• Aucun résultat trouvé

Second Harmonic Generation and related second order Nonlinear Optics

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Second Harmonic Generation and related second order Nonlinear Optics"

Copied!
129
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: cel-00520581

https://cel.archives-ouvertes.fr/cel-00520581v4

Submitted on 12 Nov 2012

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Second Harmonic Generation and related second order

Nonlinear Optics

Nicolas Fressengeas

To cite this version:

Nicolas Fressengeas. Second Harmonic Generation and related second order Nonlinear Optics. DEA. Université de Lorraine, 2010. �cel-00520581v4�

(2)

Second Harmonic Generation

and related second order Nonlinear Optics

N. Fressengeas

Laboratoire Mat´eriaux Optiques, Photonique et Syst`emes Unit´e de Recherche commune `a l’Universit´e de Lorraine et `a Sup´elec

(3)

Useful reading. . .

[YY84, DGN91, LKW99]

,

V. G. Dmitriev, G. G. Gurzadyan, and D. N. Nikogosyan.

Handbook of Nonlinear Optical Crystals, volume 64 of Springer Series in Optical Sciences.

Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 1991.

W. Lauterborn, T. Kurz, and M. Wiesenfeldt.

Coherent Optics: Fundamentals and Applications.

Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999.

A. Yariv and P. Yeh.

Optical waves in crystals. Propagation and control of laser radiation.

(4)

Contents

1 Three-wave interaction

Assumptions framework

Three Wave propagation equation Sum frequency generation

Scalar approximation

2 Non Linear Optics Application

Second Harmonic Generation Optical Parametric Amplifier Optical Parametric Oscillator

3 Phase matching

Phase matching conditions

(5)

1 Three-wave interaction Assumptions framework

Three Wave propagation equation Sum frequency generation

Scalar approximation

2 Non Linear Optics Application Second Harmonic Generation Optical Parametric Amplifier Optical Parametric Oscillator

3 Phase matching

Phase matching conditions

(6)

A classical Maxwell framework

With standard assumptions: no charge, no current, no magnet and no conductivity

Maxwell Model div (D) = 0 div (B) = 0 curl (E ) = −∂B∂t curl (H) = ∂D∂t Matter equations D = ε0E + P =εE B = µ0H P = ε0χLE +PNL

Wave equation in isotropic medium

∆E − µ0ε∂ 2E ∂t2 =µ0∂ 2P NL ∂t2

Solutions to be found only in a specific framework:

We look here for :

(7)

A classical Maxwell framework

With standard assumptions: no charge, no current, no magnet and no conductivity

Maxwell Model div (D) = 0 div (B) = 0 curl (E ) = −∂B∂t curl (H) = ∂D∂t Matter equations D = ε0E + P =εE B = µ0H P = ε0χLE +PNL

Wave equation in isotropic medium

∆E − µ0ε∂ 2E ∂t2 =µ0∂ 2P NL ∂t2

Solutions to be found only in a specific framework:

We look here for :

(8)

A classical Maxwell framework

With standard assumptions: no charge, no current, no magnet and no conductivity

Maxwell Model div (D) = 0 div (B) = 0 curl (E ) = −∂B∂t curl (H) = ∂D∂t Matter equations D = ε0E + P =εE B = µ0H P = ε0χLE +PNL Wave equation in isotropic medium

∆E − µ0ε∂ 2E ∂t2 =µ0∂ 2P NL ∂t2 Solutions to be found only in a specific framework:

We look here for :

(9)

A classical Maxwell framework

With standard assumptions: no charge, no current, no magnet and no conductivity

Maxwell Model div (D) = 0 div (B) = 0 curl (E ) = −∂B∂t curl (H) = ∂D∂t Matter equations D = ε0E + P =εE B = µ0H P = ε0χLE +PNL Wave equation in isotropic medium

∆E − µ0ε∂ 2E ∂t2 =µ0∂ 2P NL ∂t2 Solutions to be found only in a specific framework:

We look here for :

(10)

Three wave interaction assumptions

All waves are transverse plane waves propagating in the z direction

Transversal E : has x and y components Wave equation : ∂∂z2E2 − µ0ε∂ 2E ∂t2 =µ0∂ 2P NL(z) ∂t2 Quadratic non-linearity PNL is transversal [PNL]i = X {j,k}∈{x,y }2 [d ]ijk[E ]j[E ]k =[d ]ijk[E ]j[E ]k

Three wave interaction only

Three waves only are present : ω1, ω2 and ω3

Non linear interaction of two waves : sum, difference, doubling, rectification. . .

(11)

Three wave interaction assumptions

All waves are transverse plane waves propagating in the z direction

Transversal E : has x and y components Wave equation : ∂∂z2E2 − µ0ε∂ 2E ∂t2 =µ0∂ 2P NL(z) ∂t2 Quadratic non-linearity PNL is transversal [PNL]i = X {j,k}∈{x,y }2 [d ]ijk[E ]j[E ]k =[d ]ijk[E ]j[E ]k

Three wave interaction only

Three waves only are present : ω1, ω2 and ω3

Non linear interaction of two waves : sum, difference, doubling, rectification. . .

(12)

Three wave interaction assumptions

All waves are transverse plane waves propagating in the z direction

Transversal E : has x and y components Wave equation : ∂∂z2E2 − µ0ε∂ 2E ∂t2 =µ0∂ 2P NL(z) ∂t2 Quadratic non-linearity PNL is transversal [PNL]i = X {j,k}∈{x,y }2 [d ]ijk[E ]j[E ]k =[d ]ijk[E ]j[E ]k

Three wave interaction only

Three waves only are present : ω1, ω2 and ω3

Non linear interaction of two waves : sum, difference, doubling, rectification. . .

(13)

Three wave interaction assumptions

All waves are transverse plane waves propagating in the z direction

Transversal E : has x and y components Wave equation : ∂∂z2E2 − µ0ε∂ 2E ∂t2 =µ0∂ 2P NL(z) ∂t2 Quadratic non-linearity PNL is transversal [PNL]i = X {j,k}∈{x,y }2 [d ]ijk[E ]j[E ]k =[d ]ijk[E ]j[E ]k

Three wave interaction only

Three waves only are present : ω1, ω2 and ω3

Non linear interaction of two waves : sum, difference, doubling, rectification. . .

(14)

Three wave interaction assumptions

All waves are transverse plane waves propagating in the z direction

Transversal E : has x and y components Wave equation : ∂∂z2E2 − µ0ε∂ 2E ∂t2 =µ0∂ 2P NL(z) ∂t2 Quadratic non-linearity PNL is transversal [PNL]i = X {j,k}∈{x,y }2 [d ]ijk[E ]j[E ]k =[d ]ijk[E ]j[E ]k

Three wave interaction only

Three waves only are present : ω1, ω2 and ω3

Non linear interaction of two waves : sum, difference, doubling, rectification. . .

(15)

1 Three-wave interaction

Assumptions framework

Three Wave propagation equation

Sum frequency generation Scalar approximation

2 Non Linear Optics Application Second Harmonic Generation Optical Parametric Amplifier Optical Parametric Oscillator

3 Phase matching

Phase matching conditions

(16)

Three wave interaction solution ansatz

Sum of three waves

[E ]x ,y(z, t) = Re 3 X ν=1 exp (ikνz − i ωνt) ! Dispersion law : kν2 = µ0ενω2ν ε dispersion : εν = ε (ων)

How good is this ansatz ?

We have assumed ω1+ ω2= ω3

Why would ω3 not be a source as well ?

OK if wave 3 is small enough

Separate investigation at each frequency

(17)

Three wave interaction solution ansatz

Sum of three waves

[E ]x ,y(z, t) = Re 3 X ν=1 exp (ikνz − i ωνt) ! Dispersion law : kν2 = µ0ενω2ν ε dispersion : εν = ε (ων)

How good is this ansatz ?

We have assumed ω1+ ω2= ω3

Why would ω3 not be a source as well ?

OK if wave 3 is small enough Separate investigation at each frequency

(18)

Three wave interaction solution ansatz

Sum of three waves

[E ]x ,y(z, t) = Re 3 X ν=1 exp (ikνz − i ωνt) ! Dispersion law : kν2 = µ0ενω2ν ε dispersion : εν = ε (ων) How good is this ansatz ?

We have assumed ω1+ ω2= ω3

Why would ω3 not be a source as well ?

OK if wave 3 is small enough

Separate investigation at each frequency

(19)

Three wave interaction solution ansatz

Sum of three waves

[E ]x ,y(z, t) = Re 3 X ν=1 exp (ikνz − i ωνt) ! Dispersion law : kν2 = µ0ενω2ν ε dispersion : εν = ε (ων) How good is this ansatz ?

We have assumed ω1+ ω2= ω3

Why would ω3 not be a source as well ?

OK if wave 3 is small enough

Separate investigation at each frequency

(20)

Three wave interaction solution ansatz

Sum of three waves

[E ]x ,y(z, t) = Re 3 X ν=1 exp (ikνz − i ωνt) ! Dispersion law : kν2 = µ0ενω2ν ε dispersion : εν = ε (ων) How good is this ansatz ?

We have assumed ω1+ ω2= ω3

Why would ω3 not be a source as well ?

OK if wave 3 is small enough

Separate investigation at each frequency

(21)

Wave propagation for frequency ω

ν

ν ∈ {1, 2, 3}

3 Perturbed wave equations ∂2E(ων )(z,t) ∂z2 − µ0εων ∂2E(ων )(z,t) ∂t2 = µ0 ∂2Pων NL(z,t) ∂t2

Temporal harmonic notation

E(ων) is a plane wave

Non linear polarization is a plane wave

Considering only. . . the ων part ⇔ the plane wave part ∂2E(ων )(z,t)

∂z2 + µ0εωνω

2

(22)

Wave propagation for frequency ω

ν

ν ∈ {1, 2, 3}

3 Perturbed wave equations ∂2E(ων )(z,t) ∂z2 − µ0εων ∂2E(ων )(z,t) ∂t2 = µ0 ∂2Pων NL(z,t) ∂t2

Temporal harmonic notation

E(ων) is a plane wave

Non linear polarization is a plane wave

Considering only. . . the ων part ⇔ the plane wave part ∂2E(ων )(z,t)

∂z2 + µ0εωνω

2

(23)

Wave propagation for frequency ω

ν

ν ∈ {1, 2, 3}

3 Perturbed wave equations ∂2E(ων )(z,t) ∂z2 − µ0εων ∂2E(ων )(z,t) ∂t2 = µ0 ∂2Pων NL(z,t) ∂t2

Temporal harmonic notation

E(ων) is a plane wave

Non linear polarization is a plane wave

Considering only. . . the ων part ⇔ the plane wave part

∂2E(ων )(z,t)

∂z2 + µ0εωνω

2

(24)

Wave propagation for frequency ω

ν

ν ∈ {1, 2, 3}

3 Perturbed wave equations ∂2E(ων )(z,t) ∂z2 − µ0εων ∂2E(ων )(z,t) ∂t2 = µ0 ∂2Pων NL(z,t) ∂t2

Temporal harmonic notation

E(ων) is a plane wave

Non linear polarization is a plane wave

Considering only. . . the ων part ⇔ the plane wave part ∂2E(ων )(z,t)

∂z2 + µ0εωνω

2

(25)

Non Linear Polarisation P

NL

in harmonic framework

Reminder

[PNL]i = [d ]ijk[E ]j[E ]k

Temporal harmonic framework for ω1

Multiply complex fields

Include Conjugates to take Real Part Select only the ω1 component

Pω1 NL(z, t)  i = Re  [d ]ijkhE(ω3)(z)i jE (ω2)(z) ke (i (k3−k2)z−i (ω3−ω2)t) 

Wave propagation equation

∂2E(ω1)(z, t)

∂z2 + µ0εω1ω

2

(26)

Non Linear Polarisation P

NL

in harmonic framework

Reminder

[PNL]i = [d ]ijk[E ]j[E ]k

Temporal harmonic framework for ω1

Multiply complex fields

Include Conjugates to take Real Part

Select only the ω1 component

Pω1 NL(z, t)  i = Re  [d ]ijkhE(ω3)(z)i jE (ω2)(z) ke (i (k3−k2)z−i (ω3−ω2)t) 

Wave propagation equation

∂2E(ω1)(z, t)

∂z2 + µ0εω1ω

2

(27)

Non Linear Polarisation P

NL

in harmonic framework

Reminder

[PNL]i = [d ]ijk[E ]j[E ]k

Temporal harmonic framework for ω1

Multiply complex fields

Include Conjugates to take Real Part

Select only the ω1 component

Pω1 NL(z, t)  i = Re  [d ]ijkhE(ω3)(z)i jE (ω2)(z) ke (i (k3−k2)z−i (ω3−ω2)t) 

Wave propagation equation

∂2E(ω1)(z, t)

∂z2 + µ0εω1ω

2

(28)

Non Linear Polarisation P

NL

in harmonic framework

Reminder

[PNL]i = [d ]ijk[E ]j[E ]k

Temporal harmonic framework for ω1

Multiply complex fields

Include Conjugates to take Real Part

Select only the ω1 component

Pω1 NL(z, t)  i = Re  [d ]ijkhE(ω3)(z)i jE (ω2)(z) ke (i (k3−k2)z−i (ω3−ω2)t) 

Wave propagation equation

∂2E(ω1)(z, t)

∂z2 + µ0εω1ω

2

(29)

The Slow Varying Approximation

Closely related to the paraxial approximation

The Slow Varying Approximation

Beam envelope is assumed to vary slowly in the longitudinal direction

Equivalent as assuming a narrow beam

Second derivative with respect z neglected compared to

the first one with respect to z the others with respect to x and y

To put it in maths. . . ∂2E (ω1)(z,t) ∂z2 = ∂2 ∂z2Re E(ω1)(z) exp (i (k1z − ω1t))  · · · = Re  ∂2E (ω1)(z) ∂z2 + 2ik1 ∂E (ω1)(z) ∂z − k12E(ω1)(z)  e(i (k1z−ω1t)) 

(30)

The Slow Varying Approximation

Closely related to the paraxial approximation

The Slow Varying Approximation

Beam envelope is assumed to vary slowly in the longitudinal direction Equivalent as assuming a narrow beam

Second derivative with respect z neglected compared to

the first one with respect to z the others with respect to x and y

To put it in maths. . . ∂2E (ω1)(z,t) ∂z2 = ∂2 ∂z2Re E(ω1)(z) exp (i (k1z − ω1t))  · · · = Re  ∂2E (ω1)(z) ∂z2 + 2ik1 ∂E (ω1)(z) ∂z − k12E(ω1)(z)  e(i (k1z−ω1t)) 

(31)

The Slow Varying Approximation

Closely related to the paraxial approximation

The Slow Varying Approximation

Beam envelope is assumed to vary slowly in the longitudinal direction Equivalent as assuming a narrow beam

Second derivative with respect z neglected compared to the first one with respect to z

the others with respect to x and y

To put it in maths. . . ∂2E (ω1)(z,t) ∂z2 = ∂2 ∂z2Re E(ω1)(z) exp (i (k1z − ω1t))  · · · = Re  ∂2E (ω1)(z) ∂z2 + 2ik1 ∂E (ω1)(z) ∂z − k12E(ω1)(z)  e(i (k1z−ω1t)) 

(32)

The Slow Varying Approximation

Closely related to the paraxial approximation

The Slow Varying Approximation

Beam envelope is assumed to vary slowly in the longitudinal direction Equivalent as assuming a narrow beam

Second derivative with respect z neglected compared to the first one with respect to z

the others with respect to x and y

To put it in maths. . . ∂2E (ω1)(z,t) ∂z2 = ∂2 ∂z2Re E(ω1)(z) exp (i (k1z − ω1t))  · · · = Re  ∂2E (ω1)(z) ∂z2 + 2ik1 ∂E (ω1)(z) ∂z − k12E(ω1)(z)  e(i (k1z−ω1t)) 

(33)

The Slow Varying Approximation

Closely related to the paraxial approximation

The Slow Varying Approximation

Beam envelope is assumed to vary slowly in the longitudinal direction Equivalent as assuming a narrow beam

Second derivative with respect z neglected compared to the first one with respect to z

the others with respect to x and y

To put it in maths. . . ∂2E (ω1)(z,t) ∂z2 = ∂2 ∂z2Re E(ω1)(z) exp (i (k1z − ω1t))  · · · = Re  ∂2E (ω1)(z) ∂z2 + 2ik1 ∂E (ω1)(z) ∂z − k12E(ω1)(z)  e(i (k1z−ω1t)) 

(34)

Wave Propagation Equation under SVA approximation

Obtaining an envelope equation, which is simpler

Non SVA wave propagation equation

∂2E(ω1)(z, t) ∂z2 + µ0εω1ω 2 1E(ω1)(z, t) = −µ0ω12P ω1 NL(z, t) SVA equation Re  2ik1∂E ( ω1)(z) ∂z − k 2 1E(ω1)(z)  e(i (k1z−ω1t))  +Re µ0εω1ω 2 1E(ω1)(z)e(i (k1z−ω1t))  = Re  −µ0ω12[d ]ijkE(ω3)(z)  jE(ω2)(z)  ke (i (k3−k2)z−i (ω3−ω2)t) 

(35)

Wave Propagation Equation under SVA approximation

Obtaining an envelope equation, which is simpler

Non SVA wave propagation equation

∂2E(ω1)(z, t) ∂z2 + µ0εω1ω 2 1E(ω1)(z, t) = −µ0ω12P ω1 NL(z, t) SVA equation Re  2ik1∂E ( ω1)(z) ∂z − k 2 1E(ω1)(z)  e(i (k1z−ω1t))  +Re µ0εω1ω 2 1E(ω1)(z)e(i (k1z−ω1t))  = Re  −µ0ω12[d ]ijkE(ω3)(z)  jE(ω2)(z)  ke (i (k3−k2)z−i (ω3−ω2)t) 

(36)

Wave Propagation Equation under SVA approximation

Obtaining an envelope equation, which is simpler

Non SVA wave propagation equation

∂2E(ω1)(z, t) ∂z2 + µ0εω1ω 2 1E(ω1)(z, t) = −µ0ω12P ω1 NL(z, t) SVA equation Re  2ik1∂E ( ω1)(z) ∂z − k 2 1E(ω1)(z)  e(i (k1z−ω1t))  +Re µ0εω1ω 2 1E(ω1)(z)e(i (k1z−ω1t))  = Re  −µ0ω12[d ]ijkE(ω3)(z)  jE(ω2)(z)  ke (i (k3−k2)z−i (ω3−ω2)t) 

(37)

Wave Propagation Equation under SVA approximation

Obtaining an envelope equation, which is simpler

Non SVA wave propagation equation

∂2E(ω1)(z, t) ∂z2 + µ0εω1ω 2 1E(ω1)(z, t) = −µ0ω12P ω1 NL(z, t) SVA equation Re  2ik1∂E ( ω1)(z) ∂z − k 2 1E(ω1)(z)  e(i (k1z−ω1t))  +Re µ0εω1ω 2 1E(ω1)(z)e(i (k1z−ω1t))  = Re  −µ0ω12[d ]ijkE(ω3)(z)  jE(ω2)(z)  ke (i (k3−k2)z−i (ω3−ω2)t) 

(38)

Wave Propagation Equation under SVA approximation

Obtaining an envelope equation, which is simpler

Non SVA wave propagation equation

∂2E(ω1)(z, t) ∂z2 + µ0εω1ω 2 1E(ω1)(z, t) = −µ0ω12PNLω1(z, t) SVA equation Re  2ik1∂E ( ω1)(z) ∂z  e(i (k1z−ω1t))  =Re−µ0ω12[d ]ijkE(ω3)(z)  jE(ω2)(z)  ke (i (k3−k2)z−i (ω3−ω2)t) 

(39)

Wave Propagation Equation under SVA approximation

Obtaining an envelope equation, which is simpler

Non SVA wave propagation equation

∂2E(ω1)(z, t) ∂z2 + µ0εω1ω 2 1E(ω1)(z, t) = −µ0ω12PNLω1(z, t) SVA equation  2ik1∂E ( ω1)(z) ∂z  e(i (k1z−ω1t))  =  −µ0ω21[d ]ijkE(ω3)(z)  jE(ω2)(z)  ke (i (k3−k2)z−i (ω3−ω2)t) 

(40)

Wave Propagation Equation under SVA approximation

Obtaining an envelope equation, which is simpler

Non SVA wave propagation equation

∂2E(ω1)(z, t) ∂z2 + µ0εω1ω 2 1E(ω1)(z, t) = −µ0ω12PNLω1(z, t) SVA equation  2ik1∂E ( ω1)(z) ∂z   =  −µ0ω21[d ]ijkE(ω3)(z)  jE(ω2)(z)  ke (i (k3−k2−k1)z) 

(41)

The three waves

Phase mismatch and dispersion relationship

Phase mismatch : ∆k = k1+ k2− k3

Recall the dispersion relationship : k2

1 = µ0εω1ω 2 1 Wave impedance : ην = q µ 0 εων

Three wave propagation, rotating i → j → k (i , j , k) ∈ {x , y }3

h ∂E (ω1) ∂z i i = + i ω1 2 η1[d ]ijkE(ω3)  jE (ω2) kexp (−i ∆kz) h ∂E (ω2) ∂z i k = − i ω2 2 η2[d ]kijE(ω1)  iE(ω3)  jexp (−i ∆kz) h ∂E (ω3) ∂z i j = + i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) iexp (i ∆kz)

(42)

The three waves

Phase mismatch and dispersion relationship

Phase mismatch : ∆k = k1+ k2− k3

Recall the dispersion relationship : k2

1 = µ0εω1ω 2 1 Wave impedance : ην = q µ 0 εων

Three wave propagation, rotating i → j → k (i , j , k) ∈ {x , y }3

h ∂E (ω1) ∂z i i = + i ω1 2 η1[d ]ijkE(ω3)  jE (ω2) kexp (−i ∆kz) h ∂E (ω2) ∂z i k = − i ω2 2 η2[d ]kijE(ω1)  iE(ω3)  jexp (−i ∆kz) h ∂E (ω3) ∂z i j = + i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) iexp (i ∆kz)

(43)

6 equations for various quadratic phenomena

All in one for : frequency sum and difference, second harmonic generation and optical rectification, parametric amplifier. . .

Six equations (i , j , k) ∈ {x , y }3 h ∂E (ω1) ∂z i i = + i ω1 2 η1[d ]ijkE(ω3)  jE(ω2)  kexp (−i ∆kz) h ∂E (ω2) ∂z i k = − i ω2 2 η2[d ]kijE(ω1)  iE (ω3) jexp (−i ∆kz) h ∂E (ω3) ∂z i j = + i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) iexp (i ∆kz)

Why all those names ?

They differ by :

The input frequencies and the generated ones

(44)

6 equations for various quadratic phenomena

All in one for : frequency sum and difference, second harmonic generation and optical rectification, parametric amplifier. . .

Six equations (i , j , k) ∈ {x , y }3 h ∂E (ω1) ∂z i i = + i ω1 2 η1[d ]ijkE(ω3)  jE(ω2)  kexp (−i ∆kz) h ∂E (ω2) ∂z i k = − i ω2 2 η2[d ]kijE(ω1)  iE (ω3) jexp (−i ∆kz) h ∂E (ω3) ∂z i j = + i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) iexp (i ∆kz) Why all those names ?

They differ by :

The input frequencies and the generated ones

(45)

1 Three-wave interaction

Assumptions framework

Three Wave propagation equation

Sum frequency generation

Scalar approximation

2 Non Linear Optics Application Second Harmonic Generation Optical Parametric Amplifier Optical Parametric Oscillator

3 Phase matching

Phase matching conditions

(46)

Example : sum frequency generation

Input beams assumed constant Undepleted pump approximation

Assumptions

ω1+ ω2= ω3

Generated beam null at z = 0 : E(ω3)(z = 0)

j = 0 ∂ h E (ω1) i i ∂z = ∂ h E (ω2) i k ∂z = 0

One equation remains

h ∂E (ω3) ∂z i j = + i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) iexp (−i ∆kz)

(47)

Example : sum frequency generation

Input beams assumed constant Undepleted pump approximation

Assumptions

ω1+ ω2= ω3

Generated beam null at z = 0 : E(ω3)(z = 0)

j = 0 ∂ h E (ω1) i i ∂z = ∂ h E (ω2) i k ∂z = 0

One equation remains

h ∂E (ω3) ∂z i j = + i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) iexp (−i ∆kz)

(48)

Solving the SVA wave propagation equation

Equation to solve h ∂E (ω3) ∂z i j = + i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) iexp (−i ∆kz) ∆k 6= 0 y0= ae(ibx )⇒ y = ia b 1 − e(ibx )  Wave solution E(ω3) j i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) i e(i ∆kz)−1 i ∆k Intensity ∝E(ω3) jE(ω3)  j ω332d2jki E(ω2) 2 k E(ω1) 2 i sin2(∆kz 2 ) ∆k2

(49)

Solving the SVA wave propagation equation

Equation to solve h ∂E (ω3) ∂z i j = + i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) iexp (−i ∆kz) ∆k 6= 0 y0= ae(ibx )⇒ y = ia b 1 − e(ibx )  Wave solution E(ω3) j i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) i e(i ∆kz)−1 i ∆k Intensity ∝E(ω3) jE(ω3)  j ω332d2jki E(ω2) 2 k E(ω1) 2 i sin2(∆kz 2 ) ∆k2

(50)

Solving the SVA wave propagation equation

Equation to solve h ∂E (ω3) ∂z i j = + i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) iexp (−i ∆kz) ∆k 6= 0 y0= ae(ibx )⇒ y = ia b 1 − e(ibx )  Wave solution E(ω3) j i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) i e(i ∆kz)−1 i ∆k Intensity ∝E(ω3) jE(ω3)  j ω332d2jki E(ω2) 2 k E(ω1) 2 i sin2(∆kz 2 ) ∆k2

(51)

Solving the SVA wave propagation equation

Equation to solve h ∂E (ω3) ∂z i j = + i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) iexp (−i ∆kz) ∆k 6= 0 y0= ae(ibx )⇒ y = ia b 1 − e(ibx )  Wave solution E(ω3) j i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) i e(i ∆kz)−1 i ∆k Intensity ∝E(ω3) jE(ω3)  j ω332d2jki E(ω2) 2 k E(ω1) 2 i sin2(∆kz 2 ) ∆k2

(52)

Solving the SVA wave propagation equation

Equation to solve h ∂E (ω3) ∂z i j = + i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) iexp (−i ∆kz) ∆k 6= 0 y0 = ae(ibx ) ⇒ y = ia b 1 − e(ibx )  Wave solution E(ω3) j i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) i e(i ∆kz)−1 i ∆k Intensity ∝E(ω3) jE(ω3)  j ω23η23d2jki E(ω2) 2 k E(ω1) 2 i sin2(∆kz 2 ) ∆k2 ∆k = 0 y0 = a ⇒ y = ax Wave solution E(ω3) j i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) iz Intensity ∝E(ω3) jE(ω3)  j ω32η23d2jki E(ω2) 2 k E(ω1) 2 iz 2

(53)

Solving the SVA wave propagation equation

Equation to solve h ∂E (ω3) ∂z i j = + i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) iexp (−i ∆kz) ∆k 6= 0 y0 = ae(ibx ) ⇒ y = ia b 1 − e(ibx )  Wave solution E(ω3) j i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) i e(i ∆kz)−1 i ∆k Intensity ∝E(ω3) jE(ω3)  j ω23η23d2jki E(ω2) 2 k E(ω1) 2 i sin2(∆kz 2 ) ∆k2 ∆k = 0 y0 = a ⇒ y = ax Wave solution E(ω3) j i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) iz Intensity ∝E(ω3) jE(ω3)  j ω32η23d2jki E(ω2) 2 k E(ω1) 2 iz 2

(54)

Solving the SVA wave propagation equation

Equation to solve h ∂E (ω3) ∂z i j = + i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) iexp (−i ∆kz) ∆k 6= 0 y0 = ae(ibx ) ⇒ y = ia b 1 − e(ibx )  Wave solution E(ω3) j i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) i e(i ∆kz)−1 i ∆k Intensity ∝E(ω3) jE(ω3)  j ω23η23d2jki E(ω2) 2 k E(ω1) 2 i sin2(∆kz 2 ) ∆k2 ∆k = 0 y0 = a ⇒ y = ax Wave solution E(ω3) j i ω3 2 η3[d ]jkiE(ω2)  kE (ω1) iz Intensity ∝E(ω3) jE(ω3)  j ω32η23d2jki E(ω2) 2 k E(ω1) 2 iz 2

(55)

Phase match or not phase match

Phase matching is a key issue to sum frequency generation

Phase mismatch ∆k 6= 0 Oscillating intensity Max intensity ∝ ∆k12 2.5 5 7.5 10

Intensity

Δkz/2

1/Δk^2

(56)

Phase match or not phase match

Phase matching is a key issue to sum frequency generation

Phase mismatch ∆k 6= 0 Oscillating intensity Max intensity ∝ ∆k12 2.5 5 7.5 10

Intensity

Δkz/2

1/Δk^2 Phase match ∆k = 0

Intensity quadratic increase Approximations do not hold long 2.5 5 7.5 10 20 40 60 80

Intensity

Δkz/2

(57)

1 Three-wave interaction

Assumptions framework

Three Wave propagation equation Sum frequency generation

Scalar approximation 2 Non Linear Optics Application

Second Harmonic Generation Optical Parametric Amplifier Optical Parametric Oscillator

3 Phase matching

Phase matching conditions

(58)

A Scalar Three Wave Interaction model

Further approximations to remove vectors

Simplifying notations

Set indexes equal for polarization and frequency: Aν =E(ων)

 ν Consider εν = n2νε0 Abbreviate C =qµ0 ε0 q ω1ω2ω3 n1n2n3

For lossless media, d is isotropic. Assume d is frequency independent Let K = dC /2

Scalar three wave interaction

∂A1

∂z = +iK A2A3exp (−i ∆kz) ∂A2

(59)

A Scalar Three Wave Interaction model

Further approximations to remove vectors

Simplifying notations

Set indexes equal for polarization and frequency: Aν =E(ων)

 ν Consider εν = n2νε0 Abbreviate C =qµ0 ε0 q ω1ω2ω3 n1n2n3 For lossless media, d is isotropic.

Assume d is frequency independent Let K = dC /2

Scalar three wave interaction

∂A1

∂z = +iK A2A3exp (−i ∆kz) ∂A2

(60)

A Scalar Three Wave Interaction model

Further approximations to remove vectors

Simplifying notations

Set indexes equal for polarization and frequency: Aν =E(ων)

 ν Consider εν = n2νε0 Abbreviate C =qµ0 ε0 q ω1ω2ω3 n1n2n3

For lossless media, d is isotropic. Assume d is frequency independent

Let K = dC /2

Scalar three wave interaction

∂A1

∂z = +iK A2A3exp (−i ∆kz) ∂A2

(61)

A Scalar Three Wave Interaction model

Further approximations to remove vectors

Simplifying notations

Set indexes equal for polarization and frequency: Aν =E(ων)

 ν Consider εν = n2νε0 Abbreviate C =qµ0 ε0 q ω1ω2ω3 n1n2n3

For lossless media, d is isotropic.

Assume d is frequency independent Let K = dC /2

Scalar three wave interaction

∂A1

∂z = +iK A2A3exp (−i ∆kz) ∂A2

(62)

A Scalar Three Wave Interaction model

Further approximations to remove vectors

Simplifying notations

Set indexes equal for polarization and frequency: Aν =E(ων)

 ν Consider εν = n2νε0 Abbreviate C =qµ0 ε0 q ω1ω2ω3 n1n2n3

For lossless media, d is isotropic. Assume d is frequency independent

Let K = dC /2

Scalar three wave interaction

∂A1

∂z = +iK A2A3exp (−i ∆kz) ∂A2

(63)

A Scalar Three Wave Interaction model

Further approximations to remove vectors

Simplifying notations

Set indexes equal for polarization and frequency: Aν =E(ων)

 ν Consider εν = n2νε0 Abbreviate C =qµ0 ε0 q ω1ω2ω3 n1n2n3

For lossless media, d is isotropic. Assume d is frequency independent Let K = dC /2

Scalar three wave interaction

∂A1

∂z = +iK A2A3exp (−i ∆kz) ∂A2

(64)

A Scalar Three Wave Interaction model

Further approximations to remove vectors

Simplifying notations

Set indexes equal for polarization and frequency: Aν =E(ων)

 ν Consider εν = n2νε0 Abbreviate C =qµ0 ε0 q ω1ω2ω3 n1n2n3

For lossless media, d is isotropic. Assume d is frequency independent Let K = dC /2

Scalar three wave interaction

∂A1

∂z = +iK A2A3exp (−i ∆kz) ∂A2

(65)

1 Three-wave interaction Assumptions framework

Three Wave propagation equation Sum frequency generation

Scalar approximation

2 Non Linear Optics Application

Second Harmonic Generation

Optical Parametric Amplifier Optical Parametric Oscillator

3 Phase matching

Phase matching conditions

(66)

Second Harmonic Generation

SHG

Sum frequency generation of two equal frequencies from the same source

One input beam counts for two

ω1 = ω2, A1 = A2, k1 = k2,

ω3 = 2ω1

∆k = 2k1− k3

2 remaining equations

∂A1

∂z = +iK A1A3exp (−i ∆kz) ∂A3 ∂z = +iK A1 2exp (+i ∆kz) Phase matching ∆k = 0 ∂A1 ∂z = +iK A1A3 ∂A3 = +iK A 2

Figure: Closeup of a BBO crystal inside a resonant build-up ring cavity for frequency doubling 461 nm blue light into the ultraviolet. (sourceflickr)

(67)

Second Harmonic Generation

SHG

Sum frequency generation of two equal frequencies from the same source

One input beam counts for two

ω1 = ω2, A1 = A2, k1 = k2,

ω3 = 2ω1

∆k = 2k1− k3 2 remaining equations

∂A1

∂z = +iK A1A3exp (−i ∆kz) ∂A3 ∂z = +iK A1 2exp (+i ∆kz) Phase matching ∆k = 0 ∂A1 ∂z = +iK A1A3 ∂A3 = +iK A 2

Figure: Closeup of a BBO crystal inside a resonant build-up ring cavity for frequency doubling 461 nm blue light into the ultraviolet. (sourceflickr)

(68)

Second Harmonic Generation

SHG

Sum frequency generation of two equal frequencies from the same source

One input beam counts for two

ω1 = ω2, A1 = A2, k1 = k2,

ω3 = 2ω1

∆k = 2k1− k3 2 remaining equations

∂A1

∂z = +iK A1A3exp (−i ∆kz) ∂A3 ∂z = +iK A1 2exp (+i ∆kz) Phase matching ∆k = 0 ∂A1 ∂z = +iK A1A3 ∂A3 = +iK A 2

Figure: Closeup of a BBO crystal inside a resonant build-up ring cavity for frequency doubling 461 nm blue light into the ultraviolet. (sourceflickr)

(69)

Second Harmonic Beam Generation

Remember. . . ∆k = 0 ∂A1 ∂z = +iK A1A3 ∂A3 ∂z = +iK A1 2 A1 ∈ R A3∈ i R A3 = i ˜A3 ⇒ ˜A3∈ R A1 = A1 Real equations ∂A1 ∂z = −K A1A˜3 ∂ ˜A3 ∂z = K A1 2

Multiply by A1 and ˜A3 Sum

∂(A2 1+˜A23)

∂z = 0

This is Energy Conservation

Start with no harmonic

 A21(z) + ˜A23(z)  = A21(0) ˜ A3 equation ∂ ˜A3 ∂z = KA21= K  A2 1(0) − ˜A23(z) 

(70)

Second Harmonic Beam Generation

Remember. . . ∆k = 0 ∂A1 ∂z = +iK A1A3 ∂A3 ∂z = +iK A1 2 A1 ∈ R A3∈ i R A3 = i ˜A3 ⇒ ˜A3∈ R A1 = A1 Real equations ∂A1 ∂z = −K A1A˜3 ∂ ˜A3 ∂z = K A1 2

Multiply by A1 and ˜A3 Sum

∂(A2 1+˜A23)

∂z = 0

This is Energy Conservation Start with no harmonic

 A21(z) + ˜A23(z)  = A21(0) ˜ A3 equation ∂ ˜A3 ∂z = KA21= K  A2 1(0) − ˜A23(z) 

(71)

Second Harmonic Beam Generation

Remember. . . ∆k = 0 ∂A1 ∂z = +iK A1A3 ∂A3 ∂z = +iK A1 2 A1 ∈ R A3∈ i R A3 = i ˜A3 ⇒ ˜A3∈ R A1 = A1 Real equations ∂A1 ∂z = −K A1A˜3 ∂ ˜A3 ∂z = K A1 2

Multiply by A1 and ˜A3 Sum

∂(A2 1+˜A23)

∂z = 0

This is Energy Conservation

Start with no harmonic

 A21(z) + ˜A23(z)  = A21(0) ˜ A3 equation ∂ ˜A3 ∂z = KA21= K  A2 1(0) − ˜A23(z) 

(72)

Second Harmonic Beam Generation

Remember. . . ∆k = 0 ∂A1 ∂z = +iK A1A3 ∂A3 ∂z = +iK A1 2 A1 ∈ R A3∈ i R A3 = i ˜A3 ⇒ ˜A3∈ R A1 = A1 Real equations ∂A1 ∂z = −K A1A˜3 ∂ ˜A3 ∂z = K A1 2

Multiply by A1 and ˜A3 Sum

∂(A2 1+˜A23)

∂z = 0

This is Energy Conservation

Start with no harmonic

 A21(z) + ˜A23(z)  = A21(0) ˜ A3 equation ∂ ˜A3 ∂z = KA21= K  A2 1(0) − ˜A23(z) 

(73)

Second Harmonic Beam Generation

Remember. . . ∆k = 0 ∂A1 ∂z = +iK A1A3 ∂A3 ∂z = +iK A1 2 A1 ∈ R A3∈ i R A3 = i ˜A3 ⇒ ˜A3∈ R A1 = A1 Real equations ∂A1 ∂z = −K A1A˜3 ∂ ˜A3 ∂z = K A1 2

Multiply by A1 and ˜A3 Sum

∂(A2 1+˜A23)

∂z = 0

This is Energy Conservation

Start with no harmonic

 A21(z) + ˜A23(z)  = A21(0) ˜ A3 equation ∂ ˜A3 ∂z = KA21= K  A2 1(0) − ˜A23(z) 

(74)

Second Harmonic Beam Generation

Remember. . . ∆k = 0 ∂A1 ∂z = +iK A1A3 ∂A3 ∂z = +iK A1 2 A1 ∈ R A3∈ i R A3 = i ˜A3 ⇒ ˜A3∈ R A1 = A1 Real equations ∂A1 ∂z = −K A1A˜3 ∂ ˜A3 ∂z = K A1 2

Multiply by A1 and ˜A3 Sum

∂(A2 1+˜A23)

∂z = 0

This is Energy Conservation

Start with no harmonic

 A21(z) + ˜A23(z)  = A21(0) ˜ A3 equation ∂ ˜A3 ∂z = KA21= K  A2 1(0) − ˜A23(z) 

(75)

Second Harmonic Beam Evolution

˜ A3 equation ∂ ˜A3 ∂z = K  A21(0) − ˜A23(z) ˜ A3 expression ˜ A3(z) = A1(0) tanh (KA1(0) z) I3 expression I3(z) = I1(0) tanh2(KA1(0) z) I1(z) = I1(0) − I3(z) I1(z) = I1(0) sech2(KA1(0) z)

(76)

Second Harmonic Beam Evolution

˜ A3 equation ∂ ˜A3 ∂z = K  A21(0) − ˜A23(z) ˜ A3 expression ˜ A3(z) = A1(0) tanh (KA1(0) z) I3 expression I3(z) = I1(0) tanh2(KA1(0) z) I1(z) = I1(0) − I3(z) I1(z) = I1(0) sech2(KA1(0) z)

(77)

Second Harmonic Beam Evolution

˜ A3 equation ∂ ˜A3 ∂z = K  A21(0) − ˜A23(z) ˜ A3 expression ˜ A3(z) = A1(0) tanh (KA1(0) z) I3 expression I3(z) = I1(0) tanh2(KA1(0) z) I1(z) = I1(0) − I3(z) I1(z) = I1(0) sech2(KA1(0) z)

(78)

Second Harmonic Beam Evolution

˜ A3 equation ∂ ˜A3 ∂z = K  A21(0) − ˜A23(z) ˜ A3 expression ˜ A3(z) = A1(0) tanh (KA1(0) z) I3 expression I3(z) = I1(0) tanh2(KA1(0) z) I1(z) = I1(0) − I3(z) I1(z) = I1(0) sech2(KA1(0) z)

(79)

Second Harmonic Beam Evolution

˜ A3 equation ∂ ˜A3 ∂z = K  A21(0) − ˜A23(z) ˜ A3 expression ˜ A3(z) = A1(0) tanh (KA1(0) z) I3 expression I3(z) = I1(0) tanh2(KA1(0) z) I1(z) = I1(0) − I3(z) I1(z) = I1(0) sech2(KA1(0) z) I3(z) /I1(0) I1(0) = constant 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

z

(80)

Second Harmonic Beam Evolution

˜ A3 equation ∂ ˜A3 ∂z = K  A21(0) − ˜A23(z) ˜ A3 expression ˜ A3(z) = A1(0) tanh (KA1(0) z) I3 expression I3(z) = I1(0) tanh2(KA1(0) z) I1(z) = I1(0) − I3(z) I1(z) = I1(0) sech2(KA1(0) z) I3(z) /I1(0) z = L = constant 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

A(0)

1

(81)

SHG conclusion

Second Harmonic Beam Evolution

0.25 0.5 0.75 1

z

0.25 0.5 0.75 1

A(0)

1 Suprinsingly. . .

It is possible to convert 100% of a beam, with large interaction length or intensity

(82)

SHG conclusion

Second Harmonic Beam Evolution

0.25 0.5 0.75 1

z

0.25 0.5 0.75 1

A(0)

1 Suprinsingly. . .

It is possible to convert 100% of a beam, with large interaction length or intensity

(83)

SHG conclusion

Second Harmonic Beam Evolution

0.25 0.5 0.75 1

z

0.25 0.5 0.75 1

A(0)

1 Suprinsingly. . .

It is possible to convert 100% of a beam, with large interaction length or intensity

(84)

SHG conclusion

Second Harmonic Beam Evolution

0.25 0.5 0.75 1

z

0.25 0.5 0.75 1

A(0)

1 Suprinsingly. . .

It is possible to convert 100% of a beam, with large interaction length or intensity

(85)

1 Three-wave interaction Assumptions framework

Three Wave propagation equation Sum frequency generation

Scalar approximation

2 Non Linear Optics Application

Second Harmonic Generation

Optical Parametric Amplifier

Optical Parametric Oscillator

3 Phase matching

Phase matching conditions

(86)

Optical Parametric Amplifier

OPA

Optical Amplification of a weak signal beam thanks to a powerful pump beam

Signal beam amplification

ω1 : weak signal to be

amplified

ω3 : intense pump beam

ω2 = ω3− ω1 : difference

frequency generation (idler)

Undepleted pump approximation

A3(z) = A3(0) = Kp/K

Phase matched equations

∂A1

∂z = +iKpA2

Figure: White light continuum seeded optical parametric amplifier (OPA) able to generate extremely short pulses.

(87)

Optical Parametric Amplifier

OPA

Optical Amplification of a weak signal beam thanks to a powerful pump beam

Signal beam amplification

ω1 : weak signal to be

amplified

ω3 : intense pump beam

ω2 = ω3− ω1 : difference

frequency generation (idler)

Undepleted pump approximation

A3(z) = A3(0) = Kp/K

Phase matched equations

∂A1

∂z = +iKpA2

Figure: White light continuum seeded optical parametric amplifier (OPA) able to generate extremely short pulses.

(88)

Optical Parametric Amplifier

OPA

Optical Amplification of a weak signal beam thanks to a powerful pump beam

Signal beam amplification

ω1 : weak signal to be

amplified

ω3 : intense pump beam

ω2 = ω3− ω1 : difference

frequency generation (idler)

Undepleted pump approximation

A3(z) = A3(0) = Kp/K

Phase matched equations ∂A1

∂z = +iKpA2

Figure: White light continuum seeded optical parametric amplifier (OPA) able to generate extremely short pulses.

(89)

Solving the OPA equations

Phase matched equations ∂A1 ∂z = +iKpA2 ∂A2 ∂z = −iKpA1 Initial conditions A weak signal : A1(0) 6= 0 No idler : A2(0) = 0 Amplitude solution Amplified signal : A1(z) = A1(0) cosh (Kpz) Idler : A2(z) = −iA1(0) sinh (Kpz)

(90)

Solving the OPA equations

Phase matched equations ∂A1 ∂z = +iKpA2 ∂A2 ∂z = −iKpA1 Initial conditions A weak signal : A1(0) 6= 0 No idler : A2(0) = 0 Amplitude solution Amplified signal : A1(z) = A1(0) cosh (Kpz) Idler : A2(z) = −iA1(0) sinh (Kpz)

(91)

Solving the OPA equations

Phase matched equations ∂A1 ∂z = +iKpA2 ∂A2 ∂z = −iKpA1 Initial conditions A weak signal : A1(0) 6= 0 No idler : A2(0) = 0 Amplitude solution Amplified signal : A1(z) = A1(0) cosh (Kpz) Idler : A2(z) = −iA1(0) sinh (Kpz)

(92)

Solving the OPA equations

Phase matched equations ∂A1 ∂z = +iKpA2 ∂A2 ∂z = −iKpA1 Initial conditions A weak signal : A1(0) 6= 0 No idler : A2(0) = 0 Amplitude solution Amplified signal : A1(z) = A1(0) cosh (Kpz) Idler : A (z) = −iA (0) sinh (K z) Intensities Amplified signal : I1(z) = I1(0) cosh2(Kpz) Idler : I2(z) = I1(0) sinh2(Kpz) Amplification 1 2 3 4 5 6 Signal Idler

(93)

1 Three-wave interaction Assumptions framework

Three Wave propagation equation Sum frequency generation

Scalar approximation

2 Non Linear Optics Application

Second Harmonic Generation Optical Parametric Amplifier

Optical Parametric Oscillator 3 Phase matching

Phase matching conditions

(94)

Optical Parametric Oscillator

OPO

Use Optical Parametric Amplification to make a tunable laser

OPA pumped with ω3

Amplifier for ω1 and ω2

With ω1+ ω2= ω3

Phase matching: k1+ k2= k3

ω1 and ω2 initiated from noise

Frequency tunable laser

Get Non Linear Medium Adjust Cavity for ω1 and ω2

Pump with ω3

(95)

Optical Parametric Oscillator

OPO

Use Optical Parametric Amplification to make a tunable laser

OPA pumped with ω3

Amplifier for ω1 and ω2

With ω1+ ω2= ω3

Phase matching: k1+ k2= k3

ω1 and ω2 initiated from noise Frequency tunable laser

Get Non Linear Medium Adjust Cavity for ω1 and ω2

Pump with ω3

(96)

1 Three-wave interaction Assumptions framework

Three Wave propagation equation Sum frequency generation

Scalar approximation

2 Non Linear Optics Application Second Harmonic Generation Optical Parametric Amplifier Optical Parametric Oscillator

3 Phase matching

Phase matching conditions

(97)

Colinear (scalar) phase matching

Phase matching for co-propagation waves

k1+ k2 = k3 ⇒ ω1n1+ ω2n2 = ω3n3

for SHG : 2k1 = k3 ⇒ n1 = n3

The last isnever achieved, due to normal dispersion: n1 < n3

One and only solution

(98)

Colinear (scalar) phase matching

Phase matching for co-propagation waves

k1+ k2 = k3 ⇒ ω1n1+ ω2n2 = ω3n3

for SHG : 2k1 = k3 ⇒ n1 = n3

The last isnever achieved, due to normal dispersion: n1 < n3

One and only solution

(99)

Colinear (scalar) phase matching

Phase matching for co-propagation waves

k1+ k2 = k3 ⇒ ω1n1+ ω2n2 = ω3n3

for SHG : 2k1 = k3 ⇒ n1 = n3

The last isnever achieved, due to normal dispersion: n1 < n3

One and only solution

(100)
(101)

Non colinear phase matching

Use clever geometries

(102)

Non colinear phase matching

Use clever geometries

With reflections Or even more clever. . .

(103)

1 Three-wave interaction Assumptions framework

Three Wave propagation equation Sum frequency generation

Scalar approximation

2 Non Linear Optics Application Second Harmonic Generation Optical Parametric Amplifier Optical Parametric Oscillator

3 Phase matching

Phase matching conditions

(104)

SHG Type I Phase Matching

Waves polarization

1 incident wave counts for 2

They share the same polarization

Second Harmonic polarization is orthogonal

Type I phase matching

One refraction index for Fundamental

The other for Second Harmonic They must be equal

Propagate in the right direction

n0and ne function of propagation di-rection: index ellipsoid cross-section

(105)

SHG Type I Phase Matching

Waves polarization

1 incident wave counts for 2 They share the same

polarization

Second Harmonic polarization is orthogonal

Type I phase matching

One refraction index for Fundamental

The other for Second Harmonic

They must be equal

Propagate in the right direction

n0and ne function of propagation di-rection: index ellipsoid cross-section

(106)

SHG Type I Phase Matching

Waves polarization

1 incident wave counts for 2 They share the same

polarization

Second Harmonic polarization is orthogonal

Type I phase matching

One refraction index for Fundamental

The other for Second Harmonic They must be equal

Propagate in the right direction

n0and ne function of propagation di-rection: index ellipsoid cross-section

(107)

SHG Type I Phase Matching

Waves polarization

1 incident wave counts for 2 They share the same

polarization

Second Harmonic polarization is orthogonal

Type I phase matching

One refraction index for Fundamental

The other for Second Harmonic

They must be equal

Propagate in the right direction

n0and ne function of propagation di-rection: index ellipsoid cross-section

(108)

SHG Type I Phase Matching

Waves polarization

1 incident wave counts for 2 They share the same

polarization

Second Harmonic polarization is orthogonal

Type I phase matching

One refraction index for Fundamental

The other for Second Harmonic They must be equal

Propagate in the right direction

n0and ne function of propagation

di-rection: index ellipsoid cross-section

(109)

SHG Type I Phase Matching

Waves polarization

1 incident wave counts for 2 They share the same

polarization

Second Harmonic polarization is orthogonal

Type I phase matching

One refraction index for Fundamental

The other for Second Harmonic They must be equal

Propagate in the right direction

n0and ne function of propagation

di-rection: index ellipsoid cross-section

(110)

SHG Type I Phase Matching

Waves polarization

1 incident wave counts for 2 They share the same

polarization

Second Harmonic polarization is orthogonal

Type I phase matching

One refraction index for Fundamental

The other for Second Harmonic They must be equal

Propagate in the right direction

n0and ne function of propagation

di-rection: index ellipsoid cross-section

(111)

SHG Type I Phase Matching

Waves polarization

1 incident wave counts for 2 They share the same

polarization

Second Harmonic polarization is orthogonal

Type I phase matching

One refraction index for Fundamental

The other for Second Harmonic They must be equal

Propagate in the right direction

n0and ne function of propagation

di-rection: index ellipsoid cross-section

(112)

SHG Type I Phase Matching

Waves polarization

1 incident wave counts for 2 They share the same

polarization

Second Harmonic polarization is orthogonal

Type I phase matching

One refraction index for Fundamental

The other for Second Harmonic They must be equal

Propagate in the right direction

n0and ne function of propagation

di-rection: index ellipsoid cross-section

(113)

SHG Type I phase matching: a few numbers

K Fundamental index ellipso¨ıd section

1 n2 e(θ) = cos2(θ) n2 o + sin2(θ) n2 e Harmonic index ellipso¨ıd section

1 ˜ n2 o(θ) = 1 ˜ n2 o

Solve the equation

sin2(θ) = ˜no−2−n−2o

˜ ne−2−˜n−2o

(114)

SHG Type I phase matching: a few numbers

K Fundamental index ellipso¨ıd section

1 n2 e(θ) = cos2(θ) n2 o + sin2(θ) n2 e

Harmonic index ellipso¨ıd section

1 ˜ n2 o(θ) = 1 ˜ n2 o

Solve the equation

sin2(θ) = ˜no−2−n−2o

˜ ne−2−˜n−2o

(115)

SHG Type I phase matching: a few numbers

K Fundamental index ellipso¨ıd section

1 n2 e(θ) = cos2(θ) n2 o + sin2(θ) n2 e

Harmonic index ellipso¨ıd section

1 ˜ n2 o(θ) = 1 ˜ n2 o

Solve the equation

sin2(θ) = ˜no−2−n−2o

˜ ne−2−˜n−2o

(116)

SHG Type I phase matching: a few numbers

K Fundamental index ellipso¨ıd section

1 n2 e(θ) = cos2(θ) n2 o + sin2(θ) n2 e

Harmonic index ellipso¨ıd section 1 ˜ n2 o(θ) = 1 ˜ n2 o

Solve the equation

sin2(θ) = ˜no−2−n−2o

˜ ne−2−˜n−2o

(117)

SHG Type I phase matching: a few numbers

K Fundamental index ellipso¨ıd section

1 n2 e(θ) = cos2(θ) n2 o + sin2(θ) n2 e

Harmonic index ellipso¨ıd section 1 ˜ n2 o(θ) = 1 ˜ n2 o

Solve the equation

sin2(θ) = ˜no−2−n−2o

˜ ne−2−˜n−2o

(118)

Type II phase matching

In the three beam interaction, Type I was

Both input beams ω1 and ω2 share the same polarization

The generated beam ω3 polarization is orthogonal

Another solution : Type II

Input beams polarization are orthogonal Generated beam share one of them Not possible for SHG

(119)

Type II phase matching

In the three beam interaction, Type I was

Both input beams ω1 and ω2 share the same polarization

The generated beam ω3 polarization is orthogonal

Another solution : Type II

Input beams polarization are orthogonal Generated beam share one of them

Not possible for SHG

(120)

Type II phase matching

In the three beam interaction, Type I was

Both input beams ω1 and ω2 share the same polarization

The generated beam ω3 polarization is orthogonal

Another solution : Type II

Input beams polarization are orthogonal Generated beam share one of them Not possible for SHG

(121)

Type II phase matching

In the three beam interaction, Type I was

Both input beams ω1 and ω2 share the same polarization

The generated beam ω3 polarization is orthogonal

Another solution : Type II

Input beams polarization are orthogonal Generated beam share one of them Not possible for SHG

(122)

Phase matching in bi-axial crystals

A hard task

Phase matching is seldom colinear

Vector phase matching in a complex index ellipso¨ıd I will let you think on it

Paper by Bœuf can help

N. Boeuf, D. Branning, I. Chaperot, E. Dauler, S. Guerin, G. Jaeger, A. Muller, and A. Migdall.

Calculating characteristics of noncolinear phase matching in uniaxial and biaxial crystals.

(123)

Phase matching in bi-axial crystals

A hard task

Phase matching is seldom colinear

Vector phase matching in a complex index ellipso¨ıd I will let you think on it

Paper by Bœuf can help

N. Boeuf, D. Branning, I. Chaperot, E. Dauler, S. Guerin, G. Jaeger, A. Muller, and A. Migdall.

Calculating characteristics of noncolinear phase matching in uniaxial and biaxial crystals.

(124)

1 Three-wave interaction Assumptions framework

Three Wave propagation equation Sum frequency generation

Scalar approximation

2 Non Linear Optics Application Second Harmonic Generation Optical Parametric Amplifier Optical Parametric Oscillator

3 Phase matching

Phase matching conditions

(125)

Quasi phase matching in layered media

Periodically Poled Lithium Niobate

Periodic Domain Reversal d sign reversal

Wave solution h∂E (∂zω3)i

j i ω3 2 η3[d ]jki E(ω1) 2 i e(i ∆kΛ)−1 ∆k N X n=1 (−1)ne(i ∆kΛ)

(126)

Quasi phase matching in layered media

Periodically Poled Lithium Niobate

Periodic Domain Reversal d sign reversal

Wave solution h∂E (∂zω3)i

j i ω3 2 η3[d ]jki E(ω1) 2 i e(i ∆kΛ)−1 ∆k N X n=1 (−1)ne(i ∆kΛ)

(127)

Quasi phase matching in layered media

Periodically Poled Lithium Niobate

Periodic Domain Reversal d sign reversal

Wave solution h∂E (∂zω3)i

j i ω3 2 η3[d ]jki E(ω1) 2 i e(i ∆kΛ)−1 ∆k N X n=1 (−1)ne(i ∆kΛ)

(128)

Quasi phase matching in layered media

Periodically Poled Lithium Niobate

Periodic Domain Reversal d sign reversal 2 4 6 8 1 2 3 4 5 6

Wave solution h∂E (∂zω3)i

j i ω3 2 η3[d ]jki E(ω1) 2 i e(i ∆kΛ)−1 ∆k N X (−1)ne(i ∆kΛ)

(129)

Quasi phase matching in layered media

Periodically Poled Lithium Niobate

Periodic Domain Reversal d sign reversal 2 4 6 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 Intsensity Solution i ω3 2 η3[d ]jki E(ω1) 2 i 2 4Λ2

Références

Documents relatifs

Addition of silver oxide promotes bulk crystallization and, for the 6 mol% Ag 2 O composition, the crystalline phase induced by heat treatment in those samples is K[Nb 1/3 Te 2/3 ] 2

In particular, collagen has been shown to exhibit endogenous Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) signals and SHG microscopy has proved to enable the visualization of collagen

The statistical association between variations in GC-content and intron presence is too systematic to be accidental. An intron barrier effect hypothesis provides a simple explanation

/ La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur. For

la surveillance des infections associées aux soins de santé dans des hôpitaux sentinelles de soins de courte durée des quatre coins du Canada pour déceler, par exemple,

To verify whether director reorientation occurs m the elastomer the behaviour of the second harmonic as a function of the incident laser power respectively as a function of the

Specifically, γ is expressed as the curve that minimizes the weighted sum of a sum-of-squares term penalizing the lack of fitting to the data points and a regularity term defined,

As this method aims at designing nanostructures able to greatly enhance the nonlinear processes, a single grating of cylindrical nanorods is studied. The behavior of this architec-