A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
B RIAN D OLAN
A geometrical interpretation of the time evolution of the Schrödinger equation for discrete quantum systems
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 45, n
o3 (1986), p. 257-275
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1986__45_3_257_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1986, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
257
A Geometrical Interpretation of the Time Evolution of the Schrödinger Equation
for Discrete Quantum Systems
Brian DOLAN
Department of Natural Philosophy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ
Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré,
Vol. 45, n° 3, 1986, Physique ’ théorique ’
ABSTRACT. 2014 The time evolution of a quantum state in the
Schrodinger picture
of quantum mechanics ispresented
as a curve in CPn. An(n
+1)-
state quantum system is considered
semi-classically
as a cpn bundle overthree dimensional space, with structure group
SU(n
+RESUME. 2014 On identify 1’evolution
temporelle
d’un etatquantique
dansla
representation
deSchrodinger
de laMecanique Quantique
avec unecourbe dans Un
systeme quantique
a(n
+1)
etats est considere dupoint
de vuesemi-classique
comme un fibre cpn au-dessus del’espace
a trois
dimensions,
avecSU(n
+ 1 comme groupe de structure.INTRODUCTION
In this paper, a
geometrical interpretation
of the timedevelopment
of the
Schrodinger equation
for discrete quantum systems isdeveloped.
For a Hamiltonian with n + 1
eigenstates,
the space of allpossible
quan- tum states isinterpreted
as thecomplex projective
space CPn. Agiven
set of initial conditions
corresponds
to asingle point
on CP" and if the system is left undisturbed it will follow a continuous one dimensionalcurve in
CP",
theparticular
curve and the rate at which it evolvesbeing
determined
by
the initial conditions and the Hamiltonian. The Hamil-Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique - 0246-0211
Vol. 45/86/03/257/19/$ 3,90/(~) Gauthier-Villars
tonian enters as a vector field on the vector at each
point being
thetangent vector to the
unique
curve(at
agiven
instant oftime) through
thatpoint describing
the evolution of the state thatcorresponds
to thatpoint.
In section one the
general correspondence
between state vectors andpoints
in cpn is described. In Section two, the two state quantum system isanalysed
and described in terms of curves onS2,
first for a time inde-pendent
Hamiltonian and thenusing
timedependent perturbation theory;
thirdly, non-commuting
Hermitian operators, and theireigenstates
areconsidered. Section three treats the three state quantum system and sec- tion four the
general (n
+1)
state system, both for timeindependent
Hamiltonians.
Finally
in section fiveposition dependent
Hamiltoniansare considered
semi-classically,
viewed as cpn bundles over three space and theparticular
case of an electronorbiting
amonopole
is treated as anexample
of a non-trivial bundle.GENERAL FORMALISM
For a quantum system, a
particular state
is an element of acomplex (n
+1)
dimensional Hilbert space. Choose abasis { ~,
i =0,
...,n }
of thisHilbert space where
each ei
is aneigenstate
of the Hamiltonian(assumed
n
given). Denote ~ ~ ~
=by (zo,
...,zn)
where zi arecomplex
numbers.a=o
I t/J >
can then be identified with apoint
in ~n + 1.Any
two vectors whichare a
complex multiple
of one another are identified as the samequantum
state, i. e.(zo,
...,z~) = ~o? ... , zn)
is considered to be the same state as(zo,..., zn), B {
0}.
This is the definition of thecomplex projective
space with ncomplex
dimensions(or
2n realdimensions).
Thus the space of allpossible
quantum states of a system with n + 1eigenstates
is topo-logically
Eachpoint
of cpncorresponds
to a different state of thesystem. As the system evolves in
time, according
to theSchrodinger picture,
it traces out a one dimensional curve in Provided the system is left
undisturbed,
this curve will becontinuous,
but if a measurement is made the system will make a discontinuousjump
from onepoint
of cpn to ano-ther,
the latterbeing
apoint corresponding
to aneigenstate
of thequantity
measured.
If
the ei
are normalised tounity, using
a metric on the Hilbert space, then thisgives
a natural metric on theFubini-Study
metric[1 ].
This is obtained
by embedding
cpn incn+ 1
andrestricting
the zi, so thatn
=
1,
i. e., =1,
thusrestricting
the zi to lie on the unitt=0
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
259
THE TIME EVOLUTION OF THE SCHRODINGER EQUATION
sphere, s2n + 1,
in cn+ 1.Using
the standard metric onS2n + 1,
the Fubini-Study
metric on cpn is obtainedby projecting
out theremaining U(l)
from
(zo, ... , zn).
Thiscorresponds
to theHopf
fibration ofs2n+ 1.
Let
be a ket for an n + 1 dimensional quantum system. If the system is leftundisturbed,
the time evolution of the ket isgiven by
theSchrodinger equation (the
notation is that of Ref.[2 ]).
where
H(t)
is the Hamiltonian - a Hermitian operator on the Hilbert space.Interpreting
as a curvey(t)
in theSchrodinger equation
isThus we have a
geometrical interpretation
of the Hamiltonian as a timedependent
vectoralong y(t)
on(The symbol H(t)
is used here to repre- sent a Hermitian operator in a Hilbert space and thecorresponding
vector on The method of
obtaining
thecorrespondence
will be deve-loped
in thefollowing sections).
By varying
we can vary y so as to cover the whole of cpn and thus extendHV(t)
to a timedependent
vector field on Note that fory(t) corresponding
to a statesatisfying
theSchrodinger equation
the tangentvector to the curve
y(t)
at anypoint
does notdepend
on the direction ofy(t)
at earlier
times,
since itdepends only
onHV(t).
Thiscorresponds
to the factthat the time evolution of a quantum system
depends only
on the Hamil-tonian and the state at a
given
time not on the pasthistory
of the state.In
particular,
if the Hamiltonian is timeindependent, given
anypoint
in the tangent vector for any
y(t) obeying
theSchrodinger equation always points
in the samedirection,
thusy(t)
can never intersect itself.If
y(t)
ever passesthrough
the samepoint
of cpn for different values of t, then it forms a closedloop
in for a timeindependent
Hamiltonian.THE TWO STATE
QUANTUM
SYSTEMa)
Evolution with timeindependent
Hamiltonian.Consider a
quantum
system withonly
twoeigenstates (e.
g. thespin
of an electron in a
magnetic field).
The space of all quantum states is thus CP1 which istopologically S2,
the two dimensionalsphere.
Choose co-ordinate on
CP1
as follows. Let If0,
letZo(l, z 1 /zo)
=zo( 1, ~ 1 ). Then ç 1
is asingle complex
co-ordinate and covers Vol. 45, n° 3-1986.the whole of the southern
hemisphere
1.(Indeed ~ 1
can be usedto cover the whole
sphere
except for the northpole where |03BE1 | ~ (0).
Similarly, if z1 ~ 0,
let =z1(03BE0, 1).
ThenÇo
covers the northernhemisphere for I Ço I ~
1. In theoverlap
of the two co-ordinateregions Çl
=~0 1. Writing Ço
= 0 ~ r oo, 0 ~c~ 2~c,
then in standardpolar
co-ordinates on S2(radius unity)
r = tan8/2,
0 ~ 9 7r.(See fig. 1).
The
magnitude of Ço gives
thepolar angle
onS2
and thephase
the azimuthalangle.
Thisprocedure
isnothing
more than thestereographic projection
of
S2
onto[R2 ~ c.
Consider a time
independent Hamiltonian,
witheigenvalues Eo
andEi.
Take ( 1, 0) I t/J 1 ) = (0,1)
aseigenvectors
in the Hilbert space,([2,
witheigenvalues Eo
andE 1 respectively.
With the co-ordinate identi- ficationabove,
the northpole corresponds
to theeigenvector
andthe south
pole
to~.
The values of0/2
is themixing angle
for ageneral
state. In
general,
if thepolar
co-ordinates had been chosen with a different orientation relative toç 0,
theeigenstates
would not be at thepoles,
butthey
arealways diametrically opposite
one another.The
Schrodinger equation
readsgiving
and
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
261
THE TIME EVOLUTION OF THE SCHRODINGER EQUATION
Hence once the initial state is
given, ço(O) 0,
or~(0) 0,
thesubsequent magnitudes
or~1(t)
do notchange, only
theirphases.
Hence the evolution of a
quantum
state is describedby
circles of constantlatitude,
the state orbits at arate ~ = (E 1 - (see fig. 2)
and theseare the flow lines of the Hamiltonian vector field on
S2.
The state does not move from its initial
position
onCP1
ifEo
=E 1
or if it is at one of the zeros of the Hamiltonian vector field at t = 0. The
zeros of the Hamiltonian vector field therefore are at the
eigenstates.
The
Fubini-Study
metric onCpl (i.
e. the standard metric onS2)
hasSO(3)
as its group of isometries and the flow lines of the Hamiltonian vectora field
correspond
to the flow lines of theKilling
vector-
of this metric.b)
TimeDependent
PerturbationTheory.
Following
the usual construction ofperturbation theory [2] ]
suppose that the Hamiltonian can bedecomposed
into the sum of a timeindependent part, H,
and a timedependent
part,V, proportional
to some small para-meter. The
Schrodinger equation
is nowVol. 45, n° 3-1986.
Define the evolution operator,
T, by
Let
where
Eo
andE 1
are theeigenvalues
of theunperturbed Hamiltonian,
H.Also let
Then the
Schrodinger equation
reduces toNow
expand
T* in the smallparameter
where
Tn*
is order in the smallparameter, giving
Consider the first order
equation
Suppose that,
in theeigenbasis
of theunperturbed Hamiltonian,
V has theform _ _ _ . ... .
with voo and vll real.
Then,
to first order in vi~where ’ the
superscript
on means first order in v~~.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
263
THE TIME EVOLUTION OF THE SCHRODINGER EQUATION
This
gives
and
As an
example
of the use of theseformulae,
consider the case wherefor t 0
and vij
are constant for t >0,
with real.Then if
Ei,
with a similar
expression for ~ 11 ~(t).
To
picture
the evolution of the system consider thefollowing
cases,i) zo(0)
=0, Eo
= -E1 -
E > 0(i.
e. the system sits at the northpole
until V is switched
on).
Thenço(O)
is well defined andThus
Vol. 45, n° 3-1986.
and
F
Hence the system describes a small
circle,
radius2014,
tangent to the northpole (see fig. 3).
Theperiod
is since the circle is covered twice for 0 ~Either 03BE0 or 03BE1
1 wll do as a co-ordinate. Take03BE0
Thus
Annales de l’Institut Henri Physique theorique .
265 THE TIME EVOLUTION OF THE SCHRODINGER EQUATION
For 2014 «
1,
the system circles round the equator until V is switched onE
at t = O. Thereafter the system follows the great circle
given by
v
which is a circle tilted
through
anangle E (see fig. 4).
Finally
consider the case - ofdegeneracy Eo
=E 1
= E > 0.Then,
withv = > 0 and v = v10 ,
real ( > 0)
For
example zo(0)
= 0. Then the system sits at the northpole
until t =0,
when V is switched on.Subsequently
Thus, provided 2014 g
«1,
0 growslinearl
y 0 =2014, ~ , ~
andremains
constant.a .Hence the system
begins
to roll down a great circle of constantlongi-
tude
(see fig. 5).
Vol. 45, n~ 3-1986.
Given a time
independent Hamiltonian, H,
witheigenvalues Eo
andEi,
consider any other Hermitian operatorin the Hamiltonian
eigenbasis.
Let(~)
and(~_)
beeigenvectors
of A(this
assumes that(~)
is not aneigenvector)
witheigenvalues ~+
and ~, _respectively.
Then
where 1]
=201420142014,
, c ~ a. If c = a, then2h
The two
eigenstates
mustcorrespond
to twopoints
onS2.
These aregiven by
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
267 THE TIME EVOLUTION OF THE SCHRODINGER EQUATION
Hence
Thus
(if
c = a, thene + -
6 _ =03C0/2)
and theeigenstates
of A liediametrically opposite
one another on S2. To visualise thesituation,
consider the fol-lowing
two cases.(see fig. 6)
Lines of constantmixing angle
for theeigenstates
of A are circlesof constant latitude relative to the
eigenpoles
of A. These intersect the circles of constant9,
since theeigenpoles
of A are tilted relative to theeigenpoles
of the Hamiltonian
through
theangle
0- =1 /2~.
If A is a
perturbed Hamiltonian,
then this shows that the resultsi)
andii)
of partb)
for the timedependent perturbation theory
arev
exact for small - i. e. the orbits are correct for all time.
Vol. 45, n° 3-1986.
ii)
If a = c, then theeigenpoles
of A lie on the equator of the Hamilto- nian. If the state is set up at t = 0 with anequal
mixture ofeigenstates
ofthe
Hamiltonian,
then itssubsequent
evolution will take itdirectly through
both
eigenstates
ofA,
withperiod Ei).
THE THREE STATE
QUANTUM
SYSTEMConsider a quantum system with three discrete
eigenstates
and a timeindependent
Hamiltonian.Topologically
the space of allpossible
quantumstates in The
Schrodinger equation
for a Hamiltonian witheigenva-
lues
Eo, E1 and E2
is0, let ~ 1(t)
= and~2(t)
=(The
caseZo(0)
= 0can be treated in an obvious way,
by choosing
a different co-ordinate chart inand 03BE2
arecomplex
co-ordinates on and the system follows a one dimensional curve inparameterised by t
andgiven explicitly by
Unlike the two
eigenstate
system, this curve is not closed unlessfor some
integers n and m (if
eitherE 1
=Eo
orE2
=Eo,
one co-ordinate remains fixed and the motion is restrained toLet
then the time evolution of the system is such that rl
and r2
are fixed(by
initial
conditions) but 03C61
and03C62
vary with time. Thus the curve describedby
_ J the system lies ____ ..., ~.____ on a two dimensional torus embedded inp2 Explicitly
The situation is
depicted
0figs.
7 and 8.The
point ç 1 == ç 2 =
0 does not move with time. It is astationary
state,Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique " theorique "
THE TIME EVOLUTION OF THE SCHRODINGER EQUATION 269
the
eigenstate
of the Hamiltonian associated with theeigenvalue Eo.
There are two other
stationary points (which require
different co-ordinatecharts) given by
These three
stationary points correspond
to the three zeros of the Hamil- tonian vector field on That there are three zeros of any vector fieldon
Cp2
follows from the fact that the Eulercharacteristic,
X, ofCp2
is 3.Now consider the
following change
in co-ordinatesVol. 45, n° 3-1986.
where 0 p oo, 0 () 03C0,
0 03C6 203C0, 0 03C8 403C0, 03B8, 03C6 and 03C8
areEuler
angles
onS3 (~
is a different co-ordinate from~1
and~2
usedearlier).
In this co-ordinate system, the
Fubini-Study
metric on CP2 isgiven by [1] ]
The tangent vectors to the torus on which a curve,
obeying
theSchrodinger equation, lies
are2014
and2014, for
fixed rand e. These two vectors fieldsare
Killing
vectors for themetric,
g, andobviously
commute. The group of isometriesof g
is which has rank 2. Thus2014
and2014 actually
a~
span the Cart an
subalgebra (i.
e. the maximal Abeliansubalgebra)
of thealgebra
ofKilling symmetries for g (in
the standardrepresentation
ofAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
271
THE TIME EVOLUTION OF THE SCHRODINGER EQUATION
the
SU(3) algebra, 2014
and2014
would be linear combinations of~3
and/).g).
a~
This is a
generalisation
of the CP1 case, where the Cartansubalgebra
wasonly
one dimensional and so the flow lineslay
on T 1 : S rather than T2.Thus we are led to the
interesting interpretation
of the torus on whichthe curve for a quantum
system
lies - it is the surfacegenerated by
theflow lines of the
Killing
vectors in the Cartansub algebra
of the group of isometries of theFubini-Study
metric on The size of the torus isspecified by
the initial conditionsp(o)
and8(0),
and the curve followedon the torus is
specified by
the initial conditions and and the Hamiltonianeigenvalues.
Asbefore,
if the Hamiltonian is timeindependent,
the curve must not intersect
itself,
butjust
winds round the torus indefin-tely (fig. 7).
Of course, all this is
only
valid if the system is left undisturbed. If a measu- rement ismade,
the systemimmediately jumps
to apoint
inCp2
corres-ponding
to aneigenvalue
of measured operator.THE
(n
+1) STATE QUANTUM
SYSTEMA system with
(n
+1) eigenstates
istopologically Generalising
the results of the
previous
twosections,
the time evolution of such a system(if
leftundisturbed)
will be describedby
a one dimensional curve on ann-dimensional torus,
Tn,
the direction of the curvebeing specified by
theHamiltonian
eigenvalues Eo,
...,En.
TheHamiltonian,
considered as avector field on will have
(n
+1)
zeros since the Euler characteristic for cpn is n + 1 and so there will be n + 1stationary
states, theeigenstates
of the Hamiltonian
(corresponding
to the limit as the torus shrinks tozero
size).
The group of isometries of the
Fubini-Study
metric on cpn isSU(n
+ which has rank n and therefore the Cartansubalgebra
will have dimension n. For
given
initialconditions,
the torus will be gene- ratedby
the flow lines of theKilling
vector fields for the metric which lie in the Cartansubalgebra.
In the limit of n oo
(e.
g. the HarmonicOscillator)
the manifold cprois well defined and so can be used to describe such a discrete system. A continuum system
(i.
e. one with aneigenvalue
spectrum which is conti-nuous) however,
cannot be described in this way since theinfinity
ofeigen-
values are dense in the real line and it is not
possible
to set up a one to onecorrespondence
between theeigenvalues
and theintegers
which label the co-ordinates in CP°°.Vol. 45, n° 3-1986.
POSITION DEPENDENT HAMILTONIANS
So far
only
abstract Hamiltonians have beenconsidered,
withgiven eigenvalues (possibly
timedependent).
Now consider the case where theHamiltonian
depends
onposition (it
will be assumed that the number ofeigenvalues
does notdepend
onposition).
When the Hamiltoniandepends
on
position,
the situation is morecomplicated.
In a full quantum treat- ment, theeigenvalues
of the Hamiltonian areonly
obtained afterintegrating
bilinears in
eigenfunctions
over all space. Ingeneral,
the system will have both discrete and continuous sectors. Oneapproach
would be toput
the system in a finitebox,
which would make the spectrumtotally
discrete.Here a
simpler,
semi-classical treatment will beapplied.
Theposition
of the
particle
will be treatedclassically,
while the internaldegrees
offreedom
(e.
g.spin)
will be treated quantummechanically.
This situationis, mathematically,
a cpn bundle over three dimensional space, with adifferent Hamiltonian vector field at each
point
in three space. As we moveabout in three space, the zeros of the vector field will move about on cpn.
Choosing
one such zerogives
aunique point
on cpn associated with eachpoint
in space and sogives
a section of the cpn bundle over the three space(this
assumes that theeigenvalues
of the Hamiltonian arenon-degenerate).
The fibre group for the bundle will be
SU(n
+ since the Hamil-tonian vector field can be moved about
by
Lie transportalong
the flowlines of the action of this group on cpn.
For
example,
consider the case of an electronmoving
in the classicalbackground
of acharged particle with, possibly external, magnetic
fields. ,The electron’s
spin
is a two state quantum system and so can be describedby S2.
Since the field of theparticle
is infinite at theorigin,
thispoint
musteffectively
be removed fromspace, giving
space thetopology
t~~ x S2
(~ = positive
realnumbers).
The system can therefore be des- cribedby
anS2
bundle over ~ xS2,
the structure group of which will beS0(3) ~
If the Hamiltonian for the system is
given,
then we know how the zerosof the Hamiltonian vector field on the
quantum S2
move as we move about in three space. This associates an element ofSO(3) (a
rotation of the quan- tumS2)
with every one dimensionalpath
in space.Taking
the limit as thepaths
shrink to zerogives
one element of the Liealgebra of SO(3)
associatedwith every direction in three space, i. e. an
SO(3)
Liealgebra
valued connec-tion on the bundle. Thus the Hamiltonian determines the connection and hence the
global topology
of the bundle.Since [R~ is
contractible,
bundles over ~+ xS2
are in one to one corres-pondence
with bundles overS2.
For any bundle with structure group,G,
over a
sphere, sn,
the bundle is classifiedby
an element of[3 ].
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
273
THE TIME EVOLUTION OF THE SCHRODINGER EQUATION
Now 03C01
(SO(3)) = Z2,
therefore we know that there are twoinequivalent
bundles for this system. One is
obvious,
the trivialbundle,
where a constant, externalmagnetic
field isapplied
to e. g. aHydrogen
atom, and the elec- tron’sspin
isaligned parallel
oranti-parallel,
as in the Zeeman effect.Then the zeros of the Hamiltonian vector field do not move on the quan- tum S2 at all as we move about the
spatial S2,
and theSO(3)
connection iseverywhere
zero.The
other, non-trivial,
bundle is also ofinterest,
however. To see whatphysical
system this bundlecorresponds
to, consider the elements ofrcl(SO(3)). If,
inmoving
round a closedpath
inSO(3), starting
from theidentity,
we arrive back at theidentity
via a rotation of4cn, n
aninteger,
then this
corresponds
to theidentity
element of Ifhowever,
we arrive back after a rotation of
(4n
+2)7r,
then thiscorresponds
to thenon-trivial element
Suppose n
= 0. If we follow a closedpath
on the
spatial S2,
e. g. round theequator,
then this willcorrespond
to aclosed
path
inSO(3), given by
the movement of the zeros of the Hamil- tonian vector field(spin
up andspin
down in themagnetic field).
If the zerosof the Hamiltonian vector field rotate
through
27T on thequantum S2,
then we have a
quantum
systemcorresponding
to the non-trivial element of(Remember
that the zeros of the, Hamiltonian vector fieldare
always diametrically opposite
oneanother).
Such a
configuration
issupplied by
an electronmoving
in a radialmagnetic
field. Then theeigenstates
of the Hamiltoniancorrespond
tothe
spin pointing radially
inwards orradially outwards,
andthey
rotatethrough
27T on thequantum
S2 as we go once round theequator
of thespatial
S2.Let 0 ~ a 7T and
0 ~ {3
2~c bepolar
co-ordinate on thespatial S2,
radius r
(e and 03C6
are reserved forpolar
co-ordinates on the quantumS2)
andwhere B =
with g
themonopole strength.
The Hamiltonian isThen,
on thequantum S2,
withco-ordinate ç 1
as in section2c,
the zeros of H aregiven by
_Vol. 45, n° 3-1986.
So
and
showing that 03C6+
rotatesthrough
21tas 03B2 does,
as claimed.Classically,
there are no stable orbits for an electron in amonopole
field.
However,
if the centralcharged particle
has electriccharge
as wellas
magnetic charge,
then stable orbitsexist,
and such a system could be realised as an electronorbiting
adyon.
More
generally,
for an n + 1 state quantum system in the classicalbackground
of acharged particle,
the relevanttopology
would be thatof
a cpn bundle over ~ xS2,
with structure groupSU(n
+These bundles are characterised
by
+1)/~n + 1 ,: Zn+ 1.
Hencethere are n + 1 such
inequivalent
bundles.CONCLUSIONS
It has been shown how an
(n
+1)
statequantum system evolves, according
to the
Schrodinger picture,
as a curve in CP". The curve lies on an n-dimen- sional torus,T",
which isgenerated by
the flow lines of theKilling
vectorsspanning
the Cartansubalgebra
of theisometry
group for the Fubini-Study
metric on CP". The size of the torus is determinedby
the initial condi- tions of the quantum state. The one dimensional curve, and the rate at which itevolves,
is determinedby
theHamiltonian,
which is viewed as atangent
vector to the curve. The Hamiltonian is a vector field on CP"with n + 1 zeros
(corresponding
to the fact that the Euler characteristice of CPn is n +1).
Thepoints
of CP" at which the Hamiltonian vector field vanishescorrespond
tothe .n
+ 1eigenstates
of the Hamiltonian.When the Hamiltonian
depends
onposition,
the wholesystem
can be viewedsemi-classically
as aCP"
bundle over three space, with fibre groupSU(n
+ The Hamiltonian determines the connection. Thespecific
case of an electron in a
dyon
field(corresponding
to anS2
bundle overS2)
has been considered in detail.
It is
interesting
to notethat,
if the connection isgiven dynamical
status,we are
naturally
led to the notion of a non-relativisticSU(n
+1)
gaugetheory
associable with n + 1 statesystem.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
275
THE TIME EVOLUTION OF THE SHCRODINGER EQUATION
[1] T. EGUCHI, P. GILKEY and A. HANSON, Phys. Rep., t. 66, 1980, p. 213-393.
[2] P. A. M. DIRAC, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Oxford. University Press, 1981, 4th Edition.
[3] N. STEENROD, The Topology of Fibre Bundles, Princeton University Press, 1951.
( M anuscrit reçu Ie 2 janvier 1986)
Vol. 45, n° 3-1986.