Cassava breeding potential Cassava breeding potential
for bioethanol for bioethanol for bioethanol for bioethanol
Becerra López
Becerra López‐‐Lavalle L A Dufour DLavalle L A Dufour D Becerra López
Becerra López Lavalle, L.A. , Dufour, D., Lavalle, L.A. , Dufour, D., Sánchez, T. and H. Ceballos
Outline Outline
I t d ti
• Introduction
• High stable and reliable productivityHigh, stable and reliable productivity • Novel traits
• Processing methods X root quality interactions • Perspectives
Outline Outline
I t d ti
• Introduction
• High stable and reliable productivityHigh, stable and reliable productivity
• Novel traits
• Processing methods X root quality interactions
Cassava origin Cassava origin
Flooded land Flooded land
Low
Low Soil Soil FFertilityertility
Degraded Soils Degraded Soilsgg
Slopped Land Slopped Land
Cassava modern production Cassava modern production
Sub
Sub--humid environmenthumid environment Acid Acid ––Soil environmentSoil environment
19’000,000 hectares 19’000,000 hectares
Near Hanoi, Vietnam
Cassava modern production Cassava modern production
Sub
Sub--humid environmenthumid environment Acid Acid ––Soil environmentSoil environment
19’000,000 hectares 19’000,000 hectares 233 000 233 000 TT 233,000 233,000 TonnesTonnes
Near Hanoi, Vietnam
Main uses of Cassava Main uses of Cassava
Fresh
Fresh -- boiledboiled Farinha Farinha -- GariGari
Human consumption Human consumption
Cassava leaves
Main uses of Cassava Main uses of Cassava
Chicken factory
Chicken factory Dry chips for animal feedDry chips for animal feed
Animal feedstock Animal feedstock
Near Hanoi, Vietnam
Main uses of Cassava Main uses of Cassava
Bio
Bio--EthanolEthanol StarchStarch
Industrial use of Cassava Industrial use of Cassava
Fried
Tropical/Sub
Tropical/Sub--tropical croptropical crop
Outline Outline
I t d ti
• Introduction
• High stable and reliable productivityHigh, stable and reliable productivity
• Novel traits
• Processing methods X root quality interactions
Crop Potential Crop Potential
South China 5 Breeding successfully increased
fresh-root (FR) productivity & dry-matter (DM) content. We now need
South-China 5
matter (DM) content. We now need
STABLE -DM contents
SM 1433-4
84 t/ha FR in a 9.5 ha commercial field (~25 t/ha DM)
Crop Potential Crop Potential
The case of “watery” roots for ethanol
Fresh root yield (t/ha) Dry matter content (%) Dry matter yield (t/ha) (%) SM 2775‐2 53.8 32.1 17.3 At two location: Codazzi (Cesar) and Barrancas (Guajira) SM 2775‐4 35.3 35.9 12.7 SM 2775 2 37 3 30 7 11 5 At five location: Patalito, Sto Thomas & Molinero (Atlantico), La Union (Sucre) and Chinu (Cordoba) SM 2775‐2 37.3 30.7 11.5 SM 2775‐4 27.1 36.9 10.0
Crop Potential Crop Potential
The case of “watery” roots for ethanol
Fresh root yield (t/ha) Dry matter content (%) Dry matter yield (t/ha) (%) SM 2775‐2 53.8 32.1 17.3 At two location: Codazzi (Cesar) and Barrancas (Guajira) SM 2775‐4 35.3 35.9 12.7 SM 2775 2 37 3 30 7 11 5 At five location: Patalito, Sto Thomas & Molinero (Atlantico), La Union (Sucre) and Chinu (Cordoba) High Dry Matter content does not seems critical to ethanol production SM 2775‐2 37.3 30.7 11.5 SM 2775‐4 27.1 36.9 10.0
Outline Outline
I t d ti
• Introduction
• High stable and reliable productivityHigh, stable and reliable productivity
• Novel traits
• Processing methods X root quality interactions
Cassava “Novel” traits Cassava “Novel” traits
Amylose-free (“waxy”)
Amylose free ( waxy )
starch mutation
•Amylose is difficult to
degrade
•Amylose-free starch
should cost less to convert into ethanol
Cassava “Novel” traits Cassava “Novel” traits
Less amylose = Less amylose = more ethanol
Cassava “Novel” traits Cassava “Novel” traits
F bili
Fermentability:
assess their potential in bio-ethanol, bio-plastics, sweeteners
Cassava starch fermentation: with and without starch 400 250 300 350 Total et Total ethanol 100 150 200 Total et (ml eth kg sta Total ethanol (mL/Kg of starch) CM 523 7 With enzyme 0 50 100 CM 523-7 Rayong 60 NEP WAXY Without enzyme Clone 4 1/3 days
Small granule/high amylose Small granule/high amylose
h m al Starc h Nor m e Starch a ll granul e Sm a
Small granule/high amylose Small granule/high amylose
h m al Starc h Nor m
• A small granule and a rough surface
e
Starch
A small granule and a rough surface
facilitate the action of enzymes (less consumption of enzymes, lower costs of conversion).
a
ll granul
e )
• But higher amylose content would
increase costs….
Sm
Small granule/high amylose Small granule/high amylose
h ( ) RVA Amylogram Starch Viscosity (5%) 1000 1200 80 100 Waxy 600 800 o si ty (c P ) 60 200 400 Vi sc o 20 40 Small granules 0 0 5 10 15 20 Temperature (minutes) 0
Starch
Starch--lessless mutationmutation
Source:
L. Carvalho EMBRAPA Brazil
Outline Outline
I t d ti
• Introduction
• High stable and reliable productivityHigh, stable and reliable productivity
• Novel traits
• Processing methods X root quality interactions
Bio
Bio--ethanol productionethanol production
Bio
Bio--ethanol productionethanol production
Ethanol factory in Thai Nguan near Khon Kaen (Thailand)
5.27 kg of fresh root produce one liter of ethanol 1.4 – 1.5 bath / kg fresh root
1.4 1.5 bath / kg fresh root 25 bath / lt of ethanol produced
Ethanol from corn or cassava is
more expensive because starch
Boiler
more expensive because starch
need to be degraded to the equivalent of sugar cane juices
Eth l Ethanol Maize or Cassava Distillation & dehydration Starch degradation
Liquefaction & saccharification
Fermentation y
Sugarcane Sugarcane juices
Sorce of satrch Thermo-stable Alpha-amylase Yeasts Grinding Jet cooker >100 °C Alpha amylase
(Liquefacction) Yeasts Storage
tank Grinding >100 C (5-8’) o n a tion oras) tank Secondary Liquefaction ermentati o a ccharific a °C (8-10 h o
lation & ydration
Slurry t Liquefaction (95 °C – 90’) F e S a 60 ° Distil deh y Glucoamylase (Saccharification) Solids
Sorce of satrch Thermo-stable Alpha-amylase Yeasts Grinding Jet cooker >100 °C Alpha amylase
(Liquefacction) Yeasts Storage
tank Grinding >100 C (5-8’) o n a tion oras) tank Secondary Liquefaction ermentati o a ccharific a °C (8-10 h o
lation & ydration
Slurry t Liquefaction (95 °C – 90’) F e S a 60 ° Distil deh y New enzymes Glucoamylase (Saccharification) Solids y Liquefaction + saccharification
Sorce of satrch Yeasts Grinding Storage tank Yeasts Grinding o n a tion oras) tank ermentati o
lation & ydration
a ccharific a °C (8-10 h o Slurry t F e Distil deh y S a 60 ° New enzymes New enzymes + yeasts Solids y Liquefaction + saccharification Liquefaction + saccharification + fermentation
Storage tank
lation & dration
Distil
l
dehy
d
Medium throughput
Digestion rate of different cassava starches (1 0 ml of pacreatic α-amilase) 100 (1.0 ml of pacreatic α amilase) pH 6.9 at 37°C 80 ex (% ) ~80% 40 60 ro lis is In d 0 20 Hi d ~30% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time (minutes)
Digestion rate of different cassava starches (0 5 ml of StargenTM 2) 80 (0.5 ml of Stargen 2) pH 4.0 at 37°C 60 e x (% ) ~60% 40 H id ro lis is in d e 20 ~30% 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time (minutes)
Root processing vs. quality Root processing vs. quality • Starch degrading enzymes and yeast are being improved.
h h i h l l h
• The process to convert starch into ethanol constantly changes.
• As in maize, there are genetic differences in cassava for ethanol production (small starch granule).
• We are in a unique position to analyze the best germplasm – processing method to maximize economic benefit and reduce negative impact on the environment.
Outline Outline
I t d ti
• Introduction
• High stable and reliable productivityHigh, stable and reliable productivity
• Novel traits
• Processing methods X root quality interactions
Cassava Bio
Cassava Bio--ethanol perspectiveethanol perspective
• Cassava is a competitive raw material
for bio-ethanol production in Asia
(Thailand, China, Vietnam, Indonesia?, Australia?)
• A large % of the ethanol production cost
is constitute by the y enzyme and yeasty y .
• Advances in microbiology and
enzymology can significantly reduce enzymology can significantly reduce
Cassava Bio
Cassava Bio--ethanol ethanol prespectiveprespective
• There are clones with low dry matter
content but maximum productivity per hectare that can now be used in ethanol production
• Different mutants could reduce costs of
conversion from root to ethanol (including “sugary”?)
Energy crops: farms of 1-100 ha
Cassava Banana Coffee residues Ethanol
(99,5%)
Sweet potato Sugar cane Sweet sorghum
(99,5%)
Small rural communities Central Plant (dehydration)
Micro-plants 1.000 – 2.000 lt/day 5 – 10 t crop/day < 1 ha crop/day < – 1 ha crop/day Ethanol (50%) Transport ( )
Cassava Bio
Cassava Bio--ethanol perspectiveethanol perspective
• For ethanol production a key issue is the
continuous supply of feedstock all year round.
• Processing of g fresh roots (low dry y
matter?) at harvest time and dried chips
during off-season is one potential
l i
Cassava Bio
Cassava Bio--ethanol perspectiveethanol perspective
• Combining feedstock from different
crops. For instance, cassava/sweet-sorghum has proved advantageous.
• We need to further analyze the by-• We need to further analyze the by
products and their potential use for