• Aucun résultat trouvé

Towards an institutional analysis of biodiversity offsets

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Towards an institutional analysis of biodiversity offsets"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

ID: 65

Type: Voluntary contribution

38. ES and Institutions: looking beyond PES scheme attraction (OPEN) & 62. Co-investment and reward mechanisms for ecosystem services (OPEN)

Towards an institutional analysis of biodiversity offsets

Presenting author: Marie Hrabanski

Other authors: Géraldine Froger, Sophie Ménard, Philippe Méral Institution: CIRAD

Contact: marie.hrabanski@cirad.fr

At both the international and national scale, since the 1990s, the international environmental community has been increasingly interested in market-based instruments (MBIs) as mechanisms for the provision of ecosystem services (OECD, 1993, 1995, 1997). In the biodiversity sector, “biodiversity offsets” (BOs) rapidly become one of the indispensible policy solutions in the response to the challenges of maintaining biodiversity. International organizations and conventions, think tanks, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and even private enterprises have incorporated the concept and promoted offset based instruments on a supranational scale. Today, BOs are an increasingly popular yet controversial tool in conservation even if biodiversity offset schemes are very diverse and heterogeneous. “Their popularity lies in their potential to meet the objectives of biodiversity conservation and economic development in tandem; the controversy lies in the need to accept ecological losses in return for uncertain gains” (Bull et al., 2013, 1). To understand the success of BOs schemes, the communication analyses, first, the success of BOs in global biodiversity arenas since the beginning of the 2000’s and the policy entrepreneurs who introduced BO approach. Second, we discuss the multiple uses of BOs and their diverse institutional arrangements. Finally, we also propose an institutional framework that deals with challenges in the offset process in order to analyse opportunities and risks of BOs.

Références

Documents relatifs

Some biodiversity offset schemes have been inconsistent in meeting conservation objectives and the approach itself requires continuous improvements – for instance, on metrics

The impact of refined products can be assessed by using processing factors to return to quantity of commodities (we know how many tons of rice are necessary to produce one ton

16 Expert opinion on this attribution choice of impacts caused by manure left on pasture to Scope 1 livestock husbandry or grass would be very instructive.. and thus obtain

be included to verify (and correct) the impacts assessed based on pressure

area (in km²) is computed as the sum of all crops implicit areas based on FAOSTAT annual production

In GLOBIO cause effect relationships, the terrestrial on-site biodiversity impacts of pollution are accounted 104.. for in the land use (LU) pressure through the MSA value per

data, we only use the company’s industry level mix data and rely on EXIOBASE data to split the turnover 677. between the regions

In the Mining CommoTool, impact factors for all pressures except those related to climate change are 218.. expressed in MSA.km² per tonne of pure metal, mineral