• Aucun résultat trouvé

Clause 'Subordination' and Discourse Relations.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Clause 'Subordination' and Discourse Relations."

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: halshs-00081521

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00081521

Submitted on 31 Jul 2006

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Clause ’Subordination’ and Discourse Relations.

Laurence Delort

To cite this version:

Laurence Delort. Clause ’Subordination’ and Discourse Relations.. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the German Society for Linguistics (DGfS-06), Workshop on ”Subordination vs. Coordi- nation in Sentence and Text from a Cross-linguistic Perspective”, 2006, pp.138-139. �halshs-00081521�

(2)

Raum ‚Subordination’ vs. ‚Koordination’ in Satz und Text (sprachvergleichend) AG 8 ___________________________________________________________________________

Laurence Delort – Université Paris 7

Clause 'Subordination' and Discourse Relations Mi: 14.30 – 15.00

___________________________________________________________________________

It's tempting to correlate clause combining and discourse structure because both display subordination and coordination. Particularly, it seems assumed in (Matthiessen & Thompson, 1988) that subordination at the clause level (a subordinating conjunction) lexicalizes subordination at the discourse level (a subordinating relation in Segmented Discourse Representation Theory, (Asher & Lascarides, 2003), or a nucleus-satellite relation in Rhetorical Structure Theory, (Mann & Thompson, 1988)).

The goal of this study is to draw a distinction between clause 'subordination' and discourse relations, by examining two French subordinating conjunctions: avant que (English before) and parce que (English because). They usually introduce subordinate clauses which denote circumstances of eventualities described in main clauses. That is, they convey temporal or causal relations which occur at the conceptual level, not at the discourse level. On the other hand, they may not introduce subordinate clauses, but main clauses, (Green, 1976). In this case, they convey (structural) discourse relations which occur at the discourse level: avant que triggers the coordinating relation Narration, (Le Draoulec, 2005; Delort, 2006), and parce que triggers the subordinating relation Explanation, (Debaisieux, 2005; Delort & Danlos, 2005).

It seems that there is no parallel between clause 'subordination' and discourse subordination, because a subordinating conjunction can express either a conceptual relation or a discourse relation, and if a discourse relation is conveyed, it can be either coordinating or subordinating.

Asher, N. & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press.

Debaisieux, J.-M. (2005). Les conjonctions de subordination: mots grammaticaux ou mots de discours? Le cas de parce que. Revue de Sémantique et de Pragmatique. Forthcoming.

Delort, L. (2006). Avant que en contexte discursif. Cahiers Chronos. Forthcoming.

Delort, L. & Danlos, L. (2005). Coordination of Causal Relations in Discourse. In Proceedings of the Symposium on the Exploration and Modelling of Meaning (SEM-05), p. 75-84, Biarritz, France.

Green, G. M. (1976). Main Clause Phenomena in Subordinate Clauses. Language, 52(2), 382–397.

Le Draoulec, A. (2005). Avant que/de: Possibles passages à la connexion temporelle. Journal of French Language Studies, 15(2), 131–151.

Mann, W. C. & Thompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization. Text, 8(3), 243–281.

Matthiessen, C. & Thompson, S. A. (1988). The Structure of Discourse and 'Subordination'. In J. Haiman & S.

A. Thompson (eds), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, volume 18 of Typological Studies in Language, p. 275–329. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Références

Documents relatifs

Dans une série de prédications, de même que a peut redéfinir la fonction d’un antécédent nouvellement focalisé, le préverbe e peut introduire une subordonnée

Let Ω be a strictly pseudo-convex domain equipped with its minimal good family of polydiscs, then Ω has the (p, k) Bergman Carleson embedding

Zij is afkomstig van Shangai in het oosten van China en ze kwam zes maanden geleden met WEP voor een jaar naar België.. We waren

centralement à la relation d autorité ; alors que conflits et coopérations sont également envisageables dans des organisations non hiérarchiques.. Des dynamiques

- si effectivement, dans les corpus représentatifs, du français écrit et oral, il apparaissait que les emplois adverbiaux de "donc" sont fréquents et nettement disjoints de

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

Through the study of the French subordinating conjunction avant que (English before) and its interaction with discourse context, I will attempt to show that

A coordinating conjunction 'coordinates' two equivalent elements in a sentence, that is, words belonging to the same grammatical category (nouns + nouns, verbs + verbs,