• Aucun résultat trouvé

Localization of hubs in complex networks with overlapping modular structure

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Localization of hubs in complex networks with overlapping modular structure"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-03059191

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03059191

Submitted on 13 Dec 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Localization of hubs in complex networks with overlapping modular structure

Zakariya Ghalmane, Chantal Cherifi, Hocine Cherifi, Mohammed El Hassouni

To cite this version:

Zakariya Ghalmane, Chantal Cherifi, Hocine Cherifi, Mohammed El Hassouni. Localization of hubs in complex networks with overlapping modular structure. NetSci International School and Conference on Network Science, Sep 2020, Rome (Online), Italy. pp.1. �hal-03059191�

(2)

Localization of hubs in complex networks with overlapping modular structure

Zakariya Ghalmane Mohammed El Hassouni Chantal Cherifi Hocine Cherifi

University Mohammed V MOROCCO University of Lyon 2 FRANCE University of Burgundy FRANCE

Overlapping nodes

C

1

C

3

C

2

C

4

? Hubs

Problematic

Evaluation measures

Community detection

Ego-network of overlapping nodes

&

List of Hubs

Proportion of hubs Rank-biased overlap

Correlation

Degree distribution

Methodology

Empirical Networks

Results

Proportion of hubs Rank-biased overlap

Correlation

Degree distribution

University Mohammed V MOROCCO University of Burgundy FRANCE

Small Network Medium Network Large Network

Ego-Facebook network

Karate network Condense Matter network

Social network

N 34 E 78

Non Assortative Relatively high

density

Social network

N 4039 E 88234

Assortative Small density

Collaboration network

N 23133 E 93497

Assortative Very small

density

Overlapping nodes

Hubs

p = 77.6 %

P. overlapping nodes: 14.7 %

P. overlapping nodes (%)

Proportion of hubs (%)

ego-Facebook 3.1 59.25

ca-CondMat 2.1 79.57

Network

Network RBO

p=0.5 p=0.8 p=0.98 Karate club 0.998 0.952 0.844 Ego-facebook 0.998 0.952 0.844 ca-CondMat 1 0.999 0.999

Network Pearson Correlation

Spearman Correlation Karate club 0.991 0.98

ego-Facebook 0.985 0.98 ca-CondMat 0.989 0.99

Neighbors of the overlapping nodes

Hubs

Power law distribution

Ghalmane, Z., Cherifi, C., Cherifi, H., & El Hassouni, M. (2020). Exploring Hubs and Overlapping Nodes Interactions in Modular Complex Networks. IEEE

Access, 8, 79650-79683.

Références

Documents relatifs

If such a separable decomposition is not known, then it is an interesting problem to obtain a general algorithm for modular composition with a similar complexity (but this seems

Average clustering coefficient distribution as a function of degree for the co-authorship network DBLP and the associated networks of communities DBLP*.. Hop

We cumulated this score at the SCOP class level to obtain the probability for each amino acid to be a hub having a high connected occurrence in a protein SSE-IN, see Fig 11.. We

In a modular network, we can distinguish two types of influences for a node [1]: A local influence on the nodes belonging to its own community through the intra-community links, and

The modular centrality consid- ers two types of influences for a node in a modular network: A local influence on the nodes belonging to its own community through the

In order to characterize the influence of a node, various pieces of information are used such as the number of communities that the node can reach in one hop, the nature of the

The modulus of the Overlapping Modular Betweenness centrality performs better than the standard measure with an average gain that ranges between 39% and 47% in networks

Simulation results on different synthetic and real-world networks show that it outperforms Degree, Betweenness and Comm centrality in term of the epidemic size in networks with