C OMPOSITIO M ATHEMATICA
M. K AREL
A note on fields of definition
Compositio Mathematica, tome 45, n
o1 (1982), p. 109-113
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1982__45_1_109_0>
© Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 1982, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Compositio Mathematica » (http:
//http://www.compositio.nl/) implique l’accord avec les conditions gé- nérales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une in- fraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
109
A NOTE ON FIELDS OF DEFINITION
M. Karel*
Nijhoff
HaquePrinted in the Netherlands
Introduction
The purpose of this note is to show that the space of linear combinations of certain Eisenstein series on a rational tube domain is defined over an
explicitly computable ground
field in thefollowing
sense: the space has a basis of
automorphic
forms all of whose Fourier coefficients lie in theground
field. We also take this oppor-tunity
to correct an omission in an earlier version of thistheorem,
whichappeared
as 5.5.3 in[3].
To illustrate and motivate the
theorem,
consider for apositive square-free integer
m the normalizerT°(m)+ in PSL(2, 1R)0
of Hecke’scongruence
subgroup To(m);
see[1].
It is known thatT0(m)+
is amaximal discrete
subgroup
ofPSL(2, R)0
and that it hasjust
one cusp.In
particular,
it therefore has one Eisenstein series of eachweight satisfying
the condition that the first Fourier coefficient be 1. An immediate consequence of what we aregoing
to prove is that all the Fourier coefficients of these Eisenstein series are rational numbers.The earlier version of our theorem is not
applicable
here because itrequired
that the arithmetic group be a congruencesubgroup
ofPSL(2, Z)
or one of itsconjugates.
This answers aquestion posed by
John
Thompson
andkindly
communicated to the authorby
W.L.Baily,
Jr. The referee has remarkedthat,
for m aprime number,
theanswer is contained in
[2],
formula19,
sinceG(Vm)
isconjugate
to03930(m)+
here.* Supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation.
0010-437X81010109-05$00.20/0
110
1.
We now
adopt
thelanguage
of[3]
and examine Theorem 5.5.3. Let G be a linearalgebraic
group defined over Q with maximal0-split
torus T contained in a maximal
parabolic 0-subgroup
P and letp : P ~
GL(l)
be a rational character defined over a, allsubject
toassumptions (AO)
to(A5)
of([3], 1.2).
Inparticular,
the space of maximal compactsubgroups
ofG(R)
is a rational tube domain D(=
Siegel
domain of type 1 with a 0-dimensional rationalboundary component)
andP(R)0
acts as affine transformations on D. Co- ordinates are chosen so thatfor each rational
prime
p. Weidentify GL(1, )
with the Galois group Ci of the maximal abelian extension Qab of 0, and take anembedding
defined over 0
whose
image
is asplit
component ofInta(P)
and whichgives
vectorspace structure to the
(abelian) unipotent
radical of P.The Eisenstein series are
automorphic
forms for a congruencesubgroup
for some open
subgroup
K of the groupG(Ana)
of "finite adèle"points
ofG,
see([3], 2.3). Then,
for5.5.3,
one assumes that K CG(2),
and the statement should read as follows.
THEOREM:
Suppose
that normalizes bothG(2)
and K. Theneach
of
thespaces
and has a basisof
Eisenstein seriesdefined
over Q.
In
[3]
we omitted thehypothesis
that normalize K both in 5.5.2 and5.5.3,
where it is usedimplicitly
when Lemma 5.2.1 is invoked.We want to eliminate the
requirement
that K lie inG(2).
The ideais to show that the Galois group
, acting
via its effect on Fouriercoefficients,
preserves the space of Eisenstein series for T =0393(G).
This in turn comes from the
following:
the Eisenstein series inquestion
lift to adèlic Eisenstein series03A6s
as in([3], 1.2)
withU =
(G, T, P,
p, K nG(Z))
and with svarying throughout
a space0V
of functions onG(A),
which is stable under a certain action of 01.2.
Fix an open compact
subgroup
K ofG(A),
let % =(G, T, P,
p, K nG())
be asabove,
and recall that the character p determines aholomorphic
factor ofautomorphy j
onG(R)0 D,
as in([3], 1.5.3).
To start
with,
we lift the Eisenstein series 6a attached to apoint-cusp P(Q)aT
CG(G)
for T =T(K). By definition,
ifTa
is thestability
group of a in
T,
thenFor the
lifting
we introduce the operator TrK on the spaceC~(G(A))
of all
complex-valued locally
constant functions onG(A)
as follows:For
f
EC~(G(A))
we definefor any Haar measure dx on
G(A) giving
volumemeas(K)
to K. In([3], 2.3)
there are attached to the character p a norm N and aspherical
function cp. LetDefine sa
to beNK(a)-’
times the characteristic function ofP(Q) ·
a -G(R)° .
K inG(A).
Then a brief calculation shows that the functionis a lift of
Ea
toG(A).
Let denote the space of all linear combinations of the Eisenstein series
6a,
a EG(a)
nG(R)0.
We next write down a space°v
such that each’!lCPs
with s~ v
is the lift of an element(Eisenstein series)
in
,
andconversely.
112
Given an open compact
subgroup
H ofG(Ana)
let H+ =G(R)0 ·
Hand
S(H) (resp. °S(H))
be the space of allcomplex-valued
functionson
P(Q)BG(A)H+ (resp. P(Q)BP(Q)H+/H+).
LetBoth are
clearly subspaces
ofS(K
~G())
and if sE °V,
thenis the lift of some ~
~ , (i.e.,
an Eisenstein series forl).
Let bethe space of
0393-automorphic
forms that lift to functionsU03A6s
withs E V.
3.
Suppose
now that (b normalizes bothG()
and K. For each T E Q)recall that there is an operator T* on
C~(G(A))
definedby
for
f
EC~(G(A)),
where w is chosen as in 1.4.3(it
lies inG(Q)
andgives
a Cartan involution ofD).
To show that and°OE
are defined over Q it suffices to show that V and°V
are stable under all T* with03C4 ~ ;
see Lemma 5.5.1 of[3].
Since Q4 normalizesG()
andK,
Lemmas 5.2.1 and 5.5.2 of
[3]
show thatS(K)
and°S(K)
are invariantunder all T*. Thus it suffices to show that
03C4*~
= cp, which follows atonce from Lemma 5.2.2 of
[3],
and that03C4*~K
= CPK. Since @ nor-malizes
K,
the operators T* all commute withTrK ; hence, 03C4*~K
= CPK.This
gives
the desired extension of the theorem stated at thebegin- ning
to cover the case ofarbitrary
compact open K normalizedby
(S.4.
Now
drop
theassumption
that OE normalizeG()
and K. If oneintersects the normalizers
N(G())
andN(K),
one obtains an opensubgroup
of(S, necessarily
of finite index. Call it@K.
Then it is aneasy exercise to prove that and
°OE
are both defined over the fixed fieldof (Sx.
REFERENCES
[1] A.O.L. ATKIN and J. LEHNER: Hecke operators on 03930(m). Math. Ann. 185 (1970) 134-160.
[2] J. BOGO and W. KUYK: Hecke operators for
G(~q),
q prime; Eisenstein series and modular invariants. J. of Algebra 43(2), 583-605.[3] M. KAREL: Eisenstein series and fields of definition. Compositio Math. 37 (1978) 121-169.
(Oblatum 20-VI-1980 & 4-XII-1980) Dept. of Mathematics Rutgers University Camden, N.J. 08102 USA