A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 1
In case there is no infiltration under the dam, the angle α is given by So that
γ b =2 γ e
From where
In case with infiltration under the dam, the angle a is given by So that
From where
A B
y
x α H
Sol O
γ
eγ
bThe Airy stress function associated with this
loading is :
( , ) sin
A r θ = cPr θ θ
Show that A(r, θ ) is biharmonic.
Determine the components of the stress tensor.
Determine the constant c as a function of angle α . Calculate the stresses when α = π /2.
Tutorial 1 (continued) : Semi infinite plane under point load
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 3
2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1
( ) A A A
A r r r r θ r r r r θ
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
∆ ∆ = + + + +
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
( , ) sin
A r θ = cPr θ θ
The stress function A(r, θ ) is well biharmonic
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 4
The stresses are defined by the following expressions
( , ) sin
A r θ = cPr θ θ
The balance of forces is written to determine the constant c :
If α=π /2, the constant c is -1/π
and the stress σ r is the given by :
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 5
Tutorial 1 (continued) : Stress field in a plate loaded in tension and pierced with a tiny hole
σ
∞σ
∞x y
r θ
2 2
M
( , ) ln f
2cos 2
A r br c r d er
θ = + + + + r θ
The Airy stress function associated with this
loading is :
Show that ( , ) is biharmonic Determine the stress , , ( is the radius of the hole)
r r
A r
a
θ θ
θ
σ σ τ
2 2
( , ) ln f
2cos 2
A r br c r d er
θ = + + + + r θ
σ
∞
σ
∞x y
r θ M
infinite plate loaded in tension and pierced by a circular hole of radius a
2 2
2 2 2
1 1
A A A
A r r r r θ
∂ ∂ ∂
∆ = + +
∂ ∂ ∂
3
2 2 2 cos 2
A c f
br er
r r r θ
∂
= + + −
∂
2
2 2 4
2 2 6 cos 2
A c f
b e
r r r θ
∂
= − + +
∂
2
2
2
4
2cos 2
A f
d er
r θ
θ
∂
= − + +
∂
2
4 4 d cos 2
A b
r θ
∆ = −
3
8 cos 2
A d
r r θ
∂∆ = ∂
2
2 4
24 cos 2
A d
r r θ
∂ ∆ = −
∂
2
2 2
16 cos 2
A d
r θ
∂ ∆ = θ
∂
( A ) 0
∆ ∆ =
( , ) is well bi-harmonic
A r θ
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 7
, 2 , , ,
,
1 1 1
r r rr r
r
A A A A
r r
θθ θ θr
θσ σ τ
= + = = −
2 2
( , ) ln f
2cos 2
A r br c r d er
θ = + + + + r θ
σ
∞σ
∞x y
r θ M
3
2 2 2 cos 2
A c f
br er
r r r θ
∂
= + + −
∂
2
2 2 4
2 2 6 cos 2
A c f
b e
r r r θ
∂
= − + +
∂
2
2
2
4
2cos 2
A f
d er
r θ
θ
∂
= − + +
∂
2 2 4
2 2 4 6 cos 2
r
c d f
b e
r r r
σ = + − + + θ
2 42 c 2 6 f cos 2
b e
r r
σ
θ= − + + θ
2 4
2 2 6 sin 2
r
d f
e r r
τ
θ= − − θ
2
2
2sin 2
A f
d er
r θ
θ
∂
− = + +
∂
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 8
Boundary conditions at ∞ , ie far from the hole
0 0 0
( , ) 0 0
0 0 0
σ x y σ
∞
=
( , ) r P ( , ) x y
tP
σ θ = ⋅ σ ⋅ cos sin cos sin 0 0
0 0 1
P
θ θ
θ θ
= −
2
2
sin (1 cos 2 )
2
cos (1 cos 2 )
2
sin cos sin 2 2
r
r θ
θ
σ σ θ σ θ
σ σ θ σ θ
τ σ θ θ σ θ
∞ ∞
∞ ∞
∞ ∞
= = −
= = +
= =
at ∞ r >> a
2 2
2 2
b e
σ σ
∞
∞
=
=
σ
∞σ
∞x y
r θ
M
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 9
Boundary conditions at r=a
( , ) ( , ) 0
r a a
σ θ τ θ = = ∀ θ
2 4 2 6 4 cos 2
2 2
r
c d f
a a a
σ σ
σ = ∞ + − ∞ + + θ
2 4
2 6 sin 2
r 2
d f
a a
θ σ
τ = ∞ − − θ
2
2 4
2
4
2 4
4 6
2 2
2 et 6 3
2 6
2 2
d f
d a
a a
c a
d f
f a
a a
σ σ
σ
σ σ
∞ ∞
∞
∞ ∞
+ = − = −
= −
+ = =
σ
∞σ
∞x y
r θ M
2 2 4
2 2 4
2 4
2 4
2 4
2 4
1 1 4 3 cos 2
2 2
1 1 3 cos 2
2 2
1 2 3 sin 2
2
r
r
a a a
r r r
a a
r r
a a
r r
θ
θ
σ σ
σ θ
σ σ
σ θ
τ σ θ
∞ ∞
∞ ∞
∞
= − − − +
= + + +
= + −
2 2 4
2 2 4 6 cos 2
r
c d f
b e
r r r
σ = + − + + θ
2 4
2 c 2 6 f cos 2
b e
r r
σ
θθ= − + + θ
2 4
2 2 6 sin 2
r
d f
e r r
τ
θ= − − θ
2 2
2 2
b e
σ σ
∞
∞
=
=
( , 0) a 3 σ
θ= σ
∞3 σ
∞σ
∞2
c = − σ 2 ∞ a
2
4
2 6 3
2
d a
f a
σ σ
∞
∞
= −
=
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 11
Airy stress function for few loadings (1)
, , ,
x
A
yy yA
xx xyA
xyσ = σ = σ = −
( , )
2Beam in traction A x y = ay
( , ) Beam in shear A x y = axy
3
Beam subjected to ( , )
bending moment A x y ay
=
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 12
Airy stress function for few loadings (2)
( , )
3A x y axy bxy
= +
2 2 3 2 3 5
( , )
A x y ax bx y cy dx y ey
= + + + +
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 13
Airy stress function for few loadings (3)
Axisymmetric loading 1
, ,r
A
rA
rr r0
r
θ θσ = σ = τ =
( , ) ( )
2A r θ = A r = Cr
( , ) ( ) ln
2A r θ = A r = a r + cr
2 2
( , ) ( ) ln ln
A r θ = A r = a r + br r + cr
Airy stress function for few loadings (4)
, 2 , , ,
,
1 1 1
r r rr r
r
A A A A
r r
θθ θ θr
θσ = + σ = τ = −
( , ) sin
A r θ = cr θ θ
( , ) sin 2
A r θ = a θ + b θ
( , ) cos
A r θ = cr θ θ
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 15
Complex formulation of the Airy stress function
- Holomorphic functions (or analytical functions)
z x iy z x iy
= +
RS = −
M(x,y) T
x y
= +
= −
R S ||
T ||
x z z y z z i 2 2 ( , ) x y ∈ Plan →
gg x y ( , ) ( , ) x y → ( , ) z z →
gg z z ( , )
( )
( )
, , ,
, , ,
1 The derivation rules are 2
1 2
z x y
z x y
g g ig
g g ig
= −
= +
g g g
g i g g
x z z
y z z
, , ,
,
(
, ,)
= +
= −
RS T
P P x y Q Q x y
=
RS =
T ( , ) ( , ) g = + P iQ
is holomorphic if g 0
g ∂ = z
∂
g z g
x i g ' ( ) = ∂ y
∂ = − ∂
∂ E
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 16
* Properties oy analytic functions
g P iQ dg
dz g
x i g
= + = ∂ y
∂ = − ∂ avec ∂
Cauchy conditions
P Q
x y
P Q P Q
i i
P Q
x x y y
y x
∂ ∂
∂ ∂
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
∂ ∂
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
∂ ∂
=
+ = − +
= −
∆ P = ∆ Q =
E
0
The real or imaginary parts of an analytic function, are harmonic
⇐
Conversely, if ( , ) and ( , )
is an analytic function verify the Cauchy conditions
P x y Q x y
g P iQ
= +
- If g is an analytical function, its derivative and its integral are also
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 17
Examples of analytic functions
e inz , z n and ln z are analytic functions. Their real and imaginary parts that are harmonic, can be determined.
( )
( ) ( )
( ) (cos sin )
The associated harmonic fonctions are cos and sin
inz in x iy ny
inz in x iy in x iy
ny ny
f z e e e nx i nx
df f df f df
ine ine ne i
dz x dz y dz
e nx e nx
+ −
+ +
− −
= = = +
∂ ∂
= = = = − =
∂ ∂
i
Exchanging n by –n, it is seen that e ny cosnx and e ny sinnx are also harmonics. It follows that sinhny sinnx, coshny sinnx, sinhny cosnx and coshny cosnx, obtained by linear combination of the preceding harmonic functions, are also harmonic.
The hyperbolic sine and hyperbolic cosine functions are defined by
sinh cosh
2 2
ny ny ny ny
e e e e
ny ny
− −
− +
= =
1 1 1
( ) ( ) ( ) (cos sin )
( ) ( )
The associated harmonic fonctions are cos and sin
n n ei n n
n n n
n n
f z z x iy r r n i n
df f df f df
nz n x iy in x iy i
dz x dz y dz
r n r n
θ θ θ
θ θ
− − −
= = + = = +
∂ ∂
= = + = = + =
∂ ∂
i
( ) ln ln( ) ln( ) ln
1 1
The associated harmonic fonctions are ln and
f z z x iy re i r i
df f df f i df
dz z x x iy dz y x iy i dz
r
θ θ
θ
= = + = = +
∂ ∂
= = = = =
∂ + ∂ +
i
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 19
Expressions of the Airy stress function
∆ ∆ Α b g = 0 If P = ∆ A then ∆ = P 0 is harmonic P
( ) is analytic with
P Q
x y
f z P iQ
P Q
y x
∂ ∂
∂ ∂
∂ ∂
∂ ∂
=
= +
= −
Calculating the harmonic function ( , ) Q x y
Q Q
dQ dx dy
x y
P P
Q dQ dx dy
y x
∂ ∂
∂ ∂
∂ ∂
∂ ∂
= +
= = − +
( ) 1 ( ) is also analytic function 4 4
4
p q
z f z dz p iq P
x y
∂ ∂
ϕ = = + = ∂ = ∂
1 1 1 1
If p = Α − px − qy then ∆ = p 0 χ ( ) z = p + iq is analytic function
A px qy p
z z z
z z z z z z
= + + = +
= + + +
R S|
1
T| 1
2 Α Α
Re ϕ χ
ϕ χ ϕ χ
b g b g b g b g b g b g
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 20
Stresses expressions
σ
x+ i σ
xy= Α
,yy− i Α
,xy= − i d Α
,x+ i Α
,yi
y= − i c 2 Α
,zh
,y= 2 c Α
,zz− Α
,zzh
, , ,
x yy
y xx
xy xy
σ σ σ
= Α
= Α
= −Α
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
' ' '' ''
x
i
xyz z z z z
σ σ ϕ ϕ ϕ χ
+ = + − −
g g ig
g g ig
z x y
z x y
, , ,
, , ,
= −
= +
R S|
T|
1 2 1 2
d i
d i g g
xi g g
zg g
zy z z
, , ,
,
(
, ,)
= +
= −
RS T
( ) ( )
Expression of the stress function from the potential complex ( ) and ( )
1 ( ) ( )
2
z z
z z z z z z
ϕ χ
ϕ χ ϕ χ
Α = + + +
σ
yσ
xy xx xy x yx z x zz zz
i i i
− = Α
,+ Α
,= Α
,+ Α
,= Α = Α + Α
, , , , ,
d i 2 c h 2 c h
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
' ' '' ''
y
i
xyz z z z z
σ σ ϕ ϕ ϕ χ
− = + + +
σ
y+ σ
x= 2 e ϕ ' b g z + ϕ ' d i z j = 4 Re c ϕ ' b g z h
( ) ( )
( )
2 2 '' ''
y x
i
xyz z z
σ σ − + σ = ϕ + χ
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 21
Displacements expressions
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
µ ε σ λ
λ µ σ σ λ µ
λ µ σ σ σ
µ ε σ λ
λ µ σ σ λ µ
λ µ σ σ σ
x x x y x y y
y y x y x y x
= −
+ + = +
+ + −
= −
+ + = +
+ + −
R S ||
T || b gd i b gd i
b gd i b gd i
= +
+ −
= +
+ −
R S ||
T |
|
2 2
2
2 2
2 µ ε λ µ
λ µ µ ε λ µ λ µ
x xx
y yy
b g
b g
∆ Α Α
∆ Α Α
,
,
∆A P p
x q
= = 4 ∂ = 4 y
∂
∂
∂
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
,
,
2 2 2
2 2 2
x x
y y
u p y
u q x
λ µ
µ α
λ µ λ µ
µ β
λ µ
= + − Α +
+
= + − Α +
+
avec α β
y cy d
x cx d
b g b g = − + = +
RS T
12( ) 2 ( ) (
, ,)
2 µ u
xiu
y2 λ µ p iq
xi
yλ µ
+ = + + − Α + Α
+
g g ig
g g ig
z x y
z x y
, , ,
, , ,
= −
= +
R S|
T|
1 2 1 2
d i
d i Α
,x+ i Α
,y= ∂ ∂
A
d i 2 z
( ) 2 ( ) 2 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2 u
xiu
y2 z 2 2 z z z ' z ' z
z
λ µ ∂ λ µ
µ ϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ χ
λ µ ∂ λ µ
+ Α +
+ = − = − − −
+ +
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2 µ U
x+ iU
y= κ ϕ z − z ϕ ' z − χ ' z
3 3 4 for plane strain with
3 for stress plane 1
λ µ v κ λ µ κ ν
ν
= + = − +
= − +
eθ
x
er
θ θ
y
e x y
e x y
r
= +
= − +
RS T
θcos . sin . θ θ sin . cos . θ θ e e
θrx y
θ θ
θ θ
F HG I KJ = F
HG I
KJ −
F HG I
KJ
P avec P : cos sin sin cos u
u u u
u u
u u
r x
y
x y
x y
θ
θ θ
θ θ
F HG I KJ = F
HG I
KJ = F − + +
HG I
KJ
P cos sin
sin cos
u
r+ iu
θ= e
−iθ( u
x+ iu
y) 2 µ ( u
r+ iu
θ) = e
−iθ( κ ϕ ( ) z − z ϕ ' ( ) ( ) z − χ ' z )
σ σ
h
e eθh
x ytr
P P
,
=
, σ σ
θ−
r+ 2 σ σ i σ
rr+
θ=
θe =
2iθσ σ (
xσ σ +
y−
y x+ 2 i σ
xy)
( ) ( )
( )
2 2
2i'' ''
r
i
re
θz z z
θ θ
σ σ − + σ = ϕ + χ
* System coordinates change
Because we will use of polar coordinates in the solution of many
problems in elasticity, the previous governing equations will now be
developed in this curvilinear system.
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 23
3 3
Let ( ; , , ) denote the Cartesian coordinates system and ( ; , , ) a coordinate system associated with curvilinear coordinates , .
O x y x M α β x
α β
The complex number is associated with the , coordinates and the complex is associated with the curvilinear coordinates , .
z x iy x y
ζ α i β α β
= +
= +
As ( , ) and ( , ), then we have : ( ) and '( )
x x y y
z f dz f
d
α β α β
ζ ζ
ζ
= =
= =
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 24
We easily show that '( ) | '( ) | , in other words that the argument of the complex number is equal to , the angle between the two coordinate
systems respectively associated with , and , .
f f e
ix y ζ ζ
θθ
α β
=
arg '( ) arg dz arg arg , ,
f dz d u x u
ζ d ζ α θ
= ζ = − = − =
So we have '( ) | f ζ = f '( ) | ζ e
iθand '( ) | f ζ = f '( ) | ζ e
−iθso that '( )
2'( ) = f
if e ζ θ
ζ
( ) and dz '( )
z f f
ζ d ζ
= ζ =
A. Zeghloul Fracture mechanics, damage and fatigue – Plane elasticity 25