HAL Id: hal-01453113
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01453113
Submitted on 2 Feb 2017
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Relative fundamental Frequency of voiced and voiceless stops and fricatives for different phonation types in
normal French speakers
Camille Robieux, Christine Meunier
To cite this version:
Camille Robieux, Christine Meunier. Relative fundamental Frequency of voiced and voiceless stops and fricatives for different phonation types in normal French speakers. 5th Joint Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and Acoustical Society of Japan, Nov 2016, Honolulu, United States. 2016, 5th Joint Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and Acoustical Society of Japan. �hal-01453113�
-1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Relative fundamental frequency (ST)
Offset cycles Onset cycles .
-1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Relative fundamental frequency (ST)
Offset cycles Onset cycles .
-1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Relative fundamental frequency (ST)
Offset cycles Onset cycles .
-1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Relative fundamental frequency (ST)
Offset cycles Onset cycles
.
f
v
b p
-1,0 -0,5 0,0 0,5 1,0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Relative fundamental frequency (ST)
Offset cycles Onset cycles All phonation types
12 normal French speakers (6 women & 6 men)
4 consonants with voicing & manner contrast
7 phonations types : spontaneous (baseline), low or high, soft or loud & breathy or pressed
Control of intra-speaker difference to baseline for pitch (F0), intensity (SLP) & quality (H1-H2)
24 trains of 8 syllables, like "pafavabapafavaba"
For each, selection of the 4 central consonants
Measure of the relative fundamental frequency on the 10 cycles of the vowel offset & onset
Abstract #2575950
Camille F Robieux & Christine Meunier
Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, LPL, Aix-en-Provence, France (camille.robieux@lpl-aix.fr)
Relative fundamental frequency
of voiced and voiceless stops and fricatives
for different phonation types in normal French speakers
This study was conducted thanks to the financial support of the region Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur and the compagny SQ-Lab
Low-soft-breathy phonation
Δ F0 (ST) Δ SPL (dB) Δ H1-H2 (dB)
Low -3.5 -0.4 -0.1 n = 11
Soft -2.8 -8.8 +2.7 n = 11
Breathy -0.9 -5.8 +6.3 n = 9
-2.5 -5.0 +2.7
High-loud-pressed phonation
Δ F0 (ST) Δ SPL (dB) Δ H1-H2 (dB)
High +6.3 +3.2 -1.3 n = 9
Loud +5.2 +11.7 -5.1 n = 10
Pressed +3.8 +9.2 -1.8 n = 7
+5.2 +8.1 -2.9
Baseline
F0 (ST) SPL (dB) H1-H2 (dB)
Women 56 65 -0.6 n = 6
Men 46 68 +3.4 n = 6
Fundametal frequency (F0) at vowel offset & onset higher for voiceless than for voiced consonants [1-3]
Relative fundamental frequency (RFF) used to assess vocal effort in patients with more effort for lower RFF [4-7]
To explore RFF variations according
to the voicing & the manner contrasts
… & to the phonation types known to involve different levels of vocal effort
To provide data for normal speakers
RFF values will be lower for voiced than for voiceless stops & fricatives
RFF values will be lower for high, loud & pressed phonations (more vocal effort) than for low, soft &
breathy phonation (less vocal effort)
p a f a v a b a p a f a v a b a
56,0 57,0 58,0 59,0
24,688 24,738 24,788 24,838 24,888 24,938 24,988 25,038 25,088 25,138
InstantaneousF0 (ST)
Time (s)
-1,0 -0,5 0,0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
RFF (ST)
Offset cycles Onset cycles
Measure of 10 periods (time between 2 pulses) at vowel offset & onset
Calcul of the instantaneous fundamental frequencies (F0) = 1/period
Conversion of all frequencies from Hertz (Hz) to Semitones (ST)
Calcul of the relative fundamental frequency (RFF) to the farthest point from the consonant (cycle 1 in vowel offset & cycle 10 in vowel onset)
RFF varies with vocal effort: higher RFF/lower effort in LSB phonation (+ voiceless consonants) & lower RFF/higher effort in HLP phonation (+ voiced consonants)
Possible to decrease but not to increase the vocal effort for voiced consonants &
possible to increase but not to decrease the vocal effort for voiceless consonants
In spontaneous phonation: production of voiced consonants at their maximum vocal effort but production of voiceless consonants at their minimum vocal effort
Background Purposes Hypotheses
Discussion
Methodology
Results
RFF lower for voiced than for voiceless stops & fricatives at vowel onset
RFF for voiced consonants: (except /b/ at onset: LSB > Baseline > HLP) Low-soft-breathy phonation > Baseline = High-loud-pressed phonation
RFF for voiceless consonant: (except /p/ at offset: LSB > Baseline = HLP) Low-soft-breathy phonation = Baseline > High-loud-pressed phonation
LSB phonation Baseline HLP phonation
[1] Haggard M, Ambler S, Callow M. Pitch as a voicing cue. J Acoust Soc Am. 1970;47:613–7.
[2] Löfqvist A, Baer T, McGarr NS, Seider Story R. The cricothyroid muscle in voicing control. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989;85:1314–21.
[3] Ohde RN. Fundamental frequency as an acoustic correlate of stop consonant voicing. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984;75:224–30.
[4] Stepp CE, Hillman RE, Heaton JT. The impact of vocal hyperfunction on relative fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53(5):1220–6.
[5] Stepp CE, Eadie TL. Relative fundamental frequency as an acoustic correlate of vocal effort in spasmodic dysphonia. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011;129:2526.
[6] Stepp CE, Merchant GR, Heaton JT, Hillman RE. Effects of voice therapy o relative
fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset in patients with vocal hyperfunction. . J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54(5):1260-6.
[7] Stepp CE, Sawin DE, Eadie TL. The relationship between perception of vocal effort and relative fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset. J Speech Lang Hear Res.
2012;55(6):1887–96.
References
Perspectives
Easy measurement of vocal effort in dysphonic patients on voiceless consonants