Extracting soil water holding capacity parameters of a distributed agro-hydrological model from high resolution optical satellite observations series
Texte intégral
Documents relatifs
Difference between (a) airborne and ground estimates and (b) retrieved soil roughness parameter H versus 1-km field soil moisture variability includ- ing data from the four
Open-loop (OL) water table depth simulations using the RT (top panel) and reanalyzed (bottom panel) satellite precipitation prod- ucts as forcing compared to in situ measurements
Water level relative error averaged over the river versus time with no assimilation (black), with 1-day subcycle (green) and 3-day subcycle (blue) orbit SWOT assimilations..
Parameter estimates are obtained by using ASCAT σ 0 measurements together with auxiliary Leaf Area Index (LAI ) and soil-moisture (SM) datasets provided by the Interactions
Variation in available water content (AWC) between bulk and rhizospheric soil varied from non-significant to a significant increase (to about 16% increase) depending on plant
The ORCHIDEE LSM, in which we have implemented water stable isotopes, reproduces the isotopic compositions of the different water pools of the land surface reasonably well compared
The synthetic case was used in order to test four data types for model calibration: one water content profile at a single sampling time (case 1); one water content profile and one
Mapping soil water holding capacity over large areas to predict the potential production of forest stands.. Christian Piedallu, Jean-Claude Guégout, Ary Bruand,