• Aucun résultat trouvé

Structural species distribution models contrast tree responses to land use and climate changes

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Structural species distribution models contrast tree responses to land use and climate changes"

Copied!
20
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02796849

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02796849

Submitted on 5 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Structural species distribution models contrast tree responses to land use and climate changes

Nicolas Martin-Stpaul, Jean-Sauveur Ay, Joannès Guillemot, Luc Doyen, Paul W. Leadley

To cite this version:

Nicolas Martin-Stpaul, Jean-Sauveur Ay, Joannès Guillemot, Luc Doyen, Paul W. Leadley. Structural species distribution models contrast tree responses to land use and climate changes. Mobilis WorkShop, Jun 2014, Paris, France. �hal-02796849�

(2)

Structural species distribution models contrast tree responses to land use and

climate changes

12 Juin 2014 Martin-StPaul NK; Ay J-S; Guillemot J; Doyen L; Leadley P

(3)

1. Introduction: What do classic SDMs do?

Observations

Temperature

Gobal radiation

Précipitation

Environmental factors

F. Sylvatica (IFN)

BIOMOD, Cheaib et al., 2012

Proba(Presence) = f(environment) Correlative Species Distribution Model

Environment factor

P(presence)

Predictions Bioclimatic range

(4)

1. Introduction: What do classic SDMs do?

Observations

Temperature

Gobal radiation

Precipitation

Environmental factors

F. Sylvatica (IFN)

BIOMOD, Cheaib et al., 2012

Proba(Presence) = f(environment) Correlative Species Distribution Model

Environment factor

P(presence)

Predictions Bioclimatic range

SDMs aim at profiling the species distribution based on the bioclimatic envelope

SDMs have been used extensively to address a range of question in ecology and conservation

(5)

What do classic SDMs project under climate change?

Bioclimatic ranges (1950-2000) Bioclimatic ranges (2070-2100) Hanewinkel et al., 2012 NCC

(6)

What do classic SDMs project under climate change?

Projection of the futur of species distribution under

global changes

Valuable tool to project the outcome of global changes on

Forest biodiversity

Forest productivity

Forest economic value

Conservation cost

See also :

Cheaib et al 2012; Keenan et al 2012

(7)

Motivation : land use may trigger selection biais in SDM calibration?

Cheaib et al., 2012 Ecology letters

Correlative Ensemble models

BIOMOD

Ecophysiological based models =

mecanistic

(8)

Motivation : land use may trigger selection biais in SDM calibration?

Cheaib et al., 2012 Ecology letters

Correlative Ensemble models

BIOMOD

Ecophysiological based models =

mecanistic

Why is beech projected absent?

(9)

Motivation : land use may trigger selection biais in SDM calibration?

Cheaib et al., 2012 Ecology letters

BIOMOD

Why is beech projected absent?

Why would beech be absent?

Beech current distribution (NFI)

Alternative land use may cause a

« selection biais »

(10)

Potential distribution range

Species1 Species 2

Reality

view by classic SMD

(11)

Bias n°1: contrasted selection

Species1 Species 2

Reality

view by classic SMD

(12)

Bias n°2: Land use projections

Species1 Species 2

Reality

view by classic SMD

(13)

Structural equation modelling (SEM)

Presence of a tree specie is only observable in the case of compatible land use: forest

We model explicitely the presence of forest in the « selection equation » according to relative returns

The selection equation is used to:

Correct the estimation of distributional range

Integrate the land use effects in projections/ scenarios

Climate & Species observations (NFI) at ~2km resolution

Comparison with « state of the art » SDM (Bimod ensemble)

Example with European beech

(14)

Response curves (Beech)

-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

Naive Potential

Temperature-Aridity index

Probability

(15)

Response curves (Beech)

-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

Biomod

Naive Potential

Probability

Temperature-Aridity index

(16)

« Potential distribution » : beech

2e+05 6e+05 1e+06

180000022000002600000

NAIVE Current

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

2e+05 6e+05 1e+06

180000022000002600000

NAIVE 2085

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

2e+05 6e+05 1e+06

180000022000002600000

Potentiel Current

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

2e+05 6e+05 1e+06

180000022000002600000

Potentiel 2085

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

-500000 0 500000 1000000 2000000

18000002400000

BIOMOD Ensemble Current

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

-500000 0 500000 1000000 2000000

18000002400000

BIOMOD Ensemble 2085

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

Observation NFI (Beech)

(17)

« Realized distribution» : beech

2e+05 6e+05 1e+06

180000022000002600000

NAIVE Current

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

2e+05 6e+05 1e+06

180000022000002600000

NAIVE 2085

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

2e+05 6e+05 1e+06

180000022000002600000

Effective Current

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

2e+05 6e+05 1e+06

180000022000002600000

Effective 2085

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

-500000 0 500000 1000000 2000000

18000002400000

BIOMOD Ensemble Current

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

-500000 0 500000 1000000 2000000

18000002400000

BIOMOD Ensemble 2085

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

Observation NFI (Beech)

(18)

Summary and conclusion

Strong evidences of bias from classical SDM

Contrasted directions of selection bias

Positive: Oak

Negative: Beech

Intuition about a global over-estimation of the loss

On-going work

Multi species

Scenarios about returns from land, land use change, and conservation policy

(19)

THANKS

(20)

« Biomod distribution » : beech

-500000 0 500000 1000000 2000000

18000002400000

BIOMOD Ensemble Current

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

-500000 0 500000 1000000 2000000

18000002400000

BIOMOD Ensemble 2085

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

Références

Documents relatifs

Numerical results have been presented for impulse waves (i) to validate the method with one example having experimental data available, and (ii) to show the efficiency of a model

Pro- jecting 2100 urban growth to assess urban climate changes on Toulouse urban area (France): combining scenarios and land change / climate models!. GLP-OSM (Global Land Project

Habitat suitability change is shown for three future change scenarios (BAMBU, GRAS, and SEDG) and for three model types (Climate-only [a –c, j–l], Dynamic LULC [d–f, m–o], and

Dans cette hypothèse (Figure IV-1.3), la surface d'érosion à la base de l'Oligocène se serait mise en place en régime subaérien sur la plate-forme et jusqu'en pied de pente à la

Figure 5.75: Mean energy expenditure over all AUVs versus swarm centroid travel distance while constructing and maintaining a square lattice formation in simulated Red Sea

(a- d) The recovered time-lapse P-wave velocity changes obtained from DDWI starting from the baseline models shown in Figure 16a – 16d , respectively.. Redistribution subject to

The vertical temperature profiles at (x, y) 5 (1000 km, 1000 km) in the experiments with (a) the double- diffusive mixing model based on the variable flux ratio parameterization,

These results suggest that, among countries, biodiversity is a source of pathogens, but also that the loss of biodiversity or its regulation, as measured by