• Aucun résultat trouvé

From modular curves to Shimura curves: a p-adic approach

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "From modular curves to Shimura curves: a p-adic approach"

Copied!
182
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

From modular curves to Shimura curves:

a p-adic approach

Laia Amor´os Caraf´ı Universit´e du Luxembourg

Universitat de Barcelona

(2)

1. Modular curves and elliptic curves

2. Quaternion algebras and Shimura curves 3. p-adic uniformisation of Shimura curves 4. Bad reduction of Shimura curves

(3)

1. Modular curves and elliptic curves 2. Quaternion algebras and Shimura curves

3. p-adic uniformisation of Shimura curves 4. Bad reduction of Shimura curves

(4)

1. Modular curves and elliptic curves 2. Quaternion algebras and Shimura curves 3. p-adic uniformisation of Shimura curves

4. Bad reduction of Shimura curves

(5)

1. Modular curves and elliptic curves 2. Quaternion algebras and Shimura curves 3. p-adic uniformisation of Shimura curves 4. Bad reduction of Shimura curves

(6)

1. MODULAR CURVES AND ELLIPTIC CURVES

(7)

Modular curves

H={a+bi ∈C|b>0} ⊆Ccomplex upper half-plane.

SL2(R) acts onH: α= a bc d

∈SL2(R), z ∈ H α(z) := az+b

cz+d ∈ H.

SL2(Z) is a discrete subgroup that acts onH, thefull modular group. ForN∈Z, we define theprincipal congruence subgroupof levelN:

Γ(N) := a b

c d

≡(1 00 1) modN ⊆SL2(Z). Y(N) := Γ(N)/H Riemann surface, noncompact.

Adding a finite number of points we can compactify it, we denote it by X(N). This curve can be regarded, in a natural way, as an algebraic curve defined by some homogeneous polynomial(s) with coefficients in Q(ζN). We call this themodular curveof levelN.

1 / 36

(8)

Modular curves

H={a+bi ∈C|b>0} ⊆Ccomplex upper half-plane.

SL2(R) acts onH:

α= a bc d

∈SL2(R), z ∈ H α(z) := az+b

cz+d ∈ H.

SL2(Z) is a discrete subgroup that acts onH, thefull modular group. ForN∈Z, we define theprincipal congruence subgroupof levelN:

Γ(N) := a b

c d

≡(1 00 1) modN ⊆SL2(Z). Y(N) := Γ(N)/H Riemann surface, noncompact.

Adding a finite number of points we can compactify it, we denote it by X(N). This curve can be regarded, in a natural way, as an algebraic curve defined by some homogeneous polynomial(s) with coefficients in Q(ζN). We call this themodular curveof levelN.

(9)

Modular curves

H={a+bi ∈C|b>0} ⊆Ccomplex upper half-plane.

SL2(R) acts onH: α= a bc d

∈SL2(R),

z ∈ H α(z) := az+b

cz+d ∈ H.

SL2(Z) is a discrete subgroup that acts onH, thefull modular group. ForN∈Z, we define theprincipal congruence subgroupof levelN:

Γ(N) := a b

c d

≡(1 00 1) modN ⊆SL2(Z). Y(N) := Γ(N)/H Riemann surface, noncompact.

Adding a finite number of points we can compactify it, we denote it by X(N). This curve can be regarded, in a natural way, as an algebraic curve defined by some homogeneous polynomial(s) with coefficients in Q(ζN). We call this themodular curveof levelN.

1 / 36

(10)

Modular curves

H={a+bi ∈C|b>0} ⊆Ccomplex upper half-plane.

SL2(R) acts onH: α= a bc d

∈SL2(R), z ∈ H

α(z) := az+b cz+d ∈ H.

SL2(Z) is a discrete subgroup that acts onH, thefull modular group. ForN∈Z, we define theprincipal congruence subgroupof levelN:

Γ(N) := a b

c d

≡(1 00 1) modN ⊆SL2(Z). Y(N) := Γ(N)/H Riemann surface, noncompact.

Adding a finite number of points we can compactify it, we denote it by X(N). This curve can be regarded, in a natural way, as an algebraic curve defined by some homogeneous polynomial(s) with coefficients in Q(ζN). We call this themodular curveof levelN.

(11)

Modular curves

H={a+bi ∈C|b>0} ⊆Ccomplex upper half-plane.

SL2(R) acts onH: α= a bc d

∈SL2(R), z ∈ H α(z) := az+b

cz+d ∈ H.

SL2(Z) is a discrete subgroup that acts onH, thefull modular group. ForN∈Z, we define theprincipal congruence subgroupof levelN:

Γ(N) := a b

c d

≡(1 00 1) modN ⊆SL2(Z). Y(N) := Γ(N)/H Riemann surface, noncompact.

Adding a finite number of points we can compactify it, we denote it by X(N). This curve can be regarded, in a natural way, as an algebraic curve defined by some homogeneous polynomial(s) with coefficients in Q(ζN). We call this themodular curveof levelN.

1 / 36

(12)

Modular curves

H={a+bi ∈C|b>0} ⊆Ccomplex upper half-plane.

SL2(R) acts onH: α= a bc d

∈SL2(R), z ∈ H α(z) := az+b

cz+d ∈ H. SL2(Z) is a discrete subgroup that acts onH,

thefull modular group. ForN∈Z, we define theprincipal congruence subgroupof levelN:

Γ(N) := a b

c d

≡(1 00 1) modN ⊆SL2(Z). Y(N) := Γ(N)/H Riemann surface, noncompact.

Adding a finite number of points we can compactify it, we denote it by X(N). This curve can be regarded, in a natural way, as an algebraic curve defined by some homogeneous polynomial(s) with coefficients in Q(ζN). We call this themodular curveof levelN.

(13)

Modular curves

H={a+bi ∈C|b>0} ⊆Ccomplex upper half-plane.

SL2(R) acts onH: α= a bc d

∈SL2(R), z ∈ H α(z) := az+b

cz+d ∈ H.

SL2(Z) is a discrete subgroup that acts onH, thefull modular group.

ForN∈Z, we define theprincipal congruence subgroupof levelN: Γ(N) := a b

c d

≡(1 00 1) modN ⊆SL2(Z). Y(N) := Γ(N)/H Riemann surface, noncompact.

Adding a finite number of points we can compactify it, we denote it by X(N). This curve can be regarded, in a natural way, as an algebraic curve defined by some homogeneous polynomial(s) with coefficients in Q(ζN). We call this themodular curveof levelN.

1 / 36

(14)

Modular curves

H={a+bi ∈C|b>0} ⊆Ccomplex upper half-plane.

SL2(R) acts onH: α= a bc d

∈SL2(R), z ∈ H α(z) := az+b

cz+d ∈ H.

SL2(Z) is a discrete subgroup that acts onH, thefull modular group.

ForN∈Z, we define theprincipal congruence subgroupof level N:

Γ(N) := a b

c d

≡(1 00 1) modN ⊆SL2(Z).

Y(N) := Γ(N)/H Riemann surface, noncompact.

Adding a finite number of points we can compactify it, we denote it by X(N). This curve can be regarded, in a natural way, as an algebraic curve defined by some homogeneous polynomial(s) with coefficients in Q(ζN). We call this themodular curveof levelN.

(15)

Modular curves

H={a+bi ∈C|b>0} ⊆Ccomplex upper half-plane.

SL2(R) acts onH: α= a bc d

∈SL2(R), z ∈ H α(z) := az+b

cz+d ∈ H.

SL2(Z) is a discrete subgroup that acts onH, thefull modular group.

ForN∈Z, we define theprincipal congruence subgroupof level N:

Γ(N) := a b

c d

≡(1 00 1) modN ⊆SL2(Z).

Y(N) := Γ(N)/H Riemann surface, noncompact.

Adding a finite number of points we can compactify it, we denote it by X(N). This curve can be regarded, in a natural way, as an algebraic curve defined by some homogeneous polynomial(s) with coefficients in Q(ζN). We call this themodular curveof levelN.

1 / 36

(16)

Modular curves

H={a+bi ∈C|b>0} ⊆Ccomplex upper half-plane.

SL2(R) acts onH: α= a bc d

∈SL2(R), z ∈ H α(z) := az+b

cz+d ∈ H.

SL2(Z) is a discrete subgroup that acts onH, thefull modular group.

ForN∈Z, we define theprincipal congruence subgroupof level N:

Γ(N) := a b

c d

≡(1 00 1) modN ⊆SL2(Z).

Y(N) := Γ(N)/H Riemann surface, noncompact.

Adding a finite number of points we can compactify it, we denote it by X(N).

This curve can be regarded, in a natural way, as an algebraic curve defined by some homogeneous polynomial(s) with coefficients in Q(ζN). We call this themodular curveof levelN.

(17)

Modular curves

H={a+bi ∈C|b>0} ⊆Ccomplex upper half-plane.

SL2(R) acts onH: α= a bc d

∈SL2(R), z ∈ H α(z) := az+b

cz+d ∈ H.

SL2(Z) is a discrete subgroup that acts onH, thefull modular group.

ForN∈Z, we define theprincipal congruence subgroupof level N:

Γ(N) := a b

c d

≡(1 00 1) modN ⊆SL2(Z).

Y(N) := Γ(N)/H Riemann surface, noncompact.

Adding a finite number of points we can compactify it, we denote it by X(N). This curve can be regarded, in a natural way, as an algebraic curve defined by some homogeneous polynomial(s) with coefficients in Q(ζN).

We call this themodular curveof levelN.

1 / 36

(18)

Modular curves

H={a+bi ∈C|b>0} ⊆Ccomplex upper half-plane.

SL2(R) acts onH: α= a bc d

∈SL2(R), z ∈ H α(z) := az+b

cz+d ∈ H.

SL2(Z) is a discrete subgroup that acts onH, thefull modular group.

ForN∈Z, we define theprincipal congruence subgroupof level N:

Γ(N) := a b

c d

≡(1 00 1) modN ⊆SL2(Z).

Y(N) := Γ(N)/H Riemann surface, noncompact.

Adding a finite number of points we can compactify it, we denote it by X(N). This curve can be regarded, in a natural way, as an algebraic

(19)

Modular curves

Fundamental domain for the action ofSL2(Z) onH

2 / 36

(20)

Modular curves and elliptic curves

AlatticeinCis a subset of the form Λ :=Zω1+Zω2withω1, ω2∈C linearly independent overR.

We can always normalise our latices: Λ = Λ(τ) :=Z·1 +Z·τ, for someτ∈ H.

Λ(τ) = Λ(τ0)⇔ ∃ a bc d

∈SL2(Z) such thatτ0=cτ+daτ+b. The quotientC/Λ is topologically a torus. We define

P(z) := 1

z2 + X

06=λ∈Λ

1

(z−λ)2− 1 λ2

.

This is a meromorphic function onC, invariant under Λ, and the map C/Λ → P2(C)

[z] 7→ (P(z) :P0(z) : 1)

defines an isomorphism of Riemann surfaces fromC/Λ toE(C), where E is theelliptic curve

Y2Z = 4X3−g2XZ2−g3Z3, withg2andg3 are determined from the lattice Λ.

(21)

Modular curves and elliptic curves

AlatticeinCis a subset of the form Λ :=Zω1+Zω2withω1, ω2∈C linearly independent overR. We can always normalise our latices:

Λ = Λ(τ) :=Z·1 +Z·τ, for someτ∈ H.

Λ(τ) = Λ(τ0)⇔ ∃ a bc d

∈SL2(Z) such thatτ0=cτ+daτ+b. The quotientC/Λ is topologically a torus. We define

P(z) := 1

z2 + X

06=λ∈Λ

1

(z−λ)2− 1 λ2

.

This is a meromorphic function onC, invariant under Λ, and the map C/Λ → P2(C)

[z] 7→ (P(z) :P0(z) : 1)

defines an isomorphism of Riemann surfaces fromC/Λ toE(C), where E is theelliptic curve

Y2Z = 4X3−g2XZ2−g3Z3, withg2andg3 are determined from the lattice Λ.

3 / 36

(22)

Modular curves and elliptic curves

AlatticeinCis a subset of the form Λ :=Zω1+Zω2withω1, ω2∈C linearly independent overR. We can always normalise our latices:

Λ = Λ(τ) :=Z·1 +Z·τ, for someτ∈ H. Λ(τ) = Λ(τ0)⇔ ∃ a bc d

∈SL2(Z) such thatτ0 =cτ+daτ+b.

The quotientC/Λ is topologically a torus. We define P(z) := 1

z2 + X

06=λ∈Λ

1

(z−λ)2− 1 λ2

.

This is a meromorphic function onC, invariant under Λ, and the map C/Λ → P2(C)

[z] 7→ (P(z) :P0(z) : 1)

defines an isomorphism of Riemann surfaces fromC/Λ toE(C), where E is theelliptic curve

Y2Z = 4X3−g2XZ2−g3Z3, withg2andg3 are determined from the lattice Λ.

(23)

Modular curves and elliptic curves

AlatticeinCis a subset of the form Λ :=Zω1+Zω2withω1, ω2∈C linearly independent overR. We can always normalise our latices:

Λ = Λ(τ) :=Z·1 +Z·τ, for someτ∈ H. Λ(τ) = Λ(τ0)⇔ ∃ a bc d

∈SL2(Z) such thatτ0 =cτ+daτ+b. The quotientC/Λ is topologically a torus.

We define P(z) := 1

z2 + X

06=λ∈Λ

1

(z−λ)2− 1 λ2

.

This is a meromorphic function onC, invariant under Λ, and the map C/Λ → P2(C)

[z] 7→ (P(z) :P0(z) : 1)

defines an isomorphism of Riemann surfaces fromC/Λ toE(C), where E is theelliptic curve

Y2Z = 4X3−g2XZ2−g3Z3, withg2andg3 are determined from the lattice Λ.

3 / 36

(24)

Modular curves and elliptic curves

AlatticeinCis a subset of the form Λ :=Zω1+Zω2withω1, ω2∈C linearly independent overR. We can always normalise our latices:

Λ = Λ(τ) :=Z·1 +Z·τ, for someτ∈ H. Λ(τ) = Λ(τ0)⇔ ∃ a bc d

∈SL2(Z) such thatτ0 =cτ+daτ+b. The quotientC/Λ is topologically a torus. We define

P(z) := 1

z2 + X

06=λ∈Λ

1

(z−λ)2− 1 λ2

.

This is a meromorphic function onC, invariant under Λ, and the map C/Λ → P2(C)

[z] 7→ (P(z) :P0(z) : 1)

defines an isomorphism of Riemann surfaces fromC/Λ toE(C), where E is theelliptic curve

Y2Z = 4X3−g2XZ2−g3Z3, withg2andg3 are determined from the lattice Λ.

(25)

Modular curves and elliptic curves

AlatticeinCis a subset of the form Λ :=Zω1+Zω2withω1, ω2∈C linearly independent overR. We can always normalise our latices:

Λ = Λ(τ) :=Z·1 +Z·τ, for someτ∈ H. Λ(τ) = Λ(τ0)⇔ ∃ a bc d

∈SL2(Z) such thatτ0 =cτ+daτ+b. The quotientC/Λ is topologically a torus. We define

P(z) := 1

z2 + X

06=λ∈Λ

1

(z−λ)2− 1 λ2

.

This is a meromorphic function onC, invariant under Λ, and the map C/Λ → P2(C)

[z] 7→ (P(z) :P0(z) : 1)

defines an isomorphism of Riemann surfaces fromC/Λ toE(C), where E is theelliptic curve

Y2Z = 4X3−g2XZ2−g3Z3, withg2andg3 are determined from the lattice Λ.

3 / 36

(26)

Modular curves and elliptic curves

(27)

Modular curves and elliptic curves

Real points of two elliptic curves

5 / 36

(28)

To uniformise (intuitively)

Touniformisea curve overCmeans to express its complex points by means of coordinate functions. The algebraic relations that these

coordinate functions satisfy will give some equations that define the curve and that allow us to compute its points.

Examples: 1. Theunit circle. LetS1:x2+y2= 1 and consider hτi ⊆Aut(C),τ :z 7→z+ 2T, for someT ∈C.

Then there exist homolorphic functionsF,G :U ⊆C→Cinvariant under the grouphτisuch that there is a bijection

hτi \C → S1(C)⊆P2(C) t 7→ (F(t) :G(t) : 1)

• coordinate functions: F(t) = cos(t) and G(t) = sin(t)

• F andG are invariant under multiples of 2T = 2π

• they satisfy the algebraic equation F(t)2+G(t)2= 1

(29)

To uniformise (intuitively)

Touniformisea curve overCmeans to express its complex points by means of coordinate functions. The algebraic relations that these

coordinate functions satisfy will give some equations that define the curve and that allow us to compute its points.

Examples: 1. Theunit circle.

LetS1:x2+y2= 1 and consider hτi ⊆Aut(C),τ :z 7→z+ 2T, for someT ∈C.

Then there exist homolorphic functionsF,G :U ⊆C→Cinvariant under the grouphτisuch that there is a bijection

hτi \C → S1(C)⊆P2(C) t 7→ (F(t) :G(t) : 1)

• coordinate functions: F(t) = cos(t) and G(t) = sin(t)

• F andG are invariant under multiples of 2T = 2π

• they satisfy the algebraic equation F(t)2+G(t)2= 1

6 / 36

(30)

To uniformise (intuitively)

Touniformisea curve overCmeans to express its complex points by means of coordinate functions. The algebraic relations that these

coordinate functions satisfy will give some equations that define the curve and that allow us to compute its points.

Examples: 1. Theunit circle. LetS1:x2+y2= 1 and consider hτi ⊆Aut(C),τ :z 7→z+ 2T, for someT ∈C.

Then there exist homolorphic functionsF,G :U ⊆C→Cinvariant under the grouphτisuch that there is a bijection

hτi \C → S1(C)⊆P2(C) t 7→ (F(t) :G(t) : 1)

• coordinate functions: F(t) = cos(t) and G(t) = sin(t)

• F andG are invariant under multiples of 2T = 2π

• they satisfy the algebraic equation F(t)2+G(t)2= 1

(31)

To uniformise (intuitively)

Touniformisea curve overCmeans to express its complex points by means of coordinate functions. The algebraic relations that these

coordinate functions satisfy will give some equations that define the curve and that allow us to compute its points.

Examples: 1. Theunit circle. LetS1:x2+y2= 1 and consider hτi ⊆Aut(C),τ :z 7→z+ 2T, for someT ∈C.

Then there exist homolorphic functionsF,G :U ⊆C→Cinvariant under the grouphτisuch that there is a bijection

hτi \C → S1(C)⊆P2(C) t 7→ (F(t) :G(t) : 1)

• coordinate functions: F(t) = cos(t) and G(t) = sin(t)

• F andG are invariant under multiples of 2T = 2π

• they satisfy the algebraic equation F(t)2+G(t)2= 1

6 / 36

(32)

To uniformise (intuitively)

Touniformisea curve overCmeans to express its complex points by means of coordinate functions. The algebraic relations that these

coordinate functions satisfy will give some equations that define the curve and that allow us to compute its points.

Examples: 1. Theunit circle. LetS1:x2+y2= 1 and consider hτi ⊆Aut(C),τ :z 7→z+ 2T, for someT ∈C.

Then there exist homolorphic functionsF,G :U ⊆C→Cinvariant under the grouphτisuch that there is a bijection

hτi \C → S1(C)⊆P2(C) t 7→ (F(t) :G(t) : 1)

• F andG are invariant under multiples of 2T = 2π

• they satisfy the algebraic equation F(t)2+G(t)2= 1

(33)

To uniformise (intuitively)

Touniformisea curve overCmeans to express its complex points by means of coordinate functions. The algebraic relations that these

coordinate functions satisfy will give some equations that define the curve and that allow us to compute its points.

Examples: 1. Theunit circle. LetS1:x2+y2= 1 and consider hτi ⊆Aut(C),τ :z 7→z+ 2T, for someT ∈C.

Then there exist homolorphic functionsF,G :U ⊆C→Cinvariant under the grouphτisuch that there is a bijection

hτi \C → S1(C)⊆P2(C) t 7→ (F(t) :G(t) : 1)

• coordinate functions: F(t) = cos(t) and G(t) = sin(t)

• F andG are invariant under multiples of 2T = 2π

• they satisfy the algebraic equation F(t)2+G(t)2= 1

6 / 36

(34)

To uniformise (intuitively)

Touniformisea curve overCmeans to express its complex points by means of coordinate functions. The algebraic relations that these

coordinate functions satisfy will give some equations that define the curve and that allow us to compute its points.

Examples: 1. Theunit circle. LetS1:x2+y2= 1 and consider hτi ⊆Aut(C),τ :z 7→z+ 2T, for someT ∈C.

Then there exist homolorphic functionsF,G :U ⊆C→Cinvariant under the grouphτisuch that there is a bijection

hτi \C → S1(C)⊆P2(C) t 7→ (F(t) :G(t) : 1)

(35)

To uniformise (intuitively)

2. Elliptic curves:

E :y2=x3+ax2+bx+c elliptic curve overC, Λ =hT1,T2iZ⊆Clattice. There is a bijection

C/Λ → E(C) z 7→ (P(z) :P0(z) : 1)

• coordinate functions: P andP0

• P andP0 are doubly periodic functions, invariant under translations on the lattice

• they satisfy the algebraic equation y2=x3+ax2+bx+c 3. Modular curves: We have the following uniformisation:

SL2(Z)\ H → Y(1)(C) z 7→ j(z) where

j(z) :=q−1+ 744 + 196884q+ 21493760q2+. . . , q=e2πiz is the Kleinj-function.

7 / 36

(36)

To uniformise (intuitively)

2. Elliptic curves: E :y2=x3+ax2+bx+c elliptic curve overC, Λ =hT1,T2iZ⊆Clattice.

There is a bijection C/Λ → E(C)

z 7→ (P(z) :P0(z) : 1)

• coordinate functions: P andP0

• P andP0 are doubly periodic functions, invariant under translations on the lattice

• they satisfy the algebraic equation y2=x3+ax2+bx+c 3. Modular curves: We have the following uniformisation:

SL2(Z)\ H → Y(1)(C) z 7→ j(z) where

j(z) :=q−1+ 744 + 196884q+ 21493760q2+. . . , q=e2πiz is the Kleinj-function.

(37)

To uniformise (intuitively)

2. Elliptic curves: E :y2=x3+ax2+bx+c elliptic curve overC, Λ =hT1,T2iZ⊆Clattice. There is a bijection

C/Λ → E(C) z 7→ (P(z) :P0(z) : 1)

• coordinate functions: P andP0

• P andP0 are doubly periodic functions, invariant under translations on the lattice

• they satisfy the algebraic equation y2=x3+ax2+bx+c 3. Modular curves: We have the following uniformisation:

SL2(Z)\ H → Y(1)(C) z 7→ j(z) where

j(z) :=q−1+ 744 + 196884q+ 21493760q2+. . . , q=e2πiz is the Kleinj-function.

7 / 36

(38)

To uniformise (intuitively)

2. Elliptic curves: E :y2=x3+ax2+bx+c elliptic curve overC, Λ =hT1,T2iZ⊆Clattice. There is a bijection

C/Λ → E(C) z 7→ (P(z) :P0(z) : 1)

• coordinate functions: P andP0

• P andP0 are doubly periodic functions, invariant under translations on the lattice

• they satisfy the algebraic equation y2=x3+ax2+bx+c 3. Modular curves: We have the following uniformisation:

SL2(Z)\ H → Y(1)(C) z 7→ j(z) where

j(z) :=q−1+ 744 + 196884q+ 21493760q2+. . . , q=e2πiz is the Kleinj-function.

(39)

To uniformise (intuitively)

2. Elliptic curves: E :y2=x3+ax2+bx+c elliptic curve overC, Λ =hT1,T2iZ⊆Clattice. There is a bijection

C/Λ → E(C) z 7→ (P(z) :P0(z) : 1)

• coordinate functions: P andP0

• P andP0 are doubly periodic functions, invariant under translations on the lattice

• they satisfy the algebraic equation y2=x3+ax2+bx+c 3. Modular curves: We have the following uniformisation:

SL2(Z)\ H → Y(1)(C) z 7→ j(z) where

j(z) :=q−1+ 744 + 196884q+ 21493760q2+. . . , q=e2πiz is the Kleinj-function.

7 / 36

(40)

To uniformise (intuitively)

2. Elliptic curves: E :y2=x3+ax2+bx+c elliptic curve overC, Λ =hT1,T2iZ⊆Clattice. There is a bijection

C/Λ → E(C) z 7→ (P(z) :P0(z) : 1)

• coordinate functions: P andP0

• P andP0 are doubly periodic functions, invariant under translations on the lattice

• they satisfy the algebraic equation y2=x3+ax2+bx+c

3. Modular curves: We have the following uniformisation: SL2(Z)\ H → Y(1)(C)

z 7→ j(z) where

j(z) :=q−1+ 744 + 196884q+ 21493760q2+. . . , q=e2πiz is the Kleinj-function.

(41)

To uniformise (intuitively)

2. Elliptic curves: E :y2=x3+ax2+bx+c elliptic curve overC, Λ =hT1,T2iZ⊆Clattice. There is a bijection

C/Λ → E(C) z 7→ (P(z) :P0(z) : 1)

• coordinate functions: P andP0

• P andP0 are doubly periodic functions, invariant under translations on the lattice

• they satisfy the algebraic equation y2=x3+ax2+bx+c 3. Modular curves:

We have the following uniformisation: SL2(Z)\ H → Y(1)(C)

z 7→ j(z) where

j(z) :=q−1+ 744 + 196884q+ 21493760q2+. . . , q=e2πiz is the Kleinj-function.

7 / 36

(42)

To uniformise (intuitively)

2. Elliptic curves: E :y2=x3+ax2+bx+c elliptic curve overC, Λ =hT1,T2iZ⊆Clattice. There is a bijection

C/Λ → E(C) z 7→ (P(z) :P0(z) : 1)

• coordinate functions: P andP0

• P andP0 are doubly periodic functions, invariant under translations on the lattice

• they satisfy the algebraic equation y2=x3+ax2+bx+c 3. Modular curves: We have the following uniformisation:

SL2(Z)\ H → Y(1)(C) z 7→ j(z) where

j(z) :=q−1+ 744 + 196884q+ 21493760q2+. . . , q=e2πiz is the Kleinj-function.

(43)

To uniformise (intuitively)

2. Elliptic curves: E :y2=x3+ax2+bx+c elliptic curve overC, Λ =hT1,T2iZ⊆Clattice. There is a bijection

C/Λ → E(C) z 7→ (P(z) :P0(z) : 1)

• coordinate functions: P andP0

• P andP0 are doubly periodic functions, invariant under translations on the lattice

• they satisfy the algebraic equation y2=x3+ax2+bx+c 3. Modular curves: We have the following uniformisation:

SL2(Z)\ H → Y(1)(C) z 7→ j(z)

where

j(z) :=q−1+ 744 + 196884q+ 21493760q2+. . . , q=e2πiz is the Kleinj-function.

7 / 36

(44)

To uniformise (intuitively)

2. Elliptic curves: E :y2=x3+ax2+bx+c elliptic curve overC, Λ =hT1,T2iZ⊆Clattice. There is a bijection

C/Λ → E(C) z 7→ (P(z) :P0(z) : 1)

• coordinate functions: P andP0

• P andP0 are doubly periodic functions, invariant under translations on the lattice

• they satisfy the algebraic equation y2=x3+ax2+bx+c 3. Modular curves: We have the following uniformisation:

SL2(Z)\ H → Y(1)(C) z 7→ j(z)

(45)

2. QUATERNION ALGEBRAS AND SHIMURA CURVES

(46)

Quaternion algebras over Q

SL2(Q) is a matrix algebra overQ;

it is a particular caseindefinite quaternion algebraoverQ.

Definition. Leta,b∈Q×. Aquaternion algebraoverQis a simple and central algebra overQof dimension 4

B = a,b

Q

:={x+yi+zj+tk |x,y,z,t ∈Q} such thati2=a, j2=b, k=ij=−ji.

• Hamilton quaternions: H= (−1,−1

Q ) definite

• matrices: M2(Q) = (1,−1

Q ) indefinite

B isindefinitewhenB⊗QR'M2(R) anddefinitewhenB⊗QR'H.

(47)

Quaternion algebras over Q

SL2(Q) is a matrix algebra overQ; it is a particular caseindefinite quaternion algebraoverQ.

Definition. Leta,b∈Q×. Aquaternion algebraoverQis a simple and central algebra overQof dimension 4

B = a,b

Q

:={x+yi+zj+tk |x,y,z,t ∈Q} such thati2=a, j2=b, k=ij=−ji.

• Hamilton quaternions: H= (−1,−1

Q ) definite

• matrices: M2(Q) = (1,−1

Q ) indefinite

B isindefinitewhenB⊗QR'M2(R) anddefinitewhenB⊗QR'H.

9 / 36

(48)

Quaternion algebras over Q

SL2(Q) is a matrix algebra overQ; it is a particular caseindefinite quaternion algebraoverQ.

Definition. Leta,b∈Q×. Aquaternion algebraoverQis a simple and central algebra overQof dimension 4

B= a,b

Q

:={x+yi+zj+tk|x,y,z,t ∈Q} such thati2=a, j2=b, k=ij=−ji.

• Hamilton quaternions: H= (−1,−1

Q ) definite

• matrices: M2(Q) = (1,−1

Q ) indefinite

B isindefinitewhenB⊗QR'M2(R) anddefinitewhenB⊗QR'H.

(49)

Quaternion algebras over Q

SL2(Q) is a matrix algebra overQ; it is a particular caseindefinite quaternion algebraoverQ.

Definition. Leta,b∈Q×. Aquaternion algebraoverQis a simple and central algebra overQof dimension 4

B= a,b

Q

:={x+yi+zj+tk|x,y,z,t ∈Q} such thati2=a, j2=b, k=ij=−ji.

• Hamilton quaternions: H= (−1,−1

Q ) definite

• matrices: M2(Q) = (1,−1

Q ) indefinite

B isindefinitewhenB⊗QR'M2(R) anddefinitewhenB⊗QR'H.

9 / 36

(50)

Quaternion algebras over Q

SL2(Q) is a matrix algebra overQ; it is a particular caseindefinite quaternion algebraoverQ.

Definition. Leta,b∈Q×. Aquaternion algebraoverQis a simple and central algebra overQof dimension 4

B= a,b

Q

:={x+yi+zj+tk|x,y,z,t ∈Q} such thati2=a, j2=b, k=ij=−ji.

• Hamilton quaternions: H= (−1,−1

Q ) definite

• matrices: M2(Q) = (1,−1

Q ) indefinite

B isindefinitewhenB⊗QR'M2(R) anddefinitewhenB⊗QR'H.

(51)

Quaternion algebras over Q

SL2(Q) is a matrix algebra overQ; it is a particular caseindefinite quaternion algebraoverQ.

Definition. Leta,b∈Q×. Aquaternion algebraoverQis a simple and central algebra overQof dimension 4

B= a,b

Q

:={x+yi+zj+tk|x,y,z,t ∈Q} such thati2=a, j2=b, k=ij=−ji.

• Hamilton quaternions: H= (−1,−1

Q ) definite

• matrices: M2(Q) = (1,−1

Q ) indefinite

B isindefinitewhenB⊗QR'M2(R) anddefinitewhenB⊗QR'H.

9 / 36

(52)

Quaternion algebras over Q

B quaternion algebra B= (−1,−1

Q )

discriminant ofB DB = 2

Oorder,non-commutative O=Z[1,i,j,1+i+j+k2 ] discriminant ofO DO = 2, soOmaximal order integral quaternion h= 3/2 + 3/2i+ 3/2j+ 1/2k ∈ O conjugate quaternion h= 3/2−3/2i−3/2j−1/2k trace, norm of a quaternion Tr(h) =h+h= 3, Nm(h) =hh= 7 normic form ofB NmB(X,Y,Z,T) =X2+Y2+Z2+T2

(53)

Quaternion algebras over Q

B quaternion algebra B= (−1,−1

Q ) discriminant ofB DB = 2

Oorder,non-commutative O=Z[1,i,j,1+i+j+k2 ] discriminant ofO DO = 2, soOmaximal order integral quaternion h= 3/2 + 3/2i+ 3/2j+ 1/2k ∈ O conjugate quaternion h= 3/2−3/2i−3/2j−1/2k trace, norm of a quaternion Tr(h) =h+h= 3, Nm(h) =hh= 7 normic form ofB NmB(X,Y,Z,T) =X2+Y2+Z2+T2

10 / 36

(54)

Quaternion algebras over Q

B quaternion algebra B= (−1,−1

Q ) discriminant ofB DB = 2

O order,non-commutative O=Z[1,i,j,1+i+j+k2 ]

discriminant ofO DO = 2, soOmaximal order integral quaternion h= 3/2 + 3/2i+ 3/2j+ 1/2k ∈ O conjugate quaternion h= 3/2−3/2i−3/2j−1/2k trace, norm of a quaternion Tr(h) =h+h= 3, Nm(h) =hh= 7 normic form ofB NmB(X,Y,Z,T) =X2+Y2+Z2+T2

(55)

Quaternion algebras over Q

B quaternion algebra B= (−1,−1

Q ) discriminant ofB DB = 2

O order,non-commutative O=Z[1,i,j,1+i+j+k2 ] discriminant ofO DO = 2, soOmaximal order

integral quaternion h= 3/2 + 3/2i+ 3/2j+ 1/2k ∈ O conjugate quaternion h= 3/2−3/2i−3/2j−1/2k trace, norm of a quaternion Tr(h) =h+h= 3, Nm(h) =hh= 7 normic form ofB NmB(X,Y,Z,T) =X2+Y2+Z2+T2

10 / 36

(56)

Quaternion algebras over Q

B quaternion algebra B= (−1,−1

Q ) discriminant ofB DB = 2

O order,non-commutative O=Z[1,i,j,1+i+j+k2 ] discriminant ofO DO = 2, soOmaximal order integral quaternion h= 3/2 + 3/2i+ 3/2j+ 1/2k ∈ O

conjugate quaternion h= 3/2−3/2i−3/2j−1/2k trace, norm of a quaternion Tr(h) =h+h= 3, Nm(h) =hh= 7 normic form ofB NmB(X,Y,Z,T) =X2+Y2+Z2+T2

(57)

Quaternion algebras over Q

B quaternion algebra B= (−1,−1

Q ) discriminant ofB DB = 2

O order,non-commutative O=Z[1,i,j,1+i+j+k2 ] discriminant ofO DO = 2, soOmaximal order integral quaternion h= 3/2 + 3/2i+ 3/2j+ 1/2k ∈ O conjugate quaternion h= 3/2−3/2i−3/2j−1/2k

trace, norm of a quaternion Tr(h) =h+h= 3, Nm(h) =hh= 7 normic form ofB NmB(X,Y,Z,T) =X2+Y2+Z2+T2

10 / 36

(58)

Quaternion algebras over Q

B quaternion algebra B= (−1,−1

Q ) discriminant ofB DB = 2

O order,non-commutative O=Z[1,i,j,1+i+j+k2 ] discriminant ofO DO = 2, soOmaximal order integral quaternion h= 3/2 + 3/2i+ 3/2j+ 1/2k ∈ O conjugate quaternion h= 3/2−3/2i−3/2j−1/2k trace, norm of a quaternion Tr(h) =h+h= 3, Nm(h) =hh= 7

normic form ofB NmB(X,Y,Z,T) =X2+Y2+Z2+T2

(59)

Quaternion algebras over Q

B quaternion algebra B= (−1,−1

Q ) discriminant ofB DB = 2

O order,non-commutative O=Z[1,i,j,1+i+j+k2 ] discriminant ofO DO = 2, soOmaximal order integral quaternion h= 3/2 + 3/2i+ 3/2j+ 1/2k ∈ O conjugate quaternion h= 3/2−3/2i−3/2j−1/2k trace, norm of a quaternion Tr(h) =h+h= 3, Nm(h) =hh= 7 normic form ofB NmB(X,Y,Z,T) =X2+Y2+Z2+T2

10 / 36

(60)

Canonical model of a Shimura curve

We need some notation to define aShimura curve:

- B indefinite quaternion algebra overQof discriminantDB

- OB ⊆B order overZof levelN coprime to DB

- Φ:B ,→M2(R)

- Γ∞,+:= Φ({α∈ OB | Nm(α) = 1})/Z×⊆PSL2(R) discrete subgroup

- Γ∞,+\ H compact Riemann surface (⇔B 6=M2(Q)⇔DB >1)

(61)

Canonical model of a Shimura curve

We need some notation to define aShimura curve:

- B indefinite quaternion algebra overQof discriminantDB

- OB ⊆B order overZof levelN coprime to DB

- Φ:B ,→M2(R)

- Γ∞,+:= Φ({α∈ OB | Nm(α) = 1})/Z×⊆PSL2(R) discrete subgroup

- Γ∞,+\ H compact Riemann surface (⇔B 6=M2(Q)⇔DB >1)

11 / 36

(62)

Canonical model of a Shimura curve

We need some notation to define aShimura curve:

- B indefinite quaternion algebra overQof discriminantDB - OB ⊆B order overZof levelN coprime to DB

- Φ:B ,→M2(R)

- Γ∞,+:= Φ({α∈ OB | Nm(α) = 1})/Z×⊆PSL2(R) discrete subgroup

- Γ∞,+\ H compact Riemann surface (⇔B 6=M2(Q)⇔DB >1)

(63)

Canonical model of a Shimura curve

We need some notation to define aShimura curve:

- B indefinite quaternion algebra overQof discriminantDB - OB ⊆B order overZof levelN coprime to DB

- Φ:B ,→M2(R)

- Γ∞,+:= Φ({α∈ OB | Nm(α) = 1})/Z×⊆PSL2(R) discrete subgroup

- Γ∞,+\ H compact Riemann surface (⇔B 6=M2(Q)⇔DB >1)

11 / 36

(64)

Canonical model of a Shimura curve

We need some notation to define aShimura curve:

- B indefinite quaternion algebra overQof discriminantDB - OB ⊆B order overZof levelN coprime to DB

- Φ:B ,→M2(R)

- Γ∞,+:= Φ({α∈ OB | Nm(α) = 1})/Z×⊆PSL2(R) discrete subgroup

- Γ∞,+\ H compact Riemann surface (⇔B 6=M2(Q)⇔DB >1)

(65)

Canonical model of a Shimura curve

We need some notation to define aShimura curve:

- B indefinite quaternion algebra overQof discriminantDB - OB ⊆B order overZof levelN coprime to DB

- Φ:B ,→M2(R)

- Γ∞,+:= Φ({α∈ OB | Nm(α) = 1})/Z×⊆PSL2(R) discrete subgroup

- Γ∞,+\ H compact Riemann surface (⇔B 6=M2(Q)⇔DB >1)

11 / 36

(66)

Canonical model of a Shimura curve

Shimura: there exists a model defined overQfor the Riemann surface Γ∞,+\ H,

i.e. there exist

• X(DB,N) proper algebraic curve defined overQ

• J : Γ∞,+\ H→X(DB,N)(C) isomorphism

Moreover this model is characterised by certain arithmetic properties related to complex multiplication theory. It is calledcanonical model of the Shimura curveX(DB,N) of discriminantDB and level N.

The isomorphismJ is calledcomplexor∞-adic uniformisation of the Shimura curveX(DB,N).

The projective coordinates ofJ are Γ∞,+-invariant functions

Ji:H→Ccalleduniformising functions. They satisfy some algebraic relations that give rise to the equations ofX(DB,N).

(67)

Canonical model of a Shimura curve

Shimura: there exists a model defined overQfor the Riemann surface Γ∞,+\ H, i.e. there exist

• X(DB,N) proper algebraic curve defined overQ

• J : Γ∞,+\ H→X(DB,N)(C) isomorphism

Moreover this model is characterised by certain arithmetic properties related to complex multiplication theory. It is calledcanonical model of the Shimura curveX(DB,N) of discriminantDB and level N.

The isomorphismJ is calledcomplexor∞-adic uniformisation of the Shimura curveX(DB,N).

The projective coordinates ofJ are Γ∞,+-invariant functions

Ji:H→Ccalleduniformising functions. They satisfy some algebraic relations that give rise to the equations ofX(DB,N).

12 / 36

(68)

Canonical model of a Shimura curve

Shimura: there exists a model defined overQfor the Riemann surface Γ∞,+\ H, i.e. there exist

• X(DB,N) proper algebraic curve defined overQ

• J : Γ∞,+\ H→X(DB,N)(C) isomorphism

Moreover this model is characterised by certain arithmetic properties related to complex multiplication theory. It is calledcanonical model of the Shimura curveX(DB,N) of discriminantDB and level N.

The isomorphismJ is calledcomplexor∞-adic uniformisation of the Shimura curveX(DB,N).

The projective coordinates ofJ are Γ∞,+-invariant functions

Ji:H→Ccalleduniformising functions. They satisfy some algebraic relations that give rise to the equations ofX(DB,N).

(69)

Canonical model of a Shimura curve

Shimura: there exists a model defined overQfor the Riemann surface Γ∞,+\ H, i.e. there exist

• X(DB,N) proper algebraic curve defined overQ

• J : Γ∞,+\ H→X(DB,N)(C) isomorphism

Moreover this model is characterised by certain arithmetic properties related to complex multiplication theory. It is calledcanonical model of the Shimura curveX(DB,N) of discriminantDB and level N.

The isomorphismJ is calledcomplexor∞-adic uniformisation of the Shimura curveX(DB,N).

The projective coordinates ofJ are Γ∞,+-invariant functions

Ji:H→Ccalleduniformising functions. They satisfy some algebraic relations that give rise to the equations ofX(DB,N).

12 / 36

(70)

Canonical model of a Shimura curve

Shimura: there exists a model defined overQfor the Riemann surface Γ∞,+\ H, i.e. there exist

• X(DB,N) proper algebraic curve defined overQ

• J : Γ∞,+\ H→X(DB,N)(C) isomorphism

Moreover this model is characterised by certain arithmetic properties related to complex multiplication theory. It is calledcanonical model of the Shimura curveX(DB,N) of discriminantDB and level N.

The isomorphismJ is calledcomplexor∞-adic uniformisation of the Shimura curveX(DB,N).

The projective coordinates ofJ are Γ∞,+-invariant functions

Ji:H→Ccalleduniformising functions. They satisfy some algebraic relations that give rise to the equations ofX(DB,N).

(71)

Canonical model of a Shimura curve

Shimura: there exists a model defined overQfor the Riemann surface Γ∞,+\ H, i.e. there exist

• X(DB,N) proper algebraic curve defined overQ

• J : Γ∞,+\ H→X(DB,N)(C) isomorphism

Moreover this model is characterised by certain arithmetic properties related to complex multiplication theory. It is calledcanonical model of the Shimura curveX(DB,N) of discriminantDB and level N.

The isomorphismJ is calledcomplexor∞-adic uniformisation of the Shimura curveX(DB,N).

The projective coordinates ofJ are Γ∞,+-invariant functions

Ji:H→Ccalled uniformising functions. They satisfy some algebraic relations that give rise to the equations ofX(DB,N).

12 / 36

(72)

Canonical model of a Shimura curve

Shimura: there exists a model defined overQfor the Riemann surface Γ∞,+\ H, i.e. there exist

• X(DB,N) proper algebraic curve defined overQ

• J : Γ∞,+\ H→X(DB,N)(C) isomorphism

Moreover this model is characterised by certain arithmetic properties related to complex multiplication theory. It is calledcanonical model of the Shimura curveX(DB,N) of discriminantDB and level N.

The isomorphismJ is calledcomplexor∞-adic uniformisation of the Shimura curveX(DB,N).

The projective coordinates ofJ are Γ∞,+-invariant functions

J :H → called uniformising functions. They satisfy some algebraic

(73)

Reduction of Shimura curves

Theorem. Letp-NDB be a prime. ThenX(DB,N)|Fp is smooth.

Ifp|NDB, pis called abad reduction primeofX(DB,N). Theorem. Letp|N. Then the special fibreX(DB,N)|Fp has two irreducible components, each isomorphic toX(DB,N/p)|Fp.

Theorem. Ifp|DB, the fibreX(DB,N)|Fp has totally degenerate (each component is isomorphic toP1) semistable (it is reduced, connected but possibly reducible, and its only singularities are ordinary double points) bad reduction.

We want to study the bad reduction of Shimura curves, i.e. its reduction modulo some primep|DB.

13 / 36

(74)

Reduction of Shimura curves

Theorem. Letp-NDB be a prime. ThenX(DB,N)|Fp is smooth.

Ifp|NDB,p is called abad reduction primeofX(DB,N).

Theorem. Letp|N. Then the special fibreX(DB,N)|Fp has two irreducible components, each isomorphic toX(DB,N/p)|Fp.

Theorem. Ifp|DB, the fibreX(DB,N)|Fp has totally degenerate (each component is isomorphic toP1) semistable (it is reduced, connected but possibly reducible, and its only singularities are ordinary double points) bad reduction.

We want to study the bad reduction of Shimura curves, i.e. its reduction modulo some primep|DB.

(75)

Reduction of Shimura curves

Theorem. Letp-NDB be a prime. ThenX(DB,N)|Fp is smooth.

Ifp|NDB,p is called abad reduction primeofX(DB,N).

Theorem. Letp|N. Then the special fibreX(DB,N)|Fp has two irreducible components, each isomorphic toX(DB,N/p)|Fp.

Theorem. Ifp|DB, the fibreX(DB,N)|Fp has totally degenerate (each component is isomorphic toP1) semistable (it is reduced, connected but possibly reducible, and its only singularities are ordinary double points) bad reduction.

We want to study the bad reduction of Shimura curves, i.e. its reduction modulo some primep|DB.

13 / 36

(76)

Reduction of Shimura curves

Theorem. Letp-NDB be a prime. ThenX(DB,N)|Fp is smooth.

Ifp|NDB,p is called abad reduction primeofX(DB,N).

Theorem. Letp|N. Then the special fibreX(DB,N)|Fp has two irreducible components, each isomorphic toX(DB,N/p)|Fp.

Theorem. Ifp|DB, the fibreX(DB,N)|Fp has totally degenerate (each component is isomorphic toP1) semistable (it is reduced, connected but possibly reducible, and its only singularities are ordinary double points) bad reduction.

We want to study the bad reduction of Shimura curves, i.e. its reduction modulo some primep|DB.

(77)

Reduction of Shimura curves

Theorem. Letp-NDB be a prime. ThenX(DB,N)|Fp is smooth.

Ifp|NDB,p is called abad reduction primeofX(DB,N).

Theorem. Letp|N. Then the special fibreX(DB,N)|Fp has two irreducible components, each isomorphic toX(DB,N/p)|Fp.

Theorem. Ifp|DB, the fibreX(DB,N)|Fp has totally degenerate (each component is isomorphic toP1) semistable (it is reduced, connected but possibly reducible, and its only singularities are ordinary double points) bad reduction.

We want to study the bad reduction of Shimura curves, i.e. its reduction modulo some primep|DB.

13 / 36

(78)

3. p-ADIC UNIFORMISATION OF SHIMURA CURVES

(79)

p-adic uniformisation of Shimura curves

Takep|DB bad reduction prime. WriteDB =Dp.

C=C is the algebraic closure ofQ=Rand it is complete. The algebraic closure ofQp is not complete. Cp= completion of the algebraic closure ofQp.

We want to study the set ofCp-points ofX(Dp,N) and its structure as rigid analytic variety (p-adic analog of Riemann surface). This knowledge will allow us to study the reductions modpof some integral models of X(Dp,N).

The theorem of ˇCerednik-Drinfel’d of interchanging local invariants tells us which is the group that uniformises the analytic variety X(Dp,N)(Cp). It is an arithmetic group Γp,+⊆PGL2(Qp) such that

Γp,+\ Hp'X(Dp,N)(Cp),

whereHp :=P1(Cp)\P1(Qp) is thep-adic upper half-plane, thep-adic analog the the complex upper half-plane.

This uniformisation is known as thep-adic uniformisation of the Shimura curveX(Dp,N).

14 / 36

(80)

p-adic uniformisation of Shimura curves

Takep|DB bad reduction prime. WriteDB =Dp.

C=C is the algebraic closure ofQ=Rand it is complete.

The algebraic closure ofQp is not complete. Cp= completion of the algebraic closure ofQp.

We want to study the set ofCp-points ofX(Dp,N) and its structure as rigid analytic variety (p-adic analog of Riemann surface). This knowledge will allow us to study the reductions modpof some integral models of X(Dp,N).

The theorem of ˇCerednik-Drinfel’d of interchanging local invariants tells us which is the group that uniformises the analytic variety X(Dp,N)(Cp). It is an arithmetic group Γp,+⊆PGL2(Qp) such that

Γp,+\ Hp'X(Dp,N)(Cp),

whereHp :=P1(Cp)\P1(Qp) is thep-adic upper half-plane, thep-adic analog the the complex upper half-plane.

This uniformisation is known as thep-adic uniformisation of the Shimura curveX(Dp,N).

(81)

p-adic uniformisation of Shimura curves

Takep|DB bad reduction prime. WriteDB =Dp.

C=C is the algebraic closure ofQ=Rand it is complete.

The algebraic closure ofQp is not complete.

Cp= completion of the algebraic closure ofQp.

We want to study the set ofCp-points ofX(Dp,N) and its structure as rigid analytic variety (p-adic analog of Riemann surface). This knowledge will allow us to study the reductions modpof some integral models of X(Dp,N).

The theorem of ˇCerednik-Drinfel’d of interchanging local invariants tells us which is the group that uniformises the analytic variety X(Dp,N)(Cp). It is an arithmetic group Γp,+⊆PGL2(Qp) such that

Γp,+\ Hp'X(Dp,N)(Cp),

whereHp :=P1(Cp)\P1(Qp) is thep-adic upper half-plane, thep-adic analog the the complex upper half-plane.

This uniformisation is known as thep-adic uniformisation of the Shimura curveX(Dp,N).

14 / 36

Références

Documents relatifs

a Fuchsian triangle group that arises from the unit group of a quater- nion algebra over a totally real number field.. We conclude by giving some examples of how this method works

In 2D, basis functions for Crouzeix–Raviart elements are known for general polynomial order p : for p = 1, this is the standard P 1 Crouzeix–Raviart element, for p = 2 it is

cusps and 16 points over j = 0, so it is not hyperelliptic by the 3-test Alternatively, the cusp ( ] is a Weierstrass point ([I], Theorem 2)y and fixed by ( ) , which is not

The aim is to give a comprehensive description of some recent work of the author and his students on generalisations of the Gross-Zagier formula, Euler systems on Shimura curves,

the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture for modular elliptic curves and the Andre-Oort conjecture for quaternion Shimura varieties.. Historically, the CM-points on modular curves

This is a slight generalization of Carayol’s proposition in [4, p. His proof can be generalized to our case without any difficulty. So each pair of these spaces forms a complete

In this paper, we focus on the special case of Neumann-Setzer curves and we give an alternative proof of the non-triviality of self-points using the complex side of the

By a constant group over any base we mean an etale finite flat group scheme with trivial (constant) Galois representation.. By a [L-type group we mean a finite flat group scheme