A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
G. V ODEV
Sharp bounds on the number of resonances for symmetric systems
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 62, n
o4 (1995), p. 401-407
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1995__62_4_401_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1995, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
p. 401
SHARP BOUNDS ON THE NUMBER OF
RESONANCES FOR SYMMETRIC SYSTEMS
G. VODEV
University de Rennes 1, IRMAR, URA 305 du CNRS, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France.
Vol. 62, n° 4, 1995, Physique theorique
ABSTRACT. - We prove for a
large
class of first order systems that the number of resonances in thedisk z ~ I
r isO (r’~ ),
7~ > 3 oddbeing
the space dimension.
Nous prouvons que, pour une
grande
classe desystemes
dupremier ordre,
Ie nombre de resonances dans Iedisque Izl
rest 0(rn)
pour ?T. > 3, si n est la dimension de
l’espace.
During
the last ten years severalapproaches
have beendeveloped
toprove
sharp
upper bounds on the number of resonances(scattering poles)
for
compactly supported perturbations
of theLaplacian (see [2], [3], [5]
a[8]).
Thesimplest
one(see [5], [6], [8])
is based on the niceproperties
of the kernel of the
operator Ro ( z ) - Ro ( - z ) , Ro ( z ) being
theoutgoing
resolvent of the free
Laplacian
in R n.Unfortunately,
theseapproaches
do nolonger
work if one considersperturbations
of other operators as forexample
first order systems of nonconstant
multiplicities (see [4])
or thehyperbolic Laplacian (see [ 1 ]).
The purpose of this note is to present anotherapproach allowing
toimprove
the bound obtained in[4]
in the case of systems to thesharp
one.Also,
it seems to me that it could beapplied successfully
to thehyperbolic
case in order toimprove
the bound obtained in[1].
Consider in 3
odd,
a first order matrix-valued differentialAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique - 0246-0211
Vol. 62/95/04/$ 4.00/(6) Gauthier-Villars
402 G. VODEV
Tt
operator of the form
~4~ being
constant Hermitian d x dj’=i
matrices,
and denoteby Go
itsselfadjoint
realization onHo
==LZ Cd).
Suppose
that the matrix A(ç) == ~ ~~ ~ ~ R"B0,
is invertible for allç,
j=i
the operator
Go
is anelliptic
one. Note that ingeneral
theeigenvalues
ofA
(ç)
are continuous functionsof ç
and may be of nonconstantmultiplicity.
As a consequence
they
may not be smoothfunctions,
which makesimpossible
to use the methods in[3], [5], [6], [8]
to obtainsharp
bounds onthe number of resonances associated to
compactly supported perturbations
of
Go.
Let S2 ~ Rn be an open domain with compact
complement
and smoothboundary.
Consider in Q the operator+ B(x),
where.7=1
Aj (x) E C1 (0,; Cd), B (x)
ECO (H; Cd). Suppose
thatA~ (~r)
=A°,
B (x)
= 0 for p with some p > 0 such that C{x
ER :
/9}. Impose
suchboundary
conditions that this operator admitsan
unique elliptic
closedextension (denoted by G)
on the Hilbert space H =Lz (0,; Ca)
with anonempty
resolvent set.Thus,
without loss ofgenerality
we can suppose that there exists zo with Im zo 0 such that the resolventR (z) _ (G - z)-1
EG (H, H)
is well defined inan open
neighbourhood
A c0} of z0. Moreover,
as we shallsee later on
(see
also[6])
the cutoff resolvent =x (G - z)-1 x
admits a
meromorphic
continuation from A to the entirecomplex plane C,
x ECo (Rn) being
suchthat x
= 1 for + 1. Thepoles
ofthis continuation are called resonances and the
multiplicity
of a resonanceA E C is defined as the rank of the residue of
RX (z)
at z = A. As shown in[6],
this definition isindependent
of the choice of the cutoff function xprovided that x
= 1 for p. Denoteby N (r)
the number of theresonances of
G,
counted with theirmultiplicities,
in{z
EC : ~ ~ r}.
Our main result is the
following
theorem.THEOREM. - Under the above
assumptions, the counting function
N(r) satisfies
the boundwith some ’ constant C > 0
independent of
r.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique theorique
Proof. -
Denoteby Ro (z)
theoutgoing
free resolvent ofGo
definedfor Im z 0
by
If x E
Co (Rn ), by
theHuygens principle
wehave x eit G0
x - 0 for t > T with some T > 0depending
on thesupport of ~,
and hencedefines an entire
family satisfying
the estimatewhere
11.11
denotes the norm in jC(z)
= 1 +Izl.
Fix now the cutoff
function x
ECo
so thatChoose functions Xl, x2 E
Co (R"),
such that xl = 1 for p +1/3,
X1 = 0
forIxl
>p+1/2, xz = 1
forp+2/3,
xz = 0 forp+5/6.
In
precisely
the same way as in[6]
one obtains therepresentation
where K
(z) (z)
+KZ (z),
yy E
Co being
suchthat ~
= 0 for p +5/12
or p + 2,~ = 1
for p
+11/24 ~
+3/2.
Denoteby xl
the characteristic function of{~ p+1/3}
and letxl
ECo
be afamily
offunctions such that
Xi
= 1 forIxl /?+1/3, Xi
= 0 forIxl
>/9+1/2,
andX~ -~ Xl
as ê ~ 0.Replacing
the function xl in the aboverepresentation by xi gives
a new one of the formCombining (3)
and(4)
leads towhere
KK~1
+K2, pt == K~1
+ Observe now that(x) 88 (x)
as £ ~ 0, where 9 ={.r
E Rn : = P +1/3},
Vol. 62, n ° 4-1995.
404 G. VODEV
Q
E(8; Cd). Hence,
as ~ ~ 0, tends to an operatorPl
witha kernel of the form
where
N (x, w)
denotes the kernel ofK (z)
andM (w, y)
denotes the kernel of the operator~y denotes the restriction on S. Hence
with N E G
(L2 (8; Cd), H),
M E £(8; Cd)).
Since the operator G is
elliptic,
we have thatKZ (z)
is an entirefamily
of compact operators whose characteristic values
satisfy
the estimatewith a constant C > 0
independent
of zand j.
Inparticular, (7)
shows thatK2 (z)n+1
is of trace class. Tostudy Pl (z)
we need thefollowing
lemma.LEMMA 1. - E
Co (Rn ) satisfy supp 03C8
n supp 7? ==0.
Thenfor
anyinteger
m > 1 with a constant C > 0independent
m and z.Proof. -
Sincesupp ~
n supp 17 =0, by
the finitespeed
ofpropagation
there exists
Tl
> 0 sothat 03C8 ~03B1x eit G0 ~
= 0 for0 ~ t ~ Ti.
On theother
hand,
from theHuygens principle,
there existsT2
>Tl
so that= 0
for t 2:: T2.
Choose now a functioncp(t)
Esuch that cp = 1 in a
neighbourhood
of the interval~Tl ,
= 0 fort >
T2
+ 1, andHence,
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
On the other
hand,
we have m;and
hence,
in view of(9),
Now
(8)
follows from( 10)
and( 11 )
at once. Thiscompletes
theproof
of Lemma 1.
It follows from the trace theorem and the above lemma that
Pl (z)
is an entire
family
of trace class operators.Thus,
P(z)~+1
=(Pl (z)
+KZ (z))n+1
forms an entirefamily
of trace class operators. Moreover, in view of(5)
we have thatRx (z) (1 - P (z)~‘+1)
is an entirefamily
andhence
by
theappendix
in[7]
we conclude that thepoles
ofjR~ (z),
withthe
multiplicities,
are among the zeros of the entire functionh (z) = det (1 - P (z)n+1).
Hence, to prove
(1)
it suffices to estimateproperly
forlarge Izl.
In view of
(2), (6)
and(7), using
theinequalities
Mj(~4~) ~
Mj(B),
Mj
(A
+B) ~ ~A)
+(B),
we havewith a constant C > 0
independent
of zand j.
Hence,Vol. 62, n ° 4-1995.
406 G. VODEV
For
F2 (z)
we haveTo estimate
Fl (z)
denoteby ~s
theLaplace-Beltrami
operator on S and choose afunction ~
ECo (R")
suchthat ~
= 1 in aneighbourhood
of S and
supp 03C8
n supp ~ =0. By
the trace theorem and Lemma1,
forany
integer
m, we havewith a constant C > 0
independent
ofm, j
and z.Now, taking
2 m N(~},
for any q > 0, we deduce
with some constant C
(q)
> 0independent
of z andj. Using
this andchoosing q properly,
we getwhich
together
with( 12)
and( 13 ) give
Now
( 1 )
follows from( 14)
and Jensen’sinequality.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
[1] L. GUILLOPÉ and M. ZWORSKI, Polynomial bounds on the number of resonances for some
complete spaces of constant negative curvature near infinity, Asympt. Anal., to appear.
[2] R. B. MELROSE, Polynomial bounds on the distribution of poles in scattering by an obstacle, Joumées Equations aux Dérivées partielles, Saint-Jean de Monts, 1984.
[3] J. SJÖSTRAND and M. ZWORSKI, Complex scaling and the distribution of scattering poles,
J. Amer. Math. Soc., Vol. 4, 1991, pp. 729-769.
[4] G. VODEV, Polynomial bounds on the number of scattering poles for symmetric systems, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré (Physique Théorique), Vol. 54, 1991, pp. 199-208.
[5] G. VODEV, Sharp polynomial bounds on the number of scattering poles for metric perturbations of the Laplacian in Rn, Math. Ann., Vol. 291, 1991, pp. 39-49.
[6] G. VODEV, Sharp bounds on the number of scattering poles for perturbations of the Laplacian, Commun. Math. Phys., Vol. 146, 1992, pp. 205-216.
[7] G. VODEV, Sharp bounds on the number of scattering poles in even-dimensional spaces, Duke Math. J., Vol. 74, 1994, pp. 1-17.
[8] M. ZWORSKI, Sharp polynomial bounds on the number of scattering poles, Duke Math. J., Vol. 59, 1989, pp. 311-323.
(Manuscript received January 1st, 1995;
Revised version received February 2nd 1995. )
Vol. 62,~4-1995.