• Aucun résultat trouvé

Modelling soil heat and water flow as a coupled process in land surface models

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Modelling soil heat and water flow as a coupled process in land surface models"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-00521856

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00521856

Submitted on 15 May 2020

HAL

is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire

HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Modelling soil heat and water flow as a coupled process in land surface models

R. Garcia-Gonzalez, A. Verhoef, P.L. Vidale, Isabelle Braud

To cite this version:

R. Garcia-Gonzalez, A. Verhoef, P.L. Vidale, Isabelle Braud. Modelling soil heat and water flow as a

coupled process in land surface models. 7th EGU General Assembly, May 2010, Vienna, Austria. 1

p. �hal-00521856�

(2)

Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 12, EGU2010-1767-10, 2010 EGU General Assembly 2010

© Author(s) 2010

Modelling Soil Heat and Water Flow as a Coupled Process in Land Surface Models

Raquel García González (1,2), Anne Verhoef (1), Pier Luigi Vidale (2), and Isabelle Braud (3)

(1) Department of Soil Science, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom ([email protected]), (2) NCAS-Climate, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom, (3) Cemagref, Unité de recherche

Hydrologie-Hydraulique, Lyon, France

To improve model estimates of soil water and heat flow by land surface models (LSMs), in particular in the first few centimetres of the near-surface soil profile, we have to consider in detail all the relevant physical processes involved (see e.g. Milly, 1982). Often, thermal and iso-thermal vapour fluxes in LSMs are neglected and the simplified Richard’s equation is used as a result. Vapour transfer may affect the water fluxes and heat transfer in LSMs used for hydrometeorological and climate simulations. Processes occurring in the top 50 cm soil may be relevant for water and heat flux dynamics in the deeper layers, as well as for estimates of evapotranspiration and heterotrophic respiration, or even for climate and weather predictions.

Water vapour transfer, which was not incorporated in previous versions of the MOSES/JULES model (Joint UK Land Environment Simulator; Cox et al., 1999), has now been implemented. Furthermore, we also assessed the effect of the soil vertical resolution on the simulated soil moisture and temperature profiles and the effect of the processes occurring at the upper boundary, mainly in terms of infiltration rates and evapotranspiration. SiSPAT (Simple Soil Plant Atmosphere Transfer Model; Braud et al., 1995) was initially used to quantify the changes that we expect to find when we introduce vapour transfer in JULES, involving parameters such as thermal vapour conductivity and diffusivity. Also, this approach allows us to compare JULES to a more complete and complex numerical model.

Water vapour flux varied with soil texture, depth and soil moisture content, but overall our results sug- gested that water vapour fluxes change temperature gradients in the entire soil profile and introduce an overall surface cooling effect. Increasing the resolution smoothed and reduced temperature differences between liquid (L) and liquid/vapour (LV) simulations at all depths, and introduced a temperature increase over the entire soil profile. Thermal gradients rather than soil water potential gradients seem to cause temporal and spatial (vertical) soil temperature variability. We conclude that a multi-soil layer configuration may improve soil water dynamics, heat transfer and coupling of these processes, as well as evapotranspiration estimates and land surface-atmosphere coupling. However, a compromise should be reached between numerical and process-simulation aspects.

References:

Braud I., A.C. Dantas-Antonino, M. Vauclin, J.L. Thony and P. Ruelle, 1995b: A Simple Soil Plant Atmo- sphere Transfer model (SiSPAT), Development and field verification, J. Hydrol, 166: 213-250

Cox, P.M., R.A. Betts, C.B. Bunton, R.L.H. Essery, P.R. Rowntree, and J. Smith (1999), The impact of new land surface physics on the GCM simulation of climate and climate sensitivity. Clim. Dyn., 15, 183–203.

Milly, P.C.D., 1982. Moisture and heat transport in hysteric inhomogeneous porous media: a matric head- based formulation and a numerical model, Water Resour. Res., 18:489-498

CemOA : archive ouverte d'Irstea / Cemagref

Références

Documents relatifs

This study aims to provide a systematic overview of the knowledge available on Leptospira presence and persistence in soil and water environments, including isolation and

To assess the variability of the temperature coefficient on a given site and to use another type of CP sensor to demonstrate that the correction method can be applied to a range

The model is composed of six linked sub-models, fertilisation, vegetation, organic N pool, mineral N pool, soil water and atmospheric N (Figure 1), which describe the daily fluxes

It uses a soil resistance driven by surface (0 − 5 cm) soil moisture, meteorological forcing and time (hour) of day, and has the capability to be calibrated using the

Ainsi, en commenc¸ant par le haut, nous avons des mode`les cognitifs pour les objets manipulables, dont tous les aspects nous sont visuellement acces- sibles, les objets

Pour la première alternative de choix de structures (classes de résistance du ciment de 42,5 MPa et 52,5 MPa ne nécessitant aucune opération d’entretien), nous avons développé

• The backward-looking, comparative or non-ideal approach asks, ‘‘Would it be better if human had X?’’ Here, two states of affairs are compared with regard to a specific

At 15 cm depth, we never observed ammonium from the pig manure and leaching of the nitrate, all coming from nitrification in the upper part of the soil, was completed after 750 mm