HAL Id: jpa-00231275
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00231275
Submitted on 1 Jan 1976
HAL
is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire
HAL, estdestinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Satellite NMR study of the dynamic susceptibility of Fe in Cu above and below Tk
H. Alloul
To cite this version:
H. Alloul. Satellite NMR study of the dynamic susceptibility of Fe in Cu above and below Tk. Journal de Physique Lettres, Edp sciences, 1976, 37 (9), pp.205-208. �10.1051/jphyslet:01976003709020500�.
�jpa-00231275�
SATELLITE NMR STUDY OF THE DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY
OF Fe IN Cu ABOVE AND BELOW TK
H. ALLOUL
Laboratoire de
Physique
des Solides(*)
Université
Paris-Sud,
91405Orsay,
France(Re~u
le 23 avril1976, accepte
le9 juin 1976)
Résumé. 2014 Le temps de relaxation nucléaire T1 des noyaux de 63Cu premiers, seconds et troisièmes
voisins du Fe dans les alliages
CuFe
a été mesuré dans 55 kG pour 1,2 K T 310 K. Ces mesures permettent une détermination directe du taux de relaxation 03C4-1 de l’aimantation locale du Fe. 03C4-1a une valeur constante pour T ~ TK, qui caractérise l’état de
couplage fort
du Fe et atteint unedépen-
dance du type Korringa
(03C4-1
03B1T) pour T ~ TK, en accord qualitatif avec les calculs théoriques surl’effet Kondo.
Abstract. 2014 NMR relaxation times T1 of 63Cu satellites
corresponding
to 1st, 2nd and 3rd nearestneighbours of Fe in
Cu-Fe
dilutealloys
have been measured in 55 kG for 1.2 K T 310 K.These data allow a direct determination of the relaxation rate 03C4-1 of the local
magnetization
of Fe.It is found to change from a constant value which characterizes the strong coupling state of Fe below
TK to a Korringa like behaviour 03C4-1 03B1T for T ~ TK, as
qualitatively
expected from theoretical calculations on Kondo effect.Classification Physics Abstracts
8 . 526 - 8 . 664 - 8 . 630
It has been clear for a
long
time thatspin flip
processes and
consequently
the fluctuations of the localmagnetization play a major
role in the establish- ment of the Kondo state of transition metalimpurities
in noble metal matrices
[1].
It has thus been a greatchallenge
forexperimentalists
to measure the fre-quency
dependence
of the localsusceptibility,
or atleast its
spectral width,
which in ideal cases can be identified with the inverse of aspin
autocorrelation time T(or spin
lattice relaxation time inspin
resonanceterminology).
A great number ofexperimental
tech-niques
such as ESR[2], impurity [3]
or host NMR[4, 5],
Mossbauer effect[6],
and neutronscattering [7]
have been used to determine
i-1
in various charac- teristicsystems.
However up to now suchexperiments
were
only
successful for limited ranges of temperature, either r ~TK
or T ~TK.
In the classic CuFe Kondo system for whichTK ~
30K,
recent nuclearspin
lattice’relaxation data for the near
neighbour ~ 3Cu
nuclei of Fe showed that for 7" ~
TK
z has a constantvalue
’[-1 f’OoJ kB 7~/~ [5].
In this letter wepresent
an extension of these measurements to room tempera- ture, where for the first time the variation ofi -1
could beaccurately
followed from well below to well aboveTK (-
30K).
Measurements have been carried out with
pulse
NMR
techniques
at about 60 MHz on thethree 63CU
satellites
A, M,
B[8]
whichcorrespond
to the1 st,
(*) Laboratoire associe au C.N.R.S.
2nd and 3rd nearest
neighbours
to Fe. Full details of theexperimental technique
will bereported
else-where. Here the
physical significance
of the nuclearT1
data which are summarized in
figure
1 will be discussed.For satellite B data could be taken for a
large
range ofconcentration, showing
that the measuredT1
valuesare characteristic of
neighbours
of isolatedimpurities.
T1-1
isproportional
to T below 4.2K,
goesthrough
a maximum
( ~
50K)
then a minimum( ~ 150 K)
and
finally approaches
the pure copperKorringa
rate(TiK T
= 1.28 sK)
athigher
temperature. The shorter relaxation times and lowersensitivity
makeT1
measurements more difficult and less accurate for the first and second nearest
neighbours.
It was shown in ref.
[5] that,
at lowT,
for varioussatellites,
the relaxation is dominatedby impurity
induced relaxation due to
isotropic hyperfine coupling
with the transverse fluctuations of the
impurity magnetization.
For a shell ofneighbours
at distance rfrom the
impurity
this extra relaxation rate isgiven by :
where
XT(W)
is the transversesusceptibility
of theimpurity
and WD the nuclear Larmorfrequency.
The
isotropic
transferredhyperfine coupling
cons-tant
As(r)
can be deduced from the differentialKnight
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyslet:01976003709020500
L-206 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE - LETTRES
FIG.1. - NMR relaxation rates of the 1 st (A), 2nd (M) and 3rd (B) shells of neighbours of Fe in Cu measured near 55 kG. The impu- rity induced relaxation rate
(7~?)’~
is obtained by subtractingthe Korringa rate (TIK) - ’ of pure Cu. The dashed lines for satellites A and M are deduced from the solid line (which approximates the
data for B), by assuming that
(T’mP)-’
scales with (âK)2.shift of each shell of nuclei with respect to pure copper :
where XL is the static
longitudinal susceptibility
of theimpurity. Combining (1)
and(2) yields
The
present
results allow us to demonstrate that this relaxation process is still dominant athigh
T.Repre- senting
the data for satellite Bby
the solid line drawnon
figure 1,
we obtainestimates
for the relaxation rates of satellites A and M(dashed lines) by assuming
with
[7~(r)]~ scaling
asAK 2(r).
The values~K(rA) j~K(rB)
= 4.5 and4K(rM)/OK(rB)
= 1.63 weretaken from the data of ref.
[9].
Thegood agreement
between the dashed lines and thecorresponding
measured relaxation rates confirms that eq.
(3)
describes the relaxation. It should be noted that
slight
deviations from exactscaling
withAK 2 (r)
might
be associated with a small contribution of theanisotropic
part of thehyperfine coupling
to thenuclear relaxation
[5].
In order toanalyze
the datafurther,
we assume that thesusceptibility
isisotropic
for c~ ~
kB TK,
and that it can be characterizedby
a
single
correlation time rThe value XL = 8.30 x
10- 26 emu/atom
atT = 0
[10], together
with theexperimental
data forTimp
and AK for satellite B allow anexperimental
determination
of 1"-1
from eq.(2), (3), (4).
It can beseen from
figure
2 thati-1 departs
from its constantvalue at T = 0 and increases for T ~>
TK, reaching
a
Korringa
likedependence i-1
aT for T >>TK.
The
resulting
values for 1" - 1 areplotted
infigure 2,
where the three datapoints
obtained from inelastic neutronscattering experiments [7]
are also shown.The
quantitative agreement
issurprisingly good.
FIG. 2. - Experimental values of i-1 deduced from the data of
figure 1. The three data points obtained from neutron scattering experiments [7] are in very good agreement with the present results.
The solid line approximates the data points.
The two
limiting temperature dependences
couldbe
expected
fromexisting experimental
data forT
TK
inweakly magnetic systems (Al-Mn,
Au.V) [3]
and for T >
TK in strongly magnetic systems
(AgMn) [2]. They
also appear in the theoretical results derivedby
Goetze and Schlottman in anapproximate
solution of the
spin 1/2
sd model[11].
In order toallow a
quantitative analysis
of thepresent data,
we should rather consider theoretical resultsstarting
from the Anderson
Hamiltonian, including
orbitaldegeneracy of
theimpurity
state.Using
aperturbation expansion
inUlnA (U
intraatomic coulomb inter-action,
A virtual bound statewidth) according
tothe scheme
developed by
Yamada and Yosida[12],
Shiba
[13]
showed that for TTK
thesimple
relation :holds
irrespective
of the value of~7/TcJ.
Thisyields
a
Korringa
relation for r ~TK
and~~ ~ kB TK
where § =
(fii/4 7rkB) (7e/7n)~
is the classicalKorringa
constant for a free electron gas, and
We have
already
shown in ref.[5]
that our low Tdata is in very
good
agreement with eq.(6).
In orderto evaluate
L - 1
in thehigh
temperaturelimit,
the case(//7cJ ~>
1 will beconsidered,
for which the Anderson andexchange
Hamiltonians areequivalent
but wherethe wave-vector
dependence
of theexchange
is[14]
where P~
is theLegendre polynomial (1 = 2) [15].
The
corresponding Korringa
relaxation rate for theimpurity
is[ 16] :
where p
is thedensity
of states at the Fermi level.Assuming
that XL follows a Curie law(with spin S) yields
also aKorringa
relaxation like eq.(6)
with adifferent constant :
Then the
quantity ~(T)
=T1
T~K2/~
isexpected
tochange progressively
from~GT(0)
toK~(oo)
when Tgoes
through
the Kondo temperature. Our data for limT1 71(A~)~
in CuFe aregiven
infigure 3,
where ito -’
can be seen
that,
for T 10K, ~(T)
= 4.6 ± 0.6 is in verygood
agreement with,K~(0). But, surpri- singly enough,
the variation ofK(7)
from 0 to 300K,
if any, is very small(a
least square fit to the datagives ~(T)
= 3.9 ± 0.5 for 100 K T 310K).
. , ..,
FIG. 3. - The zero frequency limit for the Korringa product T1 T(AK)2 can be seen to decrease only very slightly with tempe-
rature. The parameter ~(T) = T1 T(AK)2/S is very near to the universal theoretical value ~T(0) = 5 given by Shiba [12], for
T TK.
Whether this
corresponds fortuitously
toX T ( 00 ) being
close to~(0),
or to T - 300 Kbeing
still alow temperature for the
limiting Korringa rate- ’tK 1
of eq.
(6)
to be reachedrequires
anindependent
determination of
Jeff
p. An upper limitJeff P ~
1can be deduced from eq.
(8) assuming
fromfigure
2that /i’tK 1
= 0.64kB T.
As no reliable theoretical calculation for the realistic case S >1/2
are availablefor T ~
TK,
accurate determinations ofJeff
p areusually possible
fromcomparisons
of the data for variousphysical quantities
withperturbation theory
for r ~>
TK.
Such anapproach
is notpossible
in CuFeas measurements are
only possible
forT ~ 7~
because of the
high
Kondo temperature. An appro- ximate value forJeff
p can be obtained from thep
expression
of the Kondotemperature [14] : kB TK
= Dexp[- (2
I +1)IJeff p] . (10)
For
TK
= 30K,
the deduced value forJeff
pdepends
of the value taken for the bandwidth D which is
only
known to have the same order of
magnitude
as theFermi energy
(Jeff
p = 0.66 for D = 5eV, Jeff
p = 0.94 for D = 0.5eV).
A better determinationmight
beexpected
from theamplitude
of thespin
density
oscillations : ,It is clear now on
experimental grounds [8, 9, 17]
that eq.
(11)
holds at any temperature.Then,
since the main influence of the Kondo effect onn(r)
appears in the variationof ~ ~ ~, comparison
of the63Cu
NMR linewidth data with the
impurity magnetization
should allow us to derive
Jeff
p.Unfortunately
suchan
analysis requires
an accurateknowledge
of the shyperfine
field constantof 63Cu
and of theexchange
enhancement of the Pauli
susceptibility
of pure copper.The value
Jeff
p = 0.75 was obtained from the data of Alloul et al.[ 17]
but whenanalysed along
the linesproposed by
Walstedt and Walker[18], J,,ff p -
1is obtained. In any case for such
large
values of the effectiveexchange interaction,
the use of thelimiting exchange
modelof eq. (7)
isquestionable.
For instanceif
UlnA
is notlarge enough
the value ofJeff
p whichshould be introduced in eq.
(8), (9)
and(10)
areexpected
to be different functions of the parameters of the Anderson model. From thisanalysis
it canonly
be concluded that
2 ~ ~ T ( (0) ;$
5.It should be mentioned at this
point
that the present results are somewhat different from those obtainedon
Au. V,
for whichT1
Tof 51V
was found constantup to
TK (-
300K) [19],
whichcorresponds
to adecrease of
J~(r)
of about a factor 4 from T = 0to T -
TK,
whileJeff
pmight
beexpected
to belarger
than in CuFe
(larger TK).
These results(which
inci-dentally also correspond
to a decrease ofzr 1
from T = 0 to T -7~)
seem somewhat difficult to under-stand,
evenqualitatively,
whencompared
to thepresent
ones.L-208 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE - LETTRES
In conclusion new progress in the
understanding
ofthe
dynamic properties
of Kondoimpurities
has beenachieved as these satellite NMR data allow one to
study
thechange
from the strongcoupling regime
tolocal moment behaviour of the
dynamic susceptibility
of Fe in Cu. Nevertheless it cannot be decided present-
ly
from our data whether ~-1 is still enhanced with respect. to thelimiting Korringa
law for T ~ 10TK.
Such a
possibility
is indeedsuggested by
the theore- tical results of Gotze and Schlottman[11],
who indi-cate that many decades in
temperature
are -necessary to reach theasymptotic behaviour, -r-1 being
stillenhanced
by
about a factor 10 for T - 10TK.
Thispossibility
isapparently supported by
some inde-pendent experimental
results. In Au.Yb alog
Tdeviation from i-1 aT has been evidenced
by
Moss-bauer effect measurements
[6]
for 0.5 K T 5K,
whileTK
is known in this system to be less than 1 mK[20, 21].
In CuMn(TK -
10mK)
the relaxation-r - 1 measured
at helium temperaturesfrom 63Cu
NMR data[4]
is much greater than thatextrapolated
fromimpurity
NMR measurements at 1 000[22]
and300 K
[23].
Similar NMR satelliteexperiments
arepresently being
undertaken on CuMn and should allow aquantitative
determination of the variationof ~-1 over
alarge
range of temperatures aboveTK.
References [1] A series of review articles devoted to Kondo effect can be
found in Magnetism Vol. 5 GT Rado and H. Suhl, ed.
(Academic Press New York) 1973.
[2] DAVIDOV, D., RETTORI, C., ORBACH, R., DIXON, A. and CHOCK, E. P., Phys. Rev. B 11 (1975) 3456.
[3] NARATH, A., ref. [1], chap. 5.
[4] ALLOUL, H. and BERNIER, P., J. Phys. F : Metal. Phys. 4 (1974) 870.
[5] ALLOUL, H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 35 (1975) 460.
[6] GONZALEZ-JIMENEZ, F. and IMBERT, P., Solid. State Commun.
13 (1973) 85.
[7] LOEWENHAUPT, M. and JUST, W., Phys. Lett. 53A (1975) 305.
[8] BOYCE, J. B. and SLICHTER, C. P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974)
61 and Phys. Rev. B 13 (1976) 379.
[9] ALLOUL H., AIP conference proceedings : Magnetism and Magnetic Materials Philadelphia (1975) to be published.
[10] THOLENCE, J. L. and TOURNIER, R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 25 (1970)
867.
[11] GÖTZE, W. and SCHLOTTMANN, P., J. Low Temp. Phys. 16 (1974) 87.
[12] YAMADA, K., Prog. Theor. Phys. 54 (1975) 316 and ref. therein.
[13] SHIBA, H., Prog. Theor. Phys. 54 (1975) 967.
[14] BLANDIN, A., J. Appl. Phys. 39 (1968) 1285.
[15] In this particular case of
Cu-Fe,
which has a high Kondotemperature, the direct exchange term can be neglected
with respect to the sd mixing.
[16] DAVIDOV, D., MAKI, K., ORBACH, R., RETTORI, C. and CHOCK, E. P., Solid State Commun. 12 (1973) 621.
[17] ALLOUL, H., DARVILLE, J. and BERNIER, P., J. Phys. F. Metal Phys. 4 (1974) 2050.
[18] WALSTEDT, R. E. and WALKER, L. R., Phys. Rev. B 11 (1975)
3280.
[19] KAZAMA, S., KUME, K., MIZUNO, K. and MIZOGUCHI, K., Phys. Lett. 42A (1972) 141.
[20] BENOIT, A., FLOUQUET, J. and SANCHEZ, J., Phys. Rev. B 9 (1974) 1092.
[21] FROSSATI, G., MIGNOT, J. M., THOULOUZE, D. and TOUR-
NIER, R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1976) 203.
[22] WALSTEDT, R. E. and WARREN, W. W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 31 (1973) 365.
[23] KUME, K. and MIZOGUCHI, K., Solid State Commun. 16
(1975) 675.