• Aucun résultat trouvé

Study of the weak charged hadronic current in b decays

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Study of the weak charged hadronic current in b decays"

Copied!
11
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Article

Reference

Study of the weak charged hadronic current in b decays

L3 Collaboration

AMBROSI, Giovanni (Collab.), et al.

Abstract

Charged and neutral particle multiplicities of jets associated with identified semileptonic and hadronic b decays are studied. The observed differences between these jets are used to determine the inclusive properties of the weak charged hadronic current. The average charged particle multiplicity of the weak charged hadronic current in b decays is measured for the first time to be 2.69±0.07(stat.)±0.14(syst.). This result is in good agreement with the JETSET hadronization model of the weak charged hadronic current if 40±17% of the produced mesons are light-flavored tensor (L=1) mesons. This level of tensor meson production is consistent with the measurement of the π⁰ multiplicity in the weak charged hadronic current in b decays.

L3 Collaboration, AMBROSI, Giovanni (Collab.), et al . Study of the weak charged hadronic current in b decays. Physics Letters. B , 1997, vol. 393, p. 477-486

DOI : 10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01689-9

Available at:

http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:113055

Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version.

1 / 1

(2)

&!Q ii!!!! . --

*H

-- __

13 February 1997

PHYSICS LETTERS B

ELSEVIER Physics Letters B 393 (1997) 477-486

Study of the weak charged hadronic current in b decays

L3 Collaboration

M. Acciarri ab, 0. Adrianiq, M. Aguilar-Benitez=, S. Ahlen k, B. Alpat ai, J. Alcarazaa, G.. Alemanni w, J. Allaby r, A. Aloisio ad, G. Alverson e, M.G. Alviggi ad, G. Ambrosi t,

H. Anderhub ay, V.P. Andreevam, T. Angelescu m, F. Anselmo i, D. Antreasyan’, A. Arefiev ac, T. Azemoon”, T. Azizj, P. Bagnaiad, L. Baksay a, R.C. BallC, S. Banerjeej,

K. Banicz au, R. Bar-ill&e r, L. Barone ae, P. Bartalini ai, A. Baschirotto ab, M. Basile i, R. Battiston’, A. Bay w, F. Becattiniq, U. Beckerr, F. Behner aY, J. Berdugo aa, I? Berges P,

B. Bertucci r, B.L. Betevay, S. Bhattacharyaj, M. Biasini’, A. Bilanday, G.M. Bilei ai, J.J. Blaising’, S.C. Blyth G, G.J. Bobbinkb, R. Bock a, A. Bohm a, B. Borgiaae,

A. Bouchamd, D. Bourilkovay, M. Bourquint, D. Boutigny d, J.G. Branson ao, V. Brigljevic aY, I.C. Brockd, A. Buffiniq, A. Buijs at, J.D. Burgerr’, W.J. Burger t, J. Busenitz as, A. Buytenhuijs af, X.D.

Cai

P, M. Campanelli a!‘, M. Cape11 P, G. Cara Romeo i,

M. Caria ai, G. Carlino d, A.M. Cartacci 9, J. Casaus aa, G. Castellini 9, F. Cavallari &, N. Cavallo ad, C. Cecchi t, M. Cerrada”“, F. Cesaroni ‘, M. Chamizo aa, A. Chan ba, Y.H. Chang ba, U.K. Chaturvedi ‘, M. Chemarin ‘, A. Chen ba, G. Chen g, G.M. Chen s,

H.F. Chen “, H.S. Chen g, M. Chen P, G. Chiefari ad, C.Y. Chien e, M.T. Choi =, L. Cifarelli an, F. Cindolo i, C. Civininiq, I. Clare P, R. Clare P, H.O. Cohn ag, G. Coignet d, A.P. Colijnb, N. Colinoaa, V. Commichaua, S. Costantini &, F. Cotorobai m, B. de la Cruz”,

A. Csilling n, T.S. Dai P, R. D’ Alessandroq, R. de Asmundis ad, H. De Boeckaf, A. Degrt d, K. Deiters av, P. Denes *, F. DeNotaristefani&, D. DiBitontoaS, M. Diemoz &,

D. van Dierendonckb, F. Di Lodovico ay, C. Dionisi ae, M. Dittmaray, A. Dominguez ao, A. Doria ad, I. Dome d, M.T. Dova s*4, E. Drago ad, D. Duchesneau d, P. Duinker b, I. Duran aP,

S. Duttaj, S. Easo ai, Yu. Efremenko as, H. El Mamouni ‘, A. Engler 4, F.J. Eppling P, EC. ErnC b, J.P. Ernenwein ‘, P. Extermann t, M. Fabre av, R. Faccini &, S. Falciano “, A. Favaraq, J. Fay ‘, 0. Fedin am, M. Felcini ay, B. Fenyi as, T. Fergusoni, D. Fernandez =,

F. Ferroni ae, H. Fesefeldt a, E. Fiandrini ai, J.H. Field t, F. Filthautd, PH. Fisher P, G. Forconi P, L. Fredj t, K. Freudenreichay, C. Furetta”‘, Yu. Galaktionov ac,p, S.N. Gangulij,

P. Garcia-Abia =, S.S. Gau e, S. Gentile ae, J. Gerald e, N. Gheordanescu m, S. Giagu ae, S. Goldfarb”, J. Goldsteink, Z.F. Gong “, A. Gougase, G. Grattaah, M.W. Gruenewaldh,

V.K. Gupta *, A. Gurtuj, L.J. Gutay au, B. Hartmann a, A. Hasan ae, D. Hatzifotiadou i, T. Hebbeker h, A. Her& r, W.C. van Hoek af, H. Hofer ay, H. Hoorani t, S.R. Hou ba, G. Hu e,

0370-2693/97/$17.00 Copyright 0 1997 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

PI/ SO370-2693(96)01689-9

(3)

478 L3 Collaboration/Physics Letters B 393 (1997) 477-486

V. Innocente r, H. Janssen d, K. Jenkes a, B.N. Jin s, L.W. Jones ‘, P. de Jong r, I. Josa-Mutuberria”“, A. Kasser”, R.A. Khans, D. KamradaW, Yu. Kamyshkovas, J.S. Kapustinsky Y, Y. Karyotakis d, M. Kaur s,5, M.N. Kienzle-Focacci t, D. Kime, J.K. Kim =, S.C. Kim ar, Y.G. Kim ar, W.W. Kinnison Y, A. Kirkby ah, D. Kirkby ah,

J. Kirkby r, D. Kiss n, W. Kittel af, A. Klimentovr,ac, A.C. Konigaf, I. KorolkoaC, V. Koutsenko pvac, R.W. Kraemer 4, W. Krenz a, H. Kuijten af, A. Kunin P,ac, P. Ladron de Guevara aa, G. Landi q, C. Lapoint P, K. Lassila-Perini ay, P. Laurikainen “, M. Lebeau r, A. Lebedev P, P. Lebrun ‘, l? Lecomte ay, P. Lecoq r, P Le Coultre ay, J.S. Lee a,

K.Y. Lee ar, C. Leggett ‘, J.M. Le Gaff’, R. Leiste aw, E. Leonardi ti, P. Levtchenko am, C. Li “, E. Lieb”“, W.T. Lin ba, EL. Linde b,r, L. Lista ad, Z.A. Liu g, W. Lohmann aw, E. Longoat, W. Lu ah, Y.S. Lu s, K. Lubelsmeyer a, C. Luci aP, D. Luckey P, L. Luminari a’,

W. Lustermann av, W.G. Ma”, M. Maity j, G. Majumderj, L. Malgeri a’, A. Malinin ac, C. Maiiaaa, S. Mangla J, P Marchesini ay, A. Marin k, J.P. Martin ‘, F. Marzano ap, G.G.G. Massaro b, D. McNally r, S. Mele ad, L. Merola ad, M. Meschini q, W.J. Metzger af,

M. von der Mey a, Y. Mi w, A. Mihul m, A.J.W. van Mil af, G. Mirabelli ti, J. Mnich r, P. Molnar h, B. Monteleoni 9, R. Moore c, S. Morganti &, T. Moulikj, R. Mount ah, S. Mtiller”, F. Muheim’, E. Nagy “, S. NahnP, M. Napolitanoad, F. Nessi-Tedaldi ay,

H. Newman ah, T. Niessen a, A. Nippe a, A. Nisati acl, H. Nowak”“, H. Opitz”, G. Organtini&, R. Ostonen “, D. Pandoulasa, S. Paoletti ae, P. Paolucci ad, H.K. Park”‘, G. Pascale &, G. Passalevaq, S. Patricelli ad, T. Paul’, M. Pauluzzi ai, C. Paus a, F. Pauss ay,

D. Peach r, Y.J. Pei a, S. Pensotti ab, D. Perret-Gallixd, S. Petrakh, A. Pevsnere, D. Piccolo ad, M. Pieri 9, J.C. Pinto 4, P.A. PirouC *, E. Pistolesi ab, V. Plyaskin ac, M. Pohl ay, V. Pojidaev ac,q, H. Postema P, N. Produit t, D. Prokofiev’“, G. Rahal-Callot ay,

P.G. Rancoitaab, M. Rattaggiab, G. Raven ao, P. Razis ae, K. Readas, D. Ren ‘Y, M. Rescigno ae, S. Reucroft ‘, T. van Rhee at, S. Riemann aw, B.C. Riemers a”, K. Riles ‘, 0. Rind c, S. Ro a, A. Robohm ay, J. Rodin P, F.J. Rodriguez aa, BP Roe ‘, L. Romero aa,

S. Rosier-Lees d, Ph. Rosselet w, W. van Rossum at, S. Rotha, J.A. Rubio r,

H. Rykaczewski ay, J. Salicio’, E. Sanchez aa, A. Santocchiaai, M.E. Sarakinos “, S. Sarkarj, M. Sassowsky a, G. Sauvaged, C. Schafer”, V. Schegelsky am, S. Schmidt-Kaersta,

D. Schmitz a, P. Schmitza, M. Schneegans d, N. ScholzaY, H. Schoppera”, D.J. Schotanus af, J. Schwenke”, G. Schwering”, C. Sciaccaad, D. Sciarrino t, J.C. Sens ba, L. Servoli”‘, S. Shevchenkoah, N. Shivarov”q, V. Shoutko”“, J. Shukla Y, E. Shumilov ac, A. Shvorobah,

T. Siedenburg a, D. Son x, A. Sopczak aw, V. Soulimovad, B. Smithp, P. Spillantiniq, M. Steuerp, D.P. Stickland*, H. Stone*, B. Stoyanov”‘i, A. Straessner”, K. Strauch’,

K. Sudhakarj, G. Sultanov”, L.Z. Sun “, G.F. Susinno’, H. SuteraY, J.D. Swains, X.W. Tangs, L. Tauscherf, L. TaylorP, Samuel C.C. Ting P, S.M.

Ting

P, M. Tonutti a,

S.C. Tonwarj, J. Toth “, C.

Tully

ak, H. Tuchscherer=, K.L. Tungs, Y. Uchidar,

J. Ulbricht ay, U. Uwer r, E. Valente ae, R.T. Van de Walle af, G. Vesztergombi “,

I. Vetlitsky ac, G. Viertel ay, M. Vivargent d, R. Volkert aw, H. Vogeli, H. Vogt aw,

I. Vorobiev ac, A.A. Vorobyov am, A. Vorvolakos ae, M. Wadhwa f, W. Wallraff a, J.C. Wang P,

(4)

L3 Collaboration/Physics Letters B 393 (19971477-486 419

X.L. Wang ‘, Z.M. Wang ‘, A. Weber”, F. Wittgenstein’, S.X. Wu ‘, S. Wynhoff”, J. Xu k, Z.Z. Xu”, B.Z. Yang”, C.G. Yangg, X.Y. Yaog, J.B. Ye’, S.C. Yehba, J.M. Youq, An. Zalite am, Yu. Zalite am, P. Zemp aY, Y. Zeng a, Z. Zhang g, Z.P. Zhang “, B. Zhou k,

Y. Zhou c, G.Y. Zhu g, R.Y. Zhu ah, A. Zichichi i,r,s, F. Ziegler aw

a I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH, D-52056 Aachen, FRG ’ III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH, D-52056 Aachen, FRG

h National Institute for High Energy Physics, NIKHEE and University of Amsterdam, NL-1009 DB Amsterdam, The Netherlands c University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI 48109, USA

e Laboratoire d’Annecy_le-Vieux de Physique des Particules, LAPPIN2P3-CNRS. BP 110, F-74941 Annecy-le-Vieux CEDEX, France e Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA

f Institute of Physics, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland g Institute of High Energy Physics, IHEP 100039 Beijing. China6

h Humboldt University, D-10099 Berlin, FRG ’ i INFN-Sezione di Bologna, i-40126 Bologna, Italy j Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay 400 005, India

k Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA r Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA

m Institute of Atomic Physics and University of Bucharest, R-76900 Bucharest, Romania

n Central Research Institute for Physics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. H-1525 Budapest 114, Hungary2 a Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

P Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 9 SNFN Sezione di Firenze and University of Florence, I-50125 Florence, Italy r European Laboratory for Particle Physics, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland

s World Laboratory, FBUA Project, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland

University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland

u Chinese University of Science and Technology, USTC, Hefei, Anhui 230 029, China 6

’ SEFT Research Institute for High Energy Physics, PO. Box 9, SF-00014 Helsinki, Finland w University of Lausanne. CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

x INFN-Sezione di Lecce and Universitd Degli Studi di Lecce, I-73100 Lecce, Italy Y Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos. NM 87544, USA

’ Institut de Physique Nucleuire de Lyon, IN2P3CNRS,Universite’ Claude Bernard, F-69622 Vtlleurbanne, France na Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas. CIEMAT E-28040 Madrid, Spain 3

ah INFN-Sezione di Milano, I-20133 Milan, Italy

ac Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, ITEP, Moscow, Russia ad INFN-Sezione di Nupoli and University of Naples, i-80125 Naples, Italy ae Department of Natural Sciences, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus af University of Nymegen and NIKHEE NL-6525 ED Nymegen. The Netherlands

% Onk Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA ah California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125. USA

ai INFN-Sezione di Perugia and Universitd Degli Studi di Perugia, l-06100 Perugia, Italy

‘j Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA ak Princeton University Princeton, NJ 08544, USA

ar INFN-Sezione di Roma and University of Rome, “La Sapienza”, I-00185 Rome, Italy Bm Nuclear Physics Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia

Bn University and INFN, Salerno, I-84100 Salerno, Italy

” University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA

Q Dept. de Fisicn de Particulas Elementules, Univ. de Santiago, E-15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain aq Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Central Laboratory of Mechntronics and Instrumentation. BU-I1 I3 Sojia. Bulgaria

at Center for High Energy Physics, Korea Advanced Inst. of Sciences and Technology, 305-701 Taejon. South Korea ils University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL 35486, USA

1 Utrecht University and NIKHEF NL-3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands a’ Purdue University, West Iafayette, IN 47907, USA

av Paul Scherrer Institut, PSI, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland aw DESY-Institut fiir Hochenergiephysik, D-15738 Zeuthen. FRG

ay Eidgeniissische Technische Hochschule. ETH Ziirich, CH-8093 Ziirich, Switzerland

(5)

480 L3 Collaboration/Physics Letters 6 393 (1997) 477-486

a’ University of Hamburg, D-22761 Hamburg, FRG ha High Energy Physics Group, Taiwan, ROC

Received 27 November 1996 Editor: K. Winter

Abstract

Charged and neutral particle multiplicities of jets associated with identified semileptonic and hadronic b decays are studied. The observed differences between these jets are used to determine the inclusive properties of the weak charged hadronic current. The average charged particle multiplicity of the weak charged hadronic current in b decays is measured for the first time to be 2.69+0.07( stat.) *O. 14( syst.). This result is in good agreement with the JETSET hadronization model of the weak charged hadronic current if 401!c 17% of the produced mesons are light-flavored tensor (L=l) mesons. This level of tensor meson production is consistent with the measurement of the r” multiplicity in the weak charged hadronic current in b decays.

1. Introduction

The decays of b hadrons are often described with the spectator model [ 11, where a b quark is assumed to decay into a charm quark and a virtual W boson.

The basic weak decay dynamics of b hadrons are thus assumed to be similar to the decay properties of p and 7 leptons. The observed momentum spectra of the charged leptons [ 21, the neutrinos and thus the polar- isation of the virtual W [ 31 in semileptonic b decays (b+ cev) are well described by this model. Further- more, the good agreement of the individual lifetimes of the different b mesons [4] indicates that the spec- tator model provides also a good approximation of hadronic b decays. Much less is known about purely hadronic b decays (b + ciid and b + CCS) which have a branching ratio of more than 76%.

Measurements of inclusive hadron production in b decays exist [4], but their interpretation is in gen- eral difficult as these hadrons can be produced either directly or in the subsequent decays of the charmed hadron system. For the few identified decays a con-

Supported by the German Bundesministerium fiir Bildung, Wis- senschafi, Forschung und Technologie.

’ Supported by the Hungarian OTKA fund under contract number T144.59.

3 Supported also by the Comisidn Interministerial de Ciencia y Technolog;a.

’ Also supported by CONICET and Universidad National de La Plats, CC 67. 1900 La Plats, Argentina.

5 Also supported by Panjab University, Chandigarh-160014, India.

’ Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

siderable fraction of tensor mesons (L=l ) has been observed [ 51. In contrast to hadronic b decays a mul- titude of measurements have been performed on the properties of the weak charged hadronic current (“the hadronic W* current”) in semileptonic 7 decays (7 ---) v+hadrons) [ 41. Experimental information about the hadronic W’ current at the higher q* in b and c decays might lead to future theoretical insights into the weak decay dynamics of b and c flavored hadrons.

Assuming the spectator model ansatz, it is possi- ble to extract some simple properties of the hadronic W* current in b hadron decays. With this assumption, properties like the associated hadron multiplicities are essentially independent from the charm system in the b decay. Furthermore, in hadronic Z decays to b6 jets the decay products from the two b hadrons are usu- ally well separated from each other and the hadrons which are associated to the jet fragmentation and the cascade c hadron decays are similar for the jets con- taining semileptonic and hadronic b decays. Thus, the differences between the jets associated with semilep- tonic and hadronic b decays are related to the prop- erties of the hadronic W* current in b hadron decays.

Such a comparison of jets which contain semileptonic and hadronic b decay candidates using the L3 detector is described in the following.

The L3 detector consists of a central tracking cham- ber, a high-resolution electro-magnetic calorimeter composed of BGO crystals, a cylindrical array of scintillation counters, a uranium and brass hadron calorimeter with proportional wire chamber readout,

(6)

L3 Collaboration/Physics Letters B 393 (1997) 477-486 481

and a precise muon spectrometer. These detectors are installed in a 12 m diameter solenoid which provides a uniform field of 0.5 T along the beam direction. A detailed description of the L3 detector can be found elsewhere [ 61.

More than a million hadronic Z decays collected be- tween 1991 and 1993, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 46 pb-‘, are preselected using the cri- teria described in [ 71. In order to reduce complica- tions due to hard-gluon radiation, the measurements are performed using a selection of well measured two- jet events as explained in [ 81. With these selection cri- teria 575k hadronic events are selected in the data and 450k events in the Monte Carlo sample. The hadronic Monte Carlo events are simulated using JETSET 7.3

[ 91 and a GEANT-based description of the L3 exper- iment [ lo].

The Monte Carlo simulation of the semileptonic b hadron decays is based on the results discussed in 1 81, where a semileptonic branching ratio of 10.85%

is used. Furthermore, the momentum spectrum of the weakly decaying b hadrons is simulated with the Pe- terson fragmentation function [ 111 as implemented in JETSET, with an average XE of 0.72 as required by the observed momentum spectrum of electrons and muons in the two-jet event sample.

2. Selection of b-flavored jet samples

The selection of b-flavored jets with inclusive elec- trons and muons is identical to the ones used for our recent measurement of the semileptonic branching ra- tio (b -+ &X) [ 81. High p and pi electron and muon candidates are used to select b-flavored events and jets which contain semileptonic b decay candidates.

Electron candidates with a minimum energy of 3 GeV are selected in the barrel BGO calorimeter for the polar angle 8 satisfying 1 cosO\ < 0.72. To separate electrons from other particles it is required that the lateral shower shape of the BGO clusters is consistent with that of an electromagnetic shower and that the centroid of this cluster is well matched in azimuthal angle with a charged track.

Muons are identified and measured in the muon chamber system by reconstructing a track with seg- ments in at least two of the three detection layers. The muon track should point back to within 4a of the in-

teraction point in transverse and longitudinal distance of closest approach. The momentum of the track, cor- rected for the energy loss in the calorimeter, must be between 4 GeV and 35 GeV.

In order to select semileptonic b hadron decays among the electron and muon candidates, a pi of more than 1.4 GeV with respect to the jet direction, exclud- ing the charged lepton, is required.

With this selection 7561 jets with an electron can- didate are selected. The purity for jets with correctly identified semileptonic b decays using this selection is found to be 78.7&2.1%. About 15% of the selected events originate from background of light-flavored jets and semileptonic charm decays. The sample of jets with inclusive muon candidates consists of 13967 jets with a purity of correctly identified semileptonic b de- cays of 69.6&l .3% [ 81 and a background from light- flavored jets and semileptonic charm decays of 21%.

Further details are found in [ 81.

Events which contain an inclusive lepton define the sample of bg events. In order to compare jets with semileptonic and hadronic b decays each event is di- vided into two hemispheres, defined by a plane per- pendicular to the thrust axis. The particles associated to the hemisphere which contain the charged lepton define the semileptonic b decay jet sample. Particles in the hemisphere opposite to a hemisphere contain- ing an inclusive lepton are assumed to originate from jets with a hadronic b decay. Assuming that all non semileptonic b decays are hadronic decays, one finds that about 65%(60%) of the jets opposite to the jet with the inclusive electron (muon) candidate contain the decay products of hadronic b decays. The fraction of jets with hadronic b decays can be enhanced with a removal of jets which have large missing energy due to energetic neutrinos from semileptonic b decays. With the requirement of a visible energy of more than 40 GeV for the jets opposite to the tagged jet, the frac- tion of jets which contain hadronic b decays is found to be 75.4f 1.2% for the electron tagged events and 70.2f0.8% for the muon tagged events. The number of jets selected as hadronic b-decay candidates are 5203 (9528) for electron (muon) tagged events.

(7)

482 L3 Collaboration/Physics Letters B 393 (1997) 477-486

3. Characteristics of the hadronic W* current in b decays

We now compare the inclusive characteristics of jets which contain semileptonic and hadronic b hadron de- cays. From this analysis the average charged multi- plicity, the associated inclusive momentum spectrum and the 7~’ and 7 content of the hadronic W* current are extracted.

3.1. The charged multiplicity of the hadronic W current

The tracks used for this analysis are required to be well measured and to have a minimum pr of 100 MeV with respect to the beam direction. The main criteria for well-measured tracks are a minimum track length of 12.5 cm with reconstructed wire signals from at least 75% of the possible signals. Furthermore, the tracks should have a maximum distance of closest ap- proach to the interaction point of 30 mm in the plane transverse to the beam and of 100 mm along the beam direction. After adjusting the Monte Carlo to describe the observed angular distributions of tracks for the different data taking periods the average tracking ef- ficiency with these selection criteria is determined to be about 89%.

The track-multiplicity distributions of jets which contain identified leptons, excluding the lepton track, and for the jets with hadronic b decays, are shown in Figs. 1 (a) and (b) for electron- and muon-tagged events respectively. For the mean charged multiplic- ity a clear difference of about 2 tracks, between jets associated to hadronic and semileptonic b decay can- didates is observed. The charged multiplicity for both kinds of jets, corrected for the tracking efficiency for the electron- and muon-tagged events in the data and in the Monte Carlo, are given in Table 1.

The Monte Carlo is corrected by reweighting the tracking efficiency for each half-sector based on the measured tracking efficiency. The procedure gives good agreement between data and Monte Carlo for this efficiency as a function of the azimuthal angle.

Conservatively the remaining difference between data and Monte Carlo is assumed to originate from the efficiency uncertainty and a systematic error of *3%

is assigned to the average tracking efficiency of 89%

obtained from the Monte Carlo. This error covers also

L3

Data Electron lag

t Hadron Side

+ Lepton Side - 1

10 15 20 2

Number of Tracks

Data Muon Tag

* 800 E

w s! 600

t Hadron Side + Lepton Side - 1

10 15 20 2

Number of Tracks

Fig. I. Comparison of the measured charged multiplicity for the lepton side (the lepton is subtracted) and the hadron side in the data, (a) is for electron-tagged events and (b) for muon-tagged events.

possible differences for the efficiency of jets with semileptonic and hadronic b hadron decays which are found to be smaller than 1%.

The charged multiplicity of the selected b decay hemispheres is 3-4% higher in the data than in the Monte Carlo sample. A similar difference is observed for the two jet hadronic event sample, where the aver- age track multiplicity in the data is about 2% higher than in the Monte Carlo sample. This discrepancy could be related to the Monte Carlo description of the jet fragmentation or to an inaccurate simulation of the tracking efficiency. As the multiplicity of the charged

(8)

L3 Collaboration/Physics Letters B 393 (1997) 477-486 483 Table I

Observed average charge multiplicity of jets (tracking efficiency corrected) in the data and in the Monte Carlo for electron- and muon- tagged b flavored events. For jets which contain the lepton candidate one track is subtracted. The purities for semileptonic b decay jets ( Pt,_t ) and for correctly identified hadronic b decay jets (Pb+had) are also given.

Event type

electron pi > 1.4 GeV muon pl > 1.4 GeV

Lepton side -1 track

data MC

7.58ItO.04 7.20f0.04 7.61 f0.03 7.37f0.03

Pb-4

0.79 0.70

Hadron side data 9.57f0.05 9.64f0.04

MC Ph-had

9.32ztO.05 0.75 9.25f0.04 0.70

Table 2

The difference for the charged track multiplicity for jets with semileptonic (the track from the lepton is subtracted) and hadronic b decays for electron- and muon-tagged events. The estimated contributions to the systematic errors are also given.

Type

uncorrected h(n,h)

background and bias corrected result (Kf corr.)

systematic errors

tracking efficiency (0.89&0.03) b,c decay systematics

MC b 4 &X stat. (bias corr.) b decay purity error

“two jet” definition total error

Data electrons 1.99f0.07 2.56fO.11 2.471tO.11

0.08 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.13 0.19

Data muons 2.03f0.05 2.92f0.09 2.83f0.09

0.09 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.16

hadronic current is obtained from the difference in the data between jets with a semileptonic b decay and jets with a hadronic b decay, only the uncertainty from tracking efficiency is relevant for this measurement.

The multiplicity difference between jets containing hadronic and semileptonic b decays, A (Q), must be corrected for background from light-flavored Z de- cays and wrongly identified b decays. The correction is derived from Monte Carlo adjusted to properly re- produce the charged lepton spectra and the semilep- tonic b hadron branching ratios [ 81. The correction to A (n,t,) is 0.47f0.08 tracks for electron tagged events and 0.79f0.07 tracks for muon tagged events.

taining leptons. The systematic error of this correction was taken from the statistical error of the Monte Carlo.

The 40 GeV minimum visible jet energy requirement was also studied and found to result in a negligible bias. Uncertainties from c and b decays, including D, D* and D** production were also found to be small.

The charged multiplicity measurement is further corrected for the contributions from weak decays of strange particles. The correction due to decays of such particles (mainly Ki -+ &z--) reduces the average multiplicity by 0.09f0.01. The systematic error due to this correction is included in the efficiency error given in Table 2.

The selection of semileptonic b decays with high p The changes from the uncorrected multiplicity dif- and pi leptons favors jets with a slightly lower multi- ference between jets with hadronic and semileptonic plicity. This bias was studied using a Monte Carlo sam- b decays to the final result for the hadronic W* cur- ple containing only b decays and found to be 0.10 f rent for electron- and muon-tagged events and the cor- 0.07 tracks for electron tagged events and 0.10 f 0.06 responding estimated contributions to the systematic tracks for muon tagged events. These factors are added error are summarised in Table 2.

to the measured multiplicities of the hemispheres con- The average charged multiplicity for the electron

(9)

484 W Collaboration /Physics Letters B 393 (1997) 477-486

tagged events is 2.5g (statistical error only) lower than the one for the muon tagged events. A possible source of this discrepancy could be related to an in- accurate background description in the Monte Carlo for the fragmentation of light-flavored jets. No statis- tically significant source for this difference has been identified from a variation of the electron and muon se- lection criteria. However, it is found that a stronger cut against gluon radiation, e.g. removing events which have a hemisphere with an invariant mass larger than 15 GeV instead of 25 GeV, gives a more consistent results for the hadronic W* multiplicity of 2.60&O. 13 and 2.74hO.l 1 for the electron- and the muon-tagged events respectively. The difference between the result given in Table 2 and the one with the jet mass cut of

15 GeV is added to the systematic error. The different contributions to the systematic error for the multiplic- ity measurement are also listed in Table 2. While the uncertainties from the simulation of c and b hadron de- cays and the uncertainties in the tracking efficiency are correlated for the electron- and muon-tagged events, the errors related to the background corrections, the b purity, the bias of the method (estimated for 100% b purity) and the definition of the “two-jet” system are essentially independent for the two tagging methods.

Averaging electron- and muon-tagged events we ob- tain 2.69 f O.O7(stat.) f O.l4(syst.) for the charged multiplicity of the hadronic W* current in b hadron decays.

The comparison of jets associated to semileptonic and hadronic b hadron decays can also be used to study the momentum spectrum of charged particles associ- ated to the weak charged hadronic current, using the scaled momentum x,, = p/Et,,,,. For this study the electron and muon events are combined. Figs. 2(a) and (b) show the observed xp spectra in the data and simulation of all charged particles in jets associated to leptonic and hadronic b decays. Correcting each x,, bin using the procedure described above the xI, spec- trum of the W’ is obtained. The data show a slightly harder x,, spectrum than the Monte Carlo. The sys- tematic errors are found to be of the order of &IO%

for xp below 0.20. For larger momenta the errors are dominated by the limited Monte Carlo statistics.

L3

+ Data +MC

b,,

1’ ,I,, I.‘,!

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

xP

Hadron Side

L3 +

Data

+MC

lo-11, L

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

xP

Fig. 2. The observed momentum spectrum xP for charged particles in the data and the Monte Carlo for jets which contain the lepton (a) and for jets opposite to the lepton with a visible energy above 40 GeV (b).

3.2. The n-O and ‘17 content of the hadronic W current

The 7r” and 7 content of semileptonic and hadronic b decays has also been studied. The two photon decays are used to reconstruct ?r” and 77 signals in the selected b event sample. The selection criteria are similar to those described in [ 121. The TO’S are selected in the momentum range between 0.4 to 3 GeV (v’s between 2 to 10 GeV).

After subtraction of the combinatorial background, 5 1121tlOS ?r”‘s are selected in jets with semileptonic b decays and 3107f82 TO’S in jets with hadronic b

(10)

L3 Collaboration/Physics Letters B 393 (1997) 477-486 485

decays. The corresponding numbers of reconstructed r]‘s are 88f15 in jets with semileptonic b decays and 45&l 1 in jets with hadronic b decays.

To extract the 71-O and q content related to the hadronic W” current the signals have to be corrected for the detection efficiency. Due to the lower mul- tiplicity in semileptonic b decays one finds that the efficiency is up to a factor of two higher in jets with semileptonic b decays than for jets with hadronic b decays. After the corrections for background from light-flavored events and wrongly identified b jets, I .80*0.04 TO’S are associated to jets with semilep- conic b decays and 2.31f0.07 for jets with hadronic b decays. The difference between the two type of jets is 0.51 *to.08 ~“s. Finally, after applying the bias correction of 0.12f0.09, the ?r” multiplicity of the W* current in the xp range given above is measured lo be 0.63 f 0.09(&d.) f O.ll(syst.).

The measurement of the associated v multi- plicity is limited by statistics. After applying the same corrections as for the ?r”‘s the number of v’s, with a momentum between 2 and 10 GeV, asso- ciated to the hadronic W* current is found to be 0.11 f O.O@stat.) f O.lO(syst.).

1. Discussion of the results

The combined result of 2.69 f O.O7(stat.) &

O.l4(syst.) charged particles, associated to the hadronic W* current in b hadron decays can be com- pared with the charged particle multiplicity in semilep- tonic 7 decays, with an average of 1.455f0.013 charged hadrons in the case of the 7 lepton [4]. Such an increase is expected due to the higher mass7 of the virtual W in b hadron decays.

In a more quantitative analysis our results can be compared with expectations from JETSET 7.4 [ 131 with a fragmentation of the W--t qq system. Using the default parameterisation on finds on average 3.04 charged particles in the weak charged hadronic cur- rent. This is 2.2 standard deviations higher than in the data. The Monte Carlo multiplicity is found to be es- sentially identical for the W* decay into iid and into

From a Monte Carlo study of b decays one finds an average mass of the hadronic system recoiling against the charmed hadron of about 2.3 GeV, compared to about 0.9 GeV for 7 decays.

3.4

L3

3.2 -

2.2 . . . Vector Mesons/ail Mesons = 0.5

..I.... Vector Mesons/all Mesons = 0.8 I t.,..I....l.‘.‘l...‘l”“l”“I

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

Tensor Mesons/all Mesons

Fig. 3. Comparison of the charged multiplicity of the W* in the data and the JETSET 7.4 fragmentation model. The horizontal band shows the allowed range from the measurement. The two dashed lines show the multiplicity prediction as a function of the tensor mesons production rate for two different production rates of vector mesons.

Cs quarks. However, the charged multiplicity for the qq system can be lowered if the production of tensor mesons (angular momentum L=l, spin S=O, 1) is al- lowed. As shown in Fig. 3, the model provides good agreement with the data if 40f17% of the produced hadrons are tensor mesons. As can also be seen from Fig. 3, the production rate of vector mesons with re- spect to pseudoscalar mesons is less important for the charged hadron multiplicity. A similar trend is found for the inclusive r” multiplicity where the number of 7~“s decreases from 0.83 for the default parame- terisation to 0.75 for 40% tensor meson production.

The measured ?r” multiplicity of 0.63 f 0.09( stat.) f 0.11 (syst.) is thus in good agreement with the ten- dency observed for charged particles.

It is worth pointing out that a large rate of tensor me- son production in hadronic b decays can be expected as tensor mesons are also observed in the hadronic W’

current in 7 and charm decays [4]. Furthermore, the observed fractions of resonant multi-pion states with respect to all observed multi-pion states in exclusive measurements of weak b hadron decays [ 51 indicate also a large fraction of tensor mesons.

The momentum spectrum of charged particles as- sociated to the hadronic W* current is shown in Fig.

4 for the data and the JETSET simulation adjusted to

(11)

486 L3 Collaboration/Physics Letters B 393 (1997) 477-486

L3

+

Data r’JETSET 40%

Tensor Mesons

-+cI

-2

10 : I

I

I T,

1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

XP

Fig. 4. Comparison of the measured momentum spectrum of the charged hadrons associated to the weak charged current in the data and the JETSET 7.4 fragmentation model with 40% tensor meson production probability.

the production of 40% tensor mesons. The shape of the spectrum is found to be rather insensitive to the level of tensor meson production. The data indicate a slightly different hadron momentum spectrum than obtained from the Monte Carlo.

5. Summary

The structure of jets associated to hadronic and semileptonic b hadron decays has been studied. From the comparison of jets with associated semileptonic and hadronic b decays the average charge multiplicity of the hadronic W* current in b decays and the momen- tum spectrum of the associated charged particles has been measured for the first time. The average charged hadron multiplicity, associated to the hadronic W*

current is found to be 2.69fO.O7(stat.) fO.l4(syst.).

This is about one unit higher than the multiplicity of the hadronic W* current in r decays. The r” mul-

tiplicity is 0.63 i O.O9(stat.) f O.lO(syst.) for no’s with a momentum between 0.4 and 3 GeV and the 77 multiplicity is 0.11 f0.08( stat.) fO.lO(syst.) for q’s between 2 and 10 GeV

The data are in good agreement with the JETSET 7.4 phase space simulation of weak hadronic b decays if a fraction of 40f17% tensor mesons is produced in the fragmentation of the hadronic W* current. This result is consistent with the measured 7r” multiplic- ity. However, the momentum spectrum of the charged particles associated to the hadronic W* current is not simultaneously described by the Monte Carlo.

References

[ 1 ] G. Altarelli, N. Cabibbo, G. Corbo, L. Maiani and G.

Martinelli, Nucl. Phys. B 208 (1982) 365.

121 CLEO Collaboration, B. Barish et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76

13

14

]5

( 1996) 1570.

L3 Collaboration, M. Acciarri et al., Phys. Lett. B 351 (1995) 375.

Particle Data Group, R.M. Barnett et al., Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 1.

I CLEO Collaboration, D. Bortoletto et al., Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 21.

[ 6 1 L3 Collaboration, M. Adeva et al., Nucl. Ins&. Meth. A 289 (1990) 35.

[ 7 1 L3 Collaboration, B. Adeva et al., Z. Phys. C 5 1 ( 1991) 179.

[ 81 L3 Collaboration, M. Acciarri et al., Z. Phys. C 71 (1996)

191

1101

1111 1121

]I31 379.

T. Sjostrand, Computer Phys. Commun. 27 ( 1982) 243; and PYTHIA 5.6 and JETSET 7.3, CERN preprint CERN-TH 6488/92. More details about the simulation of c- and b- hadrons can be found in [ 31,

The L3 detector simulation is based on GEANT Version 3.14; see R. Brun et al., GEANT 3, CERN/DD/EE/84-

1 (Revised), September 1987 and GHEISHA program (H.

Fesefeldt, RWTH Aachen Report PITHA 85/02 (1985) for the simulation of hadronic interactions.)

C. Peterson et al., Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 105.

L3 Collaboration, M. Acciarri et al., Phys. Lett. B 328 (1994) 223.

T. Sjostrand, Comp. Phys. Commun. 82 (1994) 74.

Références

Documents relatifs

tion (21), and by OPAL (dotted curve) and ALEPH (dot-dashed curve) with the same parametrization, compared with a similar t to distributions generated with the JETSET PS model

The corresponding probability for events in the combinatorial background was ob- tained using real data candidates selected in the side-bands of the D signal: the probabil-.. ities

defined in this plane (see inset) to measure the signal yield and the contributions of the 4 peaking B background categories.. Therefore, these two amplitudes can interfere

First signals from LHCb of hadronic B decays, of interest for the determination of the CKM angle γ within tree or loop diagrams, have been shown. This demonstrates the ability of

This ratio was then used to correct the background evaluation (see below). After all the selections, 22 events were left in data, while the normalised number in simulation was

The Tau1P3P algorithm which starts with a good quality track, is capable of separating a τ- jet with 1, 2, 3 and 4 tracks and shows a good efficiency for τ-jet identification and a

A. Hadronic B decays at BABAR. QCD 05 12th High Energy Physics Interna- tional Conference in Quantum Chromodynamics, Jul 2005, Montpellier, France.. It also seeks to test

The selected event sample is also used to set upper limits for the branching ratios of exclusive charmless hadronic two-body decays of B hadrons.. The cut on P 2 was optimized to