may exhibit a quadratic

More precisely, perinatal exposure to glyphosate is reprotoxic to young animals, contrary to GBH exposure which is less toxic in the short term but shows its effect in the

Il ne doit pas pleuvoir pendant au moins 4 à 6 heures pour que SPARTAN m md d puisse être absorbé par les feuilles des mauvaises herbes.. • Appliquer l’herbicide SPARTAN md m d

Une diminution du résultat courant allant de 8 % pour les systèmes à très forte valeur ajoutée, à 153% pour les vignobles initialement modestes. Rôle important des

Pour supprimer les mauvaises herbes vivaces dans les sites d'interventions sylvicoles en utilisant 7 à 12 litres par hectare de ce produit, appliquer avec 50 à 100 litres d’eau

Our hypotheses were the following: (i) agricultural practices, such as herbicide use, impair the development of photosynthetic microbial crusts, thereby decreasing soil