• Aucun résultat trouvé

Productive tiller number per plant Specific leaf area (cm -1 2 ) g

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Productive tiller number per plant Specific leaf area (cm -1 2 ) g"

Copied!
23
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Can higher grain yield be

achieved in irrigated rice

fields through desirable

nursery management?

Tanguy Lafarge

Zuziana Susanti, Estela Pasuquin

CSSP, 10 May 2006, Palawan

(2)

Transplanting 20 to 30 days-old

seedlings (7 to 10-leaf stage)

– Farmers prefer to transplant old seedlings

– High tiller mortality if early transplanting may induce significant dry matter loss

Sowing in the nursery from 3000 to

10000 seeds m

-2

(75 to 250 g seeds m

-2

)

(3)

Productive tiller number per plant 0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 7 D A S 2 1 D A S 3 5 D A S D a y s a f te r s o w in g ( d a y s ) 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0

Specific leaf area

(cm 2 g -1 ) 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0

Transplanting age: 7, 21 and 35 days Nursery density: 3000 seeds m-2

I1 I1

4 tillers

(4)

Productive tiller number per plant 0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 7 D A S 2 1 D A S 3 5 D A S D a y s a f te r s o w in g ( d a y s ) 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0

Specific leaf area

(cm 2 g -1 ) 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0

SLA = leaf area leaf dry weight I1

I1

Calculation of specific leaf area

- Tiller emergence was delayed if extended stay in the nursery

- Tiller emergence resumed right after transplanting whatever the age

Transplanting age: 7, 21 and 35 days Nursery density: 3000 seeds m-2

(5)

Productive tiller number per plant 0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 7 D A S 2 1 D A S 3 5 D A S D a y s a f te r s o w in g ( d a y s ) 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0

Specific leaf area

(cm 2 g -1 ) 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0

- Tiller emergence was delayed if extended stay in the nursery

- Tiller emergence resumed right after transplanting whatever the age

- SLA increased in the nursery if transplanting was delayed - SLA resumed to the control value right after transplanting

I1 I1

Extended stay in the nursery affected tiller emergence

Transplanting age: 7, 21 and 35 days Nursery density: 3000 seeds m-2

(6)

500 pl m-2 3000 pl m-2

40000 pl m-2

10000 pl m-2

I1 in the nursery, 6 days after sowing

(7)

Days after sowing (days)

0 30 60 90 120 150

Productive tiller number per plant 0

5 10 15 20 500 pl m-2 3000 pl m-2 10000 pl m-2 40000 pl m-2

Transplanting 35 days after sowing

main field nursery

Plant response to seed density

-Tiller emergence resumed

right after transplanting whatever the density

- Tiller emergence was delayed if high density in the nursery

I1

(8)

Days after sowing (days)

0 20 40 60 80

Leaf number on the maintiller 0 4 8 12 16 500 pl m-2 3000 pl m-2 10000 pl m-2 40000 pl m-2

Transplanting 35 days after sowing

Plant response to seed density

leaf 3

leaf 4

(9)

Days after sowing (days)

0 20 40 60 80

Leaf number on the maintiller 0 4 8 12 16 500 pl m-2 3000 pl m-2 10000 pl m-2 40000 pl m-2

Transplanting 35 days after sowing

main field nursery

- Leaf emergence recovery from competition in the

nursery visible only 20 days after transplanting

- Leaf emergence was similar before and after transplanting whatever the seed density

- Leaf emergence was affected in the nursery if high density

Plant response to seed density

(10)

No transplanting shock was observed

High seedling density in the nursery and late

transplanting induced a delay in leaf and tiller

emergence and an increased in SLA

Recovery in tiller emergence and SLA was

observed right after transplanting, whatever

the seed density and transplanting age were

Leaf emergence was not affected by

transplanting

(11)

transplanted 7 days after sowing transplanted 21 days after sowing transplanted 14 days after sowing

I1 in the main field,

34 days after sowing for all 3 situations

Transplanting, hill spacing 20 x 20 cm

Plant response to early transplanting

(12)

Crop establishment Grain yield (t ha-1) I1 H1 7 days transplanting 6.99 7.75 14 days transplanting 6.55 7.59 21 days transplanting 6.06 6.97

- same sowing date

- same plant density

- same nutrient management

I1: IR72 H1: IR75217H

Days after sowing (days)

0 40 80 120

Productive tiller number per plant 0

10 20 30 40 7 days 14 days 21 days

(13)

Plant response to early transplanting

Crop establishment Grain yield (t ha-1) I1 H1 7 days transplanting 6.99 7.75 14 days transplanting 6.55 7.59 21 days transplanting 6.06 6.97

Higher grain yield with

early transplanting valid

for:

-

contrasted genotypes

(inbreds, NPTs, hybrids)

-

wet and dry seasons

(larger gap in the dry season)

-

different locations

(Philippines, Indonesia,…) - same sowing date

- same plant density

- same nutrient management

(14)

Leaf number on the maintiller 0 4 8 12 16

D ays after sow ing (days)

0 20 40 60 80

Shoot dry weight

per plant (g) 0 5 10 15 20 500 pl m -2 3000 pl m-2 10000 pl m-2 40000 pl m-2

Transplanting 7 days after sowing

For nursery densities as high as 40000 seed m-2, there was:

Plant response to seed density

main field nursery

Early transplanting reduces the area required for the nursery

- no impact on leaf emergence

- no impact on shoot dry matter accumulation

(15)

Early transplanting induced an increase in

grain yield (up to 1 t ha

-1

in some conditions)

Early transplanting shall promote a

significant reduction in nursery area

Early transplanting increased tiller mortality

rate (for contrasted genotypes and seasons)

(16)

Tiller mortality rate:

TMR =

Days after sowing (days)

0 40 80 120

Productive tiller number per plant 0

10 20 30 40 transplanted at 7 days transplanted at 14 days transplanted at 21 days

senescent tillers

total tillers

(17)

Days after sowing (days)

0 40 80 120

Productive tiller number per plant 0

10 20 30 40 7 days 14 days 21 days

Productive tiller number

per plant 0 5 10 15 20 25 7 DAS 21 DAS 35 DAS

Days after sowing (days)

0 20 40 60 80 100

Specific leaf area

(cm 2 g -1 ) 0 100 200 300

Impact of tiller mortality rate

Early transplanting was associated with high tiller mortality

Did high tiller mortality reduce the impact of the positive effect of early transplanting on grain yield?

(18)

Days after sowing (days)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Productive tiller number

per plant 0 10 20 30 40

High tiller senescence Low tiller senescence

How to get this contrast in plant response?

Conceptual framework:

to achieve similar tiller emergence rate and

productive tiller number but contrasted tiller

mortality rate

Impact of tiller mortality rate

Tiller emergence is affected by water depth

(19)

Days after sowing (days)

0 40 80 120

Productive tiller number per plant 0

10 20 30 40 3 cm water level 8 cm water level

Transplanting, hill spacing 20 x 20 cm

Impact of tiller mortality rate

Tiller emergence is affected by water depth

Increase in water depth at mid-tillering

(20)

Days after sowing (days)

0 40 80 120

Productive tiller number per plant 0

10 20 30 40 3 cm water level 8 cm water level - Decrease in TMR from 0.33 to 0.24 - Similar productive tiller number

-Similar rate in tiller emergence

Transplanting, hill spacing 20 x 20 cm

Has grain yield increased?

(21)

Genotypes Water management Tiller mortality rate Grain yield (t/ha) Tiller density (m-2)

Per productive tiller

Grain size (g) Filled grain dry weight (g) Filled grain number I1 3 cm water level 0.33 6.89 554 1.60 72.2 22.2 8 cm water level 0.24 6.61 527 1.45 64.5 22.6 H1 3 cm water level 0.33 9.08 473 2.17 91.8 23.6 8 cm water level 0.25 9.08 465 2.20 92.3 23.8

Grain yield was unchanged for both genotypes

(22)

High tiller mortality rate did not affect

grain yield

Tiller mortality:

• concerned small tillers then low plant dry matter

• concerned non-competitive tillers for access to light because inside the canopy

• may have contributed to higher dry matter

accumulation in productive tillers through efficient remobilization

(23)

Références

Documents relatifs

Rate of tiller emergence for sorghum was linearly related to leaf number on the main tiller, with the first tiller emerging at leaf number 6 (when the incomplete leaf was counted)

Dynamics of total tiller emergence with leaf number on the main tiller was exponential and was variable with growing conditions like climate conditions and plant density.. The

Rather high seedling competition in the nursery, due to either late transplanting or high seed density, was reported to be critical to achieve high leaf area production and high

• Low seed rate in the nursery and early transplanting did not delay leaf and tiller emergence and shoot dry weight increase. • No transplanting shock

Even in the presence of an imperfect knowledge of the phase structure function, and with a limited exposure time, the expected error root mean square of the estimation error is of

Par ailleurs, c’est avec vous qu’ont été forgés, dans le cadre de l’ECU (Commission d’Enseignement Continu Universitaire) dont vous étiez membre assidu, les

(2) Cycle infectieux, échelle secteurde feuille

The evolutionary history of LMA thus paints different evolutionary trajectories of vascular plant species across clades, revealing the coordination of leaf trait evolution with