• Aucun résultat trouvé

Dynamics of root growth in response to grazing intensity and climate variability of a permanent upland mesic grassland

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Dynamics of root growth in response to grazing intensity and climate variability of a permanent upland mesic grassland"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02801238

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02801238

Submitted on 5 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Dynamics of root growth in response to grazing intensity and climate variability of a permanent upland

mesic grassland

Catherine Picon-Cochard, Nathalie Vassal, Damien Herfurth, Sandrine Revaillot, Stéphane Sauvat, Priscilla Note, Frédérique Louault

To cite this version:

Catherine Picon-Cochard, Nathalie Vassal, Damien Herfurth, Sandrine Revaillot, Stéphane Sauvat, et

al.. Dynamics of root growth in response to grazing intensity and climate variability of a permanent

upland mesic grassland. EcoSummit 2016 Ecological Sustainability: Engineering Change, Aug 2016,

Montpellier, France. 2016. �hal-02801238�

(2)

RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

UREP

Grassland Ecosystem Research Clermont-Ferrand

Dynamics of root growth of upland grasslands in response to grazing intensity and climate variability

INTRODUCTION

Picon-Cochard Catherine 1 , Vassal Nathalie 1,2 , Herfurth Damien 1,2 , Revaillot Sandrine 1 , Sauvat Stéphane 2 , Note Priscilla 1,3 , Louault Frédérique 1

1

INRA UR874, Grassland Ecosystem Research, Clermont-Ferrand, France;

2

Université Lyon, VetAgro Sup, INRA, UREP, F-63370 Lempdes, France;

3

INRA, UE1414, Herbipôle, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France

Contact: catherine.cochard@clermont.inra.fr

METHODS

The site is part of the long-term observatory network (SOERE-ACBB) located at St-Genès-Champanelle (upland area in the French Massif Central). Grassland is managed since 10 years with a gradient of grazing intensity: abandonment, low (Cattle-) and high (Cattle+) stocking density (0, 6.9 and 13.8 LSU ha

-1

, livestock unit, respectively) with 5 grazing rotations each year. Dynamics of root mass production was measured with in-growth cores, inserted in the 0-20 cm soil layer and collected 10 times each year during two years (2014 and 2015). Root mass stock was measured 3 times (spring, summer, autumn) the first year and annual root turnover was calculated as the ratio of annual BNPP to mean root mass stock. Soil temperature measured at 20cm depth was averaged at daily scale.

In permanent grassland, root activity (growth, exsudation, mortality) contributes to the main inputs of C and N compounds into the soil. Understanding how root activity and soil C stock respond to management is of prime importance for providing ecosystem C sequestration service. Lower below-ground net primary production (BNPP) is expected in intensive than in extensive grazing treatments due to stimulation of shoot mass at the expense of roots.

Abandonment

• Soil temperature increases in Spring and Autumn-Winter led to higher root mass across treatments. But the first grazing rotation in May reduced root mass earlier in Cattle+ than in Cattle-.

• In Summer, soil dehydration is expected to be the main driver of root mass reduction.

• Warmer and drier climatic conditions in 2015 reduced both annual root production and root turnover by about 44%.

• Overall, cattle treatments showed higher root mass than Abandonment leading to higher BNPP in 2015 (+32%) the drier year.

• Root turnover values ranged between 0.97 and 1.7 y

-1

, which are similar and higher than data from literature for temperate grassland, respectively (Gill and Jackson 2000; Leifeld et al 2015).

• No important changes of root mass production and BNPP were observed in response to the grazing intensity gradient although above-ground biomass and botanical composition were affected (Herfurth et al 2015). However soil temperature was lower in Abandonment than in Cattle treatments, due to litter accumulation, slowing plant greeness and delaying root production.

• Altogether these results showed that inter-annual climatic conditions had a more pronounced effect on root production than management for upland permanent grassland.

Thus it can be expected that climatic variability increase should slow root mass the dry years and thus should affect soil C stock.

4 in-growth cores / plot 4 plots / treatment 3 treatments 10 dates / year

• Root production peaked twice in Spring and late Summer early Autumn for all treatments and occurred earlier in grazed Cattle than in Abandonment treatments.

This can be related to higher soil temperature measured in grazed plots.

• The second year was drier than the first year, especially in Summer. This led to very low root mass production and to a delay for the second peak of root mass production in autumn.

References

Gill RA, Jackson RB. 2000. Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytologist 147: 13–31.

Herfurth D, Vassal N, Louault F, Alvarez G, Pottier J, Picon-Cochard C, Bosio I, Carrère P. 2015. How does soil particulate organic carbon respond to grazing intensity in permanent grasslands? Plant and Soil, 394, 239-255 Leifeld, J., Meyer, S., Budge, K., Sebastia, M.T., Zimmermann, M., and Fuhrer, J. (2015). Turnover of grassland roots in mountain ecosystems revealed by their radiocarbon signature: Role of temperature and management.

PLoS ONE 10, e0119184.

Cattle+ Grazing intensity Cattle-

• For spring 2014 and 2015, soil temperatures measured at date numbers 2, 3, 4, 12, 13 and 14 are shown; For Autumn-Winter 2014 and 2015, soil temperatures measured at date numbers 1, 9, 10,11, 19 and 20 are shown.

2014 Spring

Root mass (g m-2) 0 50 100 150 200

2015 Spring

2 4 6 8 10 12 14

0 50 100 150

Abandonment Cattle- Cattle+

2014 Autumn-Winter

Soil temperature (°C, 20 cm)

0 50 100 150 200

2015 Autumn-Winter

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0

50 100 150 Root mass (g m-2)

0 50 100 150 200 250

Abandonment Cattle- Cattle+

Soil temperature (°C)

0 5 10 15 20

2015 2014

Feb Mar

Apr May

Jun Jul Aug

Sep Oct

Nov Dec

Jan Feb

Mar Apr

May Jun Jul

Aug Sep

Oct Nov

Dec Jan

Feb

Rainfall (mm), Aridity index (P-PET, mm)

-150 -100 -50 0 50 100

Rainfall Aridity index

Rainfall: 2014: 847 mm 2015: 622 mm

* *

*

*

* * * *

*

* *

*

*

* *

*

Soiltemperature (°C, 20cm depth)

Aridity index: 2014: +121 mm 2015: -143 mm

Grazing periods

*

Références

Documents relatifs

degrees as long as it continues to grow. It is frozen to its current value when it stops growing and a new root el- ement is created. We see that this model combines two aspects

 Gravimetric soil water measured weekly from sowing to 40 days after sowing (DAS) in 0-15 cm soil depth..  Root distribution, shoot dry matter (SDM) and crop nitrogen (N)

Objectives, sites and approches • To understand  the impact of this forest co‐ governance system on communities adaptation to  CC and CV

Finally, we will discuss on-going investi- gations to couple our model to water and soil nutrients models [4], and to take into account roots

calibration of the diffusion and advection operators; simulation results of non- centralized root growth provided by the RootTyp software (b) and by C-ROOT (c). Springer

According to the above presented results (Figs. 2, 3 and 4) which highlight the low anisotropy of sorghum roots, another simpler approach could be used that ignores root

(b) Final shoot DW two years after transplanting in relation to site conditions (field = open, forest = black), stock type and root-pruning treatment.. Columns followed by the

Par exemple, lorsqu’un projet de Parc naturel régional de la côte picarde a été soumis au Conseil National de la Protection de la Nature en janvier 2006, le dossier a été