I-Li]
Architectural Intensification:
Patterns of Use and Construction Assemblage
as Opportunity for Elaboration
By Charles Treister
B.A., Princeton University, 1978
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of
Master of Architecture at the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
June, 1981
@ Charles Treister 1981
The Author hereby grants to M.I.T. permission to reproduce and distribute publicly copies of this thesis document in whole or in part.
Signature of Author
Department of Architecture February 11, 1981
Certified by
Maurice Smith, Professor of Architecture Thesis Supervisor
f
Accepted byProfessor Imre Halasz, Chairman
,eartmental Committee for Graduate Students
JUN 1
K1381
UBABIES
1~
LII
Architectural Intensification:Patterns of Use and Construction Assemblage as Opportunities for Elaboration
by Charles Treister
Submitted to the Department of Architecture on February 6, 1981, in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of Master of Architecture.
ABSTRACT
The loss of small scale elements and the lack of opportunity for personal elaboration has been an area of failure in contemporary buildings. These small scale elements are essential in
providing human scale, enabling useful inhabitation, and giving a sense of place.
This study attempts to define a design approach in which small scale elements and details will be an intrinsic outgrowth of the building process. The fulfillment of utilitarian conditions; use patterns, structure, and
construction, form the basis of this approach rather than the application of some "decoration" to the basic form. This approach calls for
the intensification of design decisions, based on utility and maintaining the integrity of earlier decisions. Built intensification
serves as the optional aesthetic manner in which a utilitarian distinction is made.
This theory of intensification is studied through a design of an infill system of interior elements to be used in multi-family housing. This system relies on standardized elements, shop
fabricated, which can be custom assembled within each dwelling to meet the particular programatic needs of the inhabitant. These elements, which would serve as storage, use surfaces and
separation, would also be amenable to personal elaboration and rearrangement by the occupant at a later time.
One typical dwelling unit, taken from the context of a larger housing project that I designed, serves as the area to be inhabited. There are four phases of the design process of
this infill system. Each of the phases is illustrated through drawings and photographs of a model. The four phases of the design process are: 1) the primary structural zone;
2) the catalogue of interior elements and their details; 3) the assemblage of these elements in the primary structure; and 4) the details,
connections and further intensification of the assembled pieces.
Thesis Supervisor: Maurice Smith Title: Professor of Architecture
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my gratitude to Professor Maurice Smith, who has provided valuable insights and thoughtful criticism on this project. My appreciation goes to Professor Edward Allen and G Wolf for their advice and direction.
Many thanks I would like to extend to Fernando Ca and Michael Sela for their support, advice, and 1 throughout the term. I extend my gratitude to Jo
Alan Joslin, Mark Landsberg, and Chip Pinkham for
help on this project , and for their friendship a
discussions throughout my time at M.I.T.
Most special thanks go to my parents , for all of
support, and to Lisa, who has made this semester, especially January, one of the happiest times of
ary stro aughs n Alff, their nd their and my life.
Table of Contents
A. Introduction... 5
B. The Design Problem: Multi-Family Housing.. 8
The Design C. The Housing Context... 12
D. Concrete Intensification ... 15
E. The Dwelling Support... 23
F. Catalog of Interior Elements ...29
G. Details of Interior Elements ...37
H. Combination of Elements... 46
I. Options of Assemblage... 55
J. Details of Assemblage... 62
Introduction
The Human Dimension in Buildings
Human beings perceive the built environment on both the large and small scale. Spatial
qualities and massing are each important to our experience of a building but it is the small qualities -- materials, textures, sizes that we intimately appreciate. Small-size elements help us to establish a sense of
scale: we know that a doorknob, for instance, is the size of our hand. Often, these small dimensions are reflections of material sizes and hand crafting, and provide us with visual clues for understanding a particular
environment. Many times, the small-scale elements are pragmatic parts of their context: chairs, benches, desks, beds. These pragmatic elements whose dimensions
are based on the size of the human body are essential, enabling us to relate directly to our environment.
The Loss of the Small Scale
All too often in recent architectural
history, buildings have been produced which
F.C. Bogk Residence, Milwaukee, by
lack in small scale characteristics. For most Wright; in Global Interiors #9,
of the architects in the Modern Movement, and for many designers practicing today, the
primary concern was on the overall form of a
Frank Llyod
L!n~roduction
_______ _____ _______building and its spatial qualities. These architects consciously chose to subordinate material distinctions and small detail in
favor of a building's larger elements. In addition, modern construction methods, with an emphasis on the "gypsum building," have also served to undermine a traditional concern for fine scale details.
Elaboration: The Desire to Personalize our World Many of today's buildings also suffer from a related problem: they are placeless and with-out context. Throughout history, people have elaborated utilitarian objects and buildings
in order to signify ownership, convey feelings of value or place, or to commemorate an event. At its root, this process of "ornamentation" expresses a human need to personalize or make
special. Often it is the elaboration of an element rather than its basic form that relates an object to a specific time, place or culture. Today, however, as a result of a singular
professional attitude among architects and construction practices which stress uniformity and standardization, buildings throughout the world are remarkably similar.
The desire to personalize one's surroundings and the need for human scale references often converge; elaboration usually occurs at small
scales. The application to architecture, however, must be integral; one does not first build a
structure and then tack on some superfluous
,(,-t ~~-g I' ~ r * p 4..,L Tf
--Midway Gardens, Chicago, by Frank Llyod Wright;
in The Work of F.L.W., The Wendingen Edition p.69.
ornament. Rather, one should build in such a way that each design decision carries into the next, and elaboration strengthens the utility and integrity of a structure, while at the same time allowing it to develop a human scale.
Introduction--
--
,
Glasgow School of Art Library, by Charles Rennie
Mackintosh; in Mackintosh Arch., p. 25.
Intensification of Previous Design Decisions Elaboration is not the addition of an
ornamental motif to a finished design. Rather, I believe in an elaboration based on construction and use, an elaboration which intensifies
previous design decisions-. As Antonio Gaudi stated,: "Our furniture and buildings demand the fulfillment of an infinite number of
conditions, which if clearly laid out in an adequate and organized manner already provide for the basis of ornamentation." The basis of ornamentation, lies not in some pictorial or artistic motif, but in the rationally.
conceived building process itself, a process of intensifying design based on use and
construction.
Patterns of Use and Construction Assemblage
A process based on patterns of use implies
consideration of the dimensions of the human body, consideration of the sizes, shapes, and textures of the objects that we need to carry out our daily lives, and consideration of physical, accoustical, and visual climates that we need to conduct our personal and communal activities. Building to recognize patterns of use involves specifically an
understanding of use dimensions. Vertical ones such as siting, writing, and passage as
well as horizontal ones that range from storage to inhabitation. A process
based on construction considers the manner
of building; the sizes and shapes of
building materials, the intrinsic qualities
of these materials, how they fit together.to
provide structural integrity, and the durability
and propriety of each structural decision,
A Process of Building
These descriptions are purposely broad,
and there are a variety of solutions that can
fillfill these criteria. The purpose of this
study is to acknowledge the vast number of
possible alternatives, and to address an
attitude towards architecture which Frank
Lloyd Wright dubbed "integral ornamentation":
an attitude that claims that small scale detail
and elaboration can be, and must be, intrinsic
parts of the building process.
The Design Problem: Multi- Family
Housin
I chose to develop my thesis on
"Intensification" in the area of contemporary
multi-family housing, an area which clearly
suffers from lack of elaboration and small
scale detail.
The dwelling units in most
current housing projects suffer from numerous
intrinsic problems.
Problems in Current Housing
Design
Attitudes Restrict Growth - Eachactivity, whether it be public or private, is
assigned an area of space, usually in the shape
of a rectangle, and solid walls are constructed
around that area.
These boxes, called rooms,
are arranged to form a dwelling.
This design
attitude gives no consideration to specific use
patterns for using these spaces, nor does it
allow any type of optional partial definition Peabody Terraceormitories, Harvard Univ., Camb
by Jose Luis Sert; in Bastlund, Jose Luis Sen
such as screens or openings.
v.
230Walls Hinder Human Intervention - The
walls in most multi-family housing projects
provide no use other than separation.
The
inhabitant is forced to create his or her own
useful conditions through the arrangement of
furniture; beds, desks, shelves, and closets,
for inhabitation and internal clarity. While
it is beneficial for the inhabitant to have
ridge
The Design Problem
Peabody Terrace Dormitories, Harvard Univ., Cambridge, by Jose Luis Sert; in Bastlund, Jose Luis Sert, p. 231.
some control over the use of the living
environment, the wall as simple separation
provides no clue to utility and actually
inhibits the occupant's opportunity to
intervene.
Surfaces Resist Elaboration - Walls
reveal no horizontal markings, useful surfaces,
or other clues to lend a human scale to a room.
Generally, there are no distinctions in building
materials:
gypsum board runs from floor to
ceiling. A paper material, such as gypsum,
does not lend itself to elaboration or
personalization, even to the limited extent
of allowing occupants to erect shelves or
hang artworks.
Layouts Defy Individuality
-
The layouts
of multi-family dwelling units are standardized
according to size or type and then repetitively
stamped out.
Inhabitants of these units, who
have a variety of personal preferences and/or
spatial requirements, are confined to a given
number of rooms, of limited dimensions, in a
single, restricted arrangement.
Construction Defies Revision - Because
of the fixed nature of the walls in contemporary
mass housing projects, any additions or changes
an inhabitant may wish to make within a dwelling
unit require major efforts and expense for
demolition and reconstruction.
The Problem with Custom Design
The goal of this study is the creation of
an architectural vocabulary which makes reference
to human dimensions and which is replete with
detailed, small-scale distinctions and
elaboration. Historically, such a vocabulary
has been possible through custom design work.
The skilled hands of a craftsman can combine
carefully carved and milled pieces in a way
that glorifies intricate personal details.
Customized built-in furniture and moldings
can establish a human scale and a sense of
elaboration that many of today's buildings
lack.
Economics, however, prevent the
wide-spread application of customized solutions;
[The Design Problem
skilled labor and finished materials simply
cost too much money for most people.
Only
the very wealthy could afford a building
system which relied solely on
custom-designed and crafted elements.
The Premise of the Study:
Custom Assemblage
My proposition, therefore, is to design
a system of standardized elements which can
be assembled in unique and diverse ways, and
which will reveal large level of smallscale
detail.
These elements would come in a
variety of sizes and shapes in order to meet
a range of programmatic conditions, and they
would be amenable to individual intensification
through the addition of other elements at a
later time.
Only a limited amount of custom
work would be done on-site in order to
establish effective connections between the
combinations of standard elements.
All of
these standard elements would be manufactured
in a shop.
Durable, detailed, diverse, and
dynamic, the entire system would also be
readily affordable.
As a premise for a model that attempts
to solve the problems found in contemporary
housing projects, I adopted the basic attitude
of the S.A.R. Housing Group from the Netherlands,
whose method calls for the inhabitants of a
housing project to establish their own dwelling
arrangements based on a number of optional
variations. Under the S.A.R. system, the architect is responsible for designing the public spaces in a housing project, the access and circulation, and the primary "support" structures, which would be built to accept the greatest possible range of unit plans.
With assistance from the architect, inhabitants would design their own unit plans, drawing
on their own needs and individual preferences.
m
r I Th D t- ia Prohlem
esC1k.#Cblg I- A£ lJ
Design Process
For the purposes of this study, I am concerning myself with the design of the dwelling and its inhabitation. The context of this dwelling unit will be provided in a multi-family housing design which I previously proposed for Brookline, Mass. The site, overall building form and primary unit support are taken from this design. The design process of specific dwelling
units then breaks down into four levels:
1. Primary Support: The architect designs a structural framework of floor slabs and some vertical containment walls. These are built with poured-in-place concrete. 2. Secondary Infill: The architect designs
a variety of closure and infill pieces
which are standardized and shop fabricated.
3. Custom Unit Design: The inhabitant and/or architect designs a specific living unit using on-site labor for custom assembly of the standardized secondary elements.
4. Modification of Elements: The inhabitants adapt and modify their units over time
by moving, changing, adding to, or
subtracting from the original assembly of elements.
Intensification of the design occurs at all four levels of intervention. At the primary
support level: surface intensifications of
the poured-in-place concrete are possible. The individual standardized elements can be
intensified in the design of the secondary infill. The pattern of assemblage and the connections between elements creates an opportunity for intensification at the third level of the dwelling unit design. These assemblages can be further intensified
by the inhabitants at the fourth level, by
the addition of personalizing pieces and through modification.
I
iij
12
The Housing Context
The housing design which serves as a
context for this thesis was proposed as part
of an earlier MIT studio under Professor
Maurice Smith in 1980.
Located in Brookline,
Mass., the mid-rise housing was intended to
provide a favorable alternative in terms of
personal control and communal living, to
the detached housing or high-rise slabs that
currently exist in the neighborhood.
The site
eliminates the rectilinear block grid in favor
of more intense green belts that would weave
through the area, with access to the buildings
provided on paved drives.
The buildings
orient around a series of common courts, upon
which open balconies, and exposed promenades
would provide view and allow access between
the units and the court. The dwelling units
(which are described in detail later) were
developed as a concrete support structure,
only as a context for dwelling.
Actual
in-habitation would be provided through secondary
less permanent elements under the control of
the inhabitants.
The schematic design of
this housing then serves as the starting off
point for this thesis design study of the
details and assemblage of the interior
elements
Building Axonometric showing southern face with access.FHousing
Context
* -
--_ *
SITE PLAN, SECTION, & BUILDING MA
ARCHITECTURAL INTENSIFICATIONooCHARLES TREISTER
M AS MASTER'S T H ESIS o OOMASSACHIJSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECH NOLOGY OODFAL L 1930
SSING
f aF
The Housing Context
14
BUILDING SECTION & ENTRY COURT PLAN
ARCHITECTURLINTENSIFICATIONooCH A R LES TREISTER
ASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY aoOFALL 1950
0 - -~ -U,
A R C H I T E C T U R A L MA51ER'S T HESIS o o OM
Concrete Intensification
Pouring the concrete for the primary
system is the first step in the construction
process.
Intensifying this concrete is
dependent on its material properties and the
method involved in construction. The plastic
qualities of the concrete must be handled within
the constraints imposed by its method of
forming.
In addition, the structural properties
of the concrete must also be taken into account.
Where there is high structural stress, the
positioning of steel reinforcing bars place
constraints on the thickness and shape of
the concrete.
Because it leaves a visible impression on
the finished concrete, the deposition of
formwork should form the basis for any process
of intensification. Numerous patterns can be
created through the manipulation of the shape,
type, texture, and securing method of the
formwork.
Points of contact, such as corners
and the junctures between column and slab,
require special treatment during the forming
process and therefore provide special potential
for intensification. As the base from which
the rest of the building develops, the concrete
must provide a receptive environment for the
Imperial Hotel, Tokyo, by Frank Llyod Wright; in James,
The Imperial Hotel.
secondary infill
and, at the same time,
maintain the clear continuity of the overall
building structure.
I
Concrete Intensification
4
jVFLT
T
7I~~
;ii~
-- .-- -Ail-.*.
.9
u...
1ME.rAJ~
-V
4~VLfIt1i~1~
--- 'i-i
Liii
I'
7~AW4~ ~
LA RC H I-TEICTU R A L M A ST E R' S T HE S IS aoaDM) I N T E N S I F A S S A C H U S E T T S t~. 85, 0 eq I C A T IO N o o I N S T I T U T E OFFORMWORK & FINISHES
CHARLES TREI STER
TECHNOLOGY 0o OFALL 1980 7-i. -4 - -b * .8.
*
* -.i-;nI-
IELI * . - . . .~HI
IlL
~1$~%oA
I.6~D ~,. '~.0*
0 0El
m --jam jto% Jt 30~ 0eCOo 0~
0 0C0 0 e o c oC C 0000 c c 0c wlm_F%21
V*
ttAM MM
Z5ANUk2
L
j-, IAIT %--j\oe-Ilk
Q A
66AO
/l'N
I
FConcrete
Intensification
17
FAAM INUL-ATV.i
-imi I1.1
U
III,
I~T~EZWUV
L~~-TPdI~-
--FORMING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
ARCH ITECTU RA L I NTEN S IFI CATI ONoa o C H A R L E S
MASTER*S THESISao o MASSACHIUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
T R E I S T E R
0 0 0 F A L. L 1 9 8 0
It
r
Concrete
Intensification
COLUMN INTENSIFICATION
-
CONCRETE
1 0 1
CONCRETE SURFACE ARTICULATION
A RC H ITECTU RAL I NTEN S I FI C
M A S T E R ' S T H E S I S OOO M A S S A C H U S E-T T S IN A T I O N ooo N S T I T U T E OF CHARLES T E C H N OL OG Y TREISTER7 0 0 F A L L 1 95a 0 ii .0 1-~~~~~~ --I
Concrete Intensification
11JW
- ~ ~ - -I 1' -u -,~.-t I 'F..-I., - I -1 II
1-
-
1
-~.121
TIN
7' ~~~LiAi -~I
1J4-~L-~II
t--- IiI
K
~~~~1~
ik=t=='
IF
_____________________-1'I
* -- H7iTi~~.:
79>
I
liii
-1]______
V
~i"~iit
1111
7.
_______4
-i--I--I-.
i-i-I
I-
_____________ -1-I-11
I
.~II
T
FORMWORK ASSEMBLAGE
ARCHITECTURAL INTENSIFICATIONoooCHARLES TREISTER,
M A S T E R ' S T H-E S I S o1o M A S S A C H U S E T T S I N S T I T UTE OF TECHNOLOGY o aDOFAL 1 930
F-II
I i i
1*-,,-"",,4.,&.6
-71-,
Amm 4 --T--T--T-lzamlr - .- . or- T
-=21 ==I L- - I- -L I I I I -I T-T
flE
i -- 4 MEJAC.-7 --7' -6 0 A:1
1 I I I Ll 09FConcrete
Intensification
at k. ~
ELEVATION & AXONOMETRIC STUDY OF
SUPPORT.
ARCHITECTURAL INTENSIFICATIONoaoCHARLES TREISTER
M. AS.MASTER'S THESIS oooMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY OO OFALL 1980
FConcrete
Intensification
I7r
ELEVATION OF SUPPORT
ARCHITECTURAL INTENSIFICATIONaooCHARLES TREISTER
1231
The Dwelling Support
The secondary system is designed and implemented within a specific spatial zone in the primary structure. Although structural necessity places limitations on the spatial dimensions of the primary system, the support zone must be horizontally and vertically
large enough to allow a variety of configurations in this secondary infill. In this proposal
I select a typical concrete "support" zone as the context for the system of closure and interior definition. This context or
"support" is bounded horizontally by the floor and ceiling slabs and vertically be concrete retaining walls and columns. The primary concrete structural zone is a flat slab that rests between two eight-foot wide vertical support areas which parallel each other every twenty-five feet.
This specific support zone is located on
the middle level promenade of the building, approximately one and one-half stories above
Model: View of concrete support for dwelling.
the street. Inhabitants reach the apartment
by way of an open promenade.
This promenade
is reached from the entry court via an exposed
stairway or by an elevator. The unit sits on
a north-south axis with access on the south
side adjacent to the public promenade. On
the north side of the unit, exterior balconies
overlook the common green space.
The Support
ARCHITECTURAL
MASTER'S THESIS OD OM
IN T E N S IF ICATIONODO C H A R LES TR E I STE R
A S S A C H U S E T T S I N S T I T U T E OF TECHNOLOGYOaO FALL 1 9 8 0
1
9rlk
TYPICAL SUPPORT AT THE
PERAMBULATORY LEVEL
Scale:1/8 inch equals one foot
L
[The Support
[
25
I.U.
I II I I I III I I i i ii ITTII-W4fl4I
-[[IARCHITETURAL INTENSIFIC A T IONoaooC H A R LES TR
S TERS THESIS000MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY o o o
E I S T E R
F A L L .19 8 0
INDIVIDUAL SUPPORT PLAN, SECTION!
-1 4 11 -1 fill 1 11, -LL I --q - -- - - -- - I - - F - -I i I I I I I I I I I I i
F
The Support
View of southern face of dwelling support, at perambulatory access level. The large open concrete area is an optional build
zone, which the inhabitant can either en-close or maintain as an open deck.
Northern face of dwelling support. Private
terraces overlook the common greenspace. The middle level of the unit (plus three
ft.) is shown. Only a small area of the
upper floor(plus ten ft.) is part of the concrete support. The remainder of the
unit is a double height "loft like" space
which can be optionally inhabited with wooden platform elements.
ARCHITECTURAL INTENSIFICATIONoaCHARLES TREISTER
MMAS T E RS THESIS OO01MASSACHUSETTS INSTIT U T E OF TECHNOLOGY130 03FALL 1980
Li
21
MODEL:
INDIVIDUAL SUPPORT
1
I A a
The Support
References
S.A.R. Variation Studies - In these studies,
which he did for his book Variations, John
Habraken introduced the concept of a dwelling unit that has a variety of potential floor plans. Dimensions of the "support" system are established only after variations of potential unit types have been tested. In the specific
examples, which are based on the morphology of the Dutch row house, the support is characterized
by single-height floor slabs and parallel bearing
walls. The bearing walls, however, are not continuous, allowing occupants to enlarge individual units into neighboring territories.
S
S
H Nw
-L~i z~S m
14
STORE MOTEL STUDENT ROOMS APARTMENT FOR APARTMENT WITH
TWO PERSONS DOUBLE HEIGHT LIVING
ROOM
H
APARTMENT WITH HOBBY ROOM APARTMENT WITH GARAGE
11
APARTMENT FOR FOUR
PERSONS
Diagrams of pesible inhabitations for a repetitive
structural support, in Habraken,et. al., Variations: The Systematic Design of Supports
p. 194. -- _---_ 16I 81/83 b /8 L2 B1/B3 E/K1 b /B4
Sub-variation diagrams of a low-rise support, in Variations, op. cit., p. 154.
m
-271
L1 B3 Li 83 K1/83
E /Ki b/Bi E/1 k/B4 E b/b82
"S i - e AITS Li E /K
i
I 196,[The Support
ILZ61
Hertzberger's Experimental Housing at Delft
-These are another example of row housing but with the important introduction of
multi-level platforms which allow sectional continuity.
The three half-levels allow open common spaces
and create the potential for even larger spatial
dimensions. As opposed to S.A.R. in which
primary walls are always linear, Hertzberger employs both walls and three-dimensional concrete cores which are perpendicular to the walls. These vertical cores serve as containments for the stairs and bathrooms, and help define the spatial territories within
the primary structural system.
Experimental Housing Type "Diagoon" at Delft, by
Herman Hertzberger, (plans, sections, and studies) ,
in Architecture & Urbanism, March 1977, No. 75,
p. 113-114. 3 11 5 9 6j 10 - i 1) Q is 13 I I
Catalog of Interior
Elements
Inhabitants create definition within the
units by arranging a series of standardized
elements.
These elements, arranged according
to individual preference, provide separation,
storage space and use-surfaces such as benches,
desks, counters and shelves.
Because the elements
must fit into a number of different situations,
they come in a variety of vertical and
horizontal dimensions and can serve as a full
range of separation, from full closure to
operable separation to open screen.
The elements fall into eight major
categories:
1.
opaque and translucent wall panels of
different heights and widths
2.
screens and partial separations
3.
free-standing and self-supporting
shelving units
4.
solid storage pieces such as closets,
bureaus, and end tables
5.
sliding and swinging interior doors,
both opaque and transparent
6.
floor platforms for lofts and intermediate
levels
7.
stair pieces
8.
horizontal surfaces such as desks, tables,
and benches
LZ-I
LIIIIZ
I
-
---
J
Shoji screen variations from Traditional Japanese
Buildings, in Saburo, Washitsu Zosa Shusei
A similar catalog of closure elements,
and bathroom, kitchen elements would also be provided but they are outside of the scope of this work.
I
Fr'OtaA
nf Interinr Flemente I ~LLLL4i~.J~ _______*1
1 ___ZTZ~-*" 1 -IWALL PANELS
Scale
1 /4
inch equals one foot
ARCHITECTU
MASTE R'S T H ESIS
RAL INTENS I FICATION ooa OCHARLES
0 0 DMASSACH USETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
T RE I ST E R. a o a FAL L 1980
4
IIi
II4
UI
ICatalog of Interior Elements
:v
-- ~ £ rn44law
uffx
4'
I-~IIII1
1%il1
~I
ii ARCHITECTUR 'MAST E R 'S T H E S I S O1 AL INTENSIFICATIONoa C O O MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF T1 H ARLES TREISTER: E C H N OL OG Y 0D 0 F A L L 1 9 8 o1SCREENS, SHELVING, & STORAGE UNITS
Scale:1/4 inch equals one foot
I
L
4--11=
TI
-'V.-'11
I'
IE~
-it zzr~-4~::izz~
-i - i
I~Catalog of Interior Elements
I I I L'
~11
mzi
rzm
It'
-
1*.
CLOSETS, DOORS, & FLOOR PLATFORMS
Scale : 1/4 inch equals one foot
ARCH ITECTU RAL INTENSIFI
M ASTER'S T H ES I S OO 0 M A S S A C H U S E T T S
C A TION aD o.C H A R LES T RE IS
INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY o0O FALL
TER-1 9 0
I
-l;
'3t-t
i-rn
--
-T
----4 - t- --trCatalog
-R"WtAn-om---of Interior Elements
UPIFCatalog
of Interior Elements
I ~1
4-~u'zzzv'x~
' I -- IARCHITECTURAL INTENSIFICATIONoooCH ARLES TREISTER
MASTER*S THESIS O130 D MAS S A C H U S E T T S I N S T I T U T E O F T E C H N OL OGVOOO F A L L I 9 8 o
STAIRS
Scale : 1/4 inch equals one foot
'3
b-b
A~O'
#6'
F
Catalog of Interior Elements
The interior elements are designed to serve
a range of functions. The vertical heights relate to the activities of sittinq,
writ-ing, workwrit-ing, passage, maximum reach and
sight. The horizontal dimensions begin with the size of material: connections to shelves
(10"), larger storage of objects (2') and finally to dimensions that allow human in-habitation (3 feet or more).
A. Wall panels serve as vertical separation. Heights range from full height of 7 feet, 6 inches to low walls of 3 feet for par-tial closure. These vertical panels also serve as structural supports for lofts and platforms.
B. Other vertical elem nts r a a 'i e..
Storare/ seating niche, door frame, lattice
screen, shelving unit, and clothing stor-age unit.
C. Floor panels are used to build intermedi-ate platforms and lofts. These platforms
are structurally independent and would
rest on beams.
D. Stair piece, shelf and clothes storage.
L~1
II
ii~
_MODEL: INTERIOR ELEMENTS GROUPS
A R C H I T E C T U R A L I N T E N S I F I C A T 1 O N oaoo C H A R L E S T R E I S T E R
Catalog of Interior Elements
The basic wall panels are framed by
2" x 10" boards, giving a large useful
storage dimension. The intermediate sup-ports within the panel are 2"-wide pieces of lumber, and allow for the addition of table tops, shelving or other later elab-orations. The horizontal intermediate support occurs at heights two feet-eight inches and six feet-eight inches above the
floor, one for table tops and the other at
passage height. The bottom of the panel
is 6" above the floor, allowing for a
kick space.
The singular wall panels can then be grouped together to form small areas of containment
in "u" shapes. These can be securely con-nected and strengthened by floor platforms and sealed at the top by ceiling pieces. They can serve as niches, sitting nooks, closets, desk enclosures, or head boards.
The entire catalog of interior elements
(of which not all are shown) would allow
for a wide range of privacies, partial enclosures and movable passages. These elements would serve as the basis for further elaboration and custom additions.
MODEL: CATALOG OF INTERIOR ELEMENTS
ARCHITECTURAL INTENSIFICATIONo aaoC H A RL E S T RE I STE R
M A S T E RK'*S THESIS o o 0MASSACHUSETTS I N S T I T U T E O F TECHNOLOGYao O FALL 1 9 8 0
[
Catalog of Interior Elements
of Traditional
The residential architecture of traditional Japan offers a highly
developed example of a building
system based on the assemblage of standardized elements. Each component of the building system, be it the wall panel, floor panel, screen, or even decorative moldings, is mass produced to a given modular dimension. Within the standardized format a great variety of different designs is possible.
The shoji panels and lattice screens shown here are taken from a Japanese pattern book to illustrate some of the options that exist within the Japanese system. The amount of fine detail, and intricacy of design that these panels have is only feasible because of their standardized fabrication. Were similar screens to be custom built, the price would be prohibitively
high.
The Victorian pattern book of doors, windows, and moldings used in the United States is a similar
example of the benefits of standardized elements, which can allow for a richer,
more intensified building apporach,
at an affordable price.
I
----
-I.
LIZ
LIII
I
~llh1flU
LIZ
Shoji screen variations from Traditional Japanese Buildings, in Saburo, Washitsu Zosa Shusei, pp.
302,303,223 and 241. Standardized Pieces Japanese Residences
I MIMIIIIIIHIMH
IMIH
m
11 11 11a Mill
Details of Elements
Design of interior elements is based on function and construction type. Each piece is designed to accommodate its specific use and
to combine gracefully with other elements from the catalog. Beacuse pieces must serve
individually and in combination, each piece is structurally self-sufficient.
Construction can proceed in one of two methods: simple fabrication or more complex
"furniture-style" fabrication. In the simple case, which I have used for a number of design studies, standard nominal lumber and conventional hand tools are used to build the elements.
To eliminate waste, dimensions in the simple case are based on divisions of standard
sizes of available building products.
In the complex case, individual elements are manufactured and finished in a shop allowing for higher quality construction and improved joinery.
Wood was chosen as the major structural material in both cases because of aesthetics, its ease of construction, and its amenability to further intensification by unit inhabitants.
A system of metal interior elements, however,
is certainly feasible and might even be easier and less expensive to fabricate on a mass scale.
The Drawing Room, 120 Mains St., Glasgow, by Charles Rennie Mackintosh, in Cooper, Mackintosh Arch.,
p. 58.
37~
-iaus
01
mo1ineri r___emeu'UfUTF
f'AglTN
M
41
/ANP4 Pitf!5'
1r
fpVM 9O*P
~/4S rC~L~~,~-NOW -0
bwf01
-VSMA~ I :lARAWY iF X ii vo I,1
e -VLzI
I
53
4,
K
zI
:e
ARCHITECTURAL INTENSIFI- MASTER'S THESIS a a OMASSACH USETTS
-1--CATIONoooCH ARLES TREISTER
INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYDO OFALL 1 91a 0
-rap
,- p
* I I I Ia
A -WIWI1L38
/;;MV~fAL. 1ON4rWMd4MO
-FAHUa
-
AV"N
&
A
11V2AM31H/JMI~6t
7I
I
)~VALrPANEL CONSTRUCTION
I;
I
ii'
& CONNECTIONS
Scale : as shown
- I -,, 1 IMAT !KLAu V5.:
-vI
*77r.#r
A
14N -INEP 7ff 717Details of Interior Elements
39~
V
1L~0
ed
ZiS-W-I~A
ARCHITECTURAL INTENSIFICATIONooM A S T E It 'S THESIS-O1oO MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE 0
OCH ARLES TREISTERi
F T E C H N O L.OGY 00O OF A LL1 I 9a o
BUREAU & CLOSET ELEMENT
Scale : as shown
v
W -T 61TMIM
-Details of Interior Elements
4~1~I~2
I04 | I40l
-1--.9
ARCHITECTURAL .. M A S T E R ' S T H E S I S C3 r3O0M I N T E N S I F I C A T IO N o o1 C H A R LES TR E I STE R! A S S A C H U S E T T S I N S T I T U T E OF TECHNOLOGYO13013O FALL 1 9 8 0PANEL OPTIONS
-
SCREEN &
PARTIAL CLOSURE
-
F-V7WAI-1TYM,--Oz
IA
--4
A R C H IT E CTU R A L I NTE N S I FI C AT.I ON ono C H A R L E S TI
STUDY: ENCLOSURE PIECES
-
-
jPANEL
MATERIALS
RE IS TE R a F AL 1. 9 801i
&
Scale : as shown
M ASTE R*S THESIS OO O MASSACH USETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY D D
4
/ ,r
/
/
*-OKl
i(f- LIA
& Y#f90j14 0K ?1t'Y- P
YrriA
t-lt
--z
Y
rati.FOK c"1rr
~ 2 l ICW
-4ina1evari
FTWW/DWZOG -1 1 bulr
Details of
Interior Elements
V
t
Details of Interior Elements
.ARCHITECTURAL I N T E N S I.FI CATION ooo CH ARLES MMASTE R'S THESIS OO 0 M A SSACH USETTS INSTITUTE OF TECH N OL O G Y
El
STUDY: COMBINING PANELS INTO NICHE
Scale : 3/4 inch equals one foot
T R E I S T E R
0 F A LL 1 9 80
Details of interior Elements
ea u
- 4 C
ina
lit
7
DREFERENCE: MACINTOSH FURNITU
ARCHITECTURAL INTENSI FICATI0NoooCH ARLES TREISTER - MASTER'S TH ESISo Oo0MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLO G Y O OFALL 1980.
[
Details of Interior Elements
144}
Human Scale:
Horizontal use dimensions allow surfaces for actions to take place. Their
sizes relate to the minimal action
possible.
0"-3" : Material connection",
3"-12": Storage of objects,
12"-3': Work surface, writing, eating,
etc.
3'+ :Area for inhabitation,
sitting, standing.
Vertical use dimensions relate to the physical size of man and the
comfortable height of different activities.
6"- : Kick space
1'-6" : Sitting height
2'-6" : Desk height, writing or a seated activity
3'-0" : Counter height for a standing activity
4'-0" : Low partition, partial
privacy
6'-8" : Passage, min. clearance for standing space
7'-6" : Maximum reach.
Construction dimensions: The sizes
of materials, and hardware, if expressed,
will give a recognizable scale to our built pieces. The depth of a
table-top, the width of a door frame, and
the size of a door handle, are elements that permit us to understand the scale
of an object and the way it works.
Wright's room elevation for
Taltesan East exemplifies an
under-standing of all three concepts of dimensions, Vertically the activity
heights are built: the kickspace at
8", the bed at l'-6", the desk top
at 2'-6", the top of curtain privacy
at 4'-4", and the window height at
6'-8". The dimensions of materials
such as the desk top is heighted by
the separation from the panel below
by a space of a few inches. This creates
a new height dimension of 2'-2". To
register lower heights onto larger pieces, Wright uses "Virtual Use
Dimensions", or moldings that represent
the useful height onto another surface. The end board of the bed at right has
the desk heights 2'-6", and 2'-2"
marked by cross pieces even though
its useful height is much taller.
Gilmore Residence, Madison, Wisconsin, by Frank Llyod
Wright; in Global Interiors #9, p. 114.
Bedroom in the Hillhouse, Hellensborough, by
Charles Rennie Mackintosh; in Mackintosh
Architecture, p. 45.
-,
-p-I
I
Drawing of Taliesan East, by Frank Llyod Wright, in F.L.W. Architecture, The Wendingen Edition, p. 41.
"w
Dtv
ld
Ki i rNM& umrmruiPAprv7
WounaiiTrcr
T llwp--
--* --*
*a
Drawing of furniture for the Little House, by F.L. Wright, in Hanks, The Decorative Designs of F.L.W.,
Details of Interior Elements
~fff'J7 fp~~AHi CH,1
&-4i
AL__r__...
m
r-
WMA: mi cm- latPk kJOITnx ivoyjw; f w1~aY
~ii4A
'Ar * p(*1tc~c~
~
-VV~rt~- -OF ~ i~ '~'f~4L~ ] Atf 7 '* A O 0ra ma-LAmi o 00FVKM6 N-WDft)srW ON Awoao, A!,4~S4 14* kz- NWV , A A, -Mr- lffr~ftc5% rp~r Agg6V P 19 cay'm wt l~aH y *mowImA Plbfw LT-, c o A eIC6 A" 4AW6'rfaG, T-H% H EiT b(A &)166 y 10 trAi
A Fb1&MA(,
6440-1
n~7~A '~Ar ~v.e~o~J > J,~fkA' * -4mo5~i II A&- OPSrS W O * we WAIOM6&
T1w 1410An interior system of study
-carrels and work stations designed
by Maurice Smith for the Architecture
Department at M.I.T., utilized hand--built standardized wall panels that
can be assembled in a variety of ways. The system has 4 components: homosote wall panels that are placed vertically and horizontally, free standing
shelving units, long single height
shelves, and table tops. The panels are framed with standard 2"x6" lumber, with intermediate supports of 1"x2"
to be used for attaching tables and shelves.
OM -MP CV-A) Z"(,
f_4 5V c*904 it'~Hr4c-k g.. ffAI L-1~ 'flT4N~fO fl~I
I
-r Ic ~-3w,e
A
th&
A C451
Abi
ro IWentdo
I-|
461
Combinations of
Elements
Pieces from the basic kit of parts are
assembled to form a variety of more complex
elements.
In some instances, the complex
assemblages would be securely fastened together
to remain permanently as a single unit.
In
other cases, individual elements would simply
rest in combination, ready for dismantling and
re-assembly.
These drawings represent various possible
combinations of elements based on their potential
use.
These specific variations are designed
without a context; they are merely examples from
a "pattern book" of useful configurations which
might be applied to a specific apartment
context.
Diagrams of possible arrangements of Tokanoma alcove, in Saburo, Washitsu Zosa Shusei, p. 33.
w7 R*K--101 s 9 99--11 103 Ten 107 0 111 97)85 115 WRM 42' 119 &EN 100 MIEN15' 104 waN-8Isem 108 V"41 112 BiH t 116 *RtM 120 in R a 105 i U -
---109 11g 113 *1W-* M 117 ~ 2% 106 e 0 110 W91+ 114 -AN 118 ZIn I ICombinations of Elements
It
-1
H
I I 117r gr-hi It4'
OPTIONS OF PANEL COMBINATIONS
Scale : as shown
ARCH ITECTU RAL INTEN SIF ICATI
MASTE RS THESIS Oo OMASSACH USETTS I N S T I T
O N o ao C H A R LES TR E I STE R U T E OF T E C H N OL OG Y O OF ALL 19 930
I
-I 1-" I I =I rCombination of Elements
% NU
Il-I
(f)
7:
4
ARCH ITECTU RAL I N T E N S I F I C A T IO N o o C H
A
R LES TREISTIE Ri-M A S T E R 'S T H E S I S OO M A S S A C H U S E T T S I N S T I T U T E OF TECHNOLOGYaO O FALL 1 9 8 0
PANEL VARIATIONS FOR SPECIFIC USES
- Scale :1/2 inch equals one foot
--[Combination of Elements
4 ~
tA~&~T pi -V Ai x.+ )1(-To--AJF6 4r 4.t-lr
e* p=I
i.
PANEL VARIATIONS FOR SPECIFIC USES
Scale : 1/2 inch equals one foot
ARCHITECTUR AL INTENSIFICATIONoooCH ARLES TREISTER
M A S T E R'-S THESIS OO 0MASSACHUSETTS I N S T I T U T E O F TECHNOLOGY DO 13o1FALL 1 9 8 0
A- c~ 1~, ~'IP~
2
13 VFM M1187 f "A L y TO 4 ?1 11 v rr-, -M LOWWALL-F
Combination of Elements
The interior elements can be assembled to provide containment or total containment with the addition of closure boards at the base and at the top. The pieces will then be securely fastened to each other and to the primary concrete support to make a sturdy and stable assemblage that can
with-stand lateral and vertical loading. The solidity of the pieces and their connectors will also alllow for greater acoustical
privacy when desired. Repositioning and modification of the elements by the
inhab-itant will be possible with hand tools as needs change.
A. Screens and shelf units and desk used
as partial containment.
B. The wall panels can serve as supports
for loft platforms.
MODEL: ELEMENT COMBINATIONS, A
ARCH ITECTU R A L I NTEN S I FI CAT ION ooo C H A R L E S T*R E I STE RMASTER'S THESISoo o MASSACHIUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY OOO FALL-- 1980
F
Combination of Elements
C. "Slack" or custom-built pieces will serve to affect closure between panels over any irregular dimension. Here
the irregular space between the door
frame and storage niche is closed with
the custom solid wall or "slack" piece.
D. Elements can be combined free-standing, attached or used singularly since the endboard of the bed is located here.
51
MODEL: ELEMENT COMBINATIONS, B
I
A R C H I T E C T U R A L I NTENS I FICATIONoooC H A R LES TREISTER
FCombination
of Elements
A. The room is no longer conceived of as
a box. Here it becomes a space where various activities can take place. Each one can have the necessary area and surfaces available specifically for
that activity. No longer a simple wall everywhere; the various options of
in-terior elements allow a range of sep-arations that can be suited to the spe-cific activity and lifestyle of the inhabitant.
B. & C. Secondary wooden floor platforms can be utilized as lofts or entire upper floors.
These elements can also be used as
inter-mediate height platforms. They are
op-tional additions which can be inserted into the double-height space depending on the particular needs of the inhabitant.
MODEL: ELEMENT COMBINATIONS,
BIRD'S EYE VIEW
ARCHITECTURAL INTENSIFICATION oa0o C H A R LES T RE-I STE R
M A S T E R ' S THESIS OOOMASSACH U SETTS I N S T I T U T E O F TECHNOLOGYO 0OFALL 1 9 8 0
FCombination
of Elements
- f-i ~m7-'A.,t
A-CLOSURE OPTIONS
Scale: 3/16 inch equal one foot
ARCHITECTURAL INTENSIFICATIONoooCHARLES TREISTER
MASI E R'S THESIS OOOMASSACH USETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY o 0OOFALL 1930
rCombinations
of Elements
Vi6X5t
V sI~
__OO
r1
pg-py
=
1*A RC H ITECTU R AL INTEN S I FI CAT1IONOa o CHARLES TREISTER
.. M.ASTER'S THESISO1O o0MASSACHUSETTS INS.TITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYOOOFA.LL 19,3.0
H LL -p
r~ii
-- "Lv-_--I mm_Teahouse, Katsura Imperial Villa, Kyoto Japan
In traditional Japanese architecture, each element is constructed in both
size and material to suit a specific use. The elements are then assembled in an additive way. Each one is registered to the structural frame at one end,
while the other end is left to float
free.
In this example of a teahouse, the entry door is placed on the floor-beam and flush against the corner post. The viewing window frame rests on the door frame and similary is flush to the corner post. The ventilation screen is placed against the ceiling beam and next to the vertical wooden post. With each of these elements "registered"
(or placed adjacent) to the wooden
supports, a remaining "slack" dimension is created between the element and the next wooden post.
REFERENCE :ASSEMBLAGE OF ELEMENTS
Options of Assemblage in the Dwelling
A variety of configurations is possible
for each specific unit within the given
primary support structure. Interior elements
can be assembled in a number of ways to suit
specific activity patterns and desired levels
of privacy.
Although the dimensions of the
elements are based on a consistent standard,
the overall system is not modular. Any uneven
dimension is filled with some custom-made
piece, or "slack",
used to effect closure
between the parts and the primary structure.
The system of elements also allows a degree of transitory adaptibility. Assembled pieces can be taken apart and re-combined in different positions; new elements cna be added on to existing assemblies. This flexibility is desirable when the needs of a family change over time, or when new occupants move into an apartment.
Pieces, however, are not inherently
mobile, and they are not designed to be easily moved around by the occupants of a unit. The elements are to be securely fastened to one another and to the primary structural support
in order to provide sturdiness and acoustical
privacy when called for. Re-assembly after initial placement would require a group of semi-skilled workers.
The assembled elements not only define the
walls of the separate rooms but they also provide
horizontal platforms and elevated lofts.
Unit
masonry walls provide a secure permanent closure
between adjacent apartments. Bathrooms are
composed of modular pieces:
a bath unit, a
toilet unit, a sink/vanity unit.
These will
connect with a plumbing core in the concrete
primary system, but can be arranged in a
variety of configurations.
ro
nt ions of Assemhla~e
--in the Dwell in~
-A0l
flz:l
-J
ARCHITECTURAL INTENSIFICATIONoaoCHARLES TREISTER
M A S TER'S THESISOO O MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYO OOFALL 1 938 0
PLAN VARIATIONS OF ASSEMBLED
ELEMENTS
Scale:1/8 inch equals one foot
I
56
L-A i
wmwv-Options of Assemblagze
Iin
the
DwellIing
TI i .Options of Assemblage in the Dwelling
-rleN
A-A
±~A~~1C SUF~F'O~T
~'FAe~zz--
c Tlti-
A-A
'TI2ON E>-. P: FETlt N'.:I
SECTIONS: VARIATION 1 AND BASIC SUPPORT
Scale: 1/8 inch equals one foot
LA R C H I Tm M A S T E- R '
S-ECTURAL I N T E N S I F I C A T ION a o o CHARLES TREISTER
[Options
of Assemblage in the Dwelling
iwo
~ '~?'A~ 7~~TrOt1 ~ ~Tk~HA-A
zoPriori w
~.§QPWtt Th.Z
-S-&TION
A-A
SiFTwiON
>-f>
SECTION VARIATIONS
Scale
1/8 inch equals one foot
ITECTURAL
S T H E S I S a DoD0M
INTENSIFICATIONaoaCH ARLES TREISTERJ
ASSAC H USETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY1O3O FALL 1 918 0