HAL Id: jpa-00247092
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00247092
Submitted on 1 Jan 1995
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Oil-Water Interface in the Widom Model: Is It Smooth, Rough or Crumpled?
Prabal Maiti, Debashish Chowdhury
To cite this version:
Prabal Maiti, Debashish Chowdhury. Oil-Water Interface in the Widom Model: Is It Smooth, Rough or Crumpled?. Journal de Physique I, EDP Sciences, 1995, 5 (6), pp.671-674. �10.1051/jp1:1995108�.
�jpa-00247092�
Classification
Pbysics
Abstracts68.lom 82.70y
Oil-Water Interface in the Widom Model: Is It Smooth, Rough
or
Crumpled?
Prabal K. Moiti and Debashish
Chowdhury
Department
ofPhysics,
Indian Institute ofTechnology, Kanpur
208016, India(Received
23 November 1994, revised 18January1995, accepted
6February 1995)
Abstract. Trie interface in trie two-dimensional
Ising
model withonly nearest-neighbour ferromagnetic
interactions is known ta berougir
at ail temperatures T > o. Trie Widom model for temary microemulsionsis, effectively,
aspin-1/2 Ising
modelwith,
DotOrly nearest-neighbour ferromagnetic interactions,
but aise specificfarther-neighbour antiferromagnetic
interactions.We
investigate
trie effects of thesefarther-neighbour
interactions m the Widom model on theroughening properties
of the interfaceby
carrymg eut Monte Carlo simulations.Temary
microemulsions are three component mixtures whereamphiphilic
molecules act assurfactants between oil and water
iii.
Several lattice models of these systems bave been pro-posed
and are similar inspirit
to trie lattice gas model for trieliquid-gas
transition[2].
Toour
knowledge,
trie Widom model [3] is triesimplest
among trie lattice models ofternary
microemulsions. Thisis, effectively,
aspin-1/2 Ising
model with notonly nearest-neighbour ferromagnetic interactions,
but also with fartherneighbour antiferromagnetic
interactions ofspecific type
descnbed below. Triefarther-neighbour
interactions arise from Widom'sprescrip-
tion forincorporating
triebending rigidity
of trieamphiphilic
membrane(a monolayer)
formedby
trie surfactants at the oil-water interface [4]. Trie interface between trie up-spm and down-spin
domains in trie two-dimensionalIsing
model withonly nearest-neighbour
interactions isknown to be
rougir
at ail non-zerotemperatures.
Trie atm of this communication is tostudy
trie effects of triefarther-neighbour antiferromagnetic
interactions m trie Widom model on trieroughening properties
of trie interface. In contrast to trie earlier seriesexpansion study
for trie three dimensional Widom modelby Kahng
et ai. [5] we carry out Monte Carlo Simulation of trie two dimensional Widom model.In trie Widom model trie
amphiphilic molecules,
as well as trie molecules of oit andwater,
areassumed to be located on trie
nearest-neighbour
bonds of asimple
cubic lattice. ClassicalIsing spins
areput
at each of trie lattice sites and one uses trie convention that each bond betweennearest-neighbour (+ +) spin pairs
isoccupied by
a molecule ofoil,
that between(--) spin pairs
isoccupied by
a molecule ofwater,
and that betweenanti-parallel nearest-neighbour spin pairs
isoccupied by
a surfactant. Trie Hamiltonian of triesystem
m ternis of trieIsing spin
©
Les Editions dePhysique
1995672 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
I N°6variables is
given by
[3]H
=
-J£ S~Sj
2M£ S~Sk
M£ Szsi (1)
where trie summations in trie
first,
second and trie third ternis on trieright
hand side are to be carried over thenearest-neighbour,
thesecond-neighbour,
and the fourthneighbour spin
pairs,respectively,
on asimple
cubic lattice. The interaction J ispositive (ferromagnetic),
whereas M isnegative (antiferromagnetic);
the latter anse from aparticular prescription, suggested by Widom,
fortaking
into account thebending
energy of theamphiphilic
membrane at trieinterface between oil and water. Trie M
= 0 limit of the Hamiltonian
(1)
is identical with theordinary Ising
Model with nearestneighbour
interactions on asimple
cubic lattice. The interface between domains of up and downspins
is known to berough
at all T#
0. The aim of this communication is toinvestigate
the effects ofnon-vanishing
M on theroughness
of thisinterface. We restrict our
investigation
to space dimension d= 2
only.
In space dimension d
=
2,
the Hamiltonian for the Widom model [6] isgiven by
trie same form as(1) except
that the summations in the third term on thenght
hand side is to be carried ont over triethird-neighbour spin pairs,
instead of triefourth-neighbour spin pairs.
Triephase diagram
of this model isusually given
in trie(j, m) plane,
where j=
J/kBT
and m=
M/kBT,
both in d
= 2 [6] and d = 3
[7,8].
We bave focused attentiononly
on that part of thephase diagram
on the(j, m) plane
where thedroplet phase (1.e.,
theferromagnetic phase
m triespin language)
isthermodynamically
stable.We have used the standard
technique
of Monte Carlo(MC)
simulation. Thesystem
consists ofL~
x(L~
+4)
latticewhere, by
convention X and Y denote the horizontal and verticaldirections, respectively.
Each site of the lattice isoccupied by
a classicalIsing spin
(S~ =+1).
Penodic
boundary
condition isapplied
in the X-direction whereas a fixedboundary
conditionis
applied
in theY-direction;
thespins
in the two uppermostlayers
remain "frozen"m the
up
(+)
state, while those in the two lowermostlayers
remain "frozen" in the down(-)
statethroughout
the simulation. In some of our runs we used an alternativeboundary
conditionwhere,
instead of fixedboundaries, anti-periodic boundary
condition wasapplied
in the Y-direction.
However,
within the accuracy of ourcomputation,
the data for these two sets ofboundary
conditions wereindistinguishable. Therefore,
almost all of ourproduction
runswere made with fixed
boundary
condition in the Y-direction.Application
of theseboundary
conditions are usedroutinely
mcreating
interfaces in theIsing
model wheremajority
of thespins
m the Upper half are m the up state, whereasmajority
of thespins
m the lower half arem the down state. For each set of values of
j,
m,L~
andL~
webegan
with an initial state m which all thespins
in the Upper half of thesystem
were in the up state whereas those in the lower half were in the downstate;
this initial conditionhelps
us in fasterequilibration
of thesystem.
Durcomputations
were carned out on DEC ALPHA PB22H-CX andHP9000/735
and the total CPU time
required
for theproduction
runs were 200 hours and 80 hours withspin updating speeds
of 20 millionupdates
and 1 millionupdates
persecond, respectively.
If the two nearest
neighbour
spms areantiparallel
we call trie bondconnecting
these twospms to be a "broken" one. After the
equilibration
of eachconfiguration,
we measured the number of broken bondsNb(1/)
as a function of the row-index y; m thedroplet phase (ferro- magnetic phase),
one expects a maximum mNb(v)
nearL~/2, provided
accurate data have beengenerated by averaging
over asufficiently large
number ofconfigurations. Moreover,
onecan calculate the width of the interface
by measuring
the full width at half maximum(FWHM)
m trie
plot
ofNb(v).
In
Figure
1 weplot Nb(v)
as a function of y for trie parameter valuesj
= 1.0 and m=
0;
thiscorresponds
to atwo-dimensiona1Ising
model withonly nearest-neighbour
interactions. The30 CO 500 00
L, 2000 L, 20000
400 00 60 00
~ 300 00
j 40 00 £
200 00
20 où
ioo oo
~)
~~ ~~ ~~ b '°° Où 150 00~ ~~
y
Fig.
l. Twotypical plots
ofNb(y)
for j = 1-o, m = o-o are shown. L~= 2000 in
la)
and 20000 in(b). Ly
= 200 in both(a)
and(b).
Trie data m(a)
and(b)
bave been obtainedby
averaging over 20 and 6configurations, respectively.
18 oo
1300
~
~fi
8 00
/
3
0 00
~ i/z
2.
interactions
1.e., = o) are plotted against LÎ/~ for
three
different valuesof j.
figures
1(a)
and(b) respond
to
L~
=2000
and 20000, respectively. Similar plots ereobtained
for
j= 1.25,
m=
o-o and j
= 1.6,
m=
o-o- Sincetwo-dimensional Ising dels are known to vary as fi~ ith
trie length L~ we show m Figure
2
that
our data are, deed,consistent with
this
behaviour. oreover,
note
that for triesaine
L, trie smaller trie value
of
j trie larger triewidth
of trie nterface, as itext, in Figure 3, we plothe width
of
the interface as afunction
of 4~ for trieof
jas m
Figure
2,
but now fornon-zero values of m. Clearly, trie nterface is still rougir in
spiteof the on-zero
values
of thefarther-neighbour interactions. Moreover,
note
that, for given L and j,trie interface
iswider
Ising interface for
which
m =0.
This ansesfrom
trie fact that, for
given j, trie
system
is doser674 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
I N°61800 J=10 m=-002
O
~
~1300
W10,
~
Î
j
O~l
6 m=-0 08
8 00
i~' 6, m=0 0
3 00
30
~,/2
Fig.
3. Trie width of the interface of trie Widom model (1.e., J#
ù, m# ù)
areplotted against LÎ/~
for two different values ofj;
thecorresponding plots
for m= 0 are also
given
forcomparison.
to trie critical
point
forlarger
value of m aslong
as triesj,stem
remains in trieferromagnetic phase.
We conclude that
although
thefarther-neighbour
interactions m the Widom mortel bavecrucially important
effects on trie bulkphase diagram
of triesystem,
thesebave, however,
noobservable elfect on trie
roughening properties
of trieinterface,
except that trie interface is wider when m#
0 than when m= 0 because of trie doser
proximity
to trie cnticalpoint
incase of non-zero m.
Acknowledgments
We thank D. Stauifer for
suggesting
theproblem
durin~ a short visit of one of us(DC)
tuCologne;
the visit wasfinancially supported by
SFB341 and tue Richard Nixon fund. We also thank D. Stauffer for useful discussions and comments on themanuscript.
References
iii
Micellar Solutions andMicroemulsions,
S. H. Chen and R.Rajagopalan,
Eds.(Springer, Berlin, 199ù).
[2]
Gompper
G. and Schick M., Modem Ideas and Problemsm
Amphiphile Science,
W. Gelbert, D.Roux and A.
Ben.Shaui,
Eds.(Springer 1993).
[3] Widom B., J. Chem.
Phys.
84(lQ86)
6943.[4] Helfrich
W.,
Z.Naturforsch.
C 28(1973)
~93.[Si
Kahng B.,
Rerera A. and DawsonK.A.,
Phys. Rev. A 42(199ù)
6ù93.[fil Morawietz D.,
Chow~dhury
D., Vollmar S. and Stauffer D.,Physica
A 187(1992)
126.[7] Jan N. and Stauffer
D.,
J.i~hys.
France 49(1988)
623.[8] Dawson K-A-, Lipkin M.D. and lN'idom B., J. Chem. Phys. 88