• Aucun résultat trouvé

Fourier transform of the Boltzmann collision integral for a bimodal distribution function

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Fourier transform of the Boltzmann collision integral for a bimodal distribution function"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: jpa-00247836

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00247836

Submitted on 1 Jan 1993

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Fourier transform of the Boltzmann collision integral for a bimodal distribution function

Alexander Orlov

To cite this version:

Alexander Orlov. Fourier transform of the Boltzmann collision integral for a bimodal distribution function. Journal de Physique II, EDP Sciences, 1993, 3 (3), pp.339-342. �10.1051/jp2:1993136�.

�jpa-00247836�

(2)

Classification

Physics

Abstracts

05.20D 47.45 47.40N

Fourier transform of the Boltzmann collision integral for

a

bimodal distribution function

Alexander Orlov

(*)

Dept.

9, Institute for

High Temperatures

(Russian Acad. Sci.), 13/19

Izhorskaya

Street, Moscow 127412, Russia

(Received 3 September J992,

accepted

J3 November J992)

Rdsum£. Pour le modble d'onde de choc de Mott-Smith

correspondant

h des blteractions Maxwelliermes, la transfornlde de Fourier du terme de collision est calcul£e. La m£thode utilis£e est celle

qui

a dtd donn£e par

Bobylev

pour

l'dquation

de Boltzmann.

Abstract. The Fourier transform of the Boltzmann collision

integral

for a gas of Maxwell molecules is calculated

explicitly

for the bimodal distribution

proposed by

Mott-Smith for the shock wave structure. The results of

Bobylev's approach

of Fourier

transforming

of the Boltzmann equation were used as the

starting point.

1. Introduction.

The Boltzmann collision

integral

is

usually

calculated

approximately

with the use of

expansion

in Sonine or Hermite

polynomials

of

velocity [I].

This

expansion

is correct in the

vicinity

of

equilibrium.

Mott-Smith's bimodal distribution function

[2]

is a linear combination of Maxwellians with different parameters. It is an

example

of a

non-equilibrium

distribution. That is

why

it was

frequently

used for the

problem

of shock wave structure

(see

e.g.

[3]

and references

therein).

However, the users of the bimodal distribution function

usually

added

some

closing

moment

equation

to obtain the shock

profile.

As far as we known, the Boltzmann collision

integral

for a combination of Maxwellians was

explicitly

calculated

only

for

rigid spheres by Deshpanded

and Narasimha

[4]

and for

quasi-Maxwell

molecules

by Segal [8] (the

result without derivation was cited

by Segal

and

Ferziger [7]).

The results in both cases are rather awkward and

expressed by

the confluent

hypergeometric

function

,F

i

(in

the first

case)

or

by

the

hyperbolic

sine sinh

(in

the second

case)

of such

non-analytical

function of the molecular

velocity

as

R

[(Cl

+

C( )~/4 (C~ Cp

)~]~'~

,

(*) Address

for

correspondence:

Tashkentskaya

Street10-2-39, Moscow 109444, Russia.

(3)

340 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE II N° 3

where

C~,

p =

(2 RT~,

p

)~

~'~

(v

u~,

p

).

It seems rather hard to calculate the moment of this

integral with,

e.g., some

integer

power of the molecular

velocity vi.

Rode and Tanenbaum

[7]

have done this for a Maxwell molecule gas

(notice

that the derivation in

[7]

is

again absent),

but their result in the form of

8-uple

series appears not so easy to treat.

In this short paper we calculate the Fourier transform of the collision

integral

for a gas of Maxwell molecules

using Bobylev's

results

[5].

This

approach

reduces the

problem

of the calculation of the moments of the collision

integral

from

integration

of the awkward functions to

simple

differentiation with

respect

to the Fourier variable k and

putting

k

= 0 afterwards.

Section 2 contains an

analysis

and section 3 is devoted to conclusions.

2.

Analysis.

Bobylev [5]

showed that the use of the Fourier transform of the

velocity

distribution function for a gas of Maxwell molecules leads to the

following

form of the Boltzmann collision

integral

J=

jd~ng(k.n/k) [~(~~~" ~(~~~" -~(k)~(0)j, (1)

2 2

where ~ is the Fourier transform of the distribution

function,

~

(k )

=

d~v f (v )

e~ '~ ~

,

(2)

g is the

product

of the absolute value of the relative

velocity

and the collisional cross

section,

and the

integration

is over the surface of the unit

sphere.

For

plane,

one-dimensional

problems (e,g.

shock

wave)

the Boltzmann

equation

is thus of the form :

I

a~~lazifk~

= J

(3)

We shall further use the linear combination of two Maxwellians

f(v)

= c~ e~ ~~

~°~~~

+ cp e~ "

~fl'~

,

(4)

where c, = n,

(2 gra( )~

~'~,

a(

=

RT,,

so that the Fourier-transformed distribution function is

~

(k)

= c~

~~

+ cp

#ip

,

(5)

where

w,(k)

=

e-aS~~-ik.Ua, (6)

and the collision

integral

is J

=

J~p

+

Jp~,

where e,g.

J~p

is

k~(a$ +

a)

y4 >k;(u~ + up Y2 2 k

jai al

)k

n + ik(u

p u~)nj2

J~p

~~

=

(g/4

gr c~

cp

e d n e

)

and we assumed g =

#/4

gr

(isotropic scattering)

to be able to lead

explicit analysis

to the end.

Therefore,

all we need to do is to evaluate the

integral d~n

eP'~

Usually

one puts the

n~ direction

along

the vector p and then the matter is easy :

iv

2w

I-

I

d~n

eP'~

=

do sin 0 de eP~°~~

= 2 gr dx eP~

=

0 0

= 2 gr

(eP e~P)/p

=

4 gr sinh

p/p, (8)

(4)

the function can be viewed as a series over

p~.

But in our case

Im~p~)

~

0, p~

=

[k(aj a$ )/4]~ (k~ kj)

+

[k(a( a$ ) k/4

+

ik~(up

u~

)/2

,

(9)

so we cannot

put

n~

along

p. The

integral id~n e~'~~~~~~

should be calculated

thoroughly.

We set n~ =

sin 0 cos ~, n~ = sin 0 sin ~, n~ = cos 0 and let a~ =

0. Then

~ #

i~2~

~a n +ibn~ #

~

~ ~E

)~

~~ ea, sin sin p + az cos + ib cos Sin ~ ~~

0 0

The

integral

over

s is easy :

Ids e5

~~~ ~ "~ ~

=

2

grJo(ia~

sin

0)

= 2

grIo(a~

sin

0), (11)

~

where

lo

is the modified Bessel

function,

so

A = 2 gr

~

do sin 0

e~'~~~~~°~

~

Io(a~

sin 0

)

= 2

gr

l~

dt

e~"

~'~~~

Io(a~ /l).

(12)

-1

To

integrate

this

expression

we rewrite the Bessel function in the form of a series

j

W

a)~(l t~)~

Io(a~

I t

=

~j (13)

q=o

2~~ (ql)~

and use the well-known formula

([6], 3.387)

l~

dx i

x~

p

_1~-~~ ~~

~~~

~ ~~~

~P~~~ ~

Ip

ij~~p

).

~~~~

As

Iq

+ i12(A

)

=

2

~ q + i i d q +

~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~

~

(15)

the result is

l~

dt

ezt Io(A fi)

=

2

Si@

= 2

io (Wm)

,

(16)

z + A

io being

the

spherical

Bessel function. Thus we see that the r-h- s, of the Fourier transform of the BoltzmanJJ

equation

is

j

~

j~

~

j~ ~

ii~

~

ii~ ~ ~

~ j ~i~~

Here

~

~~~~4~~~~~~~~2~ ~~' ~~~)~_~~'

~~~~

a fl

(5)

342 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE II N° 3

3. Conclusions.

In this brief note we have calculated the Fouder transform of the Boltzmann collision

integral

for a bimodal distribution function in a gas of Maxwell molecules with

isotropic scattering.

The Fourier-transform

approach permits

us to calculate the moments of the collision

integral by

differentiation with respect to k at the

point

k

= 0 instead of

performing explicit

or

numerical

quadratures

of

hypergeometric

or

hyperbolic

functions of

non-analytical

arguments,

see

[4, 7-9].

For

example,

the coefficients of the

kj

and

k(

terms in the

Taylor expansion

of our result at k

=

0

give

the well-known

v)

and

v(

moments of the collision

integral corresponding

to the

original

Mott-Smith choice

[2].

Acknowledgements.

Valuable conversations with Dr. A.

V.Bobylev

and Dr. A. S. Goncharov are

gratefully

appreciated.

References

[ii FERzIGER J. H. and KAPER H. G., Mathematical

Theory

of

Transport

Processes in Gases (North- Holland, Amsterdam-L., 1972).

[2] Mom-SMITH H. M., Phys. Rev. 82 (1951) 885.

[3] BASHKIROV A. G. and ORLOV A. V., J. Statist. Phys. 64 (1991) 429.

[4] DESHPANDE S. M. and NARASIMHA R., J. Fluid Mech. 36 (1969) 545.

[5]

BOBYLEV A. V., Theor. Math.

Phys.

60

(1984)

820.

[6] GRADSHTEYN I. S. and RYzHIK I. M., Tables of

Integrals,

Series, and Products (Academic, N-Y-, 1965).

[7] SEGAL B. M. and FERzIGER J. H.,

Phys.

Fluids 15 (1972) 1233.

[8] SEGAL B. M., Ph. D. thesis, Stanford

University

(1971).

[9] RODE D. L. and TANENBAUM B. S.,

Phys.

Fluids 10 (1967) 1352.

Proofnot

corrected

by

the author.

Références

Documents relatifs

Overall, several studies have approached different relevant topics for two-phase jet diffusion in plunge pools but a compre- hensive analysis of dynamic pressures in limited-depth

When the angular cross section of the Boltzmann equation has non-integrable singularity described by the parameter β ∈ (0, 2] (with β = 0 corresponding to the cutoff case), then

Our aim here is to consider uncertainty principles in which concentration is measured in sense of smallness of the support (the no- tion of annihilating pairs in the terminology of

Titchmarsh’s [5, Therem 85] characterized the set of functions in L 2 ( R ) satisfying the Cauchy Lipschitz condition by means of an asymptotic estimate growth of the norm of

proved two useful estimates for the Fourier transform in the space of square integral multivariable functions on certain classes of functions characterized by the generalized

In this case, equation (4.4) reduces to a much smaller computation. For example, when composing atomic transforms for the inverse TFT, returning the first value of B 2 is actu-

The solver that we construct has the following algorithmic properties: first, it preserves the efficiency of standard FFT algorithm; then, the storage cost is independent of

In particular, estimates (3.10), (3.11) and (3.12) (with ν = 1) should be compared with the results on the monochromatic inverse scattering problem obtained by H¨ ahner, Hohage