• Aucun résultat trouvé

-1 ) Seed-cotton yield (kg ha -1 fertiliser kg ha

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "-1 ) Seed-cotton yield (kg ha -1 fertiliser kg ha"

Copied!
22
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Sustaining soil productivity of

cotton-based cropping systems in the Savannahs

of west and central Africa:

Challenges and Opportunities

P. Tittonell and M. Cretenet

(2)
(3)

• Savannah woodlands

• Crops at variable distances from homesteads

• Cotton main cash crop in rotation with food crops

• Smallholder, family agriculture (self-consumption)

Cotton-based systems of West and Central Africa

(4)

Parallel development of Cotton and Cereal productions in West Africa.

• Cotton development has a ‘dragging’ effect on cereal production (in areas and yields) in this part of Africa

• Cotton plays a positive role for food security, contrary to earlier perceptions of competition for resources between cash and food crops (1970s)

(5)

The contribution of West Africa to world cotton production increased from 1 to 5% in 40 years (« le boom cotonnier »)

The 2003 predictions failed in reality: West African cotton production stops growing The end of the ‘success story’ of African cotton coincides with the WTO summit at Cancun, Mexico

Worldwide and West African production of cotton fibre from 1960/61 to 2008/09.

(6)

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 50 000 100 000 150 000 200 000 250 000 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 kg ha-1 ha

Cotton crop acreage and yield in

North Cameroon

Sharp decrease in cotton production:

1. Less profitability (higher fertiliser costs, lower fibre prices)

(7)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 fertiliser kg ha -1 Seed-cotton yield (kg ha -1 ) year

Evolutions du rendement et des engrais utilisés

en culture cotonnière au Nord Cameroun

There was a parallel evolution of cotton yields and fertiliser use

A reduction in fertiliser use has both short (growing season) and long term (cumulative) effects

Long term evolution of yields and fertiliser use

on cotton in N Cameroon

(8)

n=7 n=34 n=66 n=31 n=6 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 seed-cotton kg ha -1 fertiliser kg ha-1

"Temps court": Cotton crop response to

fertilisers North Cameroon

Soil Fertility

-+

Crop yields without fertilisers as indicator of soil fertility

Crop responses are characterised by 3 parameters:

• Crop yields without fertilisers

• The production potential with fertilisers

• Fertiliser use efficiency

Short term:

(9)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 0,45 0,50 0,55 0,60 0,65 0,70 0,75 0,80 0,85 0,90 0,95 seed-cotton kg ha-1 SOM %

SOM and Crop response relationship

YIELD POTENTIAL

FERTILISER EFFICIENCY CONTROL

Soil organic matter is strongly correlated with these three parameters:

• Crop yields without fertilisers (control)

• The production potential with fertilisers

(10)

0,60 0,70 0,80 0,90 1,00 1,10 1,20 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 F0 F1 F0 F1 F0 F1

residues exported residues returned res.ret. + straw

SOM% yield kg ha -1 maize 72-80 cotton 72-80 mean 0-30 cm

Long term experiment on SOM evolution

under different cropping system

(Aplahoué Benin)

Long term trials allow evaluating cumulative effects of agricultural practices on soil organic matter and productivity

The impacts of fertiliser use and crop residue management are evident after 8 years (16 cropping seasons)

(11)

Aplahoué Bénin

Yield %

"SOIL MEMORY"

F1 + Residues Returned + Fallow Straw mulch

FM + Rest. + Paillage 858 kg ha-1 680 kg ha-1 780 kg ha-1 "Exhaustion phase" "Regeneration phase"

Years under cultivation

Long term:

Soil regeneration and soil memory

The phase of ‘regeneration’ that follows soil fertility ‘exhaustion’ consists of implementing soil conservation measures

After 8 years of regeneration, the gap between initial and actual productivity is termed soil ‘memory’

(12)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 100 200 300 400 500 CO 2 équivalent Tha-1 fertiliser kg ha-1 biomass compartment soil compartment

Csoil sequestration through fertiliser use

What to do to improve the soil C compartment ?

6% Harvest CO2 Soil Organic Matter 15‐35 TC ha‐1 SOM mineralisation photosynthesis Humification  15‐40% Crop residues CO2 Soil tillage Cultivars Catch crops Associated crops Agro sylvo pastoral systems fertilisation 2.5-3.5 TC ha-1

(13)

There is no alternative cash crop to replace cotton in West and

Central Africa

Crop production on these soils cannot be sustained without

fertilisers

Cash crops are the ‘gate’ by which fertilisers may enter the

system (thus benefiting also food crops)

Current relative prices of fibre and fertilisers discourage

farmers to invest in soil fertility

Greater productivity means also larger C inputs to increase soil

organic matter (a win-win situation ?)

(14)
(15)
(16)

y = 22.2x ‐ 1897 r² = 0.69 y = 1.5x + 1016 r² = 0.09 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 seed-cotton yield (kg ha -1 ) fertliser kg ha-1

North Cameroon "Soil memory"

1986_1995 1996_2005

"Soil Memory"

• In Cameroon, cotton responds to fertilisers between 1986-1995, but not between 1996-2005, in spite of the application rates

• The ‘memory’ of the first period of soil fertility degradation persists, and translates in poor subsequent responses to applied fertilisers

(17)
(18)

Organic component of CEC.

Parcelles cultivées Tchad¹

y = 5.38x + 0.36 R2 = 0.79 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 C g.100g -1 CEC (cmol c .kg -1 ) ¹ H. Guibert

(19)

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 s e e d-c ot ton k g ha -1 K ech. meq/100g

Production potential and exchangeable bases

AL<0.01 Al=0.02 Al=0.03 AL=0.04 Al=0.05

(20)
(21)

Inputs costs as equivalent of seed cotton weight

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 kg coton graine fertiliser insecticides Σ inputs

(22)

Modèles empiriques

Essais Longue Durée

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

coton kg/ha

M

O

S

(

0-30 cm

)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

M

O

S

(

0

-40)

cm

N'Tarla

Aplahoué

1 T coton 0.2 % MOS

Références

Documents relatifs

Julien est arrivé deux places devant Emma, mais derrière Ida.. v Range ces enfants selon leur

incarnat, trèfle d'alexandrie, moutarde brune, vesce velue, lin 27 Jouffray Drillaud M-Clovers Trèfle incarnat, Micheli, Squarosum, Perse (ajout 80 kg/ha de féverole) 10 + 80

Cotton seeding in non tilled soil showed that seedling stand was globally inferior under mulch (dead vegetal cover composed of Calopogonium or Brachiaria) compared to nude soil. In

This paper ex- plores progress and challenges in making produc- tivity gains at the field level based on data ob- tained from surveys implemented in Mali, Benin and

Il sera alors possible de remplacer, dans le génome d'une plante produisant un allergène, le gène codant pour cet allergène par celui qui est codant pour une molécule qui

The threshold treatment technique is p rim a rily used to control the main pests such as spider mites and leaf- eating caterpillars, sucking insects and b o llw o rm s. For

La chenille de couleur blanc crème aux jeunes stades devient par la suite rose sombre (Fig. Sur capsule, le trou d'entrée de la jeune chenille est peu visible car rapide-

The objectives of this study were to assess, in the context of southwestern Burkina Faso, (i) the potential differences be- tween organic and non-organic cotton using a range of in