• Aucun résultat trouvé

Preface of DO 2013

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Preface of DO 2013"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Montreal, Quebec, Canada July 6th—12th 2013

4th International Conference on Biomedical Ontology ICBO 2013 9th Data Integration in Life Science DILS 2013

4th Canadian Semantic Web Conference CSWS 2013

Definitions in Ontologies

(2)

INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON

DEFINITIONS IN ONTOLOGIES (DO 2013)

Proceedings

edited by

Selja Seppälä and

Alan Ruttenberg

DO 2013 is held in conjunction with the

4th International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO 2013)

Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada

July 7, 2013

(3)

Preface

Ontologies built using OBO Foundry principles are advised to include both formal (logical) definitions, as well as natural language definitions. Depending on the effort, one or the other can be underrepresented. Possible explanations to this bottleneck are the high cost of producing well-written definitions; an insufficient understanding of the nature of natural language definitions or of logic; the lack of an operational theory of definitions; the lack of studies that evaluate usability and effectiveness of definitions in ontologies; a paucity of tools to help with definition authoring and checking. Producing natural language definitions is time-consuming, costly and prone to all kinds of inconsistencies. Producing logical definitions that are effective, correct, and communicative is also difficult. It is therefore worth exploring different ways of assisting, with automation, creation and quality control of definitions.

This workshop gathers interested researchers and developers to reflect upon general themes as the selection and modeling of defining information; the relation between definitions in specific domains as opposed to domain-independent definitions; the theoretical underpinnings of definitions; tools that can facilitate relating logical and natural language definitions. In addition, we wanted to encourage participation by different communities using definitions so that their needs and solutions can be exposed. This interdisciplinary goal proved successful, as each of the three selected papers represents a different community: ontology, terminology, and natural language processing (NLP).

Topics

Topics of interest were split between foundational aspects, pragmatic issues and user perspectives. Below we list some possible topics.

Foundational aspect

• Theories of definition and their implications for the defining practice

• Realist versus conceptualist approaches in definition writing

• Definition modeling: what kinds of information are defining

• Domain-independent versus domain-specific definition models

• Formal versus natural language definitions

Pragmatic issues

• Quality control in definitions

• Ways of evaluating definitions

• Comparison and evaluation of different definition production techniques: handwritten, automatically generated from formal definitions, extracted from corpora or constructed from information retrieved from corpora

• Methods and tools to automate definition production and checking

• (Multilingual) definition generation

(4)

• Information retrieval for definition production

• Use of definition models to facilitate information retrieval

• Definition extraction from corpora

• Interactions between ontologies and lexical resources (WordNet, FrameNet)

• Consequences/Strategies of giving necessary versus necessary and sufficient definitions, or simply sufficient definitions

• Coordination of logical and textual definitions

• Alternatives to and variants of definitions: elucidations, explanations, glosses, figures

User perspectives

• Assessment of definitions used in current practice

• Balancing needs of within discipline use and wider use of definitions

• Use of specialized terminology versus general vocabulary

• Presentation of definitions to different user audiences

• Alternatives/Augmentations of textual definitions, such as figures and images
 for anatomy, where textual definitions may be harder to formulate

The articles published in these proceedings cover three distinct aspects of definitions in ontologies, and include a survey report summary on defining practices in the ontology community conducted in preparation of the workshop:

Summary of the survey results:

Selja Seppälä and Alan Ruttenberg

Survey on Defining Practices in Ontologies: Report Summary

Automatically populating ontologies with multilingual definitions:

Guoqian Jiang, Harold Solbrig and Christopher Chute

A Semantic Web-Based Approach for Harvesting Multilingual Textual Definitions from Wikipedia to Support ICD-11 Revision

Displaying user-oriented defining contents using domain-specific templates:

Antonio San Martín and Pilar León Araúz

Flexible Terminological Definitions and Conceptual Frames

Enhancing term retrieval through the definition’s contents:

Gerardo Sierra-Martinez and Laura Elena Hernandez-Dominguez

Automatic Construction of the Knowledge Base of an Onomasiological Dictionary

In addition to these papers, the workshop’s program includes three presentations aimed at widening the scope of the issues to be discussed:

(5)

Pragmatic aspects of defining diseases in the Disease Ontology:

Lynn M. Schriml

Definition of Disease Terms

Domain- and language-independent definition templates:

Selja Seppälä

Using BFO Categories for Creating Generic Definition Templates

Definition authoring tools:

Alan Ruttenberg

Tool Support for Definition Authorship and Management: Desiderata

Our invited speaker covers some foundational aspects of definitions in ontologies:

Barry Smith

Introduction to the Logics of Definitions

We expect to have a rich and insightful discussion with the participants and the attendees of the workshop that will yield a prioritized list of needs and useful recommendations regarding the defining practices in ontologies.

Acknowledgements

This workshop would not have been possible without the thorough reviews of the 18 scholars in the domains of ontology, natural language processing, terminology and lexicography that constituted the program committee. Three referees reviewed each of the four submissions we received. We would like to thank them for their participation and support to this workshop. We would also like to thank the ICBO organizers for hosting the workshop and providing the logistic assistance, as well as the Swiss National Science Foundation and the State University of New York at Buffalo for their support.

July 2013 Selja Seppälä Alan Ruttenberg

(6)

Organizing Committee

Selja Seppälä (University at Buffalo, USA) Alan Ruttenberg (University at Buffalo, USA)

Program Committee

César Aguilar (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile)

Nathalie Aussenac-Gilles (National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), France) Caroline Barrière (CRIM, Canada)

Thomas Bittner (University at Buffalo, USA)

Mélanie Courtot (British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Canada) Christiane Fellbaum (Princeton University, USA)

Natalia Grabar (Université de Lille 3, France)

Janna Hastings (European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, UK) Marie-Claude L’Homme (Université de Montréal, Canada)

James Malone (European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, UK) Alexis Nasr (Aix Marseille Université, France)

Fabian Neuhaus (National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), USA) James Overton (Knocean, Toronto, Canada)

Richard Power (The Open University, UK)

Patrice Seyed (Tetherless World Constellation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, USA) Robert Stevens (The University of Manchester, UK)

Allan Third (The Open University, UK) Sandra Williams (The Open University, UK)

(7)

DO 2013 PROGRAM

July 7, 2013

8:30–8:45 Welcome

8:45–9:00 Lynn M. Schriml

Definition of Disease Terms

9:00–9:15 Gerardo Sierra-Martinez and Laura Elena Hernandez-Dominguez Automatic Construction of the Knowledge Base of an Onomasio- logical Dictionary

9:15–9:30 Guoqian Jiang, Harold Solbrig and Christopher Chute

A Semantic Web-Based Approach for Harvesting Multilingual Textual Definitions from Wikipedia to Support ICD-11 Revision

9:30–9:45 Antonio San Martín and Pilar León Araúz

Flexible Terminological Definitions and Conceptual Frames 9:45–10:15 Discussion

10:15–10:45 Coffee Break

10:45–11:15 Invited Speaker: Barry Smith

Introduction to the Logic of Definitions 11:15–11:30 Selja Seppälä

Using BFO Categories for Creating Generic Definition Templates 11:30–11:45 Alan Ruttenberg

Tool Support for Definition Authorship and Management: Desiderata 11:45–12:00 Discussion

Références

Documents relatifs

The hierarchy of semantic labels, developed during the construction of the DiCo database (Polguère, 2003), currently contains 790 labels that have been defined

formal objects are the words (i.e. finite strings ), formed from the letters of a certain alphabet 58. In the second alternative, called an.. ob system, the formal

renoncement et du foncteur lui correspondant a pour point de départ la distinction de deux situations : celle dans laquelle l’action n’a pas été accomplie et

The selected formalism of representation of semantic knowledge, being the model for the conceptual graphs, this analysis therefore consists of the semantic translation of

Therefore, and within the scope of the EndoTerm project, examples will be provided in the following sections of how conceptual information (i.e.. concept system, its

 Circularity  is  prevented

The greatest number of characteristics was formed in the formal concept with the characteristic "Behaviour"; one of them defined socialization as «a process of

We used the notion of differentia in order to define the essential characteristics that mark the distinction of the entity under definition from other entities