• Aucun résultat trouvé

IBANA-Calc: new software to calculate the effect of sound insulation against aircraft noise

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "IBANA-Calc: new software to calculate the effect of sound insulation against aircraft noise"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Canadian Acoustics, 28, 3, pp. 54-55, 2000-09-01

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

IBANA-Calc: new software to calculate the effect of sound insulation

against aircraft noise

Bradley, J. S.; Birta, J. A.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC:

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=92c99a7e-0da7-4187-96a2-35e9f0e238ab https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=92c99a7e-0da7-4187-96a2-35e9f0e238ab

(2)

NRCC-44302

Canadian Acoustics / Acoustique Canadienne Vol. 28 No. 3 (2000) - 54

IBANA-Calc: NEW SOFTWARE TO CALCULATE THE EFFECT OF

SOUND INSULATION AGAINST AIRCRAFT NOISE

J.S. Bradley and J.A. Birta

Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council, Montreal Rd. Ottawa, K1A 0R6

A version of this paper was originally published in Canadian Acoustics, 28, (3), Proceedings of Acoustics Week in Canada 2000 (Sherbrooke, Québec, 9/28/2000), pp. 54-55, September 01, 2000

RÉSUMÉ - Disponible aussi tôt que possible.

Introduction

As part of the IBANA project (Insulating Buildings Against Noise from Aircraft), new software has been developed for calculating the effect of sound insulation against aircraft noise. The software is intended to be both more accurate and more convenient than previous approaches that have used look-up tables and single number ratings of sound insulation[1]. The program includes a large database of new sound transmission loss data of building façade components as well as aircraft noise spectra. While the included database is quite extensive, the user can add new data themselves. Users simply select the construction type of each façade element and enter its area. The total sound reduction or the expected indoor sound levels are calculated and displayed graphically. Multiple scenarios can be calculated and compared to evaluate their relative effectiveness either in terms of graphical results or audible simulations. The program is written in Visual Basic and is intended to run on a standard PC type computer.

Calculations

The user first enters the outdoor aircraft noise level either as an NEF or an Leq24 value. NEF values are assumed to be those calculated by Transport Canada’s NEF_1.7 noise contour prediction software. The relationship between these NEF and Leq24 values is[2],

Leq24 = NEF + 32, dBA

The aircraft noise source type is then selected (See Fig. 1). Users can select one of several standard sources or create a mix of several types of aircraft. The overall level of the selected source is adjusted to equal the chosen NEF value. The user also has the option of entering their own source spectrum for other source types. The selected outdoor sound level and source spectrum are assumed to be the free field outdoor sound levels.

The indoor sound level is calculated for each 1/3 octave band from 50 to 5k Hz as,

L2(i) = L1(i) – TL(i) +10 log[S/A(i)] + 3, dB

Here, L1(i) is the outdoor sound level, L2(i) is the indoor

sound level, TL(i) is the transmission loss measured in the laboratory, A(i) is the sound absorption in the receiving room and S is the area of the particular façade element. Sound absorption is entered as a fraction of the floor area. Where a particular façade is made up of several components such as a wall section, a window and a door, the total transmission loss is calculated from the area-weighted transmission coefficients of each element.

Data Bases

The program includes databases of source spectra and of laboratory transmission loss measurements of façade elements. The program currently includes aircraft noise spectra for: Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 jet aircraft as well as spectra for propeller aircraft and helicopters. It also

Fig. 1 Source selector screen.

(3)

Canadian Acoustics / Acoustique Canadienne Vol. 28 No. 3 (2000) - 55 includes several standard spectra such as previously used

in the CMHC Guide[1], the spectrum in the ASTM OITC standard [3] and a new standard aircraft spectrum based on measurements at Ottawa, Vancouver and Toronto airports. These spectra can also be corrected for the effects of air absorption at different distances. The user can also add their own source spectra. Further corrections are being

developed to account for the orientation of the façade relative to the flight track of the aircraft.

There is also a database of laboratory transmission loss measurements for various building façade elements. These were mostly obtained in tests for the current project and include 50 exterior walls, 50 roof-ceilings, 40 windows and glazing units and a few doors. Again the user is able to add their own new transmission loss results to the data-base using the screen shown in Fig. 4.

Scenarios

Each calculation is referred to as a scenario. The user can

calculate and display multiple scenarios. For example, one could try various combinations of wall and window constructions to determine which combination gives the desired result. For each scenario, either the total transmission loss or the indoor sound levels can be displayed as shown in Fig. 3.

Scenario Comparisons

Multiple scenarios can be compared in terms of either indoor sound levels or sound transmission loss values (see Fig. 5).

Reports

The results of a particular scenario or the comparisons of several scenarios can be printed out as complete reports. The associated results can also be printed to a file for importing into a spreadsheet or other software.

Scenario Combinations

The results of several scenarios can be combined. For example, a room at the corner of a building might have exterior walls exposed to quite different incident sound. The sound transmitted through each could first be calculated in separate scenarios and the results combined to give the total indoor sound levels.

Audible Simulations

The program can also produce audible simulations of several scenarios. The sound of an aircraft fly-over is modified according to the calculated sound attenuations of each scenario and played back using a standard sound card. For each audible simulation, up to four scenarios can be compared. Of course, the quality of the playback is improved with an external amplifier and reasonable quality loudspeakers.

Acknowledgements

This project is jointly sponsored by Transport Canada, the Department of National Defence and the National Research Council. Further financial support was obtained from Vancouver International Airport. The helpful advice of the following consultants is very gratefully acknowledged: Valcoustics Canada Ltd., Aercoustics Engineering Ltd., and BKL Ltd. The original code was written by Steve Wrich and subsequently modified by Emily Nichols.

Fig. 5. Scenario comparison screen Fig. 3. Scenario results screen.

(4)

NRCC-44302

Canadian Acoustics / Acoustique Canadienne Vol. 28 No. 3 (2000) - 54

References

1. Anon, “New Housing and Airport Noise”, Canada Mortgage and Housing (1981).

2. Bradley, J.S., “NEF Validation Study: (3) Final Report”, IRC Contract Report A-1505.3, 1996. 3. ASTM 1332, “Standard Classification for

Determination of Outdoor-Indoor Transmission Class”, Am. Soc. for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia.

Figure

Fig. 2. Façade element selection screen.
Fig. 5. Scenario comparison screenFig. 3. Scenario results screen.
Fig 4. Transmission loss database screen.

Références

Documents relatifs

To contain all the data contained by the many cards created during Programming (>300 cards for most projects), the Henn group needs to store the data in a

Second, a pairwise approach is non-parametric, in that the cardinality of the input vector is not dependent upon the number of tasks (or actions) that can be performed in any

The feasibility of all-solid-state Li-ion batteries based on Li- garnet solid electrolyte in terms of processing, materials and cycling at stable performance with relatively fast

Having created a program structure tree for each subroutine in each strand object file, the C-Flow compiler is almost ready to begin merging the separate strands

The dynamics of Stimulated Brillouin Scattering (SBS) in a homogeneous finite medium has captured considerable interest both in laser-plasma interactions [1-4] and in

By comparing the boundaries of these spaces, we show that the only Hilbert and Thompson geometries that are isometric to Banach spaces are the ones defined on the cone of

What is the meaning of this secondary peak set found for AS and 400°C? The solute elements Au and Ag were speci fically chosen for their preference to segregate from the Pt solvent

A4 and A7 modified PES membranes exhibited both lower fouling and higher permeation flux when compared with the control membrane, and their performance was comparable with