• Aucun résultat trouvé

Preassociative aggregation functions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Preassociative aggregation functions"

Copied!
20
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Preassociative aggregation functions

Jean-Luc Marichal Bruno Teheux

University of Luxembourg

(2)

Associative functions

G : X2 → X isassociativeif

G (G (a, b), c) = G (a, G (b, c))

Examples: G (a, b) = a + b on X = R

(3)

From associative functions to functions with indefinite arity

G (G (a, b), c) = G (a, G (b, c))

Extension to n-ary functions

(4)

Associative functions with indefinite arity

Fact

If G : X2 → X is associative and p + q + r ≥ 2 then Ge(x1, . . . , xp, y1, . . . , yq, z1, . . . , zr)

= Ge(x1, . . . , xp, Ge(y1, . . . , yq), z1, . . . , zr)

Definition. F : S

n≥0Xn→ X isassociativeif for every p + q + r ≥ 0

F (x1, . . . , xp, y1, . . . , yq, z1, . . . , zr)

(5)

We use more comfortable notations

(6)

Associative functions with indefinite arity

F : X∗ → X isassociativeif

F (xyz) = F (xF (y)z) ∀ xyz ∈ X∗

F1 may differ from the identity map!

Proposition

(7)

Associative functions with indefinite arity

F : X∗ → X isassociativeif

F (xyz) = F (xF (y)z) ∀ xyz ∈ X∗

F1 may differ from the identity map!

Proposition

(8)

Preassociative functions

Definition. We say that F : X∗ → Y ispreassociativeif F (y) = F (y0) ⇒ F (xyz) = F (xy0z)

Examples: Fn(x) = x12+ · · · + xn2

(9)

Associative functions are preassociative

F (y) = F (y0) ⇒ F (xyz) = F (xy0z)

Fact

If F : X∗ → X is associative, then it is preassociative Proof. Suppose F (y) = F (y0)

(10)

Construction of preassociative functions

F (y) = F (y0) ⇒ F (xyz) = F (xy0z)

Proposition (right composition)

If F : X∗ → Y is preassociative, then so is the function x1· · · xn 7→ Fn(g (x1) · · · g (xn))

for every function g : X → X

(11)

Construction of preassociative functions

F (y) = F (y0) ⇒ F (xyz) = F (xy0z)

Proposition (left composition)

If F : X∗ → Y is preassociative, then so is g ◦ F : x 7→ g (F (x))

for every function g : Y → Y such that g |ran(F ) is one-to-one

Example: Fn(x) = exp(x12+ · · · + xn2) (X = Y = R)

(12)

Construction of preassociative functions

F (y) = F (y0) ⇒ F (xyz) = F (xy0z)

Proposition (left composition)

If F : X∗ → Y is preassociative, then so is g ◦ F : x 7→ g (F (x))

for every function g : Y → Y such that g |ran(F ) is one-to-one

Example: Fn(x) = exp(x12+ · · · + xn2) (X = Y = R)

(13)

Associative ⇐⇒ Preassociative with ‘constrained’ F

1

F (y) = F (y0) ⇒ F (xyz) = F (xy0z)

Proposition

(14)
(15)

Nested classes of preassociative functions

Preassociative functions Preassociative functions ran(Fn≤1) = ran(F )

(16)

If ran(F

n≤1

) = ran(F )

Proposition

Let F : X∗ → Y and G : X∗ → Y be two preassociative functions such that ran(Fn≤1) = ran(F ), ran(Gn≤1) = ran(G ), F0 = G0,

(17)

Factorizing preassociative functions with associative ones

Theorem (Factorization)

Let F : X∗ → Y . The following assertions are equivalent:

(i) F is preassociative and satisfies ran(Fn≤1) = ran(F )

(ii) F can be factorized into

F = f ◦ H

(18)

Acz´

elian semigroups

Theorem (Acz´el 1949)

H : R2 → R is

continuous

one-to-one in each argument associative

if and only if

H(xy ) = ϕ−1(ϕ(x ) + ϕ(y )) where ϕ : R → R is continuous and strictly monotone A class of associative functions:

(19)

Preassociative functions from Acz´

elian semigroups

Theorem

Let F : R∗ → R. The following assertions are equivalent:

(i) F is preassociative and satisfies ran(Fn≤1) = ran(F ),

F1 and F2 are continuous and one-to-one in each argument

(ii) we have

Fn(x) = ψ ϕ(x1) + · · · + ϕ(xn)



(20)

Open problems

(1) Find new axiomatizations of classes of preassociative functions from existing axiomatizations of classes of associative

functions

(2) Find interpretations/applications of preassociativity in (fuzzy,modal) logic, artificial intelligence, machine learning, MCDM. . .

Références

Documents relatifs

The aim of this task is the proposal of a monitoring strategy based on the fuzzy logic inference system, that informs us about the healthy function and stator fault

Therefore, up to one-to-one unary maps, the associative string functions can be completely described in terms of length- preserving associative string functions, and similarly for

of some noteworthy classes of associative ε-standard operations, such as the class of variadic extensions of Acz´ elian semigroups, the class of variadic extensions of t- norms

Jean-Luc Marichal Bruno Teheux. University

Erkko Lehtonen (∗) Jean-Luc Marichal (∗∗) Bruno Teheux (∗∗).. (∗) University of Lisbon (∗∗) University

Find interpretations of the preassociativity property in aggregation function theory and/or fuzzy logic...

In particular, in Section 2 we showed that certain restrictions on the length of the string variables induce strict hierarchies of nested classes whose intersections reduce to

This talk explores the use of AI techniques (such as fuzzy logic) for data classification and suggests a method that can determine requirements for classification of organizations’