• Aucun résultat trouvé

Relative fundamental Frequency of voiced and voiceless stops and fricatives for different phonation types in normal French speakers

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Relative fundamental Frequency of voiced and voiceless stops and fricatives for different phonation types in normal French speakers"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01453113

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01453113

Submitted on 2 Feb 2017

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Relative fundamental Frequency of voiced and voiceless stops and fricatives for different phonation types in

normal French speakers

Camille Robieux, Christine Meunier

To cite this version:

Camille Robieux, Christine Meunier. Relative fundamental Frequency of voiced and voiceless stops and fricatives for different phonation types in normal French speakers. 5th Joint Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and Acoustical Society of Japan, Nov 2016, Honolulu, United States. 2016, 5th Joint Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and Acoustical Society of Japan. �hal-01453113�

(2)

-1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Relative fundamental frequency (ST)

Offset cycles Onset cycles .

-1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Relative fundamental frequency (ST)

Offset cycles Onset cycles .

-1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Relative fundamental frequency (ST)

Offset cycles Onset cycles .

-1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Relative fundamental frequency (ST)

Offset cycles Onset cycles

.

f

v

b p

-1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Relative fundamental frequency (ST)

Offset cycles Onset cycles All phonation types

 12 normal French speakers (6 women & 6 men)

 4 consonants with voicing & manner contrast

 7 phonations types : spontaneous (baseline), low or high, soft or loud & breathy or pressed

 Control of intra-speaker difference to baseline for pitch (F0), intensity (SLP) & quality (H1-H2)

 24 trains of 8 syllables, like "pafavabapafavaba"

 For each, selection of the 4 central consonants

 Measure of the relative fundamental frequency on the 10 cycles of the vowel offset & onset

Abstract #2575950

Camille F Robieux & Christine Meunier

Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, LPL, Aix-en-Provence, France (camille.robieux@lpl-aix.fr)

Relative fundamental frequency

of voiced and voiceless stops and fricatives

for different phonation types in normal French speakers

This study was conducted thanks to the financial support of the region Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur and the compagny SQ-Lab

Low-soft-breathy phonation

Δ F0 (ST) Δ SPL (dB) Δ H1-H2 (dB)

Low -3.5 -0.4 -0.1 n = 11

Soft -2.8 -8.8 +2.7 n = 11

Breathy -0.9 -5.8 +6.3 n = 9

-2.5 -5.0 +2.7

High-loud-pressed phonation

Δ F0 (ST) Δ SPL (dB) Δ H1-H2 (dB)

High +6.3 +3.2 -1.3 n = 9

Loud +5.2 +11.7 -5.1 n = 10

Pressed +3.8 +9.2 -1.8 n = 7

+5.2 +8.1 -2.9

Baseline

F0 (ST) SPL (dB) H1-H2 (dB)

Women 56 65 -0.6 n = 6

Men 46 68 +3.4 n = 6

 Fundametal frequency (F0) at vowel offset & onset higher for voiceless than for voiced consonants [1-3]

 Relative fundamental frequency (RFF) used to assess vocal effort in patients with more effort for lower RFF [4-7]

 To explore RFF variations according

to the voicing & the manner contrasts

 … & to the phonation types known to involve different levels of vocal effort

 To provide data for normal speakers

 RFF values will be lower for voiced than for voiceless stops & fricatives

 RFF values will be lower for high, loud & pressed phonations (more vocal effort) than for low, soft &

breathy phonation (less vocal effort)

p a f a v a b a p a f a v a b a

56,0 57,0 58,0 59,0

24,688 24,738 24,788 24,838 24,888 24,938 24,988 25,038 25,088 25,138

InstantaneousF0 (ST)

Time (s)

-1,0 -0,5 0,0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

RFF (ST)

Offset cycles Onset cycles

Measure of 10 periods (time between 2 pulses) at vowel offset & onset

Calcul of the instantaneous fundamental frequencies (F0) = 1/period

Conversion of all frequencies from Hertz (Hz) to Semitones (ST)

Calcul of the relative fundamental frequency (RFF) to the farthest point from the consonant (cycle 1 in vowel offset & cycle 10 in vowel onset)

 RFF varies with vocal effort: higher RFF/lower effort in LSB phonation (+ voiceless consonants) & lower RFF/higher effort in HLP phonation (+ voiced consonants)

 Possible to decrease but not to increase the vocal effort for voiced consonants &

possible to increase but not to decrease the vocal effort for voiceless consonants

 In spontaneous phonation: production of voiced consonants at their maximum vocal effort but production of voiceless consonants at their minimum vocal effort

Background Purposes Hypotheses

Discussion

Methodology

Results

RFF lower for voiced than for voiceless stops & fricatives at vowel onset

RFF for voiced consonants: (except /b/ at onset: LSB > Baseline > HLP) Low-soft-breathy phonation > Baseline = High-loud-pressed phonation

RFF for voiceless consonant: (except /p/ at offset: LSB > Baseline = HLP) Low-soft-breathy phonation = Baseline > High-loud-pressed phonation

LSB phonation Baseline HLP phonation

[1] Haggard M, Ambler S, Callow M. Pitch as a voicing cue. J Acoust Soc Am. 1970;47:613–7.

[2] Löfqvist A, Baer T, McGarr NS, Seider Story R. The cricothyroid muscle in voicing control. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989;85:1314–21.

[3] Ohde RN. Fundamental frequency as an acoustic correlate of stop consonant voicing. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984;75:224–30.

[4] Stepp CE, Hillman RE, Heaton JT. The impact of vocal hyperfunction on relative fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53(5):1220–6.

[5] Stepp CE, Eadie TL. Relative fundamental frequency as an acoustic correlate of vocal effort in spasmodic dysphonia. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011;129:2526.

[6] Stepp CE, Merchant GR, Heaton JT, Hillman RE. Effects of voice therapy o relative

fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset in patients with vocal hyperfunction. . J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54(5):1260-6.

[7] Stepp CE, Sawin DE, Eadie TL. The relationship between perception of vocal effort and relative fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset. J Speech Lang Hear Res.

2012;55(6):1887–96.

References

Perspectives

 Easy measurement of vocal effort in dysphonic patients on voiceless consonants

Références

Documents relatifs

[r]

More precisely, a part-tone reconstruction of a non- stationary acoustic object is self-consistent, if the centre filter-frequency contour(s) of a subset of the bandpass

Initial results from an experiment with French listeners rating speech rates in French, German, and English show that, despite varying objective speech rates, listeners are well

It has been demonstrated that the limit strains predicted in the range of positive strain paths are unrealistically high when the regularized version of the Schmid law is used to

Using multimodal transcriptions of the interaction data from these sessions, screen shot data, and students’ post-course interviews, it was found, firstly, that whilst a head and

This technical note is a follow-up that intends to close the subject of strong duality and convergence of the Lasserre hierarchy, by proving a general strong result at the

The rationale is that the verification cost has a larger impact on the overall performance since the number of verifier nodes can be high in a large distributed system: data