• Aucun résultat trouvé

Evaluation of a semi-distributed model through an assessment of the spatial coherence of Intercatchment Groundwater Flows

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Evaluation of a semi-distributed model through an assessment of the spatial coherence of Intercatchment Groundwater Flows"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02603536

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02603536

Submitted on 16 May 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Evaluation of a semi-distributed model through an assessment of the spatial coherence of Intercatchment

Groundwater Flows

Alban de Lavenne, Guillaume Thirel, Vazken Andréassian, C. Perrin, M.H.

Ramos

To cite this version:

Alban de Lavenne, Guillaume Thirel, Vazken Andréassian, C. Perrin, M.H. Ramos. Evaluation of a semi-distributed model through an assessment of the spatial coherence of Intercatchment Groundwater Flows. EGU General Assembly 2016, Apr 2016, Vienna, Austria. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 18, pp.1, 2016. �hal-02603536�

(2)

EVALUATION OF A SEMI-DISTRIBUTED MODEL THROUGH AN ASSESSMENT

OF THE SPATIAL CONSISTENCY OF INTERCATCHMENT GROUNDWATER FLOWS

E P

Interception En

Pn-Ps Es

Pn

Ps

0.9 0.1

UH2

Q x1

x3 F(x2,x5)

Q1 Q9

Qd Qr

S

R Perc Production

store

Routing store

2.x4

Pr

F(x2,x5)

E P

Interception En

Pn-Ps Es

Pn

Ps

0.9 0.1

UH2

Q x1

x3 F(x2,x5)

Q1 Q9

Qd Qr

S

R Perc Production

store

Routing store

2.x4 Pr

F(x2,x5)

E P

Interception En

Pn-Ps Es

Pn

Ps

0.9 0.1

UH2

Q x1

x3 F(x2,x5)

Q1 Q9

Qd Qr

S

R Perc Production

store

Routing store

2.x4

Pr

F(x2,x5)

C C

Upstream catchment 1 Upstream catchment 2

Downstream catchment 3

1 2 3

Model structure 1 Model structure 2

IGF IGF IGF IGF

IGF IGF

We propose to evaluate two structures of a semi- distributed model using spatial consistency of simulated intercatchment groundwater flows (IGF).

The idea is that the water that is lost in one place should be recovered somewhere else within the catchment to guarantee a spatially consistent water balance in time.

IGF spatial consistency

Water balance analysis

Evaluation period: 1980−2010

Calibration period: 1980−1994 Evaluation period: 1980−2010

Calibration period: 1995−2010

0 10000 20000

Lumped GR5J

Semidistributed GR5J v1.0

Semidistributed GR5J v2.0 Lumped GR5J

Semidistributed GR5J v1.0

Semidistributed GR5J v2.0

Sum of mean annual IGF (m3/s) IGF sign

negative positive

- Structure 1: most of the water that is released to the groundwater is never recovered somewhere else.

- Structure 2: enables to nearly close the water balance for one of the two calibration periods.

- New constraints have to be found on the model structure and calibration in order to reinforce this spatial consistency.

- The two model structures give totally different maps of intercatchment groundwater flows.

- Structure 1: most of the catchments are leaking.

- Structure 2: leakage concerns mostly upstream

catchments whereas downstream catchments are gaining water (spatial consistency).

Model structure 1

Model structure 2

The semi-distributed model GRSD is based on an implementation of a lumped daily GR5J model (5 parameters) on each subcatchment. GR5J is composed of two stores: a production store (capacity X1) and a routing store (capacity X3), which is filled by the output of a unit hydrograph (of time base X4). Two other parameters, X2 and X5, are used to quantify the IGF. Outflow simulations of upstream catchments are routed downstream using a streamflow celerity (parameter C).

Two model structures are modelling intercatchment groundwater flow

in a different way (figure le�):

Structure 1: Upstream simulations are directly routed downstream so they

are not considered in IGF.

Structure 2: Upstream simulations are filling the downstream routing

reservoir, so it can be included in IGF. *de Lavenne A., Thirel G., Andréassian V., Perrin C., Ramos M.-H.

Irstea, HBAN, Antony, France. *[email protected]

GRSD model structure

EGU General Assembly 2016 – 18-22 April 2016 – Vienna – EGU2016-11745

Références

Documents relatifs

Prior to the mid-1990s, the leading mode of variability defines a large scale pattern, with concomitant variations in the Atlantic Water (AW) inflow in the Faroe-

judgments and consumers’ behavior knowledge have to be incorporated into the estimation of the operation parameters of the solar generation model: this information is

Throughout its history as a British colony, Ireland had periodically rebelled against Britain, particularly in the second half of the nineteenth century during which the

This workshop – jointly organised by the French and German space agencies, CNES and DLR – was embedded as satellite symposium into the Plant Biology Con- gress 2012, held by FESPB

Effect of routine controlled cord traction as part of the active management of the third stage of labour on postpartum haemorrhage: multicentre randomised controlled trial

Une très grande prudepce doit donc être exercée dans les mesures d’absorption des raies de résonance par les valeurs alcalines. Une telle incrustation des atomes alcalins ne

"Recognize position and orientation of, and identify various visually impaired children moving in two distant and limited areas and display programmable auditory

Conversions entre mm et cm (A) Effectuez les conversions