• Aucun résultat trouvé

Relaxed intersection of thick sets

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Relaxed intersection of thick sets"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Relaxed intersection of thick sets

Benoit Desrochers and Luc Jaulin

Lab-STICC, ENSTA Bretagne, Brest, France benoit.desrochers@ensta-bretagne.org

Relaxed Intersection : Theq-relaxed intersectionmsetsX1, . . . ,Xm of Rn, is the set of all x ∈ Rn which belong to allXi’s except q at most.

This notion is important in the context of robust bounded error esti- mation [1].

Thick set. Denote by (P(Rn),⊂), the powerset of Rn equipped with the inclusion ⊂ as an order relation. A thick set JXK of Rn is an interval of (P(Rn),⊂). If JXK is a thick set of Rn , there exist [2] two subsets of Rn , called the subset bound and the supset bound such that

JXK = JX,XK = {X ∈ P(Rn)|X ⊂ X⊂ X}. (1)

Thick test. Given a thick set JXK, the corresponding thick test JtK : Rn → {0,?,1} associates to any x the value 0 if x ∈/X, 1 if x ∈ X and ? otherwise.

Algorithm. Using a paver and an arithmetic on thick tests we show that we can easily obtain a guaranteed approximation of the relaxed intersection of m thick sets.

TestCase: Let us take the following system of interval linear equa- tions [3]:

[2,4] [−2,−1]

[0,2] [−3,−1]

[−6,−4] [−1,0]

[−3,−2] [−3,−2]

[−1,1] [−5,−4]

·x =

[−1,1]

[−5,0]

[−6,0]

[2,7]

[−9,−3]

. (2)

1

(2)

This system corresponds to six interval equations, each line of which corresponds to a thick set JXiKinR2. Performing a relaxed intersection of the thick sets JXiK, we obtain the characterization relaxed intersec- tion JX{q}K of the JXiK for q ∈ {1,2,3}as given by Figure 1. For q = 0, JX{q}K is empty.

Figure 1: JX{1}K(Right), JX{2}K(middle) andJX{3}K(Right). Red boxes correspond to the subset bound X{q}⊂ of JX{q}K, blue ones are outside the supset bound X{q}⊃ and orange boxes belong to X{q}⊃\X{q}⊂.

References:

[1] Q. Brefort, L Jaulin, M. Ceberio, V. Kreinovich, To- wards Fast and Reliable Localization of an Underwater Object:

An Interval Approach, Journal of Uncertain Systems, (2015).

[2] B. Desrochers, L. Jaulin, Computing a guaranteed approxima- tion the zone explored by a robot, IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, (2016).

[3] V. Kreinovich and S. Shary, Interval Methods for Data Fitting under Uncertainty: A Probabilistic Treatment, Reliable Comput- ing, (2016).

2

Références

Documents relatifs

Bracketing largest invariant sets of dynamical systems : an application to drifting underwater robots in ocean currents.. ENSTA Bretagne - École nationale supérieure de

Our method uses the geometrical properties of the vector field given by the ODE and a state space discretization to compute an enclosure of the trajectories set that verifies the

Usually, most sensors detect reflection from the sensor, so we can find the actual location of the sensor as a non-empty intersection of a subfamily of the family of all the sets S i –

Our method uses the geometrical properties of the vector field given by the ODE and a state space discretization to compute an enclosure of the trajectories set that verifies the

Abstract—In this paper we compare the use of a Kalman filter and a Robust State Observer for the localization and mapping of an underwater vehicle using range-only measurements

On each part of the figure, the output y im (k) is drawn in dash-line in order to be compared with its estimates based on each model. Therefore the admissible output domains are

Abstract—This paper proposes an original interval-based method to compute an outer approximation of all invariant sets (such as limit cycles) of a continuous-time non-linear

Zhang, “Stabilisation for a class of non-linear uncertain systems based on interval observers,” Control Theory Applications, IET, vol. Niculescu, “Robust interval observers