C OMPOSITIO M ATHEMATICA
L IANG -C HI T SAO
The rationality of the Fourier coefficients of certain Eisenstein series on tube domains (I)
Compositio Mathematica, tome 32, n
o3 (1976), p. 225-291
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1976__32_3_225_0>
© Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 1976, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Compositio Mathematica » (http:
//http://www.compositio.nl/) implique l’accord avec les conditions géné- rales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infrac- tion pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
225
THE RATIONALITY OF THE FOURIER COEFFICIENTS OF CERTAIN EISENSTEIN SERIES ON TUBE DOMAINS
(I)
Liang-Chi
Tsao*Noordhoff International Publishing
Printed in the Netherlands
Introduction
In this paper we wish to prove that under certain conditions the Fourier coefficients of certain Eisenstein series for an arithmetic group
acting
on a tube domain are rational numbers. The conditions are that the domain be
equivalent
to a boundedsymmetric
domainhaving
a0-dimensional
boundary
component(with
respect to the arithmeticgroup),
and that the arithmetic group be asubgroup
of aspecial
arithmeticgroup
(cf. § 7.1).
* This paper was written with partial support from National Science Foundation grant GP36418X1.
As in
[4],
let G be aconnected, semi-simple, Q-simple,
linearalgebraic
group defined over the rational number field Q. Let R be the real number field. We assume that
G0R
is centerless and has no compactsimple factors,
and that if K is a maximal
compact subgroup
ofG0R
then X =KBG0R
is aHermitian
symmetric
space. We may write G =RfM./QG’,
where G’ isabsolutely simple,
and defined over atotally
realalgebraic
numberfield K and
RK/Q
is theground
field reduction functor[21, Chapt. 1].
We assume also that X is
isomorphic
to a tube domainwhere C is the
complex
number field and R is ahomogeneous, self-adjoint
cone in RM. It follows that the relative R-root system of G is a sum of
simple
root systemsof type
C. We assume furtherthat,
when X is realizedas a bounded
symmetric
domain Din CM,
then D has a 0-dimensionalboundary
componentFo.
Then X may be identified with the tube domain :1: in such a way that every element ofN(F 0) = {g
EG0R|F0 · g
=FOI
acts on :1:
by
a linear affine transformation of the ambient vector space CM of:1:,
that every element of theunipotent
radicalUR
=U(F 0)
ofN(F 0)
actsby
a realtranslation,
and thatN(Fo)
is aQ-parabolic subgroup
of
G0R.
LetNh
be the normalizer ofN(Fo)
in the groupGh
of all holo-morphic automorphisms of :1:,
and r be an arithmeticsubgroup
ofGh.
Let 0393’ =
Go
nr,
and03930
= r nNh* If g ~ Gh
andZ E :1:,
letj(Z, g)
be the functional determinant
of g
at Z. LetG’
=GQ
nG0R;
and ifa E
G’Q,
let03930,a
= r naNha -1. Then,
if 1 is alarge positive
rationalnumber
(with
conditions on its denominator to be indicatedlater),
we form the
following
Eisenstein series at the cusp a :which converges
absolutely
anduniformly
on compact subsets of:1:and represents there an
automorphic
form with respect to r.Let
G*Q
be the normalizer ofG’
inGh,
and letNQ
=Nh
nG*Q.
Thenr
~ G*Q,
and we can writeG*Q
=~03B1~A0393aNQ, a disjoint
union of a finitenumber of double cosets with A c
G’Q.
We have alsoGQ
=U aeAl r’ aP Q
for some finite set
A1,
where P is a maximalQ-parabolic subgroup
of Gsuch that P n
G0R
=N(F 0).
For each a E
A,
letc(a)
be acomplex number,
and define an Eisenstein seriesLet ’ = r n
U Q’
then ’ is a lattice inUQ;
let be its dual lattice with respect to thenon-degenerate symmetric
bilinear form inducedby
the trace function on
UR
=RM,
when the latter is realized as a real Jordanalgebra.
Since
El(Z+S)
=El(Z)
forall £ e A’, El
has a Fourierexpansion:
where 8( )
=e203C0i(), and ( , ) is the induced symmetric bilinear form on CM.
In this paper, we restrict ourselves to the case when r c
G0R
and r isa
subgroup
of aspecial
arithmetic group. Then we are able to prove that the Fourier coefficientsal(T)
are rational numbers forsuitably
chosen
c(a).
Our methods have been
adapted largely
from theproof
of this result in aspecial
case in[5].
For the historical
background,
see[6, Introduction].
We sketch the contents of each section of this paper as follows : In Section
1,
we describe therelationships
between tube domains and Jordanalgebras.
The next two sections are then devoted to Jordanalgebras.
Some technicallemmas,
which areimportant
for the later calculation ofexponential
sums, areproved.
Sections4,
5 and 6 are devoted toparabolic subgroups,
functional determinants andboundary
components,
respectively,
and therelationships
amongthem,
which enable us in Section 7 to reduce our treatment of the Fouriercoefficients, by induction,
to those ofthe ‘biggest
cell’.Also,
in Section7,
we describe the way ofchoosing c(a).
In Section8,
weapply
Gammaintegral
andPoisson summation formula to the
biggest cell,
and express the Fourier coefficients in terms ofexponential
sums and the volumev()
of afundamental
period parallelogram
of the lattice A. In Section9, by applying
Hensel’s lemma[3],
we further reduce the calculations of theexponential
sums to those over finite Jordanalgebras.
Then we devoteSection 10 to the
explicit
calculations of theexponential
sums, whichturn out to be
products
of Eulerfactors;
and then devote Section 11 to the calculation of the volumev(A). Finally,
in the lastsection, by using
the values of L-functions(which
come from theproduct
ofexponential sums),
we are able to prove therationality
of the Fourier coefficients.In
June, 1972,
when the author submitted part of this paper as the dissertation(see [19]
for theannouncement)
at theUniversity
ofChicago,
he was not able to calculate the value of
v()
for certain tube domains of typeA,
thus left the workuncompleted.
In the summer of that year,Baily [6]
carried out this calculation viatheory
ofquadratic
formswhile the author did it in a rather
straightforward
way and was able todispose
thetype
A case in fullgenerality.
We combine this calculation with the dissertation and present here the whole story.The author would like to express his
appreciation
and thanks to his thesisadvisor,
Professor W. L.Baily, Jr.,
without whose advice and encouragement this work would not have beenpossible.
Thanks alsoare due to Dr. M.
Karel,
with whom the author has had several fruitful talks.0. Notation
0.1. As
usual, Z, 0, R,
Cdenote, respectively,
thering
ofintegers,
and the fields of
rational,
real andcomplex
numbers.Fp03B1
denotes the finite field ofp03B1 elements,
where p is aprime
and a is apositive integer.
0.2. If A is an
algebra,
then A* denotes the set of invertible elements of A.0.3. Let E c F be two
field,
thenNF/E(x)
orN(x) (resp. TrfF/fE(x)
orTr
(x))
denotes the norm(resp. trace)
of x e F in E.0.4. Let K be an
algebraic
number field.Then p
denotes aprime
ofK
dividing
aprime
p of O.Kp (resp. Op)
is the local field at p(resp. p),
and
?Lp (resp. Zp)
is thep-adic (resp. p-adic) integers
ofKp (resp. Op).
Let n be a local parameter of
KP. Let L (resp. 11.)
be the standard norm onKp (resp. (JJp) (so
that theproduct
formula istrue).
0.5. Let A be an
algebra
with an involution J : a ~ a*. We write(A, J)
for such analgebra,
andH(A, J)
for the set of allsymmetric
elements in this
algebra;
if there is no confusion we writeH(A) = H(A, J).
LetM(n, A)
denote the set of all n x n matrices over A.Denote the
identity
matrixby
I(or In),
and the matrix with 1 on the(i, j)-th
entry and 0 elsewhereby eij.
If X is a matrix(not necessarily
asquare
matrix),
then X* denotes the transposeconjugate (w.r.t. a ~ a*)
of X. Given an invertible element A in
M(n, s)
such that A =A*,
definean involution
JA
onM(n, s) by
X AX*A-1. WriteWrite
diag (al, ..., an)
for adiagonal
matrix inM(n, A).
0.6. Let H be a non-empty subset of a group
G,
thenN(H) (resp. Z(H))
denotes the normalizer
(resp. centralizer)
of H in G. If G is analgebraic
group defined over an
algebraic
number fieldK,
we writeGp
forGKp
for a
prime
p.(Also applied
to analgebra
A defined over K :Ap = ’W K,
if there is no
confusion.)
Part I. TUBE DOMAINS
1. Tube domains and Jordan
algebras
We summarize the
relationships
between tube domains and Jordanalgebras
as stated in[4, §§ 2,3].
1.1. Let G be a
centerless, connected, simple,
linearalgebraic
group defined over R. If K is a maximal compactsubgroup
ofG0R,
we assume thatX =
KBG0R
isisomorphic
to a bounded hermitiansymmetric
domain D.Assume further that the relative R-root system of G is
of type C,
then X isisomorphic
to a tube domainwhere R is a
homogeneous
irreducibleself-adjoint
cone in RM.Let S
= RT
be a maximal R-trivial torus of G withsimple
R-rootsystem
R0394.
Thenprecisely
onesimple
root a is non-compact, sinceR0394
isof type
C. LetSo
be the 1-dimensional subtorus of S on which allsimple
R-roots vanish except a. The centralizer
Z(So)
ofSo
and thepositive
R-root
subgroups
of G generate a maximalR-parabolic subgroup
P of G.Then P n
Go
=N(F 0) = {g ~ G0R|F0 · g
=FOI
for some 0-dimensionalboundary
componentF 0
ofD,
and X may be identified with 2 in sucha way that every element of
N(F0)
acts on 2by
a linear affine trans-formation on the ambient vector space CM
of:1:,
and every element of theunipotent
radicalUR (=
U nG’,
Ubeing
theunipotent
radicalof P)
of
N(F0) by
a real translation. ThenUR
may be identified withRM,
and will have a
simple
compact real Jordanalgebra
structure such thatthe cone R may be described as the interior of the set of all squares of this Jordan
algebra [13; 20].
1.2. Let G be taken
subject
to thegeneral assumption
of the Introduc-tion ;
then G =RK/QG’
for someabsolutely simple
linearalgebraic
group G’ defined over atotally
real number field K. We may choose a maximal torus T, a maximal R-trivialtorus RT,
and a maximal Q-trivial torusQT
in G such that T is defined over Qand QT ~ RT
c T. Then for asuitable maximal K-trivial torus
KT’,
a maximal R-trivial torusRT’ and
amaximal K-torus T’in
G’,
wehave KT’ ~ RT’
~ T’and QT
cRK/Q(KT’),
T =
RK/QT’.
We takecompatible orderings
on all the root systems.Assume that D has a 0-dimensional rational
boundary
componentF0.
Let P =
N(F o)c’
and let U be theunipotent
radical of P. The R-root system of eachsimple
factor of G is of typeC;
and sincedim Fo
=0,
we know that the non-compact
simple
root in eachsimple
factor of Gis critical and that the
simple
Q-root systemQ0394
of G is of type C. LetSo
be the subtorus
of QT
on which allsimple
Q-roots vanish except the non-compact one. Then P is the maximalQ-parabolic subgroup
of Ggenerated by
the centralizerZ(So) of So
and thepositive
Q-rootsubgroups
of
G,
and then P =RIM./QP’,
U =RIM./QU’,
where P’ is the maximalK-parabolic (and
henceR-parabolic) subgroup
of G’of §
1.1(in
whichthey
were denotedby
P andG, respectively),
and U’ is itsunipotent
radical. Then
UR
is asemi-simple
compact real Jordanalgebra
withQ-structure
U Q
induced(via
theground
field reduction functorRK/Q)
by
thesimple
real compact Jordanalgebra U’
defined over thetotally
real
algebraic
number field K.The tube demain Xis then a direct
product
of irreducible tube domains 03C3F’corresponding
tosimple
factors03C3G’,
where G =RK/QG’ = 03A003C3~03A303C3G’,
and Z is the set of all
isomorphisms
of K into R.2. Jordan
algebras
In this
section,
we discuss the compact real Jordanalgebras
and theirK-structures,
where K is atotally
realalgebraic
number field.2.1. In this
article,
we intend to describe all thesimple
compact real Jordanalgebras [20, Chapt. 2].
Let V be a vector space of
dimension ~
1 overR, provided
with anegative
definite bilinear form( , ).
Consider the vector space R E9 V with theproduct
of two of its elements definedby
for a, b
~ R,
u, v E TlThen R ~
V becomes analgebra
with involution a+u ~(a+u)*
= a-u.Let W be any one of the
real,
thecomplex,
thequaternion,
theCayley
or the above-constructed
algebra,
then W is a realalgebra
with involutionc ~ c* such that
(1)
traceof c ~ F : tr(c) = c + c* ~ R,
(2)
norm of c ~ F :n(c)
= cc* = c*c ER,
and(3)
the norm form ispositive
definite on the real vector space W.Let dim W = n., and denote
Fn0n
the space of all n x n hermitian(with
respect to the involution*) symmetric
matrices with entries in W. Then anysimple
compact real Jordanalgebra F
isisomorphic
to one of thefollowing
five types:provided
with the Jordanmultiplication
A 0 B =1 2(AB + BA),
whereAB is the usual matrix
multiplication.
Note : The restrictions on n for the first three types and no for the last type are not necessary;
but, by
suchrestrictions,
no two of the Jordanalgebras
listed above areisomorphic.
Now,
the irreduciblehomogeneous self-adjoint
cone R may be described as R= {T* TI
T is an n x n uppertriangular
matrix with entries in W and withpositive
real numbers on thediagonal}, and Z
+ iRis the irreducible tube domain.
2.2. Let us collect some well-known facts about the
general
structuretheory
of Jordanalgebras
over any field e ofcharacteristic ~
2[12, Chapt. 4, 5].
THEOREM 2.2.1: A
finite-dimensional
centralsimple
Jordanalgebra
isone
of the following
types :(1)
a Jordanalgebra of
anon-degenerate symmetric
bilinearform 03A6 ~ V, dim V ~ 2;
(2)
a Jordanalgebra H(A, J) of symmetric
elementsof
afinite-
dimensional central
simple
associativealgebra
with involution(A, J);
(3)
a Jordanalgebra F,
suchthat F03A9, for
Q thealgebraic
closureof 0,
is
isomorphic
toH(O3, fI) of
3 x 3 octonionsymmetric
matrices over theoctonion
algebra
0 over Q.THEOREM 2.2.2:
[12,
p.209]. If (si, J)
is afinite-dimensional
centralsimple
associativealgebra
withinvolution,
then(si n’ J)
isisomorphic
to(Dn, JI),
n ~1,
the n x n matrices over thesplit composition algebra
Dover
Q, of
dimension2,
1 or 4.The
algebra (A, J)
is then said to be of typeA,
B orC, respectively,
and n is called the
degree
of(A, J).
THEOREM 2.2.3:
[12, p. 209].
Twofinite-dimensional
centralsimple
associative
algebras
with involutions(d n, JI)
and(R03A9, JI)
areisomorphic if
andonly if they
areof
the same type andof
the samedegree.
THEOREM 2.2.4:
[12,
p210].
A Jordanalgebra
isfinite-dimensional, special,
and centralsimple of degree ~
3if
andonly if
it isisomorphic
to a Jordan
algebra H(A, J),
where(A, J)
is afinite-dimensional simple
associative
algebra
with involutionof degree
n.If (A, J)
and(R, J’)
aretwo
finite-dimensional
centralsimple algebras
with involutionsof degree
~
3,
thenthey
areisomorphic if
andonly if
the Jordanalgebras J)
and
H(R, J’)
areisomorphic.
A Jordan
algebra H(A, J)
is of typeA,
B or C if andonly
if(A, J)
isof the
corresponding
type. And the Jordanalgebras
of(1)
and(3)
inTheorem 2.2.1 are said to be of types D and
E, respectively.
THEOREM 2.2.5:
[12,
p.208].
There are three typesof finite-dimensional
central
simple
associativealgebras
with involutions :(1) (A, J),
where d is centralsimple
and J is an involutionof
thefirst kind;
(2) (A, J),
where d is centralsimple,
and J is an involutionof
thesecond
kind;
(3) (A, J) = (f18
E9f18, J),
where P4 is centralsimple,
and J is the inter-change
involution.Now we restrict ourselves to the case when 03A6 =
K,
and consider the Jordanalgebraf
defined over K such thatFR
is a compact real Jordanalgebra of §
2.1.The third case of the above theorem is then ruled out, because A E9 P4 has a two-dimensional
split
center which cannot occur in the associativealgebra corresponding
to asimple
compact real Jordanalgebra.
We shalldiscuss
(1)
and(2)
over atotally
realalgebraic
number field in the next two articles.THEOREM 2.3 :
If (AK, J)
is afinite-dimensional
centralsimple
associa-tive
algebra
with involutionof
thefirst kind,
then(AK, J) = (Dn, JA),
where D is K or a
quaternion
divisionalgebra
overK,
andPROOF :
W.
is centralsimple,
hence is a matrixalgebra
over a divisionalgebra
over the field K.When
J is restricted to this divisionalgebra,
it is an involution of the first kind. It is
known [1, Chapt. 10,
Th.20]
that a division
algebra
with involution of the first kind over analgebraic
number field is either the number field itself or a
quaternion
divisionalgebra
over it. Then it is a well-known fact that J= JA
for someA =
diag (al, ..., an)’ with ai
E K*.The
algebras
are of type B orC, respectively.
Note that
J)
(8) IR is a real compact Jordanalgebra
if andonly
if all ai are
positive.
2.4. We turn to the case of involution of the second kind. Then
(AK, J)
is
isomorphic
to(Dm, JA),
where D must be a centralsimple
associative divisionalgebra
withpositive
definite involution of the secondkind,
and A =diag (al,
...,an),
ai E K* and ai arepositive.
Suchalgebra
Dis a
cyclic
divisionalgebra
withpositive
definiteinvolution j
of the second kind and may be described asfollows [17, §§ 4, 5] :
Let
IK(,)
be a realcyclic
extension ofK,
andK(0)
be acomplex quadratic
extension of K. Then D is an
s(= [K(03B6): K])-dimensional
left vector spaceover
K«, 0)
with abasis {1, ~, ~2, ..., ~s-1}
such that ~c =03C4c~,
for allc ~
K(03B6, 0),
where r is a generator of the Galois groupand such
that tls
= b EK(03B8).
It isrequired
that there exist a EK«)
suchthat
NK(03B6)/K(a)
=NK(03B8)/K(b),
andthat,
forany k,
0 k s, there exist no c ~K(03B6, 0)
such thatNK(03B6, 03B8)/K(03B8)(c)
= b. Then thepositive
definite involu-tion j
of the second kind is defined in thefollowing way : j
fixes elements ofK(03B6),
and takes 0to - 03B8, and il
toa~-1.
We have n = ms.This
disposes
the cases of typesA,
B and C. We shall devote the next two articles to type D Jordanalgebras.
2.5. Let V be a vector space of
dimension ~
1 over a field 4Y of char-acteristic ~ 2, provided
with anon-degenerate symmetric
bilinear formf. Let F = F(V, f) = 03A6 ~ V
and define themultiplication
of any two elementsof f by (03B11 + v1)(03B12 + v2) = (ala2
+f(v1, v2))
+(al
V2 +a2vl)’
foral, a2 E
03A6,
vl,v2 E Y. Then
is the centralsimple
Jordanalgebra
oftype D. We also note that 03B1 + v ~ 03B1 - v is an involution in
F.
THEOREM 2.5:
H(F(V, f)2, JI) is a
centralsimple
Jordanalgebra of
type D.
PROOF : Let W = 03A6 ~ 03A6 ~ V, and define a
non-degenerate symmetric
bilinear
form g
on Wby g(03B1 + 03B2 + v)
=a2+p2- f(v).
Thendefines a Jordan
algebra isomorphism
ofH(F(V, f)2, JI)
ontof(W, g),
a Jordan
algebra
of type D.2.6. For the tube domain of type
D, n0 ~ 3,
we may take G’ =SO(h)/center,
where h is aquadratic
form in more than 6variables,
of R-rank2,
with coefficients in K. We mayassume [14,
p.74]
thath =
03B1103B12 + 03B123 - g
suchthat g
is thepositive
definitesymmetric
bilinearform of the Jordan
algebra F(W, g) corresponding
to the tube domain(cf. §§ 2.1, 2.5).
The R-rank of03B123-g
is1,
and03B123-g
is in more than 4variables,
and hence is ofKp-rank ~
1 for eachprime ideal p
of K.Thus, by
Hasseprincipal
for thequadratic forms, 03B123-g is
of K-rank = 1.Then we may write
g = x21 + g0
in a suitable basis. If we writeg0 = a(x22 - f),
thenF(W,g)
isisomorphic
toH(F(V, f)2, JA),
withA =
diag (a, 1).
Theisomorphism
sendsof
H(F(V, f)2, JA)
toof
F(W, g).
2.7. It is known
[2] that,
over analgebraic
number fieldK,
a finite dimensional centralsimple exceptional
Jordanalgebra
is reduced andisomorphic
to:Yt( (D 3’ JA),
where O is an octonionalgebra
overK,
andA =
diag (a1,
a2,a3), with ai
E K*.For a
totally
real number fieldK, H(O3, JA)
(D R isisomorphic
to a compact real Jordanalgebra
if andonly
if CD is a divisionalgebra and ai
are
positive.
2.8. We summarize the
preceding
results asTHEOREM 2.8: The K-structure
U’K of
the Jordanalgebra
U’of §
1.2for
tube domainsof
typesB, C,
D or E isof
theform H(An, JA),
where Ais
K, a
divisionquaternion algebra
overK, F(V, f) of §
2.6 or an octoniondivision
algebra
overK, respectively,
and A =diag (al,
...,an),
with all aitotally positive
in K.(The
last statement followsfrom
thefact
that thereal extensions
of
theconjugates of
the Jordanalgebra U’K
are all compact(cf. § 2.10).)
We know that
:Yt(sln, JA)
~ R isisomorphic
toH((AR)n, JI) = Wnno
of§ 2.1.
Theisomorphism
may be described as follows :Any
element ofH(An, JA)
~ R is of the formAX,
for X EH(An, JI)
(D R. The isomor-phism
sends AX to X’ EH(AR)n, JI),
where if X =(xij),
X’ =(X’ i)’
thenxj
=r¡¡(¡x...
2.9. As for type
A,
the Jordanalgebra
isH(Dm, JA),
where D is acyclic
divisionalgebra
of 2s2 dimensions over K withpositive
definiteinvolution of the second
kind,
and A =diag (al, ..., am),
with aitotally
positive
in K. We have n = ms.Now we describe the
isomorphism
ofH(Dm, JA)
Q R withW2@
then x n hermitian
symmetric
matrices.As a first step, we have
LEMMA 2.9:
B. is isomorphic
toM(s, C).
PROOF:
[1]
We use the notationsof § 2.4.
Define anisomorphism Ro
from
K(03B6, 0) ~K
R intoM(s, C) by RO(C)
=right regular representation of (
onK(03B6,03B8)
overK(0)
with respect to thebasis {03B60, 03B61, ..., 03B6s-1}, where (j
=Ti,.
If a =03A3ci03B6i
EK(03B6, 8) ~K R,
then extendRo
to aby defining R0(03B1) = LciRo(’i)
EM(s, C).
Let
be one of the s-th roots of b EK(0)
~ C in C. Then03B2 ~ C
cK(03B6, 03B8) ~K R
is such thatdet R0(03B2) = IRo(P)1
= b. DefineR0(~)
= constantmatrix P
times the matrix of the linear transformationL of
K(03B6, 03B8)
overK(0)
with respect to{03B60, 03B61, ..., 03B6s-1},
and thenRo
can be extended to be an
isomorphism
fromB.
ontoM(s, C).
If no confusion is
likely
toarise,
we shall use X forRo(X),
X EDR,
and r for the matrix that represents it.
Now,
theinvolutiôn j
onDR ~ M(s, C)
is inducedby
a hermitiansymmetric
matrixBo
=B*
ofM(s, C)
withIBOI
= 1 in the sense thatj(X)
=B0X*B-10 for
all X EDR ~ M(s, C).
Put B= diag (Bo, Bo, ..., Bo)’
m factors. Then it is obvious that
(Dm, JA)
(D R ~(Cn’ JAB),
and the latteris in turn
isomorphic
to(Cn’ JI) by
thecorrespondence
ABY ~CYC*,
for any Y e
(Cn, JI),
where C is such that CC* = AB.The
isomorphisms
of the centralsimple
associativealgebras give
thedesired
isomorphism
for the Jordanalgebras H(Dm, JA) (8) [R
andW2 = H(Cn, JI):
for each S E
H(Dm, JI)
(D R.2.10. Let G =
RK/QG’
be asin §
1.2.Write F (resp. f’)
for the abelian group U(resp. U’)
with Jordanalgebra
structure. ThenFR = 03A003C3~03A303C3F’R, f Q
=RI,,f’ and 03C3F’R = F’03C3K ~ R,
where L is the set of all isomor-phisms
of K into R.In the
sequel,
weidentify F (as
a vectorspace)
with the Liealgebra (a
vectorspace)
of the abelian group U[§ 7.2].
It is easy to see
that 03C3F’R
areisomorphic
to one another for all 6 e 1.If
F’
is of typeA, B, C,
D orE,
we say that thecorresponding
tubedomaine
is, respectively, of type A, B, C,
D or E.3. Determinant and rank
In this
section,
we define the determinant and the rank of an element ofa finite-dimensional central
simple
Jordan matrixalgebra
anddevelop
some theorems that will be very useful for the calculation of
exponential
sums
in §
10.3.1. Let 0 be any field
of characteristic ~ 2,
03A9 be itsalgebraic
closure.Consider the finite-dimensional central
simple
Jordanalgebras
of thefollowing
types:A.
H(Dn, JI):n n
hermitiansymmetric
matrices over aquadratic
extension of 0.
B.
e(Dn, JI):n
x nsymmetric
matrices over 0.C.
H(Dn, JI) : n
x nquaternion symmetric
matrices over aquaternion algebra
over 0.D.
H(F(V, f)2,JI):2 2 (’hermitian’) symmetric
matrices over aJordan
algebra F(V, f)
of anon-degenerate quadratic
formf
on avector space V of
dimension ~
1 over 03A6.E.
H(O3,JI):3 3
octonionsymmetric
matrices over an octonionalgebra
over 0.We use the notation
H(An, JI)
to denote any one of the Jordanalgebras
listedabove, n being
the size of the matrix. In thefollowing discussion,
we also include the classes n2 of type D and n 3 of type E.
3.2. In
A,
we have the usual involution a ~ a* such thatand that
n(a)
is anon-degenerate quadratic
form anddefines a
non-degenerate symmetric
bilinear form.THEOREM 3.2: The
generic
minimumpolynomial MX(03BB) of X
EH(An, JI)
is
of degree
n. Thegeneric
traceof
X is the sumof diagonal
entries.PROOF: The
generic
minimumpolynomial (and
hence thegeneric trace)
isunchanged
under the extension of basefield;
thus we may assume thatX E (sin, JI)n. By [12, Chapt. VI, § 4],
the theorem isobviously
true for Jordan
algebras of type A,
B or E.(For n
= 2of type E,
the Jordanalgebra
isisomorphic
to a Jordanalgebra
of typeD,
for which the theorem will beproved later;
for n =1,
it istrivial.)
For type
C,
we notice that:Yt(d n’ JI)03A9 ~ H(03A92n, JS),
whereThe
generic
minimumpolynomial
calculated inYt(Q2n’ Js)
isof degree n,
hence it is also of
degree n
when calculated inH(An, JI)03A9.
Thegeneric
trace calculated in
Yt(Q2n’ is)
is one half of the sum of all thediagonal entries [12, Chapt. VI, § 4] ;
but adiagonal
element a of a matrix inH(An, JI)03A9 corresponds
to thediagonal
formof the
corresponding
matrix inH(03C92n, Js). Therefore,
thegeneric
tracecalculated in
H(An, JI)03A9
is the sum of all thediagonal
elements.For type
D,
we notice that(§ 2.5) H(F(V, f)2, JI) ~ f(»: g),
wheredim W =
dim V + 2, and g
=x21 + x22 - f.
Theisomorphism
betweenthem is
The
generic
minimumpolynomial
of Y is[12, Chapt. VI, § 4]
Thus the
generic
minimumpolynomial
of X isof degree 2,
and thegeneric
trace of X is a +
b,
the sum of all thediagonal
elements.3.3. If
MX(03BB) = 03BBn - 03C31(X)03BBn-1 +
... +(-1)n03C3n(X),
then thegeneric
trace
tr (X)
of Xis 03C31(X),
thegeneric
normN(X)
of X is03C3n(X).
It isknown that
MX(X)
=0,
from which we haveIf we put
then
X
=X
=N(X)I.
IfN(X) ~ 0,
then X -1 -N(X)-1.
We know that
N(X)
is the determinant of X when Xbelongs
to aJordan
algebra
oftype
A or B. Fortype D,
from(1),
we haveN(X)
=ab-(C(2- f(v))
ifAnd for type
E,
ifthen
This,
and the theorems of the nextarticle, imply
that thegeneric
normis a
generalization
of the usual determinant. We shall use the terms’generic
norm’ and ’déterminant’interchangeably,
and denoteby IXI
thedeterminant of X.
The notions of
generic polynormial, generic
norm, etc., alsoapply
toH(An, JA),
sinceH(An, JA)03A9
isisomorphic
toH((A03A9)n, JI).
3.4. Define a
unipotent
transformation(cf., [5, §2.1]) (a)ij’
i=1= j,
a ~ A,
ofH(An, JI) by (a)ij · X
=(I+a*eji)X(I+aeij).
Let M be thegroup
generated by (a)ij
for all a E a and i=1= j.
If J-l =(a)ij... (b)kl
EM,
define
J-l* by 11*
=(b*)’k... (a*)ji
E M.By
abuse oflanguage,
we shalloccasionally
write03BC*X03BC
insteadof 03BC ·
X. Note that M containswij = (1)ij(-1)ji(1)ij
which permutes the i-th andj-th
rows and the i-th andj-th
columns. Note also thatwhere
(X, Y)
= tr(X 0 Y)
is anon-degenerate symmetric
bilinear formon the Jordan
algebra H(An, JI).
THEOREM 3.4.1: For any
X ~ H(an, JI),
there is aJ1 E M
such thatJ1 . X is
of diagonal form.
PROOF : We may assume that
X ~
0. If xii~
0 for some i, thenby
applying
Wi1, we may assume from thebeginning
thatx11 ~ 0. If xii = 0
for all i, then
Xij =1=
0 for some i~ j. Again
we may assume that i = 1.If y
~ A is such that(y, x1j) ~ 0,
then the(1, 1)-entry
of(y*)j1 ·
X is(y, x1j) ~
0.Therefore, again,
we may assume thatx11 ~
0 tobegin
with.Then
let J1
=(-x-111x12)12 ...(-x-111x1n)~M,
we haveand
hence, by induction,
we may prove the theorem.THEOREM 3.4.2:
|03BC · X|
=IXI for
anyJ1 E M.
PROOF : We may check this theorem
directly
for thegenerators
of Mfor Jordan
algebras
of type D or E.For
special
Jordanalgebras of type A,
B orC,
we may use the result of[12, Chapt. VI, § 8].
It is known that if Y EM(n, A),
then X - Y*X Yis a norm
similarity
of the Jordanalgebra :Yt(dn, JI),
and is a normpreserving
if andonly if N( Y* Y)
=1. If J1 is a
generatorof M,
it is trivialto check that
N(03BC*03BC)
= 1 for Jordanalgebras of type
A or B. For typeC,
we use the
isomorphisms A03A9 ~ M(2n, 03A9)
andH(An, JI)03A9 ~ Yt(Q2n’ JS),
then it is a routine work to check our theorem.
Thus, if y -
X = A is ofdiagonal form,
thenN(X) = IXI
=03A0ni=1ai, if
A =
diag(a1,...,an).
If Y E
H(An, JI) and 03BE
is an n x 1 column vector with entries in A(for
typeD,
we assume n2,
and typeE, n 3),
we defineY[03BE] = 03BE*Y03BE
except for type
E, n
=2,
in which case we defineif
THEOREM 3.4.3:
(a) If
where Y
is (n - 1)
x(n - 1), 03BE is (n -1)
x1, and x ~ 03A6,
then|X|
=x|Y| - [03BE];
(b) (03BC · X)- = (03BC*)-1 · X .
PROOF : For Jordan
algebras
of type D orE,
we may check the theoremby
direct calculation. Now we treat the cases of typesA,
B and C.(a) Suppose that | Y| ~ 0,
thenand hence
IXI = |Y|(-Y-1[03BE]+x)
=x|Y|-[03BE].
Since
IXI
and the entries ofY are polynormial
functions of the entries ofX,
and since|X||Y| ~ 0}
is aZariski-open
densesubset,
we conclude that thepolynormial identity IXI
=x|Y| - [03BE]
is true for all X.(b)
Form the(n+ 1)
x(n+ 1)
matrixwhere (
is anarbitrary (n + 1)
x 1 matrix. Sinceis in the group M for the
(n+1)
x(n+1) matrices,
we haveSince this holds true for any
03B6,
we haveX
=03BC* · (J.1. X)
and hence(03BC · X) = (03BC*)-1 · .
We note that if A =
diag (a 1,
...,an),
then3.5. Let
X ~ F = H(An, JI),
defineLX(Y)
= X Y forY ~ F,
thenLx
EHom, (F, F). Define Px
=2Ex - LX2
andThen
AIX)
is a linearsubspace
ofF.
From theeasily
checked fact thatP03BC·X
=03BCPX03BC*
forJ.1 E M,
it follows that dimN(X)
= dimN(03BC · X)
forany J.1 E M. If J.1. X is
ofdiagonal
formhaving
r non-zerodiagonal entries,
then it is easy to see that
Thus r
depends only
on X and is called the rank of X.Henceforth,
we denote the rank of Xby R(X).
Note that for any X Ef ,
we can findp E
M,
suchthat y -
X is ofdiagonal form,
and thenR(X)
= number ofnon-zero
diagonal
entries of03BC · X;
it isindependent
of the way wediagonalize
X.LEMMA 3.5.1:
If
there exists an m x mprincipal
minorof
X~ F
withnon-zero
subdeterminant,
thenR(X) ~
m.PROOF : We may assume that the
principal
minor consists of the first m rows and m columns :Then there
exists y
EM(m) ( =
the group M for the m x mmatrices),
suchthat y -
Y = A is ofdiagonal
form. Thenand
and hence
R(X) ~ R(A)
= m.where ri is
of (n-1)
x1,
thenfor
any x E 03A6.PROOF : Let
Since
at least one of the
~i’s,
say ~1, is non-zero. Then thereexists ’1 ~ A,
such that
(03B61, ~1)
= x. And then we haveThus
for any x E 03A6.
LEMMA 3.5.3:
if and only if ~ = 0, x = 0.
PROOF : Assume the rank is 0. If
x ~ 0,
thenwhich
implies
that the rank is non-zero, a contradiction.If ~ ~ 0,
thenby
theproof
of Lemma3.5.2,
and the latter is ~ 1
by
thepreceding
argument. Thus both xand q
are zero. The converse is trivial.
LEMMA 3.5.4:
where 03BE
isof (n -1) x
1.PROOF : This is
obviously
true for type D or E. Thus one may assume thatn0 ~ 4,
and hence it is sufficient to show thatBy
the methodemployed
in thepreceding
twolemmas,
it suffices to show thatR( ç ç*) ;£
1. If for some i, say i =1, ç 1 ç! =1= 0,
thenand hence
R(03BE03BE*)
= 1. If allçiçi
=0,
and for some i~ j,
say i =1, J
=2, (03BE1, 03BE2) ~ 0,
then(03BE1 + 03BE2)(03BE1 + 03BE2)* = (03BE1, 03BE2) ~
0. Thus we mayreplace 03BE1 by Çl
+Ç2
andagain
we haveR(03BE03BE*)
= 1.Finally,
assumethat all
(03BEi, ç)
= 0. Then thesubspace generated by ç/s
isisotropic,
and hence has dimension